Xiao, Lianchun

Abstract Background Eligibility criteria for clinical trials are crucial for maintaining safety and study integrity. However, overly restrictive criteria can result in unrepresentative trial populations, leading to gaps in understanding real‐world treatment efficacy. Addressing potentially modifiable exclusions (PMEs) could enhance trial accessibility and participation without compromising safety. Methods The authors retrospectively analyzed screen‐failed patients with biliary tract cancer or pancreatic cancer between August 2019 and November 2024 at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Screen‐failed patients were those who provided informed consent but did not participate for any reason. Clinical data were obtained from screening logs and electronic health records. PMEs were identified and validated by two independent medical oncologists. Results Of 585 screen‐failed patients from 18 trials, 509 were analyzed (367 with pancreatic cancer and 142 with biliary tract cancer) after excluding 76 because of incomplete data. Leading causes of screen failure were declined participation (19%), comorbidities (12%), suboptimal organ function (11%), absence of a biomarker (10%), and insufficient biospecimens (7%). Reasons for declining included preference for standard care (23%), travel (22%), and competing trials (5%). The authors identified 69 patients (13.6%) who had PMEs (primarily borderline laboratory abnormalities), including liver function (23%), kidney function (20%), platelet count (12%), hemoglobin (7%), and white blood cell count (6%) abnormalities. Other PMEs included previous or concurrent malignancies (9%) and viral hepatitis (4%). PMEs were evenly distributed across trials. Conclusions Rigid eligibility criteria exclude stable patients who might benefit from investigational treatments. Easing criteria related to incidental or asymptomatic laboratory abnormalities could broaden trial accessibility and improve enrollment in populations that are more representative of real‐world use.

PURPOSE To compare overall survival (OS) in patients with baseline metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma (GA) with and without ovarian metastasis (OM). Furthermore, within the group that had ovarian metastases, we aimed to assess whether there was a survival benefit (SB) with palliative oophorectomy (PO). PATIENTS AND METHODS This is a single-institution retrospective analysis of the clinicopathological features of women diagnosed with metastatic GA with a comparison of outcomes based on PO status. We identified 240 women with baseline metastatic GAs who were treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center between February 2003 and September 2022. Among these women, we categorized a subgroup of 102 women who had OM from their primary GA. Patients were analyzed whether they underwent PO. RESULTS Patients who developed OM were most often non-Caucasian, had peritoneal involvement, and had tumors that were both human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative and PD-L1–negative, with signet ring cell features and diffuse histological type. Among patients with ovarian metastases, those who had PO had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group = 0, more comprehensive molecular and immunohistochemical profiling, lower percentage of family history of gastroesophageal malignancies, and lower interval between diagnosis of the GA primary and the OM. PO was associated with significantly improved OS in this subgroup (hazard ratio, 0.5 [95% CI, 0.31 to 0.81]; P = .005). CONCLUSION To our knowledge, this is the largest multiethnic population study assessing SB of PO in patients with GA with OM. Additionally, it is the largest study analyzing survival in this population according to the patient's multiethnic characteristics and metastasis timing and growth patterns. PO presents as a therapeutic option for women with GAs with OM if the patient is clinically suitable for surgical resection.

451 Background: Gemcitabine plus platinum (GP) is the standard of care first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancers (BTC). There is no established second-line therapy, and retrospective reviews report progression-free survival (PFS) for second-line treatment to be < 3 months. 5-Fluorouracil plus irinotecan (FOLFIRI) is a commonly used regimen in patients (pts) with BTC who have progressed on GP, though there is a paucity of data regarding its efficacy in this population. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated pts with advanced BTC who were treated with FOLFIRI at MD Anderson, University of Michigan and Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville. Data were obtained on pt demographics, type of BTC, PFS, and overall survival (OS). Results: Ninety-eight pts were included of which 74 (76%) had metastatic disease at the time of treatment with FOLFIRI. The median age was 59 (range, 22 to 86) years. The number of pts with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA)/gall bladder (GB)/intrahepatic CCA were 10, 17, and 71. FOLFIRI was used as 1st, 2nd, 3rd or 4th – Nth lines in 8, 50, 36, and 4 pts, respectively. Of the 65 pts whose best responses were documented, 23 (35%) had stable disease and 7 (11%) had a partial response per RECIST v1.1. Median duration on FOLFIRI was 2.2 months. The median PFS and OS were 2.4 (95% CI 1.7 to 3.1) and 6.6 (95% CI 4.7 to 8.4) months, respectively. Median PFS for pts treated with FOLFIRI in 1st, 2nd, 3rd or 4th – Nth lines were 3.1, 2.5, 2.3 and 1.5 months, respectively. Eighteen pts received concurrent bevacizumab (13) or EGFR-targeted therapy (5) with FOLFIRI, and both of groups exhibited a median PFS of 2.7 months. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) of 0-1 was associated with improved OS (P = 0.006) compared to PS of 2-3. Conclusions: In this multi-institution retrospective review of 98 pts with BTC treated with FOLFIRI, efficacy of this regimen appears to be modest. While PFS and OS outcomes were similar to what has been previously reported, the 46% disease control rate in this group of predominantly pretreated pts is encouraging. Given the lack of other standard therapies, FOLFIRI may still have a role in this pt population, but these results emphasize the need for more effective treatment options for pts with advanced, pretreated BTC.

350 Background: BTCs are often diagnosed at an advanced stage and have a poor prognosis. The standard therapy for aBTCs is the combination of GC. However, the median overall survival (mOS) is dismal at 11.7 months (mos) with a median progression free survival (mPFS) of 8 mos. Methods: A single arm, phase II study was conducted at MD Anderson and Mayo Clinic Arizona. Patients (pts) with aBTC were treated at initial dose level of G/C/N (in mg/m2) at 1000/25/125 (n = 30) which was reduced to lower doses due to grade 3/4 hematological (heme) toxicity (tox) - G/C/N: 800/25/100 (n = 30). Cycles were q21 days with restaging q3 cycles until progression. PFS was the primary endpoint (endpt). Using a Bayesian hypothesis test-based design, we assumed mPFS of 8 mos under the null hypothesis (H0), 10 mos under the alternative (H1). Secondary endpts included mOS, RECIST v1.1 response rate (RR), safety and CA19-9 response. Results: 60 pts were enrolled with 51 being response-evaluable having received more than 1 cycle of therapy (age: median 60 yrs [range 31-77], ECOG PS 0/1 (22/38), M/F (33/27), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma/extrahepatic/gallbladder (38/9/13). Median follow-up was 14 mos and median number of treatment (trmt) cycles = 5.24. Pts at initial dose level had significant grade 3/4 heme tox: neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia leading to trmt discontinuation in 6/30 pts. After dose reduction to G/C/N (in mg/m2) at 800/25/100, trmt was better tolerated with only 3 pts experiencing grade 4 heme tox. Non-heme tox were grade 3 in 19 pts: nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, thromboembolic event/CVA, hypokalemia, constipation, cystitis, LFT elevations. The mPFS = 11.4 mos (95% CI: 6.1, 16.1) and mOS = 19.2 (95%CI: 13.6, NA), 1-year survival rate 67.6%. 51 pts evaluable for response: disease control rate (PR+CR+SD)-84.3% and RR-39%. 12 unresectable cases were operated post trmt with 1 pathologic CR. Conclusions: The combination of GCN was well tolerated at adjusted doses and demonstrates encouraging efficacy having met its mPFS endpt and an impressive mOS higher than historical control. These results merit evaluating GC +/-N in a randomized controlled study. Clinical trial information: NCT02392637.

4018 Background: BTCs are often diagnosed at an advanced stage and have a poor prognosis. The standard therapy for aBTCs is the combination of GC. However, the median overall survival (mOS) is dismal at 11.7 months (mos) with a median progression free survival (mPFS) of 8 mos. Methods: A single arm, phase II study was conducted at MD Anderson and Mayo Clinic Arizona. Patients (pts) with aBTC were treated at initial dose level of G/C/N (in mg/m2) at 1000/25/125 (n = 27) which was reduced to lower doses due to grade 3/4 hematological (heme) toxicity (tox) - G/C/N: 800/25/100 (n = 33). Cycles were q21 days with restaging q3 cycles until progression. PFS was the primary endpoint (endpt). Using a Bayesian hypothesis test-based design, we assumed mPFS of 8 mos under the null hypothesis (H0), 10 mos under the alternative (H1). Secondary endpts included mOS, RECIST v1.1 response rate (RR), safety and CA19-9 response. Results: 60 pts were enrolled with data on 51 available as of the time of this abstract (age: median 60 yrs [range 31-77], ECOG PS 0/1 (17/34), M/F (30/21), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma/extrahepatic/gallbladder (32/8/11). Median follow-up was 11.5 mos and median number of treatment (trmt) cycles = 5. Pts at initial dose level had significant grade 3/4 heme tox: neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia leading to trmt discontinuation in 6/27 pts. After dose reduction to G/C/N (in mg/m2) at 800/25/100, trmt was better tolerated with only 4 pts experiencing grade 4 heme tox. Non-heme tox were grade 3 in 10 pts: nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, thromboembolic event/CVA, hypokalemia, constipation, cystitis, LFT elevations. In the initial 51 pts, mPFS = 11.4 mos (95% CI: 6.1, not reached) and mOS not reached (estimated > 20 mos, 1-year survival rate 66.7%; 95%CI: 65.9-92.2%). 34 pts evaluable for response: disease control rate (PR+CR+SD)-82.3% and RR-32.3%. 3 unresectable cases were operated post trmt with 1 pathologic CR. Conclusions: The combination of GCN was well tolerated at adjusted doses and demonstrates encouraging preliminary efficacy having met its mPFS endpt and a 1-year survival rate higher than historical control. These results merit evaluating GC +/-N in a randomized controlled study. Clinical trial information: NCT02392637.

Abstract Background: The Tumor Growth Factor-β (TGF-β) pathway is a potent tumor suppressor pathway. Its inactivation has been implicated in hepatocarcinogenesis. However, in patients with advanced stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC), TGF-β1 serum concentrations are elevated and correlated to tumor size, recurrence and shortened survival. The mechanisms mediating TGF-β1 ligand overexpression in HCC are unknown. Material and Methods: Immunohistochemical analysis of human HCC samples was performed using Tissue Micro Array. Established human HCC cell lines were used for in vitro studies. Gene expression was assessed by qRT-PCR, ELISA and immunoblot analysis. shRNA was used for gene silencing. Transcription factor DNA binding was evaluated by chromatin immunoprecipitation. For promoter analysis, transcription factor binding site containing DNA fragments were cloned into the enhancer or promoter position of luciferase expression vectors and subsequent transfected. Results: In up to 68% of advanced stage HCC tumors Stem Cell Factor (SCF) is overexpressed, and SMAD2 and STAT3 are constitutively activated. SCF expression in human HCC tumors is intratumorally and intracellularly correlated to expression of pSer465/467SMAD2 and pTyr705STAT3. In HCC cell lines, SCF stimulation induces TGF-β1 transcription, expression and secretion, all of which are abrogated by genetic silencing of STAT3. TGF-β1 stimulation of human HCC cells induces TGF-β1 transcription, and genetic silencing of SCF prevents TGF-β1 autoregulation. We identified two STAT3 recognition sites within the TGF-β1 gene. In human HCC cells, TGF-β1 stimulation results in STAT3 binding to one of the identified recognition sites. TGF-β1 activates luciferase expression vectors under control of the corresponding STAT3 binding site but not in its absence. TGF-β1-induced STAT3 binding and expression vector activation is abrogated in HCC cells with genetically silenced SCF. TGF-β1 induces SCF expression but SMAD2 knockdown inhibits TGF-β1-induced SCF transcription and expression. We identified 7 putative SMAD2-binding elements (SBE) within the SCF promoter. TGF-β1 stimulation results in SMAD2 binding to the SCF promoter and activation of luciferase expression vectors regulated by the SCF promoter; conversely, genetic silencing of SMAD2 abrogates TGF-β1-induced SCF promoter activation. Importantly, knockdown of SCF restored the antiproliferative functions of TGF-β, and prevented TGF-β-induced tumor cell migration and invasion. Conclusion: In advanced stage HCC, SCF drives TGF-β1 autoregulation through STAT3-mediated regulation of the TGF-β1 promoter. Thereby, SCF and TGF-β1 form a positive feedback loop that functionally switches the TGF-β pathway from a tumor suppressor to a tumor promoter in advanced stage HCC. Citation Format: Pingyu Zhang, Andres Rojas, Ying Wang, Nina M. Munoz, Lianchun Xiao, Jing Wang, Gregory J. Gores, Mien-Chie Hung, Boris R. A. Blechacz. A positive feedback loop between TGF-β and SCF mediates TGF-β1 ligand overexpression in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 3911. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-3911

Abstract Background: Current systemic agents for advanced Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) achieve minimal survival benefits. Tumor Growth Factor-β (TGF-β) is a potent tumor suppressor via its SMAD2/3 signaling axis; its inactivation has been implicated in hepatocarcinogenesis. Paradoxically, TGF-β serum concentrations are elevated in patients with advanced HCC. The TGF-β receptor is currently explored in clinical trials as a therapeutic target. However, the mechanisms mediating the functional switch of the TGF-β pathway to an oncogenic role in advanced HCC are unknown. Material and Methods: Gene expression profiling of human HCC was performed using the Oncomine database. Immunohistochemical analysis of human HCC samples was performed using Tissue Micro Arrays. Established human HCC cell lines were used for in vitro studies. Gene expression was assessed by qRT-PCR, ELISA and immunoblot analyses. shRNA was used for gene silencing. Cell cycle analysis was performed by FACS. Cell proliferation was assessed by microscopic quantification, MTS- and BrdU-assay. Apoptosis was analyzed by TUNEL assay and DAPI. Migration was evaluated by wound assay, and invasion by Boyden Chamber assay. Results: In human HCC, SMAD2 overexpression and decreased expression of the negative TGF-β/SMAD regulator SKI was correlated to shortened survival. Intranuclear pSer465/467-SMAD2 was identified in up to 65% of human HCC tumors, and correlated with TNM-stage, survival and pTyr705STAT3. In 50% of human HCC cell lines, the TGF-β/SMAD2 axis was functional. Exclusively in HCC cells with intact SMAD-signaling, TGF-β induced STAT3 Tyr705-phosporylation and nuclear translocation. We show that TGF-β1 transcriptionally regulates expression of the c-KIT ligand Stem Cell Factor (SCF). SCF is overexpressed in advanced HCC tumors, and correlated to pSMAD2, metastases and decreased survival. In human HCC cells, SCF activates STAT3 via auto- and paracrine stimulation of its cognate receptor c-KIT. TGF-β1-induced activation of STAT3 is inhibited by SCF-knockdown, inhibition of c-KIT or JAK1. The TGF-β1/STAT3 axis neutralizes the cell cycle inhibitory function of TGF-β in human HCC cell lines, and instead promotes EMT, tumor cell migration and invasion. Disruption of the TGF-β/STAT3 signaling axis inhibits its tumor promoting effects and restores TGF-β antiproliferative effects. Conclusion: In advanced HCC, TGF-β/SMAD2-signaling is constitutively activated and correlated to worse outcomes. The functional switch of TGF-β is mediated through aberrant expression of SCF with subsequent stimulation of the c-KIT/STAT3 signaling axis. Disruption of this axis restores TGF-β tumor suppressor function. Disruption of the molecular network between TGF-β1/SMAD2 and SCF/STAT3 constitutes a novel therapeutic strategy aiming at restoration of a dysregulated tumor suppressor. Citation Format: Andres Rojas, Pingyu Zhang, Ying Wang, Nina M. Munoz, Lianchun Xiao, Jing Wang, Gregory J. Gores, Mien-Chie Hung, Boris R. A. Blechacz. TGF-β/SMAD2 signaling drives tumor-progression via c-KIT/STAT3-signaling in advanced HCC. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 1962. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-1962

Key Points miR-155 levels are significantly and increasingly overexpressed as normal B cells progress to MBL and to CLL. Plasma levels of miR-155 before treatment were significantly lower in patients with CLL who experienced complete response than in all others.