Cameron, Daniel

Summary Cancer genome sequencing is essential for understanding tumor evolution and advancing precision medicine. 1 However, reference gaps and germline variants obscure detection of small and large somatic variants and methylation in repetitive regions. 1–3 It is common for tumor cells to gain or lose chromosome arms due to somatic structural changes that occur inside highly repetitive satellite DNA sequences in the centromeres. 4 To identify the full spectrum of somatic variants, including complex rearrangements, we construct and curate near-complete, haplotype-resolved assemblies of the most recent common ancestor of an early-passage broadly-consented hypodiploid pancreatic cancer cell line and matched normal tissues. The tumor assembly completely recapitulates all 35 tumor chromosomes observed with karyotyping, with multiple translocation-induced hybrid chromosomes. The hybrid chromosomes contain putative functional dicentric and fused centromeres, nested foldback inversions causing 14 breakpoints with a haplotype switch in a single event, and centromeric satellite tandem duplications up to 136 kbp. Direct comparison of tumor and normal assembly haplotypes uncovers >7,000 variants altering >1 Mbp of sequence in repetitive regions that have been hidden by reference gaps and germline variants. 44 % of somatic small variants change representation because they alter germline variants on GRCh38, impacting mutational signatures and kataegis/omikli clusters. Most somatic LINE insertions originate from two hypomethylated non-reference germline LINE insertions, highlighting their impact on insertion mutation burden. These assemblies demonstrate that centromeric, acrocentric, and telomeric regions conventionally excluded from analysis harbor extensive somatic and epigenetic changes. Resolving complete tumor genomes enables a deeper understanding of cancer structural plasticity and the endpoints of breakage-fusion-bridge cycles. These assembled, curated paired normal-tumor benchmarks will serve as a critical foundation for developing future algorithms to characterize the most intractable regions of cancer genomes.

Abstract Despite the well-established role of recurrent gene fusions as oncogenic drivers, current practices for characterizing and interpreting gene fusion events in clinical testing and in biomedical literature are inconsistent. From the conceptual definition of gene fusions to the salient elements that characterize these alterations, a lack of community-driven standards for the curation of gene fusions has resulted in a disparate landscape of fusion representations and supporting tools. Consequently, the evidence-based clinical evaluation of gene fusions requires extensive expert review for accurate interpretation of observed gene fusions with respect to putative evidence from biomedical literature. Furthermore, the lack of these standards inhibits the interoperability of tools, resources, and pipelines - impeding data sharing and downstream utility.To address these challenges, a cross-consortia initiative between the Variant Interpretation for Cancer Consortium and ClinGen was formed to develop a standard operating procedure (SOP) for the curation of gene fusions. The SOP is under development by an international and diverse set of experts in the representation, detection, and clinical interpretation of gene fusions. Participating stakeholders across academic, government, and industry sectors showcased challenges and solutions, and participated in community surveys and discussions to define and develop the SOP for this diverse class of alterations.An initial result of this effort was the precise molecular definition of genomic events and features constituting gene fusions. We distinguish these from similar but distinct classes of structural alterations through clinically-relevant examples. Next, we discuss our findings on community practices around the description and evaluation of gene fusions. We provide our recommendations for characterization and representation of gene fusions from these practices, and compare these recommendations to existing variant representation standards and formats (e.g. HGVS variant nomenclature). We also discuss the concurrent application of formats for standardized human- and machine-readable representations of gene fusion events.We conclude with discussion of the salient elements to enable rapid, scalable, and consistent evaluation of fusions curated from the biomedical literature. Recommendations are provided for the standardized capture of these elements to enable both intuitive and precise characterization of this diverse class of alterations in clinical reporting and literature. In summary, we provide a clinical-practice driven framework and nomenclature for gene fusions, including recommendations for human readability, computational precision, and data integrity within the SOP. This work is a substantial advancement towards standardized communication, investigation, and sharing of gene fusion data across clinical and research domains and specialties. Citation Format: Alex H. Wagner, Ioannis S. Vlachos, Dmitriy Sonkin, Panieh Terraf, Chimene Kesserwan, Andrea Sboner, Thomas Coard, Christian Reich, Deborah I. Ritter, Peter Horak, Ying S. Zou, Anna Tanska, Aaron M. Berlin, Anna Lu, Daniel Cameron, Heather E. Williams, Wan-Hsin Lin, Gokce Toruner, Arpad Danos, Jason Saliba, Huiling Xu, Xinjie Xu, Georgina Ryland, Michele Ceccarelli, Liying Zhang, Sarah Rapisardo, Catherine Rehder, Xuelu Liu, Aparna Pallavajjala, Nicole Park, Laveniya Satgunaseelan, Kristy Lee, Jie Liu, Obi Griffith, Robert R. Freimuth, Albrecht Stenzinger, Linda B. Baughn, Michael Baudis, Jennifer Lee, Marilyn Li, Angshumoy Roy, Gordana Raca. A standard operating procedure for the curation of gene fusions [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 449.