Abstract Background: Prior infection with Chlamydia trachomatis, indicated by the presence of circulating antibodies against plasmid encoded glycoprotein 3 (Pgp3), is associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer. The aberrant expression of p53 can be found in up to 95% of ovarian cancers and is an especially frequent feature among high-grade serous cancers. Prior studies have described mechanisms by which Chlamydia reprogram DNA damage response pathways, including those involving p53. However, tumor level expression of p53 among women with and without prior exposure to chlamydia is poorly described. We evaluated whether the association between prior chlamydial infection (Pgp3 seropositivity) and ovarian cancer varied by tumor p53 expression and whether Pgp3 seropositivity was associated with ovarian tumor expression of p53. Methods: Available serologic data for Pgp3 in tubo-ovarian cancer cases (n=155) and matched controls (n=556) from the Polish Ovarian Cancer Study were evaluated and stratified by p53 mutation status of cases inferred from immunohistochemical staining. Expression of p53 was assessed in tissue microarrays (2+ cores per case) and classified as aberrant (i.e., no expression or overexpression: ≥60% positive cells) or wild- type. Multinomial logistic regression with controls as the reference was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association of Pgp3 seropositivity with ovarian cancer with stratification by p53 expression among the cases. Logistic regression among cases was only used to evaluate the association between Pgp3 and aberrant p53 expression. Results: Aberrant p53 expression was found in 70% of cases. Pgp3 seropositivity was associated with increased ovarian cancer risk (OR [95% CI]: 1.86 [1.28-2.68]). Pgp3 seropositivity was associated with risk for both p53 aberrant (1.79 [1.16-2.75]) or p53 wild-type ovarian cancers (2.06 [1.11-3.80], p for heterogeneity=0.80). When restricted to high-grade serous cancers, the association with Pgp3 was also not differential by p53 status (p for heterogeneity=0.16; 83% of high-grade serous cases had aberrant p53 expression). Among women with cancer, Pgp3 seropositivity was not associated with aberrant p53 expression (versus wild-type, OR [95% CI]: 0.90 [0.45-1.81], spearman correlation: -0.05, p-value=0.55). Conclusion/Discussion: Our study provides support that previous C. trachomatis infection is associated with ovarian cancer, irrespective of aberrant p53 tumor expression. There are many possible mechanisms by which Chlamydia may influence ovarian cancer. While the current results do not rule out interactions with p53-related pathways, it is likely that C. trachomatis increases ovarian cancer risk via multiple mechanisms (e.g., infection related sequelae like chronic inflammation). Citation Format: Sarina Pollat, Nicolas Wentzensen, Tim Waterboer, Manila Hada, Jolanta Lissowska, Beata Peplonska, Mark E. Sherman, Kara A. Michels, Britton Trabert. Prior chlamydial infection and ovarian cancer risk by tumor p53 expression [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Ovarian Cancer; 2023 Oct 5-7; Boston, Massachusetts. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(5 Suppl_2):Abstract nr A051.
Abstract 4942: Serologic markers of infectious agents and ovarian cancer: Markers of prior Chlamydia trachomatis infection associated with increased ovarian cancer risk in two independent populations
Abstract Background: Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) has been associated with ovarian cancer and Chlamydia trachomatis (chlamydia) is the leading cause of PID in the developed world. Primary infection with chlamydia is often asymptomatic and may persist for several months/years, thus ascertainment of PID in epidemiologic studies is challenging due to pervasive misclassification and under-reporting. To improve our understanding of the role of chlamydia and other infectious agents in developing ovarian cancer, we evaluated serologic markers of infection with incident ovarian cancer using a staged approach in two independent populations. Methods: Studies included: 1) a case-control study conducted in Poland of 278 ovarian cancer cases diagnosed from 2000 to 2003 and age- and study site-matched controls (n=556) and 2) a nested case-control study from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial including 160 women who eventually developed ovarian cancer and 159 matched controls. We calculated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between serologic marker titers and ovarian cancer risk using logistic regression adjusted for matching factors and potential confounders. We evaluated laboratory cutpoints indicative of prior chlamydia infection and tested more stringent marker thresholds, identified in Poland and applied in PLCO, that could be relevant for a PID-like infection. Results: In the Polish study, positivity for the chlamydia plasmid-encoded Pgp3 protein was associated with increased ovarian cancer risk [OR (95% CI): 1.63 (1.20-2.22)]; when a positive result was redefined at a higher titer, ovarian cancer risk increased [cutpoint 2: 2.00 (1.38-2.89); cutpoint 3 (max OR): 2.19 (1.29-3.73)]. All other chlamydia markers measured were associated with increased risk at the more stringent positivity threshold in Poland. In the prospective PLCO study, Pgp3 was associated with elevated risk at the laboratory cutpoint [1.43 (0.78-2.63)]; using higher thresholds, Pgp3 was associated with increased ovarian cancer risk [cutpoint 2: 2.25 (1.07-4.71); cutpoint 3: 2.53 (0.63-10.08)]. In both studies, markers of other infections (i.e., Mycoplasma genitalium, herpes simplex virus-2, human papillomavirus, herpes simplex virus-1, polyomavirus, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, Epstein Barr virus, cytomegalovirus) measured were not associated with risk. Conclusions: In two independent populations, the gold standard serologic marker of prior/current chlamydia infection (Pgp3) was associated with a doubling in ovarian cancer risk, whereas markers of other infectious agents were unrelated. Although these findings need to be replicated, they suggest potential ovarian cancer risk reduction through targeted treatment of chlamydia infections. Citation Format: Britton Trabert, Tim Waterboer, Sally B. Coburn, Louise A. Brinton, Mark E. Sherman, Jolanta Lissowska, Beata Peplonska, Patricia Hartge, Michael Pawlita, Nicolas Wentzensen. Serologic markers of infectious agents and ovarian cancer: Markers of prior Chlamydia trachomatis infection associated with increased ovarian cancer risk in two independent populations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4942.
Antibodies Against Chlamydia trachomatis and Ovarian Cancer Risk in Two Independent Populations