Ajani, Jaffer A.

381 Background: In RATIONALE-306 (NCT03783442), patients (pts) with LA unresectable or metastatic ESCC who received TIS (intravenously, 200 mg, every 3 weeks) + CT (platinum + fluoropyrimidine or paclitaxel) had longer median overall survival (OS) than pts who received PBO + CT at the interim analysis; improvement was maintained after a ≥3-year follow-up. Post hoc analyses in the PD-L1 TAP ≥1% subgroup showed clinically meaningful improvement with TIS + CT. These data supported the US FDA approval for unresectable or metastatic ESCC. Here we report the subgroup analysis of pts who had LA ESCC with PD-L1 TAP score ≥1%. Methods: Pts who had LA unresectable ESCC with PD-L1 TAP score ≥1% were included in this post hoc analysis. Efficacy outcomes (OS, progression-free survival [PFS], objective response rate [ORR], duration of response [DoR]) and safety were analyzed. Results: At data cutoff (Feb 28, 2022), of 649 pts randomized, 63 had LA ESCC with PD-L1 TAP score ≥1% (TIS + CT n=31; PBO + CT n=32; median age 67.0 years; 85.7% male). At median follow-up (TIS + CT 24.4 months; PBO + CT 24.5 months), efficacy with TIS + CT was improved vs PBO + CT (Table) and was consistent with the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Efficacy was maintained after a ≥3-year follow-up (data cutoff: Nov 24, 2023; Table). Conclusions: In this post-hoc analysis, the median OS for pts receiving TIS + CT exceeded two years. The regimen was well tolerated. While the findings require validation in future clinical trials, first-line TIS + CT is an encouraging option for pts who have LA unresectable ESCC with PD-L1 TAP score ≥1%. Clinical trial information: NCT03783442 . Interim Analysis 3-Year Follow-up TIS + CT (n=31) PBO + CT (n=32) TIS + CT (n=32) e PBO + CT (n=31) f Median OS, mo(95% CI) 25.6 (15.3, NE) 11.5(9.0, 21.8) 25.6 (15.3, NE) 12.3(9.0, 21.8) HR (95% CI) a 0.36 (0.17, 0.77) – 0.50 (0.26, 0.95) – Median PFS, a mo(95% CI) 13.2(6.8, NE) 6.7(4.2, 9.7) 13.2(6.8, 27.7) 6.7(4.2, 9.7) HR (95% CI) a 0.46 (0.22, 0.96) – 0.47 (0.23, 0.96) – ORR, b,c n (%) 18 (58.1) 10 (31.3) 19 (59.4) 10 (32.3) Median DoR, b,d mo(95% CI) Not reached (8.4, NE) 5.7 (1.5, 9.6) 22.1 (6.1, NE) 5.7 (1.5, 9.6) a Stratified. b Investigator assessed. c Unconfirmed. d Based on unconfirmed ORR. e One patient’s disease status at baseline was changed to LA after interim analysis. f One patient’s disease status at baseline was changed to metastatic after interim analysis. NE, not estimable.

PURPOSE To compare overall survival (OS) in patients with baseline metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma (GA) with and without ovarian metastasis (OM). Furthermore, within the group that had ovarian metastases, we aimed to assess whether there was a survival benefit (SB) with palliative oophorectomy (PO). PATIENTS AND METHODS This is a single-institution retrospective analysis of the clinicopathological features of women diagnosed with metastatic GA with a comparison of outcomes based on PO status. We identified 240 women with baseline metastatic GAs who were treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center between February 2003 and September 2022. Among these women, we categorized a subgroup of 102 women who had OM from their primary GA. Patients were analyzed whether they underwent PO. RESULTS Patients who developed OM were most often non-Caucasian, had peritoneal involvement, and had tumors that were both human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative and PD-L1–negative, with signet ring cell features and diffuse histological type. Among patients with ovarian metastases, those who had PO had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group = 0, more comprehensive molecular and immunohistochemical profiling, lower percentage of family history of gastroesophageal malignancies, and lower interval between diagnosis of the GA primary and the OM. PO was associated with significantly improved OS in this subgroup (hazard ratio, 0.5 [95% CI, 0.31 to 0.81]; P = .005). CONCLUSION To our knowledge, this is the largest multiethnic population study assessing SB of PO in patients with GA with OM. Additionally, it is the largest study analyzing survival in this population according to the patient's multiethnic characteristics and metastasis timing and growth patterns. PO presents as a therapeutic option for women with GAs with OM if the patient is clinically suitable for surgical resection.

Gastric cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Over 95% of gastric cancers are adenocarcinomas, which are typically classified based on anatomic location and histologic type. Gastric cancer generally carries a poor prognosis because it is often diagnosed at an advanced stage. Systemic therapy can provide palliation, improve survival, and enhance the quality of life in patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. The implementation of biomarker testing has had a significant impact on clinical practice and patient care. Targeted therapies have demonstrated encouraging results in clinical trials for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. This selection from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Gastric Cancer highlights recommendations for biomarker testing and discusses updates for the treatment of advanced disease, including peritoneal carcinoma as only disease and unresectable locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic disease.

Abstract Background: Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are a highly diverse cell population that plays a crucial role in shaping the tumor microenvironment (TME). Their spatial interactions within the TME remain to be systematically characterized, and the factors driving their phenotypic heterogeneity are not yet fully understood. Recent advancements in single-cell spatial transcriptomics technologies and cell segmentation approaches enable the precise measurement of thousands of transcripts at subcellular resolution. Combined with innovative bioinformatics, these advancements have unlocked unprecedented opportunities for in-depth characterization of CAFs and their interactions within the TME. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive spatial transcriptomic analysis of CAFs across 8 cancer types, using the CosMx and MERSCOPE platforms to profile nearly 6 million cells as part of our discovery cohorts. We developed a novel computational method to spatially cluster CAF subpopulations and defined four distinct spatial CAF subtypes. We further examined their phenotypic differences, spatial niche organization, and interactions with neighboring cells. Additionally, we investigated the influence of CAF subtypes on immune cell phenotypes and infiltration levels. To validate our findings, we employed multiple spatial platforms, including Visium, Xenium, COMET, CODEX, and IMC, to ensure reproducibility across diverse technologies. Moreover, we performed correlative studies in large-cohorts with rich clinical data to evaluate the clinical significance of these CAF subtypes. Results: Our approach provided an unprecedented high-resolution examination of the spatial phenotypes of CAFs in large, complex tissues, uncovering novel insights. We comprehensively characterized CAFs across various solid tumor types and identified four conserved spatial CAF subtypes. These subtypes are characterized by distinct cell organizational patterns, neighboring cell compositions, interaction networks, and transcriptomic features. Moreover, they demonstrate significant correlations with the abundance, distribution, and phenotypes of tumor-infiltrating immune cells, as well as associations with tumor histopathological features and clinical outcomes. Conclusions: Our study provides a pan-cancer, high-resolution characterization of CAF spatial organization and interactions in solid tumors and identified conserved spatial CAF subtypes linked to distinct organizational patterns. Our findings reveal that the transcriptomic states and phenotypes of CAFs are significantly shaped by their interactions with neighboring cancer and immune cells. Beyond offering novel insights into the spatial heterogeneity of CAFs, this work paves the way for developing strategies to effectively target and modulate CAFs for therapeutic benefit. Citation Format: Yunhe Liu, Ansam Sinjab, Jimin Min, Guangchun Han, Francesca Paradiso, Yuanyuan Zhang, Yang Liu, Ruiping Wang, Guangsheng Pei, Kyung Serk Cho, Enyu Dai, Akshay Basi, Jared K. Burks, Kimal I. Rajapakshe, Yanshuo Chu, Jiahui Jiang, Daiwei Zhang, Xinmiao Yan, Paola A. Guerrero, Alejandra Serrano, Mingyao Li, Tae Hyun Hwang, Andrew Futreal, Jaffer A. Ajani, Luisa M Solis Soto, Amir A. Jazaeri, Humam Kadara, Anirban Maitra, Linghua Wang. Spatial subtypes and cellular interactions of cancer-associated fibroblasts revealed by single-cell spatial omics [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 166.

PURPOSE The outcomes of anti–PD-1 agents plus fluoropyrimidine/platinum in frontline advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas (aGEAs) remain poor. We investigated the safety, tolerability, and activity of fluoropyrimidine/oxaliplatin and tislelizumab with the DKK1-neutralizing antibody DKN-01 in aGEAs in a phase IIa open-label study. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients had untreated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative aGEAs, RECIST v1.1 measurable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1, and adequate organ function. Patients received intravenous DKN-01 300 mg once every 2 weeks, tislelizumab 200 mg once every 3 weeks, oxaliplatin 130 mg/m 2 once every 3 weeks, and capecitabine 1,000 mg/m 2 twice daily on days 1-15 of each 21-day cycle. The primary end point was safety and tolerability. Key secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR) by RECISTv1.1, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Between September 18, 2020, and April 8, 2021, 25 patients were enrolled. All patients who received at least one dose of DKN-01 were included in the safety analysis. Most patients had gastroesophageal junction tumors, median age was 61 years, 76% were male, and 55% were ECOG of 0. All patients reported at least one treatment-emergent adverse event. The ORR was 73% (95% CI, 49.8 to 89.3), with a disease control rate of 95%. The ORR was 90% (95% CI, 55.5 to 99.7) in the DKK1-high tumor patients and 67% (95% CI, 29.9 to 92.5) in the DKK1-low tumor patients. The median PFS was 11.3 months (95% CI, 5.8 to 12.0) and the 12-month PFS rate was 33%. The median OS was 19.5 months (95% CI, 15.2 to 24.4) with a 12-month OS rate of 76% and an 18-month OS rate of 55%. CONCLUSION DKN-01 can be safely combined with frontline fluoropyrimidine/oxaliplatin and tislelizumab and demonstrates encouraging activity independent of PD-L1 expression levels. A randomized phase II trial is ongoing (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04363801 ).

4027 Background: DKN-01 is an anti-DKK1 mAb which has demonstrated anti-tumor activity in patients with advanced GEA with low tumor PD-L1 expression, a subset with very limited therapeutic options. DKN-01 has immunomodulatory activity, stimulates a pro-inflammatory tumor microenvironment, and upregulates PD-L1 levels. Here we present 2-year survival data for 1L advanced GEA patients who received combination treatment with DKN-01, the Fc-optimized anti-PD-1 tislelizumab, and CAPOX chemotherapy. The ORR was previously reported (68% in ITT and 79% in PD-L1-low populations). Methods: This Phase 2, multi-center, single arm Part A of the DisTinGuish (NCT04363801) study investigated DKN-01 + tislelizumab + CAPOX as 1L therapy in advanced HER2(-) GEA, regardless of DKK1 and PD-L1 expression levels. Tumor DKK1 and PD-L1 were assessed by central laboratories. The primary endpoint was ORR in a modified intent to treat population (>1 dose DKN-01); secondary endpoints included PFS and OS in the ITT population. Results: Twenty-five patients were enrolled from September 2020 to April 2021. As of 23 January 2023: Median age was 61 years (22, 80); 17 patients had GEJ adenocarcinoma; 8 had gastric cancer. Twenty-one patients had tumors with evaluable DKK1 expression. Twenty-two patients had tumors with evaluable PD-L1 expression; the majority (73%) were low expressors (vCPS <5%). Median (m) duration on treatment is 11.3 months (mo). Seven patients remain on study, with 4 on-treatment beyond 2 years. The mPFS is 11.3 mo in the overall ITT population and 10.7 mo in patients with low tumor PD-L1 expression. The mOS is 19.5 mo in the overall ITT population and 18.7 mo in the patients with low tumor PD-L1 expression. Treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) were mild with most G1/2. The most common AEs related to the study drug regimen were nausea (72%), diarrhea (64%) and fatigue (60%). Five patients experienced G3 DKN-01-TRAEs including decreased neutrophil count (1), diarrhea (1), vomiting (1), hypophosphatemia (2), and pulmonary embolism (1). Conclusions: At 2-years of follow-up, 1L treatment of advanced GEA patients with DKN-01 in combination with tislelizumab and CAPOX resulted in a prolongation of PFS and OS compared with the modern SOC regimen of nivolumab plus chemotherapy, both in the overall population (mPFS 11.3 vs 7.7 mo; mOS 19.5 vs 13.8 mo) and in the PD-L1 low subgroup (mPFS 10.7 vs 7.5 mo; mOS 18.7 vs 12.4 mo), alongside a manageable safety profile. The prolonged PFS and OS observed in the current study are notable, especially in our trial population dominated by patients with tumors of low PD-L1 expression, where the known benefit of anti-PD-1 therapy is limited. The ongoing Part C of this study is evaluating mFOLFOX6/CAPOX plus tislelizumab with or without DKN-01 in the same 1L GEA patient population. Further evaluation of biomarkers is also ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04363801 .

Cancers originating in the esophagus or esophagogastric junction constitute a major global health problem. Esophageal cancers are histologically classified as squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) or adenocarcinoma, which differ in their etiology, pathology, tumor location, therapeutics, and prognosis. In contrast to esophageal adenocarcinoma, which usually affects the lower esophagus, esophageal SCC is more likely to localize at or higher than the tracheal bifurcation. Systemic therapy can provide palliation, improved survival, and enhanced quality of life in patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. The implementation of biomarker testing, especially analysis of HER2 status, microsatellite instability status, and the expression of programmed death-ligand 1, has had a significant impact on clinical practice and patient care. Targeted therapies including trastuzumab, nivolumab, ipilimumab, and pembrolizumab have produced encouraging results in clinical trials for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. Palliative management, which may include systemic therapy, chemoradiation, and/or best supportive care, is recommended for all patients with unresectable or metastatic cancer. Multidisciplinary team management is essential for all patients with locally advanced esophageal or esophagogastric junction cancers. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers focuses on the management of recurrent or metastatic disease.

ImportanceApproval by the US Food and Drug Administration of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) for advanced gastroesophageal cancer (aGEC) irrespective of PD-L1 status has generated controversy. Exploratory analyses from individual trials indicate a lack of meaningful benefit from ICI in patients with absent or low PD-L1 expression; however, analysis of a single variable while ignoring others may not consider the instability inherent in exploratory analyses.ObjectiveTo systematically examine the predictive value of tissue-based PD-L1 status compared with that of other variables for ICI benefit in aGEC to assess its stability.Data SourcesMEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register (2000-2022).Study Selection, Data Extraction, and SynthesisRandomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included of adults with aGEC (adenocarcinoma [AC] or squamous cell carcinoma [SCC]) randomized to anti−PD-1 or PD-L1−containing treatment vs standard of care (SOC). Study screening, data abstraction, and bias assessment were completed independently by 2 reviewers. Of 5752 records screened, 26 were assessed for eligibility; 17 trials were included in the analysis.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe prespecified primary end point was overall survival. The mean hazard ratio (HR) for ICI vs SOC was calculated (random-effects model). Predictive values were quantified by calculating the ratio of mean HRs between 2 levels of each variable.ResultsIn all, 17 RCTs (9 first line, 8 after first line) at low risk of bias and 14 predictive variables were included, totaling 11 166 participants (5067 with SCC, 6099 with ACC; 77.6% were male and 22.4% were female; 59.5% of patients were younger than 65 years, 40.5% were 65 years or older). Among patients with SCCs, PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) was the strongest predictor of ICI benefit (HR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.53-0.68] for high TPS; and HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.75-0.95] for low TPS), yielding a predictive value of 41.0% favoring high TPS (vs ≤16.0% for other variables). Among patients with AC, PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) was the strongest predictor (after microsatellite instability high status) of ICI benefit (HR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.66-0.81] for high CPS; and HR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.84-1.07] for low CPS), yielding a predictive value of 29.4% favoring CPS-high (vs ≤12.9% for other variables). Head-to-head analyses of trials containing both levels of a variable and/or having similar design generally yielded consistent results.Conclusions and RelevanceTissue-based PD-L1 expression, more than any variable other than microsatellite instability-high, identified varying degrees of benefit from ICI-containing therapy vs SOC among patients with aGEC in 17 RCTs.