Jia, Jing

Abstract Recycling of parental histones is an important step in epigenetic inheritance. During DNA replication, DNA polymerase epsilon subunit DPB3/DPB4 and DNA replication helicase subunit MCM2 are involved in the transfer of parental histones to the leading and lagging strands, respectively. Single Dpb3 deletion (dpb3Δ) or Mcm2 mutation (mcm2-3A), which each disrupts one parental histone transfer pathway, leads to the other's predominance. However, the biological impact of the two histone transfer pathways on chromatin structure and DNA repair remains elusive. In this study, we used budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to determine the genetic and epigenetic outcomes from disruption of parental histone H3–H4 tetramer transfer. We found that a dpb3Δ mcm2-3A double mutant did not exhibit the asymmetric parental histone patterns caused by a single dpb3Δ or mcm2-3A mutation, suggesting that the processes by which parental histones are transferred to the leading and lagging strands are independent. Surprisingly, the frequency of homologous recombination was significantly lower in dpb3Δ, mcm2-3A and dpb3Δ mcm2-3A mutants, likely due to the elevated levels of free histones detected in the mutant cells. Together, these findings indicate that proper transfer of parental histones during DNA replication is essential for maintaining chromatin structure and that lower homologous recombination activity due to parental histone transfer defects is detrimental to cells.

Abstract Background. Human hexokinase 2 (HK2) plays an important role in regulating Warburg effect, which metabolizes glucose to lactate acid even in the presence of ample oxygen and provides intermediate metabolites to support cancer cell proliferation and tumor growth. HK2 overexpression has been observed in various types of cancers and targeting HK2-driven Warburg effect has been suggested as a potential cancer therapeutic strategy. Given that epigenetic enzymes utilize metabolic intermediates as substrates or co-factors to carry out post-translational modification of DNA and histones in cells, we hypothesized that altering HK2 expression-mediated cellular glycolysis rates could impact the epigenome and, consequently, genome stability in yeast. To test this hypothesis, we established genetic models with different yeast hexokinase 2 (HXK2) expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast cells and investigated the effect of HXK2-dependent metabolism on parental nucleosome transfer, a key DNA replication–coupled epigenetic inheritance process, and chromatin stability. Results. By comparing the growth of mutant yeast cells carrying single deletion of hxk1Δ, hxk2Δ, or double-loss of hxk1Δ hxk2Δ to wild-type cells, we demonstrated that HXK2 is the dominant HXK in yeast cell growth. Surprisingly, manipulating HXK2 expression in yeast, whether through overexpression or deletion, had only a marginal impact on parental nucleosome assembly, but a noticeable trend with decrease chromatin instability. However, targeting yeast cells with 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG), a HK2 inhibitor that has been proposed as an anti-cancer treatment, significantly increased chromatin instability. Conclusion. Our findings suggest that in yeast cells lacking HXK2, alternative HXKs such as HXK1 or glucokinase 1 (GLK1) play a role in supporting glycolysis at a level that adequately maintain epigenomic stability. While our study demonstrated an increase in epigenetic instability with 2-DG treatment, the observed effect seemed to occur independently of Hxk2-mediated glycolysis inhibition. Thus, additional research is needed to identify the molecular mechanism through which 2-DG influences chromatin stability.