DiNardo, Courtney D.

Abstract Recent updates to monocyte count thresholds recognize oligomonocytic chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (OM-CMML) as an early form of CMML. However, the clinical validity of these changes remains uncertain without incorporating biological and genomic factors. In this study, we analyzed a cohort of 911 patients (249 with OM-CMML, 359 with overt CMML, and 303 with myelodysplastic syndromes) using unsupervised clustering to evaluate the role of genomic determinants in refining CMML diagnosis. Our findings show that CMML molecular signatures (biallelic TET2 mutations or SRSF2-TET2 comutations) are linked to a distinct transcriptome, monocytic bias, classical monocytosis, and a higher risk of progression to overt CMML in OM-CMML cases. We developed a weighted genomic model and diagnostic workflow showing that combining genomic signatures with bone marrow monocyte frequencies in OM-CMML more accurately predicts progression to overt CMML. These findings support integrating genomic determinants and our clinic-ready diagnostic workflow into the CMML diagnostic framework to improve accuracy. Significance: Through comprehensive clinical and genomic profiling of a large patient cohort, alongside immunophenotypic and transcriptional cellular analyses, this study provides evidence that incorporating genomic determinants into the diagnostic criteria for OM-CMML improves diagnostic accuracy and refines the identification of early-stage CMML, thereby preventing misclassification.

Abstract Introduction Blast transformation (BT) in CMML occurs in 15-30% of patients (pts) with a median overall survival (OS) <6 months (mo). While clonal evolution can be observed, biological mechanisms of BT remain unknown for many pts. Using paired samples from chronic phase (CP) and at BT, this study defines the cytogenetic and molecular landscape of BT-CMML. Methods BT-CMML pts from Mayo Clinic (n=153, 31%), MD Anderson (n=195, 40%), and 7 centers of the Groupe Francophone des Myélodysplasies (n=145, 29%) were included after IRB approval. ICC 2022 criteria defined CMML and AML. Pt data were collected at initial diagnosis or referral at CP and again at BT. Clonal dominance was inferred from a natural log-fold difference of mutation variant allele fractions (VAF). OS was censored at allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT). Single-cell multiomic analyses used the Tapestri platform (Mission Bio). Statistics used R. Results Among 1,883 cases of CMML with a median follow up of 96 mo, 493 (26%) underwent BT. The median age at CP and BT was 69 and 71 years, respectively. BT-CMML pts were predominantly male (69%) and had proliferative CMML (53%) or CMML-1 (69%) in CP; 39% and 33% were considered high-risk by CPSS-Mol and BLAST-Mol criteria, respectively. The median time to BT was 16 mo (interquartile range 7-35 mo) and was not different in males vs females (p=0.60). Compared to their CP parameters (p<0.001 each), pts at BT had lower median hemoglobin (10.8 vs 9.2 g/dL) and platelets (100 vs 44 x109/L) but higher leukocytes (13.9 vs 16.3 x109/L), peripheral blasts (0% vs 14%), and bone marrow blasts (6% vs 32%). Blasts exhibited mostly monocytic (57%) or immature myeloid (40%) differentiation. Abnormal karyotypes (AK) were more prevalent at BT (25% vs 62%, p<0.001). Among 318 pts with paired karyotype data, 221 (69%) had a normal karyotype (NK) in CP, of which 123 (56%) remained normal at BT and 98 (44%) acquired new abnormalities. Conversely, 97 (31%) pts had an AK in CP, of which 67 (69%) acquired abnormalities or increased clonal metaphases (6%), 23 (24%) remained stable, and 7 (7%) reverted to a NK at BT. Overall, 46% acquired and 8% lost a clonal cytogenetic abnormality, while 46% remained unchanged. Numeric (37%) and structural (30%) changes were most common. Complex (12% vs 3%) and monosomal (5% vs 2%) karyotypes were more frequent at BT than in CP. Only 6 (2%) pts acquired an AML-defining rearrangement at BT. Mutational data were available for 248 paired cases. The number of somatic mutations was higher at BT (median 3 vs 4, p<0.001). Mutations in RUNX1 (27% vs 39%), NRAS (23% vs 33%), KRAS (11% vs 17%), FLT3 (6% vs 15%), NPM1 (0% vs 11%), IDH2 (5% vs 11%), and CEBPA (3% vs 10%) were more frequent at BT (all p<0.05). At BT, the average VAF of the dominant clone increased in 32%, decreased in 35%, and remained unchanged (delta ≤5%) in 33%. The most frequent dominant clones both in CP and at BT had mutations in TET2 (8% vs 4%) or co-dominant mutations involving SRSF2-TET2 (7% vs 3%). Mutational clonal evolution was observed in 72%, with mutations gained in 45% and lost from the dominant clone in 19%. The most gained mutations at BT were in NRAS (15%) and RUNX1 (13%). Single cell proteogenomic analyses in 4 selected CP and BT pts shed light on the impact of NRAS and RUNX1 mutations on clonal hierarchies and differentiation. Among 196 fully evaluable cases, a new cytogenetic and/or molecular aberration was uniquely gained in 106 (54%) cases and lost in 9 (5%), with 40 (20%) both gaining and losing a genetic alteration. Forty-one (21%) patients had no identifiable genetic change between CP and BT, suggesting driver alterations outside of that detected by routine analyses. Median OS was 31 mo from CMML diagnosis and 5.6 mo from BT. Compared to supportive care, treatment in CP did not prolong median time to BT (14 vs 17 mo, p=0.91) or OS (35 vs 29 mo, p=0.05), regardless of intensity. After BT, median OS was 1.2 mo with supportive care (n=83), 8.7 mo with a hypomethylating agent (HMA, n=39), 10 mo with HMA plus venetoclax (n=37), 7.8 mo with chemotherapy (n=91), and 31 mo in pts who underwent alloSCT (n=57). Conclusions In this large BT-CMML cohort, cytogenetic (46% gained, 8% lost) or mutational (45% gained, 19% lost) driver events were identified in 79% of pts, with 21% having no identifiable changes by conventional testing. Whole genome/transcriptome analyses are underway in this subgroup to identify novel drivers of BT.

Abstract Introduction Heterozygous germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in the 5' untranslated region of ANKRD26 cause inherited thrombocytopenia and predisposition to hematologic malignancy (HM). The estimated lifetime HM risk is ~10% based on families ascertained from an inherited thrombocytopenia cohort. However, the malignancy spectrum, molecular features, precursor states, and overall clinical outcomes remain poorly defined. Methods We established an international, multicenter cohort of individuals with ANKRD26-related thrombocytopenia diagnosed after undergoing genetic evaluation due to a personal and/or family history of thrombocytopenia and/or HM. Clinical, pathologic, and molecular data were collected for 27 individuals with germline ANKRD26 PVs from 21 unrelated families treated at 11 institutions across 5 countries. Statistical analyses were performed using R (v4.4.2). Results Patients were predominantly male (18/27) and white (25/27). Thrombocytopenia was typically identified in childhood (median age 10 years, range 0-48) with a genetic diagnosis made later (median age 53 years, range 2-80). The mean (+/- SD) pre-malignancy platelet count was 45 +/- 24 K/uL (range 5-87). ANKRD26 PVs observed in each family included: c.-126T>C (n=9), c.-128G>A (n=3), c.-134G>A (n=3), c.-116C>T (n=3), c.-118C>T (n=2), and c.-118C>A (n=1). Thirteen HMs were diagnosed in 11 of 27 (41%) patients, including myelodysplastic neoplasm/syndrome (MDS, n=5), acute myeloid leukemia (AML, n=3), chronic myeloid leukemia (CML, n=2), MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) overlap (n=2), and Langerhans cell histiocytosis (n=1). The median age at first HM diagnosis was 63 years (range 49-80). Recurrent somatic features in myeloid malignancies included complex karyotype (4/11, 36%) and TP53 mutations (5/10, 50%). Of the 3 patients with AML, 1 achieved a partial remission (PR) with venetoclax combined with cladribine, idarubicin, and cytarabine but relapsed, 1 achieved a PR with azacitidine but relapsed <100 days after haploidentical allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT), and 1 had primary refractory disease. Among 5 patients with MDS, 1 was refractory to decitabine, 1 underwent alloSCT but relapsed 2 years post-transplant, 1 remains in remission post-alloSCT with 1 year of follow-up, 1 is undergoing alloSCT evaluation, and 1 was lost to follow-up. Both patients with CML achieved durable major molecular remissions with imatinib. To better estimate HM risk, we assumed 100% penetrance of thrombocytopenia for ANKRD26 PV carriers and included family members with chronic thrombocytopenia who had not had germline genetic testing. In this expanded series (n=62), 16 individuals developed a HM (26%). Additional diagnoses included MDS with progression to AML (n=1), AML (n=1), CML (n=1), and leukemia of unknown type (n=2). Cumulative incidence of HM was 0% by age 40 years, 17% by age 60 years, and 60% by age 80 years. Somatic sequencing of peripheral blood was performed in 5 HM-unaffected ANKRD26 PV carriers. One individual was found to have clonal hematopoiesis driven by TET2 (c.1648C>T, p.Arg550*) with a variant allele frequency (VAF) of 9% at age 55. Bone marrow biopsy showed mild megakaryocytic atypia and 4% blasts without overt evidence of malignancy. To assess the prevalence of ANKRD26-related HM, we assessed the frequency of ANKRD26 PVs in 2 large MDS/AML cohorts. In the ARUP database (9662 AML, 6397 MDS), 2 individuals (0.01%) had an ANKRD26 PV with a VAF consistent with germline origin. In the MSK-IMPACT Heme Germline MDS/AML cohort (n = 284), no ANKRD26 P/LP variants were identified. Conclusions Germline ANKRD26 PVs underlie <1% of MDS/AML diagnoses but may represent a high-risk subtype characterized by complex karyotype, TP53 mutations, and high risk of relapse. Among our series, the incidence of HM was low early in life but increased substantially with age, reaching 60% by 80 years. This exceeds prior estimates, which were derived from individuals ascertained from thrombocytopenia-based registries. Together, our findings suggest that ANKRD26-associated HM may represent a high-risk clinical entity, and that age and family history should inform surveillance strategies. More studies are needed to define genetic and environmental modifiers of HM risk as well as precursor states to enable early detection and disease interception.

Abstract Recent updates to the monocyte count thresholds for diagnosing chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) have recognized oligomonocytic CMML (OM-CMML) as an early stage within the CMML spectrum. However, the clinical validity of these revised criteria remains uncertain without considering biological factors and might misclassify myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with mild monocytosis as CMML. To characterize the genomic landscape of OM-CMML, we evaluated OM-CMML (n=249), MDS (n=304) and myelodysplastic CMML (MD-CMML, n=358) patients (pts) treated at three academic institutions. Targeted next-generation sequencing was performed on bone marrow (BM) at initial diagnosis or first referral. OM-CMML was characterized by lower frequencies of biallelic TET2 (biTET2) and RAS pathway (RASp) gene mutations (BRAF, CBL, KRAS, NF1, NRAS and PTPN11) compared to MD-CMML (p<0.001) but higher frequencies than MDS (p<0.001). BM monocyte frequencies, assessed morphologically, were higher in OM-CMML than in MDS (p<0.001) but lower than in MD-CMML (p<0.001), indicating that OM-CMML is a heterogenous group including true CMML and distinct MDS subsets. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering based on genomic alterations across all cases (n=911) identified three distinct clusters: 1) TP53 alterations (predominantly multihit TP53) and complex karyotype (TP53-complex); 2) biTET2 or TET2-SRSF2 co-mutation (biTET2/SRSF2); 3) a heterogenous group lacking these features (not otherwise specifiable [NOS]). Among OM-CMML pts, 11%, 34% and 55% belonged to these clusters, respectively. Model-based unsupervised clustering further identified 9 unique clusters that could be consolidated into 6 groups: 1) TP53-complex; 2) biTET2/SRSF2; 3) SF3B1 (without biTET2 or SRSF2); 4) SRSF2 without TET2 and frequent IDH2 mutations (SRSF2-IDH2); 5) ASXL1 and U2AF1 mutations and copy number alterations (CNA-ASXL1/U2AF1); 6) no somatic mutations (No mutation). biTET2/SRSF2 group exhibited monocytic bias with higher AMC, PB and BM monocyte % even among OM-CMML cases. This bias was not attributed to higher RAS pathway mutation frequencies, as biTET2/SRSF2 cases had similar RASp mutation frequencies but lower median variant allele frequencies for RASp mutations compared to NOS cases (9% vs. 21%, p=0.029). PB monocyte partitioning using flow cytometry (FC) in a subset of OM-CMML pts (n=50) demonstrated higher frequency of classical monocytosis (>94% CD14+/CD16- monocytes) in biTET2/SRSF2 vs other OM-CMML. To further determine if biTET2/SRSF2 genotype defines a distinct biological subgroup, we performed RNA-sequencing of BM CD34+ cells from healthy donors (n=15) and pts with OM-CMML (n=12), MD-CMML (n=14) and MDS (n=55). Unsupervised clustering based on gene expression profiles revealed that biTET2/SRSF2 clustered irrespective of their diagnostic group with greater dispersion being observed based on diagnosis. MDS and CMML with biTET2/SRSF2 had less differentially expressed genes compared to MDS and CMML with biTET2/SRSF2 relative to other MDS and CMML genotypes. Among 138 OM-CMML pts in whom progression to overt CMML was evaluable, 37 (27%) progressed to overt CMML of which 26 (70%) belonged to the biTET2/SRSF2 group. Competing risk analysis confirmed higher cumulative incidence and shorter time to CMML progression among biTET2/SRSF2 OM-CMML. Using ElasticNet regression we identified BM monocytosis and 14 genomic variables (including biTET2 and TET2-SRSF2) as predictors of overt CMML progression among OM-CMML. We developed a score-based model able to predict progression with high reliability (AUC 0.805, sensitivity 0.70, specificity 0.76). Model accuracy was confirmed by optimism-corrected bootstrap internal validation (AUC 0.668). Monocytic bias, BM classical monocytosis (>94% CD16- monocytes) and higher overt CMML progression in biTET2/SRSF2 was confirmed in a validation cohort (28, 66 and 22 pts with OM-CMML, MDS and MD-CMML, respectively). BM monocytosis of biTET2/SRSF2 was confirmed in this cohort with morphologic and FC monocyte frequency quantification having high concordance (r=0.737, p<0.001). Genomic subgroup analysis discriminated survival outcomes more reliably than diagnostic categories alone. Our findings suggest that the presence of biTET2 or TET2-SRSF2 co-mutations, combined with BM monocytosis, can more reliably identify true CMML cases within the OM-CMML spectrum. Integrating genomic determinants into the CMML diagnostic framework enhances diagnostic accuracy.

Abstract Background and Significance: CMML is a myeloid neoplasm characterized by hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPCs) monocytic bias, leading to downstream monocyte expansion that plays a key role in disease maintenance and progression. Monocytes in CMML express high surface expression of the homing C-C chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2), which promotes malignant monocyte survival. Expansion of CCR2+ monocytic progenitors drives acute transformation in CMML and contributes to venetoclax resistance in AML. For these reasons, CCR2 is a potential novel therapeutic target in CMML and monocytic AML. The CyTAC platform was designed to enable targeting of cell surface antigens that demonstrate limited or ineffective binding to conventional therapeutic antibodies. A CyTAC is a heterobivalent small molecule that binds to both a target of choice and to a fully humanized monoclonal antibody. STX-0712 comprises a CCR2 CyTAC which potently binds to CCR2 on malignant cells, and a CyTAC humanized ADCC-enabling monoclonal antibody, which when combined eliminates target cells via enhanced effector-mediated killing in the presence of NK cells. We have demonstrated that treatment with STX-0712 ex vivo results in human target engagement and pharmacodynamic activity, and in vivo leads to depletion of CCR2 MO1 monocytes in a potent and dose-dependent manner in CMML and AML (ASH 2024). Therapeutic depletion of CCR2+ malignant monocytes presents a novel opportunity to develop a potential disease-modifying targeted therapeutic agent. We have designed a first-in-human, phase 1 clinical trial to evaluate the effect of CCR2 CyTAC in patients with refractory/resistant CMML, and relapsed/refractory monocytic or monocytic predominant AML. Study Design and Methods This is a phase 1, first-in-human, open-label, multicenter clinical trial based in the USA to evaluate STX-0712 as a monotherapy in patients with CMML and AML who have no remaining treatment options known to confer clinical benefit. STX-0712 will be administered as a single intravenous (IV) infusion every 3 weeks (additional regimen schedules may be explored) until evidence of disease progression, death, intolerance to study medication, or withdrawal of consent. The study consists of a dose-escalation and dose-expansion part and includes two cohorts: Cohort 1 (refractory/resistant CMML) and Cohort 2 (relapsed/refractory monocytic or monocytic predominant AML). Dose escalation will begin in participants with CMML using the Bayesian Optimal Interval (BOIN) design, with a minimum of three patients enrolled at each dose level. Backfilling of up to two cleared dose levels will be initiated once efficacious exposure levels are reached and at least one CMML participant has achieved a complete remission (CR) or a partial remission (PR), marrow response, or clinical benefit as defined by the MDS/MPN IWG 2015 criteria. In the AML cohort, backfilling may begin once at least one participant has achieved a response defined by ELN 2022 criteria. Dose expansion will occur upon completion of dose escalation in each cohort, using a Simon 2-stage adaptive design. Approximately 47 CMML and 58 AML patients may be enrolled in this phase 1 study. The primary objectives of the study are to evaluate the safety and tolerability of STX-0712 and to determine the minimal safe and biologically effective dose, recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), and/or maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and to characterize dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Secondary objectives include evaluation of preliminary antitumor activity, pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, and pharmacodynamic effects of STX-0712 on CCR2+ malignant cells in blood and bone marrow. Key exploratory endpoints include: (1) assessment of changes in CCR2+ tumor cells following STX-0712 dosing, (2) evaluation of candidate biomarkers, (3) characterization of T cells, B cells and NK cells at baseline and over the course of treatment, and (4) to explore the effects of STX-0712 on patient-reported outcomes using the CMML Symptoms Assessment Tool (MPN-SAF-TSS scoring system) and the EuroQoL 5 Dimension 5 level (EQ-5D-5L) for AML. Enrollment for Cohort 1 (CMML) began in March 2025, and the study is ongoing. Clinical Trial Information: NCT06950034

Abstract RAS pathway (RASp) mutations induce proliferative features, and promote transformation in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). However, the unique clonal landscape and hierarchy of distinct RASp mutations remain unexplored. To characterize the landscape, architecture, and implications of unique RASp mutations in CMML, we evaluated a cohort of 814 patients with CMML. We identified 461 RASp mutations among 342 patients (42%). N/KRAS and CBL mutations were the most common, frequently involved the P-loop or RING domains, respectively, and frequently appeared as dominant events (63% and 65%, respectively). BRAF, NF1, and PTPN11 mutations spanned throughout the gene structure, and frequently appeared as subclonal events (75%, 64%, and 59%, respectively). CBL mutations frequently occurred in codominance with SRSF2 and multihit TET2, and were enriched for KIT mutations. PTPN11 mutations more frequently co-occurred with SETBP1 and DNMT3A mutations, and were infrequently codominant with TET2 or ASXL1. RASp mutations predicted for shorter overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-2.07; P = .0075) and leukemia-free survival (LFS; HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.26-2.20; P = .0011), influenced outcomes of myelodysplastic and TET2 mutant CMML, and cooperated with IDH2 and RUNX1 mutations to induce shorter LFS. These data set the bases for refined genomic classifications of CMML, and underscore the need to develop RAS-directed therapies for patients with CMML.

We sought to develop a survival model in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) that is primarily based on clinical variables and examine additional impact from mutations and karyotype. 457 molecularly-annotated patients were considered. Multivariable analysis identified circulating Blasts ≥2% (1 point), Leukocytes ≥13 x 109/L (1 point), and severe (2 points) or moderate (1 point) Anemia as preferred risk variables in developing a clinical risk Stratification Tool for overall survival (OS), acronymized to "BLAST": low-risk (0 points; median 63 months); intermediate-risk (1 point; median 28 months; HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.6-3.0), and high-risk (2-4 points; median 13 months; 5.4, 4.1-7.3); the corresponding 3/5 year OS rates were 68%/53%, 43%/18%, and 12%/1%. BLAST model performance (AUC 0.77/0.85 at 3/5-years) was shown to be comparable to that of the molecular CMML-specific prognostic scoring system (CMML-mol; AUC 0.73/0.75) and the international prognostic scoring system-molecular (IPSS-M; AUC 0.73/0.74). Multivariable analysis of mutations and karyotype identified PHF6MUT and TET2MUT as being "favorable" and DNMT3AMUT, U2AF1MUT, BCORMUT, SETBP1MUT, ASXL1MUT, NRASMUT, PTPN11MUT, RUNX1MUT, TP53MUT, and adverse karyotype, "unfavorable". Molecular information was subsequently encoded in a combined clinical-molecular risk model (BLAST-mol; AUC 0.80/0.86 at 3/5-years) that included the aforementioned BLAST clinical risk variables and a 3-tiered molecular risk score. BLAST and BLAST-mol were subsequently validated by two separate external cohorts. Independent risk factors for blast transformation included DNMT3AMUT, ASXL1MUT, PHF6WT, leukocytes ≥13 x 109/L, and ≥2% circulating or ≥10% bone marrow blasts. The current study proposes an easy to implement, globally applicable, and molecularly adaptive risk model for CMML.

ABSTRACT Patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (ND‐AML) derive variable survival benefit from venetoclax + hypomethylating agent (Ven‐HMA) therapy. The primary objective in the current study was to develop genetic risk models that are predictive of survival and are applicable at the time of diagnosis and after establishing treatment response. Among 400 ND‐AML patients treated with Ven‐HMA at the Mayo Clinic, 247 (62%) achieved complete remission with (CR) or without (CRi) count recovery. Multivariable analysis–derived hazard ratios (HR), including 1.8 for European LeukemiaNet (ELN) adverse karyotype, 4.7 for KMT2Ar , 1.7 for TP53 MUT , 2.6 for KRAS MUT , and 2.1 for IDH2 WT were applied to develop an HR‐weighted risk model: low, intermediate, and high; respective median survival censored for allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) (3‐year survival) were “not reached” (67%), 19.1 (33%), and 7.1 months (0%). In patients achieving CR/CRi, adverse karyotype, KMT2Ar , KRAS MUT , IDH2 WT predicted inferior survival, allowing for a complementary response‐stratified risk model. The model was externally validated and was shown to be superior to the ELN 2024 risk model (AIC 179 vs. 195 and AUC 0.77 vs. 0.69). Survival was inferior with failure to achieve CR/CRi or not receiving ASCT; 3‐year survival for high‐risk with or without ASCT was 42% versus 0% ( p < 0.01); intermediate 72% versus 43% ( p = 0.06); and low‐risk 88% versus 78% ( p = 0.53). The Mayo genetic risk models offer pre‐treatment and response‐based prognostic tools for ND‐AML treated with Ven‐HMA. The current study underscores the prognostically indispensable role of achieving CR/CRi and ASCT.

Introduction: Somatic mutations in RAS pathway genes are present in ~30% of patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) and are usually associated with myeloproliferative features. Whether mutations in distinct RAS pathway genes share similar genomic context and have similar implications remains unknown. Such an understanding might inform future studies evaluating genotype-specific therapies (RAS-codon specific and pan-RAS inhibitors) or cooperative leukemogenic mechanisms. This multicenter study examines the landscape of RAS pathway mutations (RASMT) in CMML. Methods: Newly diagnosed CMML patients evaluated at MD Anderson Cancer Center (n=449, 54%) and Mayo Clinic (n=383, n=46%) were included after IRB approval. Clonal relationships were tested using Pearson goodness-of-fit. Clones with the highest variant allele frequency (VAF), or with VAF close to 40% were defined as dominant, and those present at VAF &lt;20% in the presence of another dominant clone were defined as subclonal. RASMT genes included NRAS, KRAS, BRAF, CBL, CBLC, PTPN11 and NF1. Standard statistical measures were applied. Results: Among 832 CMML patients (median age 71 years, 68% male) 387 (47%) had myeloproliferative (MP) and 445 (53%) had myelodysplastic (MD) CMML. A total of 350 (42%) patients had RASMT with higher prevalence among MP-CMML compared to MD-CMML (55% vs 31%, p&lt;0.001). Among patients with RASMT, 262 (32%), 59 (7%), 20 (2%), 6 (&lt;1%) and 3 (&lt;1%) had 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 distinct RASMT, respectively. Importantly, 17 patients harbored a RASmt as the only detectable somatic mutation, with KRASMT being the most frequent (n=10, 59%), including 3 (18%) patients with &gt;1 RASMT. Among RASMT patients, a trend for higher hemoglobin (12.7 vs 10.8 g/dL, p=0.054) was observed in NF1MT CMML and lower WBC (14.4 vs 27.9 x109/L, p=0.067) values in CBLMT CMML. In total, 479 somatic mutations in RAS pathway genes were identified the most frequent involving NRAS (n=169, 35%) followed by CBL (n=120, 25%), KRAS (n=102, 21%), PTPN11 (n=38, 8%), NF1 (n=34, 7%), BRAF (n=11, 2%) and CBLC (n=5, 1%). Most frequently involved codons for each RAS pathway gene were as follows: G594 (n=3) for BRAF, R420 (n=22) and C404 (n=15) for CBL, G12 (n=41; G12D: 13, G12C: 3) and A146 (n=16) for KRAS, G12 (n=116; G12D: 74, G12C: 5) for NRAS and A72 (n=8) for PTPN11. CBLMT CMML had higher ASXL1 (58% vs 44%, p=0.011), BRAF (8% vs 4%, p=0.017), IDH2 (10% vs 4%, p=0.024), KIT (5% vs 1%, p=0.038), SRSF2 (54% vs 40%, p=0.004), TET2 (59% vs 47%, p=0.019) and ZRSR2 (10% vs 4%, p=0.014) co-mutation frequency. Of note, DNMT3A mutations were mutually exclusive of CBLMT CMML (0% vs 7%, p=0.007), and multihit TET2 was more common among TET2MT/CBLMT vs TET2MT/CBLWT CMML (82% vs 67%, p =0.039). CMML with NF1 mutations had higher BCORL1 (8% vs 0%, p=0.005), PTPN11 (15% vs 3%, p=0.014) and SETBP1 (23% vs 8%, p=0.022) mutational cooccurrences. NRASMT CMML was enriched for ASXL1 (53% vs 43%, p=0.042), ETNK1 (5% vs 1%, p=0.004), GATA2 (4% vs 1%, p=0.034) and STAG2 (4% vs 1 %, p=0.023) mutations but had lower JAK2 (1% vs 6%, p=0.036) and TP53 (1% vs 5%, p=0.022) mutational frequency. PTPN11 mutations were associated with higher NF1 (29% vs 7%, p=0.014), SETBP1 (27% vs 9%, p=0.01) and WT1 (6% vs &lt;1%, p=0.014) mutational cooccurrences and lower SRSF2 (23% vs 42%, p=0.05) frequency. We evaluated RAS mutant clonal dominance in 253 (72%) RASMT patients. NRAS (63% vs 38%), KRAS (63% vs 38%) and CBL (65% vs 35%) mutations were more frequently observed as dominant clones while PTPN11 (44% vs 56%), BRAF (25% vs 75%) and NF1 (35% vs 65%) mutations were more frequently subclonal events, particularly of TET2, ASXL1 or SRSF2 mutant clones. Presence of a RAS pathway mutation was associated with shorter LFS (36 vs 53 months, HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.2, p=0.020), with presence of multiple RAS mutations shortening LFS further (53, 43, 27 months for 0, 1 and &gt;1, p=0.017). PTPN11 mutations predicted for shorter OS (18 vs 39 months, HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.0-2.8, p=0.035) and LFS (14 vs 36 months, HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2-2.9, p=0.008). Presence of &gt;1 RAS pathway mutation was associated with shorter OS in ASXL1MT/TET2MT CMML compared to those with no RAS mutations (24 vs 53 months, HR 4.2, 95% CI 1.6-10.8, p=0.004). Conclusions: RAS mutations exhibit distinct genomic features and clonal hierarchy in CMML and cooperate with other somatic mutations to drive clinical outcomes. This study forms the foundation for assessment of novel RAS pathway inhibitors in CMML.

Introduction Patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) have a poor prognosis and, until recently, lacked therapeutic options. Ivosidenib (IVO) is an oral, targeted, small-molecule inhibitor of mIDH1. In October 2023, IVO was granted FDA approval for the treatment of adult pts with mIDH1 R/R MDS on the basis of results from the pivotal AG120-C-001 MDS substudy (NCT02074839); IVO showed an acceptable safety profile and induced durable remissions, with a high rate (38.9%) of complete remissions (CR) per International Working Group (IWG) 2006 criteria (DiNardo et al. Blood Adv 2024; bloodadvances.2023012302.). Response criteria evolve to better reflect clinical benefit in specific pt populations and reduce interobserver variability. The updated IWG 2023 criteria for higher-risk MDS lowered the hemoglobin threshold for CR, added response categories for pts with &lt;5% blasts or limited count recovery, and eliminated the marrow CR (mCR) category. Herein we analyze responses, transfusion independence (TI), and survival outcomes of pts treated with IVO according to IWG 2023 criteria. In addition, responses assessed per IWG 2023 and IWG 2006 criteria are compared. Methods Pts with mIDH1 R/R MDS who had received prior SOC therapy were eligible. Oral IVO 500 mg was administered daily on days 1-28 of 28-day cycles. Responses were assessed per IWG 2023 criteria, and a composite CR (CRc) category was included in the analysis, which comprises all CR categories: CR + CR equivalent (CRe) + CR with limited count recovery (CRL) + CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh). Overall response rate (ORR) was defined as CR + mCR + partial remission (PR) per IWG 2006 criteria, and as CRc + PR + hematologic improvement (HI) per IWG 2023 criteria. For TI analysis, non-CRc was defined as HI + PR + no response (NR)/not evaluable + progressive disease. TI was defined as requiring no transfusion for ≥56 days. Results In total, 19 pts were enrolled (median age: 73 yr; prior hypomethylating therapy: 78.9%) and data from 18 efficacy-evaluable pts were analyzed. CR + PR rate (primary endpoint) per IWG 2006 was 38.9%, with all 7 (38.9%) responders having CR. CRc + PR rate per IWG 2023 was 66.7% (n=12), with all responders having CRc, including 5 (27.8%) pts with CR, 3 (16.7%) with CRe, and 4 (22.2%) with CRL (CR unilineage [CRLuni], n=2 [11.1%]; CR bilineage [CRLbi], n=2 [11.1%]); no pt had CRh or PR. ORR was 83.3% per IWG 2006, with 7 (38.9%) pts having CR and 8 (44.4%) mCR; 4 (22.2%) pts with mCR had HI. Per IWG 2023 criteria, the ORR was 72.2%, with 12 (66.7%) pts having CRc and 1 (5.6%) HI with neutrophil response. The 8 mCR per IWG 2006 criteria were reclassified as 1 CR, 4 CRL (2 CRLuni and 2 CRLbi), 1 HI, and 2 NR per IWG 2023. Median time to CRc was 1.58 mo. Median duration of CRc was not reached and Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates at 3, 6, and 12 mo were 90.9%, 81.8%, and 68.2%, respectively. Five (CRc group n=4; non-CRc group n=1) of 7 (71.4%) and 3 (CRc, n=1; non-CRc, n=2) of 4 pts requiring red blood cell (RBC) and platelet transfusion at baseline, respectively, had TI. Median time to any (RBC/platelet) TI was 2.64 and 2.43 mo for pts with CRc and non-CRc, respectively. Moreover, 10 of 12 (83.3%) pts with CRc and 3 of 6 (50%) with non-CRc had or maintained TI during the study. Median duration of TI was not reached and KM estimates at 3 and 6 mo were 90.0% and 65.6%, respectively, for pts with CRc and 100% and 66.7% for non-CRc. Median event-free survival (EFS) was not reached for pts with CRc (n=12) or NR (n=5), and KM estimates at 1 yr were 68.2% and 53.3%, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached for pts with CRc and was 16.5 mo for pts with NR. For pts with CRc, OS KM estimates at 1, 3, and 5 yr were 90.9%, 51.1%, and 51.1%, respectively. For pts with NR, OS KM estimates were 75% at 1 yr and not estimable at 3 and 5 yr. For the pt with HI, the EFS estimate at 1 yr was 100% and OS estimates were 100% at 1, 3, and 5 yr. Conclusions IVO resulted in a high ORR (72.2%) according to IWG 2023 criteria, including a 66.7% CRc rate, despite the removal of the mCR category. Of 8 mCR per IWG 2006 criteria, 5 (62.5%) were reclassified as CRc per IWG 2023 criteria. By eliminating mCR and assessing response in a high-risk population with &lt;5% blasts, IWG 2023 criteria accurately capture the clinical benefit of IVO in R/R MDS. While comparison of survival outcomes between IWG 2006 and IWG 2023 is limited by the small sample size, a similar trend with response-dependent EFS and OS outcomes was observed.