Back to Authors

Zhou, Jiaqi

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9285-8914

Mayo Clinic

Chinese Academy of Sciences

Citations 3

Defective transfer of parental histone decreases frequency of homologous recombination by increasing free histone pools in budding yeast
Karri, Srinivasu , Yang, Yi , Dickinson, Quinn , Jia, Jing , Huang, Yuxin , Wang, Zhiquan , Gan, Haiyun , Yu, Chuanhe , Yu, Chuanhe , Zhou, Jiaqi , Wang, Zhiquan

Nucleic Acids Research | March 8, 2024 | Volume: 52 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 5138-5151

10.1093/nar/gkae205 Get It

Abstract Recycling of parental histones is an important step in epigenetic inheritance. During DNA replication, DNA polymerase epsilon subunit DPB3/DPB4 and DNA replication helicase subunit MCM2 are involved in the transfer of parental histones to the leading and lagging strands, respectively. Single Dpb3 deletion (dpb3Δ) or Mcm2 mutation (mcm2-3A), which each disrupts one parental histone transfer pathway, leads to the other's predominance. However, the biological impact of the two histone transfer pathways on chromatin structure and DNA repair remains elusive. In this study, we used budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to determine the genetic and epigenetic outcomes from disruption of parental histone H3–H4 tetramer transfer. We found that a dpb3Δ mcm2-3A double mutant did not exhibit the asymmetric parental histone patterns caused by a single dpb3Δ or mcm2-3A mutation, suggesting that the processes by which parental histones are transferred to the leading and lagging strands are independent. Surprisingly, the frequency of homologous recombination was significantly lower in dpb3Δ, mcm2-3A and dpb3Δ mcm2-3A mutants, likely due to the elevated levels of free histones detected in the mutant cells. Together, these findings indicate that proper transfer of parental histones during DNA replication is essential for maintaining chromatin structure and that lower homologous recombination activity due to parental histone transfer defects is detrimental to cells.
Extrachromosomal DNA Couples with ATM-mediated DNA Damage Response for Genome Instability in Tumors
Gan, Haiyun , Zhou, Jiaqi , Zhang, Yang , Hu, Suili, Deng, Zhiwen , Xu, Yajing, Chen, Jinyi , Yue, Zhen , Yao, Sitong , Tian, Congcong , Wen, Qing , Yan, Lixia , Depies, Olivia M , Liang, Xiao‐Huan , Liu, Xiangyu , Kang, Xing, Li, Xinran , Deng, Zhiwen, Wu, Yu-Chun , Wang, Nan , Chen, Liangming , Yue, Zhen, Yao, Yuan , Yang, Xinran , Tian, Congcong, Liang, Xiaoyan , Chan, Kui Ming , Dai, Junbiao , Wang, Zhiquan , Yu, Chuanhe , Li, Gang

No container title available | January 23, 2024 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-3708982/v1 Get It

Abstract Extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) drives the evolution of cancer cells by conferring survival advantages over normal cells. However, the functional importance of ecDNA replication and maintenance is yet to be evaluated, and the molecular components that contributed to these processes remain largely unknown. Here, using CRISPR-C (circularization of genes and chromosomes by CRISPR) technology and synthetic circular DNA mimicking ecDNA identified in tumors, we generated ecDNA-positive (ecDNA+) cell models. Using these models, we identified the proteins involved in ecDNA replication and maintenance and found DNA damage response (DDR)-related pathways were significantly enriched. We further demonstrated that ecDNA replication led to increased DDR and genome instability and DDR was also essential for ecDNA maintenance, consistent with observations that ecDNA+ tumors exhibited higher DDR scores than ecDNA-negative (ecDNA–) tumors in patients. ATM, MDC1, and CHK2, but not ATR, were activated in ecDNA+ cells compared to ecDNA– cells. Moreover, ecDNA+ cells were more sensitive to ATM and CHK2 inhibition. We further found that type II topoisomerase TOP2B and DNA ligase III (LIG3) were critical regulators for ecDNA replication and maintenance and related DDR. In summary, our findings of the reciprocal interactions between ecDNA and DDR provide new insights into detection and therapy for ecDNA+ tumors.
Defining Proximity Proteome of Histone Modifications by Antibody-Mediated Protein A-APEX2 Labeling
Li, Xinran , Zhou, Jiaqi , Zhao, Wenjuan , Wen, Qing , Wang, Weijie , Peng, Huipai , Gao, Yuan , Bouchonville, Kelly J. , Offer, Steven M. , Chan, Kui Ming , Wang, Zhiquan , Li, Nan , Gan, Haiyun , Offer, Steven M , Wang, Zhiquan

Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics | September 30, 2021 | Volume: 20 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 87-100

10.1016/j.gpb.2021.09.003 Get It

Abstract Proximity labeling catalyzed by promiscuous enzymes, such as APEX2, has emerged as a powerful approach to characterize multiprotein complexes and protein–protein interactions. However, current methods depend on the expression of exogenous fusion proteins and cannot be applied to identify proteins surrounding post-translationally modified proteins. To address this limitation, we developed a new method to label proximal proteins of interest by antibody-mediated protein A-ascorbate peroxidase 2 (pA-APEX2) labeling (AMAPEX). In this method, a modified protein is bound in situ by a specific antibody, which then tethers a pA-APEX2 fusion protein. Activation of APEX2 labels the nearby proteins with biotin; the biotinylated proteins are then purified using streptavidin beads and identified by mass spectrometry. We demonstrated the utility of this approach by profiling the proximal proteins of histone modifications including H3K27me3, H3K9me3, H3K4me3, H4K5ac, and H4K12ac, as well as verifying the co-localization of these identified proteins with bait proteins by published ChIP-seq analysis and nucleosome immunoprecipitation. Overall, AMAPEX is an efficient method to identify proteins that are proximal to modified histones.