Back to Authors

Williams, Heather

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4368-5009

Mayo Clinic

Columbia University

Citations 4

Expert Curation of Somatic FLT3 Variants By the Clingen Somatic Hematologic Cancer Taskforce (ClinGen HCT)
Shao, Xiangqiang , Mani, Coumarane, He, Rong , Danos, Arpad , Sheta, Lana , Terraf, Panieh, Raca, Gordana , Williams, Heather , Blombery, Piers , Viswanatha, David S., Jiang, Nan , Vavra, Kevin C., Zhang, Liying , Li, Yuwen , Zhong, Yiming , Matthew, Mariam T, Deeb, Kristin K. , Zhang, Fengli , Liu, Jie , Zhao, Xiaonan, Kopp, Nathan , Pondugula, Santhi , Fakim, Yasmina Jaufeerally , Wu, David , Pullarkat, Sheeja T. , Kulkarni, Shashikant , Madhavan, Subha , Kanagal‐Shamanna, Rashmi , Xu, Xinjie , Kanagal-Shamanna, Rashmi , Rao, Shruti , Saliba, Jason , Kesserwan, Chimene A. , Eno, Celeste , Jiang, Nan, Shi, Zonggao , Li, Peng , Ouseph, Madhu M. , Thompson, Ella R. , Krysiak, Kilannin , Wagner, Alex H. , McCoy, Matthew , Zhao, Xiaonan, Ferrer, Alejandro , Zhang, Wenying , Griffith, Obi L. , Griffith, Malachi

Blood | November 23, 2021 | Volume: 138 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 4387-4387

10.1182/blood-2021-153546 Get It

Abstract Clinical significance of somatic gene variants needs to be comprehensively characterized for their diagnostic, prognostic and/or therapeutic actionability in patient management. However, challenges remain due to discrepancies in interpretation and reporting of these somatic variants among different testing labs. Therefore, standardized curation, clinical interpretation and reporting of somatic variants in hematologic cancers is critical. To address this issue, the Hematologic Cancer Taskforce (HCT), composed of 52 multi-disciplinary experts including oncologists, molecular pathologists, lab directors, genomic scientists and biocurators, was formed in January 2020 within the ClinGen Somatic Cancer Clinical Domain Working Group (CDWG) with a goal to undertake systematic curation and evidence-based clinical interpretation of genes/somatic variants associated with hematologic malignancies. In collaboration with the Clinical Interpretation of Variants in Cancer (CIViC) (civicdb.org) knowledgebase, HCT members curate, edit, and verify Evidence Items for each variant extracted from peer-reviewed publications. Monthly discussions based on these Evidence Items lead to the preparation of variant Assertions, which summarize the state of the field consensus variant interpretation and include tiering based on the AMP/ASCO/CAP guidelines (PMID: 27993330). FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) encodes a class III receptor tyrosine kinase expressed in hematopoietic cells. FLT3 mutations, including both internal tandem duplication (ITD) and mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain (TKD), are the most common mutations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), occurring in approximately 30% of all AML cases. Implementing FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in different treatment regimens for FLT3 mutated AML patients has led to significantly improved overall survival. Type I FLT3 inhibitors, including midostaurin, gilteritinib, sunitinib, lestaurtinib, and crenolanib, bind to the ATP-binding site when the receptor is in active conformation. Type II FLT3 inhibitors, including sorafenib, ponatinib, and quizartinib, interact with a hydrophobic region directly adjacent to the ATP-binding domain that is only accessible when the receptor is inactive, which prevents receptor activation. Generally in AML cells, type I FLT3 inhibitors prevent activity for both ITD and TKD mutations, while Type II inhibitors target ITD but lack efficiency against TKD mutations. The development of TKD mutations in AML cells with ITD have proved to be a mechanism of acquired, or secondary resistance to Type II FLT3 inhibitors. The HCT is piloting curation assessments of FLT3 alterations, including ITD, TKD and non-TKD variants, in AML. So far, the HCT has curated 75 evidence items for FLT3 somatic variants. FLT3-ITD, as well as D835 and I836 were asserted as tier 1 level A variants based on the prediction of response to gilteritinib in relapsed/refractory AML (PMIDs: 27993330, 31665578, 28645776, 28516360, 27908881). Recent curation activities are focused on FLT3 D839G and N676K, as clinical trials using large AML patient cohorts are lacking in their ability to validate drug response/resistance associations of these two TKD variants due to their low frequency. Functional studies showed both variants result in increased proliferation and protection from apoptosis, supporting the oncogenic potential of these two variants (PMIDs: 26891877, 2468088). FLT3 D839G combined with ITD confers resistance to pexidartinib and ponatinib, both Type II FLT3 inhibitors (PMIDs: 25847190, 23430109). FLT3 N676K predicts response to the Type I FLT3 inhibitor, gilteritinib, when N676K is present alone or in combination with ITD. Interestingly, FLT3 N676K in the absence of ITD predicts response to sorafenib, a Type II FLT3 inhibitor (PMIDs: 32040554, 32984009). However, these results are mostly derived from in vitro studies. Two separate Tier II, Level D Assertions have been submitted for FLT3-ITD&D839G for its response to pexidartinib and ponatinib, and more evidence is being collected to form an Assertion for FLT3 N676K. The complexity of the prediction of response/resistance associated with FLT3 D839G and N676K supports the importance of evidence-based curation and collection for these variants in the context of the overall mutation profile, disease context and specific FLT3 TKIs to clearly define their clinical impact. Disclosures Pullarkat: Stemline Therapeutics: Honoraria.
Abstract 449: A standard operating procedure for the curation of gene fusions
Terraf, Panieh, Coard, Thomas, Ritter, Deborah , Tańska, Anna , Berlin, Aaron M., Lu, Anna, Williams, Heather , Lin, Wan‐Hsin , Danos, Arpad , Xu, Huiling , Xu, Xinjie , Ryland, Georgina L., Zhang, Liying , Rapisardo, Sarah, Rehder, Catherine , Pallavajjala, Aparna, Park, Nicole, Satgunaseelan, Laveniya , Liu, Jie , Stenzinger, Albrecht , Lee, Jennifer, Roy, Angshumoy , Raca, Gordana , Satgunaseelan, Laveniya , Wagner, Alex H. , Vlachos, Ioannis S. , Sonkin, Dmitriy , Kesserwan, Chimene A. , Sboner, Andrea , Reich, Christian , Horak, Peter , Zou, Ying , Cameron, Daniel , Törüner, Gökçe , Saliba, Jason , Ceccarelli, Michele , Liu, Xuelu, Lee, Kristy , Griffith, Obi L. , Freimuth, Robert R. , Baughn, Linda B. , Baudis, Michael , Li, Marilyn M

Cancer Research | July 1, 2021 | Volume: 81 | Issue: 13_Supplement | Pages: 449-449

10.1158/1538-7445.am2021-449 Get It

Abstract Despite the well-established role of recurrent gene fusions as oncogenic drivers, current practices for characterizing and interpreting gene fusion events in clinical testing and in biomedical literature are inconsistent. From the conceptual definition of gene fusions to the salient elements that characterize these alterations, a lack of community-driven standards for the curation of gene fusions has resulted in a disparate landscape of fusion representations and supporting tools. Consequently, the evidence-based clinical evaluation of gene fusions requires extensive expert review for accurate interpretation of observed gene fusions with respect to putative evidence from biomedical literature. Furthermore, the lack of these standards inhibits the interoperability of tools, resources, and pipelines - impeding data sharing and downstream utility.To address these challenges, a cross-consortia initiative between the Variant Interpretation for Cancer Consortium and ClinGen was formed to develop a standard operating procedure (SOP) for the curation of gene fusions. The SOP is under development by an international and diverse set of experts in the representation, detection, and clinical interpretation of gene fusions. Participating stakeholders across academic, government, and industry sectors showcased challenges and solutions, and participated in community surveys and discussions to define and develop the SOP for this diverse class of alterations.An initial result of this effort was the precise molecular definition of genomic events and features constituting gene fusions. We distinguish these from similar but distinct classes of structural alterations through clinically-relevant examples. Next, we discuss our findings on community practices around the description and evaluation of gene fusions. We provide our recommendations for characterization and representation of gene fusions from these practices, and compare these recommendations to existing variant representation standards and formats (e.g. HGVS variant nomenclature). We also discuss the concurrent application of formats for standardized human- and machine-readable representations of gene fusion events.We conclude with discussion of the salient elements to enable rapid, scalable, and consistent evaluation of fusions curated from the biomedical literature. Recommendations are provided for the standardized capture of these elements to enable both intuitive and precise characterization of this diverse class of alterations in clinical reporting and literature. In summary, we provide a clinical-practice driven framework and nomenclature for gene fusions, including recommendations for human readability, computational precision, and data integrity within the SOP. This work is a substantial advancement towards standardized communication, investigation, and sharing of gene fusion data across clinical and research domains and specialties. Citation Format: Alex H. Wagner, Ioannis S. Vlachos, Dmitriy Sonkin, Panieh Terraf, Chimene Kesserwan, Andrea Sboner, Thomas Coard, Christian Reich, Deborah I. Ritter, Peter Horak, Ying S. Zou, Anna Tanska, Aaron M. Berlin, Anna Lu, Daniel Cameron, Heather E. Williams, Wan-Hsin Lin, Gokce Toruner, Arpad Danos, Jason Saliba, Huiling Xu, Xinjie Xu, Georgina Ryland, Michele Ceccarelli, Liying Zhang, Sarah Rapisardo, Catherine Rehder, Xuelu Liu, Aparna Pallavajjala, Nicole Park, Laveniya Satgunaseelan, Kristy Lee, Jie Liu, Obi Griffith, Robert R. Freimuth, Albrecht Stenzinger, Linda B. Baughn, Michael Baudis, Jennifer Lee, Marilyn Li, Angshumoy Roy, Gordana Raca. A standard operating procedure for the curation of gene fusions [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 449.
Abstract 210: Advancing knowledgebase representation of pediatric cancer variants through ClinGen/CIViC collaboration
Danos, Arpad , Lin, Wan‐Hsin , Roy, Angshumoy , Church, Alanna J. , Ritter, Deborah , Sheta, Lana , McMichael, Joshua F. , Williams, Heather , Hiemenz, Matthew , Janeway, Katherine A. , Ji, Jianling , Chimene, Kesserwan A., Fuqua, Laura, Dyer, Lisa , Xu, Huiling , Jean, Jeffrey, Satgunaseelan, Laveniya , Zhang, Liying , Laetsch, Ted, Parsons, Donald W., Schmidt, Ryan J. , Sund, Kristen L. , Kulkarni, Shashikant , Madhavan, Subha , Xu, Xinjie , Kanagal-Shamana, Rashmi, Harris, Marian H. , Akkari, Yasmine, Yacov, Nurit Paz, Terraf, Panieh, Raca, Gordana , Satgunaseelan, Laveniya , Saliba, Jason , Rao, Shruti , Krysiak, Kilannin , Wagner, Alex H. , Barnell, Erica K. , Coffman, Adam , Kiwala, Susanna , Corson, Laura , Fisher, Kevin E. , Fuqua, Laura, Schriml, Lynn M , Griffith, Malachi , Griffith, Obi L.

Cancer Research | July 1, 2021 | Volume: 81 | Issue: 13_Supplement | Pages: 210-210

10.1158/1538-7445.am2021-210 Get It

Abstract Childhood cancers are driven by unique profiles of somatic genetic alterations, with a significant contribution from predisposing germline variants. Understanding the genomic landscape of pediatric cancers is complicated by their rarity, the heterogeneity of variation within a given disease, and the complex forms of structural variation they contain. Variants in childhood disease may differ from those in adult versions of the same cancer type, or may have different clinical significance. Currently, pediatric variants are underrepresented in cancer variant databases, and an urgent need exists for their publicly available expert curation. To address this, the Pediatric Cancer Taskforce (PCT) was formed within the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) Somatic Cancer Clinical Domain Working Group (CDWG) (https://www.clinicalgenome.org/working-groups/somatic/). The PCT is a multi-institutional group of 39 members with broad experience in childhood cancer and variant curation, whose work consists of standardization and classification of genetic variants in pediatric cancers. The CIViC knowledgebase (www.civicdb.org) is a freely available resource for Clinical Interpretation of Variants in Cancer, which leverages public curation and expert moderation to address the problem of annotating the large volume of clinically actionable cancer variants. PCT curators work together with PCT expert members and the CIViC team on variant curation, and have submitted over 230 Evidence Items and over 10 Assertions to CIViC. To further address issues specific to pediatric curation, the PCT is working with CIViC to develop new pediatric-specific CIViC features and modifications of the data model that will aid in pediatric curation. A pediatric user interface, as well as representation of large scale structural and copy number variation are being developed for version two of CIViC, expected to be released in 1-2 years, which will enable curation of a new class of structural variants often encountered in pediatric cancer. A novel standard operating procedure for childhood cancer curation in CIViC is being developed by PCT experts, curators and the CIViC team. This SOP will cover topics including curation of structural variants, as well as pediatric-specific variant tiering guidelines which take into account the sparse nature of evidence in pediatric cases. A companion resource, CIViCmine (http://bionlp.bcgsc.ca/civicmine/), will be further developed to incorporate pediatric data. These and other joint efforts of the PCT and CIViC will significantly enhance pediatric variant representation for public use, to support the care of children with cancer. Citation Format: Arpad Danos, Wan-Hsin Lin, Jason Saliba, Angshumoy Roy, Alanna J. Church, Shruti Rao, Deborah Ritter, Kilannin Krysiak, Alex Wagner, Erica Barnell, Lana Sheta, Adam Coffman, Susanna Kiwala, Joshua F. McMichael, Laura Corson, Kevin Fisher, Heather E. Williams, Matthew Hiemenz, Katherine A. Janeway, Jianling Ji, Kesserwan A. Chimene, Laura Fuqua, Lisa Dyer, Huiling Xu, Jeffrey Jean, Laveniya Satgunaseelan, Liying Zhang, Ted W. Laetsch, Donald W. Parsons, Ryan Schmidt, Lynn M. Schriml, Kristen L. Sund, Shashikant Kulkarni, Subha Madhavan, Xinjie Xu, Rashmi Kanagal-Shamana, Marian Harris, Yasmine Akkari, Nurit Paz Yacov, Panieh Terraf, Malachi Griffith, Obi L. Griffith, Gordana Raca. Advancing knowledgebase representation of pediatric cancer variants through ClinGen/CIViC collaboration [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 210.
Expert Curation of Somatic Variants in Hematological Malignancies By the Clingen Somatic Hematological Cancer Taskforce (ClinGen HCT)
Kanagal‐Shamanna, Rashmi , Terraf, Panieh, Raca, Gordana , Danos, Arpad , Mani, Coumarane, Williams, Heather , Jiang, Nan , Vavra, Kevin C., Zhang, Liying , Li, Peng , Li, Yuwen , Ouseph, Madhu M. , Zhong, Yiming , Hinceman, Nicole, He, Rong , Matthew, Mariam T, Deeb, Kristin K. , Zhang, Fengli , Liu, Jie , Viswanatha, David S., Blombery, Piers , Wu, David , Kulkarni, Shashikant , Madhavan, Subha , Xu, Xinjie , Kanagal-Shamanna, Rashmi , Rao, Shruti , Saliba, Jason , Shi, Zonggao , Thompson, Ella R. , Krysiak, Kilannin , Wagner, Alex H. , McCoy, Matthew

Blood | February 8, 2021 | Volume: 136 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 23-23

10.1182/blood-2020-143028 Get It

Hematological malignancies comprise a genetically heterogeneous spectrum of diseases caused by abnormal proliferation or maturation of a variety of hematological cell lineages. Genomic abnormalities including chromosomal translocations, copy number variations and sequence level gene mutations underlie the pathogenesis of these disorders and frequently serve as important diagnostic, prognostic and/or therapeutic markers. However, the substantial discrepancy in interpretation and reporting of these genomic abnormalities among testing labs creates challenges for patient management. Therefore, standardizing the curation, clinical interpretation and reporting of somatic alterations within the context of their diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic significance in hematological cancers is critical. In January 2020, the ClinGen Somatic Cancer Clinical Domain working group formed the Hematological Cancer Taskforce (HCT) with a goal to undertake systematic curation and evidence-based clinical interpretation of genes/somatic variants associated with hematological malignancies. The HCT has recruited 32 multi-disciplinary experts including oncologists, molecular pathologists, clinical lab directors, genomic scientists and biocurators with expertise in hematological malignancies. In collaboration with the Clinical Interpretation of Variants in Cancer (CIViC) (civicdb.org) knowledgebase, variants from peer-reviewed publications are curated with editor review for clinical utility as evidence items. Monthly discussions based on these evidence items lead to the creation of summary variant assertions using the AMP/ASCO/CAP guidelines (Li M, et al., Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, 2017). The HCT is currently focused on expert curation and clinical interpretation of somatic variants in FLT3 (internal tandem duplication, tyrosine kinase domain and non tyrosine kinase domain variants) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Expert curation of gene fusions in Philadelphia chromosome-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph-like ALL) in collaboration with the ClinGen somatic pediatric cancer taskforce is currently underway. To date, the HCT has curated 45 evidence items from clinical and pre-clinical studies on the aforementioned genes/variants. In addition, three AMP Tier I, level A variant assertions of FLT3-ITD, D835 and I836, which predict response to Gilteritinib, an FDA-approved drug for relapsed or refractory AML, have been curated. In the future, the HCT plans to extend its focus on curation of BCR-ABL1 kinase domain mutations in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Based on the initial pilot curation phase, the HCT will develop gene-specific recommendations to standardize the reporting and interpretation of somatic variants to better assist clinical decisions and apply to become official ClinGen Somatic Expert Panels in each of these gene-disease domains. Disclosures Blombery: Novartis: Consultancy; Invivoscribe: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Honoraria.