Ceccarelli, Michele

Abstract The proteogenomic characterization of human tumors has begun to uncover molecular attributes enriched in different tumor subtypes and proposed a panoply of subtype-specific targets. As these studies lacked experimental testing of potential targets in high-quality cell models accurately reflecting individual tumor subtypes, it remains unclear whether any of the proposed targets retained value for precision medicine. The absence of clinically useful classifiers further hampered translation of proteogenomic information to better diagnose and treat cancer patients. In the case of the brain tumor glioblastoma (GBM), such challenges are exacerbated by tumor heterogeneity and broad therapeutic resistance. Here, we analyzed a large dataset of human GBM to determine the multi-omics features that characterize four GBM subtypes we recently identified through single cell RNAseq analysis. Each subtype exhibits activation of unique hallmark functional traits including distinct sensitivity to inhibitors of mitochondrial respiration for the mitochondrial subtype. The inspection of proteomics, phosphoproteomics, metabolomics, lipidomics and acetylomics data revealed that each GBM subtype has a coherent molecular structure that drives the dominant function and can be extracted by each analytical platform. Stratification of tumors in four functional classes is not a specific attribute of GBM as we were able to unbiasedly identify the same subtypes in breast and lung cancer. To identify actionable targets in GBM we developed an unbiased protein kinase signaling network approach for the selection of master kinases aberrantly activated in each GBM subtype. The experimental follow-up using a library of annotated GBM patient derived organoids (PDOs) established that inhibition of DNA-PK with the clinically tested compound nedisertib radiosensitizes proliferative/progenitor PDOs by exacerbating replication stress-induced DNA damage in this GBM subtype. Furthermore, genetic and pharmacological tools qualified PKCδ as vulnerable target for the broadly resistant glycolytic/plurimetabolic GBM subtype. Thus, together with the targeting of mitochondrial GBM with OXPHOS inhibitors, the functional classification delivers experimentally validated actionable targets for three GBM subtypes. To provide rapid translation of the classifier for precision medicine in GBM, we developed a probabilistic classification tool which determines the probability that a patient’s GBM belongs to one of the four subtypes based on transcriptomic features and exhibits optimal performance when using RNA extracted from either frozen and paraffin embedded tissues. The algorithm is publicly accessible. It can be used in retrospective studies to evaluate the association of therapeutic response with GBM subtypes and as tool for selection criteria in prospective clinical trials. Citation Format: Simona Migliozzi, Young Taek Oh, Luciano Garofano, Hasanain Mohammad, Fulvio D'Angelo, Ryan D. Najac, Franck Bielle, Karima Mokhtari, Jann N. Sarkaria, Michele Ceccarelli, Marc Sanson, Anna Lasorella, Antonio Iavarone. Pathway based analysis of glioblastoma by multi-omics with applications in targeted therapy, prognosis and probabilistic classification [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 4014.

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM), the most common primary brain tumor in adults, remains uniformly fatal due to the lack of effective targeted therapies for this aggressive malignancy. Genomic amplification of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) occurs in 40-60% of primary GBM. Half of all EGFR-amplified cases of GBM also harbor EGFRvIII, a constitutively active, truncated variant of EGFR. The incidence of EGFR alterations in GBM makes inhibition of EGFR/EGFRvIII an attractive therapeutic approach. Depatuxizumab mafodotin (ABT-414) is an antibody-drug conjugate comprised of ABT-806, a mAB against EGFR, and a cytotoxic payload (monomethyl auristatin F). ABT-414 therapy initially showed promising results as an EGFRvIII therapy in vivo and in vitro; however, ABT414 failed to provide a survival benefit in phase I/II clinical trials, potentially due to therapeutic resistance. In this study, we seek to investigate the mechanisms of resistance to ABT-414 by performing whole exome, transcriptome and single cell RNA seq on ABT-414 resistant GBM PDX tumors. Our data showed an enrichment of mutations unique to the ABT-414 resistant tumors, including a point mutation (S466I) in TEK/TIE2 transmembrane angiopoietin receptor. In vitro expression of TEK S466I in GBM cells showed an increase in activation of ERK and STAT3 and increased TEK/TIE2 immunoprecipitation with EGFR compared to the wild-type TEK receptor. Furthermore, gene ontology analysis reveals that ABT-414-treated flank tumors exhibit increased activation of extracellular matrix organization and CNS developmental processes compared to flank tumors in the control treatment groups. ABT-414-treated tumors also demonstrate increased expression of inhibitor of differentiation (ID)1 and ID3, associated with stem-like phenotype in glioblastoma. Taken together, our data indicate that resistance to ABT-414 is mediated by both de novo mutations not detected in the parent tumor and adaptive dysregulation of pathways which may lead to dedifferentiation and therapeutic resistance.

Abstract Despite the well-established role of recurrent gene fusions as oncogenic drivers, current practices for characterizing and interpreting gene fusion events in clinical testing and in biomedical literature are inconsistent. From the conceptual definition of gene fusions to the salient elements that characterize these alterations, a lack of community-driven standards for the curation of gene fusions has resulted in a disparate landscape of fusion representations and supporting tools. Consequently, the evidence-based clinical evaluation of gene fusions requires extensive expert review for accurate interpretation of observed gene fusions with respect to putative evidence from biomedical literature. Furthermore, the lack of these standards inhibits the interoperability of tools, resources, and pipelines - impeding data sharing and downstream utility.To address these challenges, a cross-consortia initiative between the Variant Interpretation for Cancer Consortium and ClinGen was formed to develop a standard operating procedure (SOP) for the curation of gene fusions. The SOP is under development by an international and diverse set of experts in the representation, detection, and clinical interpretation of gene fusions. Participating stakeholders across academic, government, and industry sectors showcased challenges and solutions, and participated in community surveys and discussions to define and develop the SOP for this diverse class of alterations.An initial result of this effort was the precise molecular definition of genomic events and features constituting gene fusions. We distinguish these from similar but distinct classes of structural alterations through clinically-relevant examples. Next, we discuss our findings on community practices around the description and evaluation of gene fusions. We provide our recommendations for characterization and representation of gene fusions from these practices, and compare these recommendations to existing variant representation standards and formats (e.g. HGVS variant nomenclature). We also discuss the concurrent application of formats for standardized human- and machine-readable representations of gene fusion events.We conclude with discussion of the salient elements to enable rapid, scalable, and consistent evaluation of fusions curated from the biomedical literature. Recommendations are provided for the standardized capture of these elements to enable both intuitive and precise characterization of this diverse class of alterations in clinical reporting and literature. In summary, we provide a clinical-practice driven framework and nomenclature for gene fusions, including recommendations for human readability, computational precision, and data integrity within the SOP. This work is a substantial advancement towards standardized communication, investigation, and sharing of gene fusion data across clinical and research domains and specialties. Citation Format: Alex H. Wagner, Ioannis S. Vlachos, Dmitriy Sonkin, Panieh Terraf, Chimene Kesserwan, Andrea Sboner, Thomas Coard, Christian Reich, Deborah I. Ritter, Peter Horak, Ying S. Zou, Anna Tanska, Aaron M. Berlin, Anna Lu, Daniel Cameron, Heather E. Williams, Wan-Hsin Lin, Gokce Toruner, Arpad Danos, Jason Saliba, Huiling Xu, Xinjie Xu, Georgina Ryland, Michele Ceccarelli, Liying Zhang, Sarah Rapisardo, Catherine Rehder, Xuelu Liu, Aparna Pallavajjala, Nicole Park, Laveniya Satgunaseelan, Kristy Lee, Jie Liu, Obi Griffith, Robert R. Freimuth, Albrecht Stenzinger, Linda B. Baughn, Michael Baudis, Jennifer Lee, Marilyn Li, Angshumoy Roy, Gordana Raca. A standard operating procedure for the curation of gene fusions [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 449.

Abstract Background Tumor heterogeneity underlies resistance and disease progression in glioblastoma (GBM), and tumors most commonly recur adjacent to the surgical resection margins in contrast non-enhancing (NE) regions. To date, no targeted therapies have meaningfully altered overall patient survival in the up-front setting. The aim of this study was to characterize intratumoral heterogeneity in recurrent GBM using bulk samples from primary resection and recurrent samples taken from contrast-enhancing (EN) and contrast NE regions. Methods Whole exome and RNA sequencing were performed on matched bulk primary and multiple recurrent EN and NE tumor samples from 16 GBM patients who received standard of care treatment alone or in combination with investigational clinical trial regimens. Results Private mutations emerge across multi-region sampling in recurrent tumors. Genomic clonal analysis revealed increased enrichment in gene alterations regulating the G2M checkpoint, Kras signaling, Wnt signaling, and DNA repair in recurrent disease. Subsequent functional studies identified augmented PI3K/AKT transcriptional and protein activity throughout progression, validated by phospho-protein levels. Moreover, a mesenchymal transcriptional signature was observed in recurrent EN regions, which differed from the proneural signature in recurrent NE regions. Conclusions Subclonal populations observed within bulk resected primary GBMs transcriptionally evolve across tumor recurrence (EN and NE regions) and exhibit aberrant gene expression of common signaling pathways that persist despite standard or targeted therapy. Our findings provide evidence that there are both adaptive and clonally mediated dependencies of GBM on key pathways, such as the PI3K/AKT axis, for survival across recurrences.