Carr, Ryan M

Anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) is a rare malignancy, with most cases associated with human papilloma virus and an increased incidence in immunocompromised patients. Progress in management of ASCC has been limited not only due to its rarity, but also the associated lack of research funding and social stigma. Historically, standard of care for invasive ASCC has been highly morbid surgical resection, requiring a permanent colostomy. Surgery was associated with disease recurrence in approximately half of the patients. However, the use of chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C) concomitantly with radiation in the 1970s resulted in disease regression, curing a subset of patients and sparing them from morbid surgery. Validation of the use of systemic therapy in prospective trials was not achieved until approximately 20 years later. In this review, advancements and shortcomings in the use of systemic therapy in the management of ASCC will be discussed. Not only will standard-of-care systemic therapies for locoregional and metastatic disease be reviewed, but the evolving role of novel treatment strategies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, HPV-based vaccines, and molecularly targeted therapies will also be covered. While advances in ASCC treatment have remained largely incremental, with increased biological insight, an increasing number of promising systemic treatment modalities are being explored.

Key Points Systemic immune microenvironment signatures in CMML indicate an altered T- and natural killer cell balance. CMML bone marrow dendritic cell aggregates associate with disease progression and systemic regulatory T-cell phenotypic switch.

Introduction: Truncating mutations in Additional Sex Combs-Like 1 (ASXL1) are associated with a high-risk disease phenotype in myeloid malignancies. In chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), truncating ASXL1 mutations are known to increase transcriptional activity of leukemic driver genes and have been associated with gene body hypermethylation. We interrogated the transcriptome and methylome of patients with ASXL1-mutant (MT) and -wildtype (WT) CMML using a multi-omics approach to test the hypothesis that gene expression is mediated through gene body methylation. Methods: Bone marrow mononuclear cells from patients with ASXL1 WT (n=8) and MT (n=8) CMML were subjected to targeted NGS of DNA, whole transcriptome shotgun sequencing (RNA-seq), and immunoprecipitation of DNA methyl residues (DIP-seq). After quality control all samples were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 4000 before further processing and data analysis. Differential gene expression analysis was performed to identify genes up-regulated in MT CMML. The samples in the two groups were treated as biological replicates and subjected to a consensus peak calling strategy requiring an overlap of at least 30% between samples and an adjusted p-value < 5x10-5 for a methylation peak to be considered statistically significant. For validation purposes methylation analysis was performed on 3 ASXL1 MT and 3 WT CMML patients using Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC microarrays and differentially methylated regions were identified using a bump hunting strategy. Gene body methylation was defined as methylation in gene bodies (outside the promoter region, i.e. transcription start site ±2kb). Gene body methylation was compared between WT and MT CMML for the up-regulated genes and correlated with expression of all genes in MT CMML. Results: Sixteen WHO-defined CMML patients were included, median age 69 years (48-77), 63% male, 50% had truncating ASXL1 frame shift mutations. Abnormal karyotypes were observed in the same number of patients and the burden of co-mutations was similar between the two groups (median number per group 3 vs. 3, p=0.508). This included several modulators of DNA methylation including TET2, DNMT3A, and IDH2 (median number per group 1 vs. 1, p=0.699). There was a predominant up-regulation of gene expression in MT CMML: 707 genes up- and 124 down-regulated (FDR<0.050) without evidence of differential methylation in promoter regions of the differentially expressed genes. There was no difference in the number of genes with consensus methylation peaks in the gene body or the extent of gene body methylation (area under the consensus peaks) between MT and WT CMML for the differentially expressed genes (Figure 1a). We further validated these results using methylation microarrays (Figure 1b). Among the MT CMML patients, there was a curvilinear relationship between gene body methylation and gene expression across all genes with intermediate gene body methylation being associated with the highest gene expression (Figure 1c). As an alternative unbiased approach, we identified 1595 differentially methylated regions (DMR, regions with FDR<0.05) in the validation data set. We mapped all hypermethylated regions to gene bodies requiring that there was no concurrent hypermethylation of the promoter region of the same gene. With this approach we identified one of the 707 up-regulated genes (0.14%) with evidence of isolated gene body hypermethylation (HBZ, log2-fold change in gene expression 4.25, FDR=0.0008, DMR area=1.61, DMR FDR=0.018). Representative examples of up-regulated mitotic kinases without evidence of differential gene body methylation are shown in Figure 1d (pie charts represent the mean β-values of microarray probes, p-values represent the comparisons of mean β-values between MT and WT CMML per gene). Conclusions: Gene body methylation was positively associated with gene expression in MT CMML. However, the lack of differential gene body methylation between WT and MT CMML for the up-regulated genes make it an unlikely explanation for the observed increase in transcriptional activity among patients with MT CMML. Figure 1 Disclosures Ordog: Millipore Sigma: Patents & Royalties.

Introduction: Additional Sex Combs-Like 1 (ASXL1) is a chromatin modifier frequently affected by truncating mutations in myeloid malignancies. In chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), truncating ASXL1 mutations are associated with the overexpression of leukemogenic driver genes, however the molecular mechanisms underlying this transcriptional activation remain controversial. We performed single-cell chromatin accessibility studies of ASXL1-mutant (MT) and -wildtype (WT) CMML to identify cis-regulatory elements (CREs) such as distal enhancer elements that may explain the observed transcriptional activity in MT CMML. Methods: Bone marrow mononuclear cells from a patient with WT and a patient with MT CMML were subjected to single-cell DNA transposase accessibility studies (scATAC-seq). The cryopreserved cells were thawed and resuspended and approximately 100000 viable mononuclear cells per sample were subjected to transposase assays before proceeding to single-cell partitioning into gel beads in emulsion, barcoding, library construction, and sequencing following an established 10X Genomics workflow. The target cell recovery was approximately 2000 cells per sample. Genomic libraries were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 4000 before demultiplexing, alignment to the reference genome, and post-alignment quality control. The 10X Genomics Cell Ranger ATAC software was used for demultiplexing, alignment of the reads to the GRCh38 reference genome, filtering and quality control, counting of barcodes and unique molecular identifiers, identification of transposase cut sites, detection of accessible chromatin peaks, count matrix generation for peaks and transcription factors, clustering, and differential accessibility analysis. The two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for equality of distribution functions was used to compare the distributions of single-cell entropies. Single-cell cis-co-accessibility scores were estimated using Cicero. Results: To mitigate potential effects on the analysis introduced by unequal cell recovery due to experimental conditions, we randomly sampled 1500 single cells from each genotype. Visualizing the first two principal components of the chromatin accessibility data revealed the differences in chromatin conformation between genotypes and also the increased heterogeneity within the MT sample (Figure 1a). To quantify this increase in intratumoral heterogeneity of chromatin accessibility in MT CMML, we calculated the single-cell entropies for both genotypes. There was an increase in the dispersion of single-cell entropy values (mean 0.793±0.026 versus 0.811±0.012, p=6.19x10-151) in MT compared to WT disease (Figure 1b). To leverage the power of the single-cell chromatin accessibility data, we estimated cis-co-accessibility scores (two-way chromatin interactions). There were 631 genes involved in two-way chromatin interactions that were either specific to MT CMML or were shared between MT and WT CMML and showed an increase in co-accessibility in MT CMML. Co-accessibility was higher in MT compared to WT CMML, regardless whether the chromatin interaction was MT-specific or shared between the genotypes (Figure 1c). Gene ontology analysis revealed increased chromatin accessibility in genes involved in the regulation of cell cycle, nuclear division, chromosome organization, cell cycle phase transition, DNA conformation change, and DNA replication (FDR<1.00x10-5). The construction of cis-co-accessibility networks demonstrated a remodeling of the chromatin landscape with MT-specific chromatin interactions involving key mitotic kinases such as MAP2K3 (Figure 1d). Conclusions: MT CMML is characterized by an increase in intratumoral heterogeneity and increased chromatin accessibility. The increased chromatin co-accessibility involved key mitotic kinases and may serve as a plausible explanation for the increased transcriptional activity observed in MT CMML. Figure 1 Disclosures Ordog: Millipore Sigma: Patents & Royalties.

Abstract Chromosome region maintenance protein 1 (CRM1) mediates protein export from the nucleus and is a new target for anticancer therapeutics. Broader application of KPT-330 (selinexor), a first-in-class CRM1 inhibitor recently approved for relapsed multiple myeloma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, have been limited by substantial toxicity. We discovered that salicylates markedly enhance the antitumor activity of CRM1 inhibitors by extending the mechanisms of action beyond CRM1 inhibition. Using salicylates in combination enables targeting of a range of blood cancers with a much lower dose of selinexor, thereby potentially mitigating prohibitive clinical adverse effects. Choline salicylate (CS) with low-dose KPT-330 (K+CS) had potent, broad activity across high-risk hematological malignancies and solid-organ cancers ex vivo and in vivo. The K+CS combination was not toxic to nonmalignant cells as compared with malignant cells and was safe without inducing toxicity to normal organs in mice. Mechanistically, compared with KPT-330 alone, K+CS suppresses the expression of CRM1, Rad51, and thymidylate synthase proteins, leading to more efficient inhibition of CRM1-mediated nuclear export, impairment of DNA-damage repair, reduced pyrimidine synthesis, cell-cycle arrest in S-phase, and cell apoptosis. Moreover, the addition of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors further potentiates the K+CS antitumor effect. K+CS represents a new class of therapy for multiple types of blood cancers and will stimulate future investigations to exploit DNA-damage repair and nucleocytoplasmic transport for cancer therapy in general.

The Hedgehog-regulated transcription factors GLI1 and GLI2 play overlapping roles in development and disease; however, the mechanisms underlying their interplay remain elusive. We report for the first time that GLI1 and GLI2 physically and functionally interact in cancer cells. GLI1 and GLI2 were shown to co-immunoprecipitate in PANC1 pancreatic cancer cells and RMS13 rhabdomyosarcoma cells. Mapping analysis demonstrated that the zinc finger domains of both proteins are required for their heteromerization. RNAi knockdown of either GLI1 or GLI2 inhibited expression of many well-characterized GLI target genes (BCL2, MYCN, PTCH2, IL7 and CCND1) in PANC1 cells, whereas PTCH1 expression was only inhibited by GLI1 depletion. qPCR screening of a large set of putative canonical and non-canonical Hedgehog/GLI targets identified further genes (e.g. E2F1, BMP1, CDK2) strongly down-regulated by GLI1 and/or GLI2 depletion in PANC1 cells, and demonstrated that ANO1, AQP1 and SOCS1 are up-regulated by knockdown of either GLI1 or GLI2. Chromatin immunoprecipitation showed that GLI1 and GLI2 occupied the same regions at the BCL2, MYCN and CCND1 promoters. Furthermore, depletion of GLI1 inhibited GLI2 occupancy at these promoters, suggesting that GLI1/GLI2 interaction is required for the recruitment of GLI2 to these sites. Together, these findings indicate that GLI1 and GLI2 co-ordinately regulate the transcription of some genes, and provide mechanistic insight into the roles of GLI proteins in carcinogenesis.

Abstract Summary: In this issue, Hou and colleagues present their exciting work demonstrating that, through remodeling of the local tumor microenvironment (TME), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma forms a tumor-supportive niche capable of liberating cancer cells from dependence on oncogenic KRAS signaling. Through extensive experimentation both in vitro and in vivo, the authors reveal that the HDAC5–CCL2 axis drives the recruitment of tumor-associated macrophages to the TME to provide trophic signaling. See related article by Hou et al., p. 1058.