Coburn, Sally B.

Abstract Background: Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) has been associated with ovarian cancer and Chlamydia trachomatis (chlamydia) is the leading cause of PID in the developed world. Primary infection with chlamydia is often asymptomatic and may persist for several months/years, thus ascertainment of PID in epidemiologic studies is challenging due to pervasive misclassification and under-reporting. To improve our understanding of the role of chlamydia and other infectious agents in developing ovarian cancer, we evaluated serologic markers of infection with incident ovarian cancer using a staged approach in two independent populations. Methods: Studies included: 1) a case-control study conducted in Poland of 278 ovarian cancer cases diagnosed from 2000 to 2003 and age- and study site-matched controls (n=556) and 2) a nested case-control study from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial including 160 women who eventually developed ovarian cancer and 159 matched controls. We calculated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between serologic marker titers and ovarian cancer risk using logistic regression adjusted for matching factors and potential confounders. We evaluated laboratory cutpoints indicative of prior chlamydia infection and tested more stringent marker thresholds, identified in Poland and applied in PLCO, that could be relevant for a PID-like infection. Results: In the Polish study, positivity for the chlamydia plasmid-encoded Pgp3 protein was associated with increased ovarian cancer risk [OR (95% CI): 1.63 (1.20-2.22)]; when a positive result was redefined at a higher titer, ovarian cancer risk increased [cutpoint 2: 2.00 (1.38-2.89); cutpoint 3 (max OR): 2.19 (1.29-3.73)]. All other chlamydia markers measured were associated with increased risk at the more stringent positivity threshold in Poland. In the prospective PLCO study, Pgp3 was associated with elevated risk at the laboratory cutpoint [1.43 (0.78-2.63)]; using higher thresholds, Pgp3 was associated with increased ovarian cancer risk [cutpoint 2: 2.25 (1.07-4.71); cutpoint 3: 2.53 (0.63-10.08)]. In both studies, markers of other infections (i.e., Mycoplasma genitalium, herpes simplex virus-2, human papillomavirus, herpes simplex virus-1, polyomavirus, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, Epstein Barr virus, cytomegalovirus) measured were not associated with risk. Conclusions: In two independent populations, the gold standard serologic marker of prior/current chlamydia infection (Pgp3) was associated with a doubling in ovarian cancer risk, whereas markers of other infectious agents were unrelated. Although these findings need to be replicated, they suggest potential ovarian cancer risk reduction through targeted treatment of chlamydia infections. Citation Format: Britton Trabert, Tim Waterboer, Sally B. Coburn, Louise A. Brinton, Mark E. Sherman, Jolanta Lissowska, Beata Peplonska, Patricia Hartge, Michael Pawlita, Nicolas Wentzensen. Serologic markers of infectious agents and ovarian cancer: Markers of prior Chlamydia trachomatis infection associated with increased ovarian cancer risk in two independent populations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4942.

Abstract Background: Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) is hypothesized to give rise to many cancers that have been historically classified as ovarian primaries. Although STIC is gaining status as a diagnostic entity, similar appearing lesions would likely have been reported as fallopian tubal carcinoma in-situ (FT-CIS) in the past. Accordingly to characterize patterns of reporting and behavior for tubal cancers, we analyzed population-based data for incidence rate trends, co-occurrence with cancer at other sites and survival of FT-CIS and invasive fallopian tube carcinoma (FT-Inv). Methods: We analyzed data for FT-CIS and FT-Inv included within 33 registries using the Cancer Incidence in North America Deluxe Analytical Files provided by the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (1995-2012). Primary site of invasive carcinomas were defined according to the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (3rd edition) topography codes (ovarian (C56.9), fallopian tube (C57.0), and primary peritoneal cancers (C48.1-.2, 48.8)). We excluded cancers with non-epithelial histology. Total counts, incidence rates per 1 million adjusted to the 2000 standard US population and age-standardized stage-specific survival were computed. Temporal incidence rate patterns were analyzed by joinpoint regression with estimates of annual percentage change (APC). Results: Cases in which the first cancer diagnosis was FT-CIS, included 98 FT-CIS alone; 27 FT-CIS followed by another cancer diagnosis within 1 year and 172 cases in which FT-CIS was diagnosed concurrently with another cancer as compared with 5513 invasive tubal carcinomas over the same period. The incidence rate of FT-CIS was stable from 1995-2002, then significantly increased from 2002-2012 [APC (95% CI) = 16.2% (10.9-21.7)]. Rates of early stage high-grade serous FT-Inv increased significantly from 2002-2012 [10.4% (6.1-14.9)] and rates of late stage high-grade serous FT-Inv rose sharply from 2002-2012 [20.0% (17.5-22.6)]. Five-year age-standardized survival for women with FT-CIS only was 75.6% overall, reflecting 89.1% survival for women less than 50 years and 70.9% for women 50 years or older; survival for high-grade early stage serous FT-Inv was 77.8%. Conclusions: Diagnoses of FT-CIS and FT-Inv have increased dramatically, likely reflecting changes in diagnostic pathology practice. Developing standardized reporting for FT-CIS (and in the future, STIC) when present with concurrent invasive cancer are needed, given that this occurs often. Based on limited data, 5-year survival for FT-CIS and early stage FT-Inv are similar, but future studies to evaluate data for STIC will be required, which will likely be achievable only through national registries that are large enough to capture sufficient cases. Citation Format: Mark E. Sherman, Sally B. Coburn, Hannah Yang, William Anderson, Philip Rosenberg, Gretchen Gierach, Nicolas Wentzensen, Kathy Cronin, Britton Trabert. Incidence rates and outcomes of fallopian tube carcinomas: Data from the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 260. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-260