Yin, Meng

ABSTRACT Chronic liver disease (CLD) is a major cause of global morbidity and mortality, with outcomes closely linked to the severity of liver fibrosis. While liver biopsy has historically been the reference standard for fibrosis staging, its invasiveness, sampling variability and limited suitability for longitudinal monitoring have driven the widespread adoption of non‐invasive tests (NITs). Imaging‐based biomarkers, particularly elastography, now play a central role in the clinical assessment and care pathway design. This review focuses on imaging techniques for non‐invasive assessment of liver fibrosis, with emphasis on elastography techniques: vibration‐controlled transient elastography (VCTE), ultrasound‐based shear wave elastography (SWE) and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE). Technical principles, advantages, limitations and implementation considerations are discussed to support informed selection across clinical contexts. VCTE offers rapid point‐of‐care assessment with extensive validation for identifying advanced fibrosis but is limited by operator dependence, reduced repeatability and lack of anatomical information. SWE provides real‐time, radiologist‐controlled assessment with improved applicability in obesity and ascites, though intervendor variability and operator dependence remain challenges. MRE demonstrates the highest diagnostic accuracy, reproducibility and technical success, with assessment of larger liver volume and strong performance across etiologies, albeit with limited access due to the requirement of an MRI system. Adjunct MRI biomarkers, including proton‐density fat fraction and iron‐corrected T1 mapping, further enhance liver phenotyping by characterising steatosis and fibro‐inflammatory activity. Understanding the strengths and limitations of each technique is essential for radiologists supporting multidisciplinary CLD management and service implementation, particularly in evolving healthcare environments such as Australia.

Background: It is crucial to evaluate liver fibrosis in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Digital pathology, an automated method for quantitative fibrosis measurement, provides valuable support to pathologists by providing refined continuous metrics and addressing inter-observer variability. Although non-invasive tests (NITs) have been validated as consistent with manual pathology, the relationship between digital pathology and NITs remains unexplored. Methods: This study included 99 biopsy-proven MASLD patients. Quantitative-fibrosis (Q-Fibrosis) used second-harmonic generation/two-photon excitation fluorescence microscopy (SHG/TPEF) to quantify fibrosis parameters (q-FPs). Correlations between eight NITs and q-FPs were analyzed. Results: Using manual pathology as standard, Q-Fibrosis exhibited excellent diagnostic performance in fibrosis stages assessment with area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) ranging from 0.924 to 0.967. In addition, magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) achieved the highest diagnostic accuracy (AUC: 0.781–0.977) among the eight NITs. Furthermore, MRE-assessed liver stiffness measurement (MRE-LSM) showed the strongest correlation with q-FPs, particularly adjusted by string length, string width, and the number of short and thick strings within the portal region. Conclusions: Both MRE and digital pathology demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy. MRE-LSM was primarily determined by collagen extent, location and pattern, which provide a new perspective for understanding the relationship between the change in MRE and histological fibrosis reverse.

Spatial heterogeneity of liver viscoelasticity, measured at three-dimensional vector MR elastography, positively correlated with metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease progression.

Background and Aims: Screening for diseases can have psychological impacts, such as anxiety, and requires acceptability from the population to be effective. This study examined the perspectives on the benefits and harms of screening for metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) among the general population to optimize screening practices. Approach and Results: A survey was sent to participants enrolled between 2020 and 2024 in a prospective MASLD screening study in Olmsted County, MN. The survey assessed participants' perceived anxiety, stigma, quality of life, preferred screening methods, financial concerns, and lifestyle impacts following screening and diagnosis. Of the 461 participants, 342 (74%) completed the survey. Overall, 14% of participants reported screening-related anxiety, and 14% were concerned about disclosing a potential MASLD diagnosis to others. Among those without a MASLD diagnosis, 99% felt reassured about their liver health, 48% reported an improved quality of life, and 25% made lifestyle changes pertaining to their diet, alcohol use, and physical activity. Of the 77 participants diagnosed with MASLD, 52% experienced some anxiety about their new diagnosis; however, 95% and 97% considered it important to receive an early MASLD diagnosis to mitigate the risk for cirrhosis and cardiovascular disease, respectively. Notably, 79% of diagnosed participants found the diagnosis beneficial in adopting healthier habits, with 30% achieving a >10% weight loss after screening. Conclusion: This population-based survey demonstrates that the perceived benefits of proactive MASLD screening, such as increased awareness, lifestyle changes, and early diagnosis, outweigh the harms. These findings highlight the importance of early screening through patient-centered protocols to improve health outcomes.

BackgroundMR elastography (MRE) at 60 Hz is widely used for staging liver fibrosis. MRE with lower frequencies may provide inflammation biomarkers.PurposeTo establish a practical simultaneous dual‐frequency liver MRE protocol at both 30 Hz and 60 Hz during a single examination and validate the occurrence of second harmonic waves at 30 Hz.Study TypeRetrospective.SubjectsOne hundred six patients (48 females, age: 50.0 ± 13.4 years) were divided as follows: Cohort One (15 patients with chronic liver disease [CLD] and 25 healthy volunteers) with simultaneous dual‐frequency MRE. Cohort Two (66 patients with CLD) with second harmonic MRE.Field Strength/Sequence3‐T, single‐ or dual‐frequency MRE at 30 Hz and 60 Hz.AssessmentLiver stiffness (LS) in both cohorts was evaluated with manually placed volumetric ROIs by two independent analyzers. Image quality was assessed by three independent readers on a 4‐point scale (0–3: none/failed, fair, moderate, excellent) based on the depth of wave propagation with 1/3 incremental penetration. The success rate was derived from the percentage of nonzero quality scores.Statistical TestsMeasurement agreement, bias, and repeatability of LS were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), Bland–Altman plots, and repeatability coefficient (RC). Mann–Whitney U tests were used to evaluate the differences in image quality between different methods. A P‐value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsSuccess rate was 97.5% in Cohort One and 91% success rate for the second harmonic MRE in Cohort Two. The second harmonic and conventional MRE showed excellent agreement in LS (all ICCs >0.90). The quality scores for the second harmonic wave images were lower than those from the conventional MRE (Z = −4.523).Data ConclusionCompared with conventional and second harmonic methods, simultaneous dual‐frequency had better image quality, high success rate and the advantage of intrinsic co‐registration, while the second harmonic method can be an alternative if custom waveform is not available.Evidence Level3Technical EfficacyStage 1