Li, Peng

Abstract Objective Rare large B-cell lymphomas (LBCLs) present with concurrent or subsequent lymphomatous effusion (solid-effusion LBCL, SE-LBCL), which may have an inferior prognosis compared with their noneffusion counterpart. In addition, the relationship between SE-LBCL and human herpesvirus 8–negative effusion-based LBCL (EB-LBCL) remains unclear. Methods We collected 141 cases of SE-LBCL and a control cohort of 101 cases of stage IV solid-only LBCL. The clinicopathologic features were analyzed and compared between SE-LBCL and solid-only LBCL. Results Patients with SE-LBCL had a median age of 67 years with a male-to-female ratio of 1.3:1. Eighty-six patients had concurrent solid lymphoma and lymphomatous effusion, whereas 55 developed lymphomatous effusion subsequently. Most cases involved the pleural cavities (79%, 112/141), followed by the peritoneal (21%, 29/141) and pericardial (11%, 16/141) cavities. BCL6, CD10, and MUM1 were expressed in 77% (90/117), 46% (60/130), and 61% (58/95) of cases, respectively, and 58% (71/123) were subclassified into the germinal center B-cell (GCB) subtype. Rearrangements of BCL2, BCL6, and MYC were detected in 42% (31/73), 35% (22/63), and 40% (35/88), respectively, and 22% (19/87) had both MYC and BCL2 rearrangements. The patients with SE-LBCL had a dismal prognosis, with a median survival of 5.7 months, which was significantly worse than solid-only LBCL (147.5 months; P < .0001). Conclusions The pathologic features of SE-LBCL were similar to those of solid-only LBCL but distinct from those of EB-LBCL; in particular, lymphomatous effusion was an independently adverse prognostic factor in LBCL. Our study underscores the need for surveillance of lymphomatous effusion during LBCL staging and development of effective therapeutic regimens for SE-LBCL.

Abstract VEXAS (vacuoles, E1-ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic) syndrome is a recently described autoinflammatory disorder caused by acquired UBA1 mutations in hematopoietic precursor cells. The prevalence, clinical significance, and genomic landscape of UBA1variants in patients with hematologic malignancies (HM) remains unexplored. We analyzed the genomic profiles of 86 patients carrying 17 different UBA1variants amongst an unbiased cohort of 8,976 HM patients. Specific genetic and clinical features seen more frequently in patients with UBA1 pathogenic variants (PV) versus those with variants of uncertain significance (VUS) included: marked male predominance (98% versus 80%, P=0.002), macrocytic anemia (MCV 105 ± 1.4 fl versus 96 ± 1.4 fl, p=0.01), frequent dominant clones without concurrent somatic variants (53% versus 15%, p=0.004), and association with molecularly distinct low-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS; 13%) with superior overall survival (OS). Interestingly, while the genetic profiles of UBA1 PV patients resemble patients with clonal cytopenia of unknown significance (CCUS), rapid UBA1 clonal expansion predispose patients to convert to low-grade MDS with a notably hastened progression compared to UBA1 wild-type CCUS. This “clone surge to clinical stability” (CS) is a mechanism that emphasizes the unique pathobiology of UBA1mutations in VEXAS and supports it as a distinct entity.

Purpose of review There have been major advances in our understanding of molecular pathogenesis of myeloid neoplasms, which prompt the updates in the classification of myeloid neoplasms in the fifth edition of World Health Organization Classification (WHO-5) and the new International Consensus Classification (ICC). The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of these two classification systems for myeloid neoplasms. Recent findings The definition, classification, and diagnostic criteria in many myeloid entities have been refined in WHO-5 and ICC with improved understanding of morphology and integration of new genetic findings. Particularly, molecular and cytogenetic studies have been increasingly incorporated into the classification, risk stratification, and selection of therapy of myeloid neoplasms. Overall, despite some revisions and discrepancies between WHO-5 and ICC, the major categories of myeloid neoplasms remain the same. Further validation studies are warranted to fine-tune and, ideally, integrate these two classifications. Summary Integration of clinical information, laboratory parameters, morphologic features, and cytogenetic and molecular studies is essential for the classification of myeloid neoplasms, as recommended by both WHO-5 and ICC.

Hematological malignancies comprise a genetically heterogeneous spectrum of diseases caused by abnormal proliferation or maturation of a variety of hematological cell lineages. Genomic abnormalities including chromosomal translocations, copy number variations and sequence level gene mutations underlie the pathogenesis of these disorders and frequently serve as important diagnostic, prognostic and/or therapeutic markers. However, the substantial discrepancy in interpretation and reporting of these genomic abnormalities among testing labs creates challenges for patient management. Therefore, standardizing the curation, clinical interpretation and reporting of somatic alterations within the context of their diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic significance in hematological cancers is critical. In January 2020, the ClinGen Somatic Cancer Clinical Domain working group formed the Hematological Cancer Taskforce (HCT) with a goal to undertake systematic curation and evidence-based clinical interpretation of genes/somatic variants associated with hematological malignancies. The HCT has recruited 32 multi-disciplinary experts including oncologists, molecular pathologists, clinical lab directors, genomic scientists and biocurators with expertise in hematological malignancies. In collaboration with the Clinical Interpretation of Variants in Cancer (CIViC) (civicdb.org) knowledgebase, variants from peer-reviewed publications are curated with editor review for clinical utility as evidence items. Monthly discussions based on these evidence items lead to the creation of summary variant assertions using the AMP/ASCO/CAP guidelines (Li M, et al., Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, 2017). The HCT is currently focused on expert curation and clinical interpretation of somatic variants in FLT3 (internal tandem duplication, tyrosine kinase domain and non tyrosine kinase domain variants) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Expert curation of gene fusions in Philadelphia chromosome-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph-like ALL) in collaboration with the ClinGen somatic pediatric cancer taskforce is currently underway. To date, the HCT has curated 45 evidence items from clinical and pre-clinical studies on the aforementioned genes/variants. In addition, three AMP Tier I, level A variant assertions of FLT3-ITD, D835 and I836, which predict response to Gilteritinib, an FDA-approved drug for relapsed or refractory AML, have been curated. In the future, the HCT plans to extend its focus on curation of BCR-ABL1 kinase domain mutations in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Based on the initial pilot curation phase, the HCT will develop gene-specific recommendations to standardize the reporting and interpretation of somatic variants to better assist clinical decisions and apply to become official ClinGen Somatic Expert Panels in each of these gene-disease domains. Disclosures Blombery: Novartis: Consultancy; Invivoscribe: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Honoraria.