Musunuri, Rajeeva

Summary Cancer genome sequencing is essential for understanding tumor evolution and advancing precision medicine. 1 However, reference gaps and germline variants obscure detection of small and large somatic variants and methylation in repetitive regions. 1–3 It is common for tumor cells to gain or lose chromosome arms due to somatic structural changes that occur inside highly repetitive satellite DNA sequences in the centromeres. 4 To identify the full spectrum of somatic variants, including complex rearrangements, we construct and curate near-complete, haplotype-resolved assemblies of the most recent common ancestor of an early-passage broadly-consented hypodiploid pancreatic cancer cell line and matched normal tissues. The tumor assembly completely recapitulates all 35 tumor chromosomes observed with karyotyping, with multiple translocation-induced hybrid chromosomes. The hybrid chromosomes contain putative functional dicentric and fused centromeres, nested foldback inversions causing 14 breakpoints with a haplotype switch in a single event, and centromeric satellite tandem duplications up to 136 kbp. Direct comparison of tumor and normal assembly haplotypes uncovers >7,000 variants altering >1 Mbp of sequence in repetitive regions that have been hidden by reference gaps and germline variants. 44 % of somatic small variants change representation because they alter germline variants on GRCh38, impacting mutational signatures and kataegis/omikli clusters. Most somatic LINE insertions originate from two hypomethylated non-reference germline LINE insertions, highlighting their impact on insertion mutation burden. These assemblies demonstrate that centromeric, acrocentric, and telomeric regions conventionally excluded from analysis harbor extensive somatic and epigenetic changes. Resolving complete tumor genomes enables a deeper understanding of cancer structural plasticity and the endpoints of breakage-fusion-bridge cycles. These assembled, curated paired normal-tumor benchmarks will serve as a critical foundation for developing future algorithms to characterize the most intractable regions of cancer genomes.

Abstract Background Alzheimer's disease (AD) exhibits significant genetic heterogeneity, with no single model fully explaining its inheritance pattern. Structural variants (SVs) may contribute to the missing heritability of AD, particularly in disease pathology and familial AD, which remain largely unexplored. Method Structural variants (SVs) were analyzed in unrelated 1,162 individuals from the ROSMAP study (687 cognitively normal (CN), 475 AD patients), as well as 197 Non‐Hispanic White (NHW) families (926 individuals, 58.5% with AD) and 214 Caribbean Hispanic (CH) families (1,340 individuals, 59.17% with AD). Large insertions and deletions were identified using Manta, Absinthe, and MELT from whole‐genome sequencing, supplemented by Sniffles2 and external SV call sets. This approach generated a unified VCF file containing 45,251 insertions and 76,566 deletions. After filtering for missingness rate and allele counts, a total of 9,290 insertions and 9,529 deletions were retained for analysis. Genome‐wide SV analyses were performed with AD‐related metrics in ROSMAP, adjusting for age, sex, and principal components, and validated in an independent ADSP replication cohort comprising 29,055 unrelated individuals (17,110 CN and 11,945 AD patients). Result We identified nine SVs (one insertion and eight deletions) segregating in AD families. An insertion near PDCD10 in NHW families reached genome‐wide significance ( p <5×10 ‐8 ) for AD risk in the replication cohort. Two deletions in KIF26B and SPHKAP were found in both CH and NHW families, while five appeared only in NHW and one in CH. All eight deletions showed genome‐wide significance for AD risk. SV GWAS on AD pathologies in ROSMAP revealed an insertion in INPP4B with the strongest association to global brain pathology (β=0.19; p = 2.32×10 ‐5 ), also linked to pathological AD, diffuse plaques, and Braak staging. A deletion near ADGRB1 (β=1.53; p = 5.05×10 ‐6 ) was associated with neuritic plaques, and another near ARMC2 (β=1.66; p = 2.17×10 ‐6 ) was linked to diffuse plaques. All three SVs associated with AD ( p <5×10 ‐6 ) in replication. Conclusion Our findings reveal numerous SVs segregating in familial AD across both CH and NHW families, as well as additional SVs linked to sporadic AD. Prioritizing these SVs based on their potential effects on gene function and expression will provide deeper insight into their contributions to both familial and sporadic AD.

AbstractBackgroundLate‐Onset Alzheimer’s Disease (LOAD) is characterized by genetic heterogeneity and there is no single model explaining the genetic mode of inheritance. To date, more than 70 genetic loci associated with AD have been identified but they explain only a small proportion of AD heritability. Structural variants (SVs) may explain some of the missing AD heritability, and specifically, their segregation in AD families has yet to be investigated.MethodWe analyzed WGS data from 197 NHW families (926 subjects, 58.5% affected) and 214 CH families (1,340 subjects, 59.17% affected). Manta, Absinthe, and MELT were used for large insertions/deletions calling from short‐read WGS, combined with Sniffles2 calls from 4 ONT‐sequenced genomes and an external SV call set from HGSVC on 32 PacBio‐sequenced genomes from the 1000 Genomes Project. Genotyping produced a unified project‐level VCF. We identified 45,251 insertions and 76,566 deletions genome‐wide. Variants were tested for segregation and pathogenicity using Annot‐SV, cadd‐SV, and Variant Effect Predictor. Segregation required SV presence in all affected family members and only in unaffected members five years younger than average disease onset.ResultWe identified 453 insertions and 598 deletions segregating in 78.68% and 87.31% of NHW families, respectively. In CH families, 432 insertions and 460 deletions were segregating in 75.23% and 72.90% of the families, respectively. Genes overlapping with the SVs exhibited high expression levels in brain tissues. Notably, around 93% of insertions and 76% of deletions segregating in NHW and CH families were less than 1 kilobase pair (1kbp) in length. A total of 79 insertions and 96 deletions were found to be segregating in both NHW and CH families. Interestingly, a segregating insertion was observed in CH families overlapping within the CACNA2D3 gene, which was previously reported in a CH GWAS for clinical AD. A deletion segregating in NHW overlapped with the PSEN1, and another in a CH family overlapped with the PTK2B gene.ConclusionOur findings suggested that there are several SVs associated with familial AD across CH and NHW families. Prioritizing the SVs based on their effects on gene function and expression will be helpful in understanding their contributions in AD.