Offer, Steven M

Abstract 5-Fluorouracil (5FU)-based chemotherapy remains a front-line treatment for most patients with colorectal cancer. However, approximately 30% of patients who receive 5FU experience severe, life-threatening toxicity. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD, DPYD gene) mediates the rate determining step in 5FU catabolism. Deleterious genetic variations in DPYD have been associated with elevated concentrations of circulating 5FU and significantly increased risk for 5FU toxicity. Five deleterious variants in DPYD have been identified as clinical biomarkers of toxicity and have led to prospective genotyping and differential dosing recommendations for carriers of these variants, as noted on recent updates to the FDA label for the 5-FU prodrug capecitabine. Our previous studies also established the importance of epigenetic control of DPD expression. In this study, we used existing epigenetic repositories to identify candidate enhancer elements for DPYD. We selected 20 novel high-priority putative enhancers for further study using a combination of reporter assays and CRISPRi applied across multiple cell models. Further studies will investigate means to target these regulatory mechanisms as a means to increase localized efficacy of 5-FU-based therapies in colorectal cancer. Citation Format: Hannah Marie Krause, Julia Magee, Kelly Bouchonville, Lauryn Allyn Hahn, Ryan Jonathan Swartz, Brianna Bembenek, Lulu Jiang, Steven M. Offer. Characterizing the critical role of enhancer-gene regulation in 5-fluorouracil toxicity and resistance [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 3140.

Abstract Nearly 300,000 cancer patients are treated with fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy in the U.S. annually. Approximately one-third of patients experience severe and life-threatening toxicities, which can result in death. Deleterious genetic variants in DPYD, which encodes the rate-limiting enzyme of fluoropyrimidine catabolism (dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, DPD), have been correlated with severe toxicity in clinical studies. However, these variants explain only 10-30% of toxicity cases. Phenotypic measures of DPD function are attractive biomarkers of fluoropyrimidine toxicity risk with the potential to identify unknown causes of DPD deficiency. In this study, we compared two measures of DPD enzyme activity, blood plasma dihydrouracil to uracil ratio (UH2:U) and direct measurement of DPD activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) using 204 subjects with comprehensive DPYD genotype data. DPD PBMC measurements showed higher overall inter-individual variation compared to UH2:U ratios. Low correlation between UH2:U and PBMC measurements were noted for matched samples taken from the same subject. As expected, DPD metabolites (U and UH2) correlated with UH2:U ratio; however, no correlation was noted between U or UH2 levels and the PBMC DPD activity. Furthermore, when data were analyzed by genotype, no correlations were noted between UH2:U and PBMC DPD activity. We observed the expected decrease in UH2:U ratio for carriers of the four clinically tested DPYD variants and identified two novel variants associated with a significantly decreased UH2:U ratio. To further investigate the impact of rare genotypes and previously identified DPYD haplotypes on the UH2:U ratio, additional cohorts of 1994 and 500 subjects, enriched for specific genotypes, were utilized. Our results suggest that phenotyping may have limited validity as a single test when predicting DPD deficiency at an individual level and call into question the often-reported belief that PBMC DPD activity represents the "gold standard" for identifying DPD deficiency. Additional studies are needed to investigate correlations between phenotypic measures and 5-FU toxicity in patients, potentially as secondary biomarkers in conjunction with genetic tests. Citation Format: Brianna Bembenek, Kelly Bouchonville, Carlo Largiadèr, Steven M. Offer. Comparative analysis of phenotypic markers of DPD activity as biomarkers of 5-FU toxicity [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 3135.

Abstract Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD, encoded by the DPYD gene) is the rate-limiting enzyme in the catabolism of the widely used chemotherapeutic drug 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Genetic variations in DPYD are predictive biomarkers of 5-FU toxicity. One such biomarker, rs75017182 (the causal allele linked to the “HapB3” haplotype), has been suggested to promote alternative splicing of DPYD, leading to expression of an inactive proteoform. However, carriers of rs75017182 exhibit only moderately increased risk of 5-FU toxicity and modestly decreased ex vivo DPD activity compared to carriers of another well-studied splice variant, rs3918290 (*2A). We hypothesized that, unlike *2A, the rs75017182 variant does not cause obligate alternative splicing but instead promotes partial alternative splicing. To test this, we generated dual-fluorescent minigene reporter constructs containing either the G (wildtype) or C (variant) allele. In our minigene system, alternative splicing was elevated in cells transfected with C-containing vectors via flow cytometry, though levels were lower than those observed in a parallel *2A model. To investigate contributions of other variants in LD with rs75017182, we expanded the reporter to include additional relevant genomic regions. The analyses were complemented by the study of in vivo splicing in cells engineered to harbor various combinations of variants and in lymphoblastoid lines carrying specific genotype combinations. Overall, our findings demonstrate that rs75017182-C promotes only partial alternative splicing, eliciting a modest decrease in DPD activity and explaining its comparatively weak association with severe 5-FU toxicity. Additional variants in LD have a minimal impact on splicing and 5-FU sensitivity. Citation Format: Lauryn Allyn Hahn, Ryan Schwartz, Hannah Marie Krause, Lulu Jiang, Brianna Bembenek, Kelly Bouchonville, Steven M. Offer. Partial alternative splicing in carriers of DPYD rs75017182 explains modest association with severe 5-FU toxicity to 5-FU [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 3137.

Abstract 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is a widely prescribed chemotherapy for colorectal, breast, gastric, and head and neck cancers. The drug inhibits thymidylate synthase, blocking DNA synthesis and causing cytotoxic stress that halts tumor growth. However, patients carrying deleterious variants in DPYD, the gene encoding the rate-limiting enzyme in 5-FU metabolism (dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, DPD), can experience fatal toxicity due to impaired drug clearance and accumulation of 5-FU metabolites. Current pharmacogenetic screening guidelines in the U.S. recommend testing for few of the >2,000 nonsynonymous variants that have been reported for DPYD, leaving patients with rare, uncharacterized mutations at risk. To interpret expanded testing, however, a means to classify DPYD variants of unknown significance is needed. To address this, we developed MPACT-DPD, a random-forest-based classifier that accurately predicts the functional impact of DPYD missense variants. Our model was trained on in-vitro activity of 156 variants and leveraged a feature set of biochemical, evolutionary, and AlphaFold3-derived structural features. We optimized hyperparameters using ten-fold stratified cross-validation and evaluated model performance with Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) to account for moderate class imbalance (7:3 neutral to deleterious). It achieved exceptional performance, with a Matthews correlation coeffient (MCC) of 0.906 and an accuracy of 95.1% on an independent validation set (n=43). Furthermore, a SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations)-based interpretability analysis revealed cofactor proximity and residue conservation as the key drivers of predictions. MPACT-DPD showed superior performance at variant classification against other tools, including a DPYD gene-specific variant classifier, and has the potential to expand pre-treatment genetic screening to improve the safety of personalized 5-FU-based chemotherapy. Citation Format: Lulu Jiang, Ryan Jonathan Swartz, Lauryn Allyn Hahn, Brianna Bembenek, Hannah Marie Krause, Kelly Bouchonville, Steven M. Offer. MPACT-DPD: An interpretable machine learning classifier for predicting the functional impact of DPYD missense variants [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 2712.

Enhancers are critical for regulating tissue-specific gene expression, and genetic variants within enhancer regions have been suggested to contribute to various cancer-related processes, including therapeutic resistance. However, the precise mechanisms remain elusive. Using a well-defined drug-gene pair, we identified an enhancer region for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD, DPYD gene) expression that is relevant to the metabolism of the anti-cancer drug 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Using reporter systems, CRISPR genome-edited cell models, and human liver specimens, we demonstrated in vitro and vivo that genotype status for the common germline variant (rs4294451; 27% global minor allele frequency) located within this novel enhancer controls DPYD transcription and alters resistance to 5-FU. The variant genotype increases recruitment of the transcription factor CEBPB to the enhancer and alters the level of direct interactions between the enhancer and DPYD promoter. Our data provide insight into the regulatory mechanisms controlling sensitivity and resistance to 5-FU.

Abstract Proximity labeling catalyzed by promiscuous enzymes, such as APEX2, has emerged as a powerful approach to characterize multiprotein complexes and protein–protein interactions. However, current methods depend on the expression of exogenous fusion proteins and cannot be applied to identify proteins surrounding post-translationally modified proteins. To address this limitation, we developed a new method to label proximal proteins of interest by antibody-mediated protein A-ascorbate peroxidase 2 (pA-APEX2) labeling (AMAPEX). In this method, a modified protein is bound in situ by a specific antibody, which then tethers a pA-APEX2 fusion protein. Activation of APEX2 labels the nearby proteins with biotin; the biotinylated proteins are then purified using streptavidin beads and identified by mass spectrometry. We demonstrated the utility of this approach by profiling the proximal proteins of histone modifications including H3K27me3, H3K9me3, H3K4me3, H4K5ac, and H4K12ac, as well as verifying the co-localization of these identified proteins with bait proteins by published ChIP-seq analysis and nucleosome immunoprecipitation. Overall, AMAPEX is an efficient method to identify proteins that are proximal to modified histones.

Abstract Abstract 2655 Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has been classified into two distinct molecular subtypes: germinal center B cell–like (GCB), non-germinal centre-like (non-GCB). To improve outcomes for DLBCL patients, it is necessary to identify additional novel targets within GCB and non-GCB classifications to further stratify patients for prognosis and assist in choosing therapy for the individual patient. We have recently demonstrated that STAT3 activation is frequent in the DLBCL tumors, however the exact molecular mechanism(s) of STAT3 activation in DLBCL tumors are not known. Molecular mechanisms such as epigenetic silencing of negative regulators of the STAT3 pathway such as protein tyrosine phosphatase 6 (PTPN6) may contribute to STAT3 activation. We aimed to learn whether PTPN6 was expressed in GCB and non-GCB DLBCL, and if so, how that expression correlated with STAT3 activation and prognosis. We first performed epigenetic studies of PTPN6 in 38 DLBCL tumors and 6 DLBCL cell lines by methylation specific (MSP) PCR and high resolution melting array (HRM) methods. Surprisingly, PTPN6 promoter hypermethylation (0/38) was not detected in patient sample and cell lines by both the methods. Since the MSP PCR technique yields qualitative rather than quantitative data, we next performed pyrosequencing on the 38 DLBCL samples, and found results consistent with the MSP PCR analysis. Our data conclusively demonstrate that PTPN6 hypermethylation is absent in DLBCL tumors. We next sequenced the 600 bp upstream of the transcription initiation site of PTPN6 promoter 2 and 1 in 10 DLBCL tumors. We did not detect any point mutations in the promoter 2 and 1 core regions. Since PTPN6 promoter hypermethylation and mutations were absent in DLBCL tumors, we determined the expression level of the PTPN6 protein in 40 DLBCL tumors by molecular subtype. Formalin fixed paraffin-embedded DLBCL tumor samples were stained by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for the determination of molecular subtype using the Hans algorithm and the detection of PTPN6 expression. Using a threshold of ≥30%, 75% (30/40) of cases were PTPN6 positive with various levels of expression: 11 cases had 30–80% of tumor cells staining positive and 19 had >80% of cells PTPN6 positive. PTPN6 expression by IHC was only correlated with higher IPI scores and a trend towards a shorter event free survival (EFS) (p=0.07). Within the 29 GCB tumors 69% (20/29) were PTPN6 positive; 100% (10/10) of non-GCB cases were PTPN6 positive. These data clearly suggest that PTPN6 expression is found in both GCB and non-GCB with the latter being uniformly positive (p=0.03) and PTPN6 negative cases being uniformly GCB. PTPN6 mRNA and protein was detected in all three ABC lines (LY3, Ly10, DHL2). Within the GCB lines (DHL6, Ly1 and Ly19) DHL6 was weakly positive and Ly1 and Ly19 were negative for PTPN6 mRNA and protein. Furthermore, within the GCB group PTPN6 positive cases had inferior EFS as compared to PTPN6 negative cases. In the non-GCB group all cases were PTPN6 positive with an EFS similar to PTPN6 positive GCB cases. The role of PTPN6 in the persistent activation of the STAT3 pathway in DLBCL patients has not been investigated. We hypothesized that tumors with activated STAT3 would have loss of PTPN6. Interestingly, this hypothesis was disproven. Within the 15-pSTAT3 positive cases 12 (80%) were PTPN6 positive. Conversely, 26% (6/23) of the pSTAT3 negative cases were PTPN6 negative. The distribution of pSTAT3 and PTPN6 by IHC in samples was evaluated in both GCB and non-GCB groups. Within the PTPN6+/pSTAT3+ group out of the 12 cases most were non-GCB (8/12; 66%). However, within the PTPN6-/pSTAT3- group all the 5 cases were GCB (5/5; 100%). Survival analysis revealed that the groups with the best EFS were those with PTPN6-/pSTAT3- tumors (n=5); those with PTPN6+/pSTAT3+ group (n=12) had the shortest EFS; and those with PTPN6+/pSTAT3- tumors (n=17) being intermediate between the other groups. In summary, we have demonstrated for the first time that PTPN6 is highly expressed in DLBCL tumors, and a common abnormality in non-GCB subtypes, which is positively correlated with activated STAT3. PTPN6 expression in the DLBCLs is not regulated through SHP1 promoter hypermethylation or point mutations. The finding that SHP1 loss was found only in GCB cases and was especially favorable should be explored further and may provide an important new stratification factor for future DLBCL studies. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.