Yoshimura, Katsuhiro

PURPOSE To compare overall survival (OS) in patients with baseline metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma (GA) with and without ovarian metastasis (OM). Furthermore, within the group that had ovarian metastases, we aimed to assess whether there was a survival benefit (SB) with palliative oophorectomy (PO). PATIENTS AND METHODS This is a single-institution retrospective analysis of the clinicopathological features of women diagnosed with metastatic GA with a comparison of outcomes based on PO status. We identified 240 women with baseline metastatic GAs who were treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center between February 2003 and September 2022. Among these women, we categorized a subgroup of 102 women who had OM from their primary GA. Patients were analyzed whether they underwent PO. RESULTS Patients who developed OM were most often non-Caucasian, had peritoneal involvement, and had tumors that were both human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative and PD-L1–negative, with signet ring cell features and diffuse histological type. Among patients with ovarian metastases, those who had PO had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group = 0, more comprehensive molecular and immunohistochemical profiling, lower percentage of family history of gastroesophageal malignancies, and lower interval between diagnosis of the GA primary and the OM. PO was associated with significantly improved OS in this subgroup (hazard ratio, 0.5 [95% CI, 0.31 to 0.81]; P = .005). CONCLUSION To our knowledge, this is the largest multiethnic population study assessing SB of PO in patients with GA with OM. Additionally, it is the largest study analyzing survival in this population according to the patient's multiethnic characteristics and metastasis timing and growth patterns. PO presents as a therapeutic option for women with GAs with OM if the patient is clinically suitable for surgical resection.

ABSTRACTBackground and objectivePneumothorax is a co‐morbidity in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, its incidence, risk factors and prognostic significance in IPF remain unclear. The aim of this study was to clarify the incidence and prognostic significance of pneumothorax in patients with IPF, and to further investigate the risk factors for its onset.MethodsEighty‐four consecutive patients with IPF based on the consensus guideline were included in this study. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records, pulmonary function tests and chest high‐resolution computed tomography images, and determined the incidence of pneumothorax. The prognostic significance of pneumothorax was evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards model analysis with time‐dependent covariates. We also assessed the cumulative incidence and the risk factors for pneumothorax.ResultsOf the 84 patients, 17 (20.2%) developed pneumothorax. The cumulative incidence of pneumothorax was 8.5%, 12.5% and 17.7% at 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively. Univariate analysis demonstrated that pneumothorax was significantly related to poor prognosis (hazards ratio, 2.99; P = 0.002). Multivariate analysis, adjusting for sex, age and forced vital capacity (% predicted), revealed that pneumothorax was an independent predictor of poor outcome in IPF (hazards ratio, 2.85; P = 0.006). Lower BMI and the presence of extensive reticular abnormalities were significantly associated with developing pneumothorax.ConclusionThese results confirm that patients with IPF often develop pneumothorax during their clinical course and that the onset of pneumothorax predicts a poor outcome.