Green, Jeremy B.

AbstractBackgroundCurrent options for the reduction of acne scarring (eg, ablative laser resurfacing) are associated with considerable side effects and limitations in terms of patient population. Percutaneous collagen induction via microneedling poses an alternative treatment method due to its low rates of reported adverse events and side effects.ObjectiveTo assess the safety and effectiveness of microneedling treatments in reducing acne scars.MethodsA total of 22 patients (18 females and 4 males) with a mean age of 38 ± 7.6 years were assessed regarding the appearance of facial acne scarring. Acne scars were assessed via the Acne Scar Assessment Scale (ASAS) and the Goodman and Baron acne scar grading scale before and after two/three treatments. Additionally, the post‐interventional development of side reactions, adverse events, and patient‐reported outcomes (eg, pain/discomfort, skin redness) was reported.ResultsCompared to baseline, the mean ASAS value was improved statistically significantly on average by 1.41 and 1.46 after the second treatment as assessed by the independent raters and the patients, respectively. In patients who received a total of three treatments, a statistically significant mean improvement in ASAS value of 1.35 and 1.66 compared to baseline was assessed by the independent raters and patients, respectively. No unexpected adverse events were reported. The severity and rate of side reactions decreased over the course of this study.ConclusionMicroneedling treatments can pose a safe and effective option in the reduction of acne scarring. In this study, microneedling helped achieving a significant reduction of acne scars while showing high patient safety.

Background: The number of soft-tissue filler injections performed in the United States is constantly increasing and reflects the high demand for enhanced facial and body attractiveness. The objective of the present study was to measure the viscoelastic properties of soft-tissue fillers when subjected to different testing frequencies. The range of tested frequencies represents clinically different facial areas with more [lips (high frequency)] or less [zygomatic arch (low frequency)] soft-tissue movement. Methods: A total of 35 randomly selected hyaluronic acid–based dermal filler products were tested in an independent laboratory for their values of G′, G″, tan δ, and G* at angular frequencies between 0.1 and 100 radian/second. Results: The results of the objective analyses revealed that the viscoelastic properties of all tested products changed between 0.1 and 100 radian/second angular frequency. Changes in G′ ranged from 48.5 to 3116 percent, representing an increase in their initial elastic modulus, whereas changes in G″ ranged from −53.3 percent (i.e., decrease in G″) to 7741 percent (i.e., increase in G″), indicating both an increase and a decrease in their fluidity, respectively. Conclusions: The increase in G′ would indicate the transition from a “softer” to a “harder” filler, and the observed decrease in G″ would indicate an increase in the filler’s “fluidity.” Changes in the frequency of applied shear forces such as those occurring in the medial versus the lateral face will influence the aesthetic outcome of soft-tissue filler injections.

AbstractBackgroundThe temporal lifting technique can provide lateral facial lifting when administering hyaluronic acid (HA)‐based soft tissue fillers into the subdermal plane of the temple. However, the central facial oval is not influenced by this technique.ObjectivesTo identify the safety and esthetic effectiveness of additional midfacial injection points (in addition to the temporal lifting technique) that can volumize the medial midface, lift the lateral face, and increase jawline contouring when included into a full‐face injection algorithm.MethodsThe patient records of nine consecutive patients (all females) with a mean age of 35.0 (8.4) years and a mean body mass index of 21.7 (2.4) kg/m2 were retrospectively analyzed after a full‐face injection algorithm was performed using HA‐based fillers. The additional injection points target the supraperiosteal plane of the medial zygomatic arch, the lateral infraorbital region, and the pyriform fossa using both needles and cannula.ResultsNo adverse events were observed during the 6‐month retrospective observational period. The volume of the medial midface increased, the volume of the lateral midface decreased, and the contour of the jawline improved; all effects reached a highly statistically significant level with p < 0.001.ConclusionDespite each individual injection is currently performed on a daily clinical basis the evaluated injection algorithm following the temporal lifting technique shows some evidence that it is safe and esthetically effective. Future studies will need to confirm the results presented herein in a larger sample and with objective outcome measures to guide safe and effective esthetic outcomes.

Abstract Background Injectable soft tissue fillers are used on a global scale for a variety of aesthetic indications. Despite their widespread use, there is a dearth of information regarding needle deformation following injection procedures. Repeated injections with the same needle could lead to progressive needle tip deformation, potentially resulting in decreased precision and increased patient discomfort. Objectives The objective of this study was to quantify the magnitude of needle tip deformation utilizing scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image analysis. Methods An observational study was performed evaluating 4 differently sized needles following soft tissue filler injections for 5 different aesthetic indications (zygomatic arch, infraorbital, midcheek, nasolabial sulcus, and perioral) in patients aged 36 to 64 years. Following treatment, each needle was visualized and imaged through SEM, and the percentage of deformation in relation to the total amount of needle tip surface was calculated. Results The factor most influencing needle tip damage was revealed to be the number of injection passes, ie, dermal transitions. Per injection procedure, an increase in needle tip damage of 4.7% occurred. Touching the bone deformed the needle tip by 9.6% and an increase in needle size resulted in 0.13% more damage. Conclusions To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first SEM investigation to provide objective evidence for the deformation of needle tips after repeated facial soft tissue filler injections. These data may help improve patient safety and comfort during these minimally invasive procedures. Level of Evidence: 3

Background: Although injectable soft-tissue fillers are frequently used for facial rejuvenation, there is a dearth of objective data evaluating the tissue-lifting effects. Current practices for efficacy evaluation include some subjectivity. This study seeks to evaluate the lifting effects of facial soft-tissue fillers in a quantifiable, objective setting. Methods: Twenty fresh hemifaces obtained from 10 Caucasian body donors (seven women and three men) with a mean age of 83.5 ± 6.8 years and a mean body mass index of 25.3 ± 4.3 kg/m2 were injected with soft-tissue fillers following a predefined treatment algorithm. Three-dimensional surface scanning procedures were performed to assess postinjection effects. Results: Injections in the medial face [i.e., forehead, medial midface, and perioral (chin and labiomandibular sulcus)] increased the local surface volume by 0.67, 0.56, and 0.87 cc and created local (but not regional) lifting effects of 1.11, 0.11, and 0.74 mm. Injections in the lateral face (temple, lateral midface, and jawline) changed the local surface volume by 0.45, 0.02, and −0.38 cc, and created local lifting effects of 0.57, 0.81, and 0.29 mm, respectively. Lateral face injections, however, created additional regional lifting effects by co-influencing neighboring lateral facial regions, which was not observed for medial face injections. Conclusions: This cadaveric study provides evidence that soft-tissue fillers, although typically classified as volumizers, can induce lifting effects of the face. Whereas temporal deep supraperiosteal injections have limited lifting effects, the combined effects of subdermal injections of the temple, lateral midface, and mandibular angle can induce lifting effects of the total lateral face. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, V.

Abstract Background The most severe complications following soft tissue filler injections result from the intraarterial administration of the filler product. Although hyaluronic acid–based filler can be trans-arterially dissolved with hyaluronidase, no information is available on calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA)-based fillers. Objective The authors sought to test whether CaHA-based fillers can be trans-arterially dissolved by sodium thiosulfate (STS) when evaluated in cadaveric and in vitro models. Methods Human cadaveric facial arterial segments were each filled with 0.2 cc of commercially available CaHA product and submerged for 24 hours in 4 different STS-containing solutions: 10 cc STS (300 mg/cc) (pure, 1:1 dilution, 1:2 dilution), 0.9% saline and 10 cc STS (300 mg/cc), and 300 IU (bovine) hyaluronidase in a 1:1 ratio. Results Intraarterial CaHA was detected in human facial artery segments after 24 hours independent of the STS concentration employed. Submerging the arterial segments in STS (300 mg/cc) and 300 IU (bovine) hyaluronidase (1:1 ratio) also did not dissolve the intraarterial CaHA product. Gray scale analyses did show, however, that increasing concentrations of STS resulted in increased disintegration of CaHA in an in vitro experimental setting. Conclusions The results of this study indicate that STS is limited in its potential to dissolve intraarterial CaHA of cadaveric human facial arteries, despite the fact that it appears effective when in direct contact with the CaHA. Adverse events caused by intraarterial administration of CaHA-based fillers still lack a suitable antidote.

AbstractBackgroundDifferences in the effectiveness of neuromodulator treatments for horizontal forehead lines dependent on depth of product administration have been described. However, knowledge in respect to the fascial anatomy of the forehead still remains elusive.AimsTo relate the fascial anatomy of the forehead to the effectiveness of neuromodulator treatments by conducting a clinical, prospective, interventional split‐face study in which injections for the treatment of horizontal forehead lines are performed differently between facial sides.MethodsThis study included a total of n = 14 patients with a mean age of 35.71 (7.8) years and mean body mass index of 21.9 (3.0) kg/m2. One side of the forehead was injected superficially by positioning the product in the superficial fatty layer, whereas the contralateral side was injected deep targeting the supraperiosteal plane (random selection). The treatment outcome was rated by the physician and by two independent observers according to a forehead line severity scale (0‐4) at 14 and at 30 days.ResultsAll three observers agreed in their ratings (ICC: 0.942) that the deep injection technique resulted in a superior outcome: D14 (superficial vs deep) 0.17 (0.4) vs 0.14 (0.4; P = .583) at rest and 1.26 (0.6) vs 0.43 (0.5; P < .001) for frontalis contraction; D30 0.17 (0.4) vs 0.14 (0.3) at rest (P = .583) and 1.21 (0.6) vs 0.43 (0.5; P < .001) for frontalis contraction.ConclusionThe results of this study underscore how detailed anatomic knowledge can enhance results of aesthetic interventions, in this case horizontal forehead line treatment with neuromodulators.

AbstractBackgroundMost injection techniques utilizing hyaluronic acid–based soft tissue fillers have predictable outcomes at the location injected. However, the temporal region has been identified to have aesthetic effects beyond the temple.AimsTo identify and quantify the panfacial aesthetic effects of three different temporal injection techniques.Patients/MethodsThe medical records of nine female and five male Caucasian patients with a mean age of 50.9 ± 11.9 years were retrospectively reviewed for the effects of these techniques: supraperiosteal, interfascial, and subdermal. Panfacial effects were evaluated by the semiquantitative assessment of aesthetic scores for the temple volume, the temporal crest visibility, the lateral orbital rim visibility, the position of the eyebrows, the severity of lateral canthal lines, the midfacial volume, and the contour of the jawline.ResultsThe supraperiosteal injection technique had the greatest influence on improving the temporal volume (25.0%), the temporal crest (33.3%), and the lateral orbital rim visibility (31.0%) scales but had no effects in other facial regions. The interfascial injection technique revealed good effects on improving temporal hollowing (23.3%) but had an even greater effect on the crow's feet (26.8%) and on the position of the eyebrow (33.3%). The subdermal injection technique had its greatest effects in the lower face by improving the contour of the jawline (26.8%) followed by the improvement of the lower cheek fullness scale (14.3%).ConclusionFuture injection algorithms could utilize all three injection techniques together as one multi‐layer injection approach with a tailored proportion of each technique based on the aesthetic needs of the patient.

AbstractBackgroundWhile the temporal lifting technique has gained increasing attention, there is a dearth of objective and reliable evidence of its effects.AimThe objective of the present study is to analyze the ability of the temporal lifting technique to reduce the midfacial volume by soft tissue repositioning and to achieve an improved pan‐facial appearance by targeting exclusively the subdermal plane of the posterior and superior temple with soft tissue fillers.MethodsA total of 12 patients (1 male and 11 females) with a mean age of 36.75 ± 6.6 years and a mean body mass index of 23.04 ± 1.3 kg/m2 were included in this prospective clinical single‐center interventional study. Injection‐related outcome was evaluated utilizing 3D skin vector displacement and surface volume analyses and scoring based on five different evaluators.ResultsThree months after the treatment, the global esthetic improvement scale rating showed an improved outcome (3.08) when evaluated by the independent observers, very improved outcome when evaluated by the treating physician (4.33), and exceptional improvement when rated by the patient (4.83). Temporal volume improved by 0.36 (P < .001), lower cheek fullness by 0.47 (P < .001), and jawline contouring by 0.51 (P < .001). No major adverse events were reported during the 3‐month observational period.ConclusionObjective outcome measures have provided evidence that by augmenting the posterior superior temple the volume of the middle face can be reduced and the contour of the jawline can be accentuated; this is due to the underlying fascial anatomy and the resulting soft tissue re‐position.

Abstract Background Due to its arterial vasculature, the nasolabial sulcus is one of the most challenging facial regions to treat when trying to ameliorate the signs of facial aging. Objectives The aim of the present study was to provide data on the 3-dimensional course of the angular artery within the nasolabial sulcus in relation to age, gender, and body mass index to increase safety during minimally invasive treatments. Methods Thee hundred nasolabial sulci from 75 males and 75 females of Russian Caucasian ethnic background (mean [standard deviation] age, 45.7 [18.7] years; mean body mass index, 25.14 [4.9] kg/m2) were analyzed. Bilateral multiplanar measurements were based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography cranial scans. Results Up to 3 arteries could be identified within the nasolabial sulcus: ~90% contained 1 arterial trunk, ~9% had 2 trunks, and ~1% had 3 trunks; females had more arteries than men. The artery is located at mean depths of 21.6 mm at the oral commissure and 8.9 mm at the nasal ala. The angular artery was lateral to the nasolabial sulcus in 100% of cases; the smallest distance between the artery and the nasolabial sulcus was at the oral commissure (11.91 [7.9] mm) and the greatest was at the nasal ala (13.73 [3.9] mm). Conclusions In contrast to current concepts, the angular artery is not located strictly subdermal to the nasolabial sulcus but at a variable depth, and in 100% of the investigated cases lateral to the nasolabial sulcus. With increasing age, the depth and lateral distance between arteries and sulci reduces significantly, underscoring the need for special caution when injecting this site.