Grewal, Sanjeet S.

We describe the use of a videolaryngoscope in an unconventional manner, with the provider positioned in front of the patient during intubation. This is called a “face-to-face intubation” technique. During a deep brain stimulation surgery, with the head fixed in a Mayfield frame, the placement of the supraglottic airway was unsuccessful on the induction of general anesthesia due to inadequate formation of a seal. Due to these circumstances, we intubated the patient from the front using the face-to-face intubation technique. We believe that the ability to intubate a patient from the front adds to the anesthesiologist’s airway management skills.

AbstractObjectiveNeuromodulation for pediatric refractory epilepsy (PRE) is preferred when the seizure onset zone is not amenable to surgical resection, due to multifocal onset or involvement of eloquent cortex. Given its rapidly evolving landscape, we describe our institutional experience with neurostimulation therapies including deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior nucleus (DBS‐ANT), the centromedian nucleus (DBS‐CM), responsive neurostimulation (RNS), and chronic subthreshold stimulation (CSS) to treat PRE.MethodsA retrospective chart review was conducted to identify pediatric patients (≤18 years of age) who presented to our institution with PRE. Patients were included who had at least 1 year of follow‐up after neurostimulation was started. Patients with ≥50% seizure frequency reduction at last follow‐up compared to baseline were classified as responders.ResultsA total of 35 patients (21 females) were included in the series. Nine patients underwent DBS‐ANT, 9 underwent DBS‐CM (+ ANT in 7 patients), 5 underwent RNS, and 12 underwent CSS. The median age at seizure onset and surgery was 8 and 16 years, respectively. Structural lesions were the most common etiology of epilepsy (54%). Eighteen patients had prior interventions and 13 received invasive EEG. Post‐operative complications following neurostimulation implantation were noted in three patients (9%). However, no permanent deficits were noted. Median follow‐up time was 46 months (range 13–162 months). Twenty‐three patients (59%) were responders (3/9 DBS‐ANT; 7/9 DBS‐CM; 4/5 RNS; 9/12 CSS). Further, median seizure reduction was 25% (DBS‐ANT), 89% (DBS‐CM), 87% (RNS), and 88% (CSS) across the cohort. Six patients (17%) had improved subjective neurocognitive outcomes while the other 29 had stable neurocognitive outcomes.SignificanceDBS, RNS, and CSS are safe and effective options for PRE. An understanding of treatment approaches can optimize results by tailoring therapy to individual patients.Plain Language SummaryThis study investigates the use of various neurostimulation therapies for treating pediatric refractory epilepsy (PRE) including deep brain stimulation (DBS), responsive neurostimulation (RNS), and chronic subthreshold stimulation (CSS). Overall, neuromodulation was found to be effective in reducing seizures in most patients, with 59% of patients showing at least a 50% reduction in seizure frequency. Additionally, the treatments were generally safe, with few complications and no instances of permanent deficits.

OBJECTIVE Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an effective treatment for refractory tremor. However, the lack of reliable patient-specific targeting biomarkers leads to varying outcomes. Although connectomic-based targeting is commonly used in deep brain stimulation, its application in SRS is limited. This study aimed to develop a new targeting approach by using patient-specific structural connectivity to improve outcomes after SRS. METHODS The authors performed a retrospective study of patients in a prospective trial for frameless virtual-cone SRS on a linear accelerator for essential tremor or tremor-dominant Parkinson disease. The primary endpoint was percentage improvement in Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor rating scale scores contralateral to the treatment side. Probabilistic tractography assessed connectivity from each thalamic voxel to the primary motor cortex (M1), primary sensory cortex (S1), and supplemental motor area/premotor cortex (SMA/PMC). Group-level comparisons were conducted to evaluate the relationship between the sweet spot for maximum contralateral tremor improvement and areas maximally connected to M1, S1, and SMA/PMC. Multiple regression analysis assessed the relationship between the lesion centerpoint coordinates and the maximally connected voxel to M1, S1, and SMA/PMC at the individual level. RESULTS The analysis included 27 patients with a mean follow-up of 17.9 ± 11.1 months. The sweet spot for maximal contralateral tremor improvement at the group level was in the region most connected to M1 cortex. Smaller y-distances (anterior-posterior) from the lesion center to the M1 maximally connected voxel significantly correlated with tremor improvement at the single-subject level (p < 0.001). However, the authors found no significant correlation between the lesion y-coordinate and the maximally connected voxel to SMA/PMC and S1, nor between the x-distances from the lesions to the SMA/PMC, M1, and S1 voxels (p > 0.07). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that patient-specific connectivity between the treatment target and M1 correlates with treatment outcomes. The authors’ approach provides a practical targeting method for SRS thalamotomy for tremor.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A typical workflow for deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery consists of head frame placement, followed by stereotactic computed tomography (CT) or MRI before surgical implantation of the hardware. At some institutions, this workflow is prolonged when the imaging scanner is located far away from the operating room, thereby increasing workflow times by the addition of transport times. Recently, the intraoperative O-arm has been shown to provide accurate image fusion with preoperative CT or MR imaging, suggesting the possibility of obtaining an intraoperative localization scan and postoperative confirmation. In this article, we aim to evaluate the compatibility of the stereotactic frame system with the intraoperative O-arm system regarding lead accuracy and surgical flow. METHODS: A total of 17 patients undergoing DBS surgery for movement disorders were evaluated. One patient underwent both the stereotactic CT and O-arm localization, while 16 patients underwent only intraoperative O-arm localization. Following lead placement, intraoperative O-arm imaging was obtained to evaluate the accuracy of the lead placement. Accuracy was defined as the error measured as the distance from the center of the planned trajectory to the cannula. RESULTS: Less than 0.1 mm difference was found between the O-arm imaging technique and CT image localization of the NaviNetics stereotactic head frame in DBS surgery. Of the 16 patients who underwent the intraoperative O-arm imaging alone, the targets included bilateral ventral intermediate nucleus (16 leads), bilateral globus pallidus internus (4 leads), and subthalamic nucleus (12 leads). The mean ± SD radial error in the probe's eye view was 0.71 ± 0.33 mm for n = 32 leads. No tract hemorrhage was observed. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative O-arm imaging can be used safely and effectively for stereotactic registration and lead placement confirmation with the stereotactic system in both awake and asleep DBS surgery.

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of direct targeting in deep brain stimulation (DBS) for essential tremor using 7T MRI versus 3T MRI. The authors hypothesized that 7T MRI direct targeting would be noninferior to 3T MRI in early tremor outcomes. METHODS A retrospective study was conducted on patients undergoing unilateral thalamic DBS for essential tremor between 2021 and 2023. Two matched cohorts were assessed, one using 7T MRI and the other using 3T MRI for surgical planning. The primary endpoint was the percentage improvement in the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale (TRS) scores. Additionally, the authors assessed optimized programming settings and variance in electrode position on postoperative imaging. Demographic and clinical data were compared using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U-test. The squared Euclidean distance of each contact from the group mean centroid was calculated and averaged across the entire cohort to provide the variance (i.e., the mean squared distance) of electrode contact position. RESULTS A total of 34 patients were analyzed, with 17 in each cohort. There were no significant differences in demographic information or mean surgical dates between the groups. There were no differences in intraoperative target repositioning or adverse events. The 7T group had a significantly greater TRS improvement than the 3T group (64.9% ± 11.4% vs 50.9% ± 16.4%, p = 0.004). Patients in the 7T cohort also had a lower mean stimulation current compared with those in the 3T cohort (2.0 ± 0.8 mA vs 2.7 ± 0.9 mA, p = 0.01). Image evaluation revealed that although the mean electrode position was comparable between 7T and 3T, the 7T electrode positioning was more clustered, indicating a lower variance in the final electrode location. The mean Euclidean distance between the individual electrode tips and the group centroid was significantly less at 7T than at 3T (1.82 ± 0.68 mm vs 2.75 ± 0.81 mm, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Despite concerns for increased artifacts and distortions at 7T, the authors show that these effects can be mitigated with an appropriate workflow, leading to improved surgical outcomes with direct targeting using 7T MRI. Their results suggest similar accuracy but greater precision in targeting with 7T MRI compared with 3T MRI, resulting in lower stimulation currents and improved tremor reduction. Future studies are needed to assess outcomes related to 7T MRI in targeting other subcortical structures.

OBJECTIVE Conventional frame-based stereotactic systems have circumferential base frames, often necessitating deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery in two stages: intracranial electrode insertion followed by surgical re-preparation and pulse generator implantation. Some patients do not tolerate awake surgery, underscoring the need for a safe alternative for asleep DBS surgery. A frame-based stereotactic system with a skull-mounted "key" in lieu of a circumferential base frame received US FDA clearance. The authors describe the system’s application for single-stage, asleep DBS surgery in 8 patients at their institution and review its workflow and technical considerations. METHODS Eight patients underwent DBS lead insertion and IPG implantation in a single surgical preparation under general anesthesia using the system. Postoperative CT imaging confirmed lead placement. RESULTS Eight patients underwent implantation of 15 total leads targeting the ventral intermediate nucleus (4 patients), globus pallidus internus (GPi; 3 patients), and subthalamic nucleus (STN; 1 patient). Intraoperative microelectrode recording was conducted for GPi and STN targets. Postoperative CT imaging revealed a mean ± SD radial error of 1.24 ± 0.45 mm (n = 15 leads), without surgical complications. CONCLUSIONS The stereotactic system facilitated safe and effective asleep, single-stage DBS surgery, maintaining traditional lead accuracy standards.