Pan, Zenggang

Abstract Pyroptosis is a form of programmed cell death characterized by the cleavage of the gasdermin (GSDM) family proteins that form pores in the plasma membrane, cell rupture, and the release of proinflammatory cytokines. In this study, we performed immunohistochemistry for cleaved gasdermin D (GSDMD), gasdermin E (GSDME) N-terminus, and gasdermin C (GSDMC) in 2 different cohorts of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and analyzed the impact of GSDM expression on prognosis and immunity. The results showed frequent cleaved GSDMD (N-terminal) expression. Only cytoplasmic GSDMD N-terminal expression correlated with significantly better patient survival in the 2 cohorts. In contrast, GSDME was mainly expressed in the vascular endothelium, and correlated with significantly adverse prognostic effect. Correlating with the multiplex fluorescent immunohistochemistry results, we found that cytoplasmic GSDMD N-terminal expression was associated with increased CD38+ (activated) M1 macrophages in both cohorts, cognate interactions between live DLBCL cells and activated M1 macrophages (and T cells), and lower PD-1/PD-L1 expression in the analyzed cases. In contrast, T-cell pyroptosis, lymphoma cell-resistance to cell death, and phagocytosis by M2 macrophages were observed in tissues with predominantly nuclear GSDMD N-terminal expression. Bulk gene expression profiling and deconvolution analysis revealed associations of cytoplasmic GSDMD N-terminal expression with downregulation of “Don’t eat me”–signaling genes, upregulation of many RNA genes, decreased frequency of “inflammatory” lymphoma microenvironment subtype, increased frequencies of prognostically favorable cell states and ecotypes, and decreased frequency of T-cell exhaustion state. In summary, this study showed distinct cellular and subcellular patterns of 3 GSDM proteins and their associated immune response phenotypes and prognostic effects, with implications for novel therapeutic strategies for B-cell lymphoma.

Abstract Objective Rare large B-cell lymphomas (LBCLs) present with concurrent or subsequent lymphomatous effusion (solid-effusion LBCL, SE-LBCL), which may have an inferior prognosis compared with their noneffusion counterpart. In addition, the relationship between SE-LBCL and human herpesvirus 8–negative effusion-based LBCL (EB-LBCL) remains unclear. Methods We collected 141 cases of SE-LBCL and a control cohort of 101 cases of stage IV solid-only LBCL. The clinicopathologic features were analyzed and compared between SE-LBCL and solid-only LBCL. Results Patients with SE-LBCL had a median age of 67 years with a male-to-female ratio of 1.3:1. Eighty-six patients had concurrent solid lymphoma and lymphomatous effusion, whereas 55 developed lymphomatous effusion subsequently. Most cases involved the pleural cavities (79%, 112/141), followed by the peritoneal (21%, 29/141) and pericardial (11%, 16/141) cavities. BCL6, CD10, and MUM1 were expressed in 77% (90/117), 46% (60/130), and 61% (58/95) of cases, respectively, and 58% (71/123) were subclassified into the germinal center B-cell (GCB) subtype. Rearrangements of BCL2, BCL6, and MYC were detected in 42% (31/73), 35% (22/63), and 40% (35/88), respectively, and 22% (19/87) had both MYC and BCL2 rearrangements. The patients with SE-LBCL had a dismal prognosis, with a median survival of 5.7 months, which was significantly worse than solid-only LBCL (147.5 months; P < .0001). Conclusions The pathologic features of SE-LBCL were similar to those of solid-only LBCL but distinct from those of EB-LBCL; in particular, lymphomatous effusion was an independently adverse prognostic factor in LBCL. Our study underscores the need for surveillance of lymphomatous effusion during LBCL staging and development of effective therapeutic regimens for SE-LBCL.