Haddad, Tufia C.

Abstract Purpose: The neutralizing peptibody trebananib prevents angiopoietin-1 and angiopoietin-2 from binding with Tie2 receptors, inhibiting angiogenesis and proliferation. Trebananib was combined with paclitaxel±trastuzumab in the I-SPY2 breast cancer trial. Patients and Methods: I-SPY2, a phase II neoadjuvant trial, adaptively randomizes patients with high-risk, early-stage breast cancer to one of several experimental therapies or control based on receptor subtypes as defined by hormone receptor (HR) and HER2 status and MammaPrint risk (MP1, MP2). The primary endpoint is pathologic complete response (pCR). A therapy “graduates” if/when it achieves 85% Bayesian probability of success in a phase III trial within a given subtype. Patients received weekly paclitaxel (plus trastuzumab if HER2-positive) without (control) or with weekly intravenous trebananib, followed by doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide and surgery. Pathway-specific biomarkers were assessed for response prediction. Results: There were 134 participants randomized to trebananib and 133 to control. Although trebananib did not graduate in any signature [phase III probabilities: Hazard ratio (HR)-negative (78%), HR-negative/HER2-positive (74%), HR-negative/HER2-negative (77%), and MP2 (79%)], it demonstrated high probability of superior pCR rates over control (92%–99%) among these subtypes. Trebananib improved 3-year event-free survival (HR 0.67), with no significant increase in adverse events. Activation levels of the Tie2 receptor and downstream signaling partners predicted trebananib response in HER2-positive disease; high expression of a CD8 T-cell gene signature predicted response in HR-negative/HER2-negative disease. Conclusions: The angiopoietin (Ang)/Tie2 axis inhibitor trebananib combined with standard neoadjuvant therapy increased estimated pCR rates across HR-negative and MP2 subtypes, with probabilities of superiority >90%. Further study of Ang/Tie2 receptor axis inhibitors in validated, biomarker-predicted sensitive subtypes is warranted.

Introduction While chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has transformed the management of hematologic malignancies, it requires frequent monitoring for acute toxicities, almost universally achieved through mandatory hospitalizations, therefore utilizing a significant amount of healthcare resources. At Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN, our standard practice is administering CAR-T cell therapy in the outpatient setting through a multi-disciplinary hospital-based outpatient (HBO) unit and remote patient monitoring (RPM) program. Our CAR-T RPM program consists of in-home, electronic health record-integrated technology to monitor vital signs and neurologic symptoms for 30 days post CAR-T infusion. Here we report the healthcare utilization outcomes of CAR-T patients managed in the outpatient setting enrolled in the RPM program. Methods Patients undergoing FDA-approved CAR-T cell treatment in the outpatient setting and participating in the CAR-T RPM program at Mayo Clinic Rochester were included in this IRB-approved study. Patient characteristics, healthcare utilization metrics, inpatient interventions, and patient satisfaction data regarding the RPM program were reviewed. Length of stay (LOS) includes any hospitalizations for which the admission date falls within the RPM monitoring period (CAR-T cell infusion to day +30), even if the hospitalization continued past day +30. Results A total of 123 patients participated in the CAR-T RPM program and underwent treatment in the outpatient setting. Median age at CAR-T infusion was 63 years (range 22 - 83), and most patients were male (n=78, 63%). Non-Hodgkin lymphoma was the most common diagnosis (n=74, 60%), followed by multiple myeloma (n=47, 38%), ALL (n=1, 1%) and other (n=1, 1%). During the PRM monitoring period, 19 (16%) patients were managed entirely in the outpatient setting. The remaining 104 (84%) patients required at least one hospitalization, with most patients (n=70, 57%) hospitalized only once [26 (21%) patients were hospitalized twice, and 7 (6%) patients were hospitalized 3 times, and 1 (1%) patient hospitalized 4 times during the monitoring period]. When considering the first hospitalization post CAR-T infusion, the median LOS was 6 days (range 2 - 47). When considering all hospitalizations post CAR-T, the median LOS was 8 days (range 2 - 47). Only 7 (6%) patients required an ICU stay, with a mean ICU stay of 0.2 days (standard deviation 0.9). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was noted in 92 (75%) of patients at a median of 3 days (range 0 - 18) post CAR-T infusion. All patients with CRS received tocilizumab, at a median of 4 days post CAR-T infusion. Steroids for CRS were administered in 63 (68%) of these patients. Neurotoxicity was reported in 45 (37%) patients at a median of 7 days (range 1 - 19) post CAR-T infusion. During the RPM monitoring period, patients were seen in our HBO unit with a median of 18 outpatient visits (range 4 - 30). Patient survey data, obtained at the end of the RPM monitoring period, were available from 37 patients. The majority of patients felt that the RPM program helped them feel comfortable managing their health at home, were able to reach a team member, and receive an appropriate response promptly. The majority of patients felt comfortable using the RPM equipment and interacting with providers virtually. Overall, 83% of patients were satisfied with the RPM program and 6% were neither satisfied nor dissatisfied. When asked about the reason for disappointment, technical difficulties/issues with the devices were the themes mentioned by the few patients (11%) who were unsatisfied with the RPM program. Conclusion: Despite the complexities and frequent monitoring associated with CAR-T cell therapy, outpatient CAR-T cell treatment is a feasible model of care. As the standard practice at our institution, the CAR-T RPM program was part of the management of nearly all patients undergoing an FDA-approved CAR-T product in the outpatient setting. RPM in the acute setting post CAR-T infusion is a well-received practice initiative by the majority of patients, including a high level of comfort utilizing the RPM equipment and virtual interaction with the RPM providers.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Accelerated atherosclerosis has been described in breast cancer patients receiving cardiac exposure from adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). As a result of multidisciplinary care, breast cancer cure rates have improved in recent decades. Therefore, evaluating radiation-induced heart disease (RIHD), especially coronary artery disease (CAD), is essential. The 2022 cardio-oncology European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines recommend screening patients 5 to 10 years after RT for CAD according to cardiovascular risk factors. This screening is generally recommended with exercise stress echocardiography since it can assess the physiological functional performance. Until now, it is unknown if dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is an equal screening tool and if it can predict major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiac death, revascularization). PURPOSE Evaluate if DSE is an adequate tool to stratify and predict MACE in post-radiotherapy patients. Methods A retrospective, descriptive cohort study was conducted. Patients who had chest RT for breast cancer and underwent DSE from 2000 to 2022 were included. A bivariate analysis, including Kruskal Wallis and Pearson Chi-Squared test, was done to identify variables associated with a positive DSE. A multivariable Cox Model for MACE and a time-to-event curve for MACE were also performed. Results We identified 163 patients that underwent DSE after a median time of 5.8 years from the end of RT. The median age was 74 years, 98.2% were female, 50% had left and 45% right breast cancer, 81% had hypertension, 41% diabetes mellitus, 71% dyslipidemia, 34% were smokers, and 19% had a prior myocardial infarction. The average dose of photon RT to the chest was 55Gy in the cohort, and 40% received chemotherapy before RT. Patients were divided into two groups: positive and negative DSE. A positive DSE was seen in 19.6%. The median (Q1, Q3) regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) of patients with a positive DSE was 1 (1, 1.015) at baseline and 1.280 (1.190, 1.520) at peak stress, and for a negative DSE, was 1 (1, 1) at baseline and peak stress. 88.2% of negative DSE and 87.5% of positive DSE achieved the target heart rate of 85%. HTN, dyslipidemia, and prior MI were significantly associated with a positive DSE (p <0.023). The cumulative incidence of MACE was higher in the group of positive DSE (p<0.001), even after adjusting for hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, smoking, and prior myocardial infarction, with a hazard ratio of 2.500 (1.51 – 4.13) and a p< 0.001. Similar results were observed regardless of RT laterality. Conclusions In breast cancer survivors that received adjuvant radiotherapy as part of multidisciplinary care, a positive DSE was an independent predictor of MACE compared to a negative result. These results support the usefulness of dobutamine stress echocardiography as a screening tool in breast cancer survivors.Kaplan-Meier Curve for MACE

Abstract Background Exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) is a non-invasive, radiation-free, and widely available technique that has demonstrated a reliable accuracy for the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD). Chest radiotherapy (RT) is associated with accelerated age-related atherosclerosis and fibrosis in a dose-dependent manner. ESE plays a role as a screening tool of RT induced heart disease, however, the prognostic value of changes in regional wall motion abnormalities in this population during ESE has not been evaluated. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study of breast cancer survivors treated with adjuvant RT that underwent ESE from 2000-2020 after treatment completion. Outcomes evaluated were: major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, revascularization and stroke); and all-cause mortality. A univariate analysis was performed to characterize the population. Continuous variables were presented as means ± standard deviation (SD) or median with quartile 1 and 3 (Q1, Q3), and categorical variables as numbers and percentages. A Cox regression model adjusted by age and cardiovascular risk factors was used to evaluate variables associated with outcomes, and a time to first event approach was used. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results From 2000-2020, 507 patients, with a mean age 66 ± 10 years, underwent ESE at a median of 5.8 years after RT completion. The most prevalent comorbidities were dyslipidemia (59%), HTN (55%) and obesity (37%). 55% underwent RT for left-sided breast cancer and 45% for right-sided, and median RT dose was 6000 cGy. Baseline characteristics are presented in Table 1. Most patients underwent Bruce Protocol (92%). Patients exercised a mean time of 6.6 minutes achieving 7.3 METS and 109% of functional aerobic capacity (Table 2). At a median follow up of 7.8 years, 61 MACE events occurred. Predictors of MACE were double product, baseline and stress EF, baseline and peak regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA), development of new ischemic RWMA, inability to reach 85% of maximum HR, and an abnormal EF response with stress after adjusting for age, HTN, DM, smoking history, dyslipidemia, obesity, prior MI and cancer staging (Fig 1). Predictors of all-cause mortality were METS, LV mass index, baseline and peak RWMA, development of new ischemic RWMA and an abnormal EF change with stress even after adjusting for variables described previously (Fig 2). Conclusions The development of new or worsening RWMA of just 2 segments with stress, was a significant predictor of MACE and all-cause mortality in a large cohort of breast cancer survivors undergoing multidisciplinary management including adjuvant RT. Special emphasis on management of cardiovascular comorbidities and closer surveillance are recommended for these patients.

572 Background: The DEFeNDR (Decreasing the burden of Febrile Neutropenia through Dynamic RPM) program leverages in-home technology and centralized nurse monitoring to facilitate ambulatory management as an alternative to hospital-based care for cancer patients with neutropenic fever (NF). The objective of this study is to assess 30-day care utilization outcomes and patient satisfaction at 12 months after program implementation. Methods: Adult cancer patients hospitalized with NF were assessed daily for DEFeNDR program eligibility including MASCC score ≥21 (per ASCO guidelines) and no cellular therapy (CAR-T, BMT) in the prior 100 days. Patients agreeing to participate in the 30-day program received a cellular-enabled tablet with pre-connected devices for twice-daily vital signs and symptom assessments. Patient generated data were EHR-integrated in real-time. Embedded decision trees facilitated alerts for adverse trends. Virtual RPM nurses responded to alerts and utilized predefined care pathways. The primary endpoint was the mean proportion of evaluable days spent inpatient (mPEDI) within 30 days of eligibility comparing those who participated in the program (RPM) with those who declined (no RPM). Results: Of 85 eligible patients, 62 were offered DEFeNDR participation. Of those, 34 (54.8%) participated and 28 (45.2%) declined. Baseline characteristics and care utilization outcomes are summarized in Table 1. RPM patients experienced significantly lower mPEDI compared with unmonitored patients [5.1% (Standard Error [SE], 1.9%) vs 12.4% (SE, 2.1%); Wilcoxon Rank Sums p-value, 0.032]. RPM patients also experienced a trend toward fewer total hospital days and lower 30-day readmission rate, as well as shorter mean length of stay and lower rate of ICU utilization when readmitted. Non-visit care activities (EHR clinical communications, documentation, and patient messaging) were decreased from pre-hospital baseline for 58.8% of RPM patients versus 46.6% of those unmonitored. All RPM patients completing a patient satisfaction survey (n=9) indicated that they would recommend the program to patients with a similar condition. Conclusions: Cancer patients with NF participating in the DEFeNDR program experienced a significant reduction in mPEDI and care utilization compared with those who declined. Further studies are warranted to assess comparative effectiveness of this model vs usual care.[Table: see text]

365 Background: Automated scalp cooling (ASC) is utilized in breast cancer patients to reduce chemotherapy-induced alopecia. Nursing staff and patient perspectives on ASC are limited regarding impact on care delivery and outcomes. Methods: A survey-based study of patient and chemotherapy nurse perspectives of ASC was conducted at three multi-regional Mayo Clinic sites. One-time surveys were sent to breast cancer patients and nurses for self-reporting of the ASC experience. Patients were identified via ICD-10 codes for breast cancer with subsequent chart review to confirm relevant chemotherapy regimen and ASC use. Chemotherapy nurses were identified by their respective chemotherapy unit nurse managers. Patient survey responses were compared between groups that did or did not use ASC by use of Pearson chi-square test for frequency data and the Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test for continuous measures. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: Surveys were sent to 181 nurses with 61 (33.7%) completing them. Nurses reported ASC administration to 10-50 patients (n=43, 63.9%) or ≥50 patients (n=18, 29.5%). Most felt they had little or no technical support available (67.2%), witnessed scheduling difficulties (52.5%), were distressed by workload intensity (52.5%), and did not receive adequate training (67.2%). Most felt that ASC demanded greater nursing time compared to other duties (57.4%). Most would not recommend ASC to a friend or family member (88.6%). Surveys were sent to chemotherapy patients with 93 of 465 (20.0%) ASC patients and 56 of 341 (16.4%) without ASC (control) completing them. Controls were significantly more likely to experience hair loss, shave their head, and wear a wig (all p<0.001). There was no significant difference between groups for the EORTC QLQC30, EORTC BR23, and Body Image Scale results or frequency of headaches. Patients who used ASC for less than half of their chemotherapy sessions reported significantly more cold discomfort ( p=0.040) and dizziness ( p=0.003). Time investment (33.3%) and side effects (31.2%) were the most frequent burdens cited. Conclusions: Most nurses indicated that ASC increased nursing workload compared with other duties, and they lacked adequate training and technical support. Increasing formal nurse education and access to technical support documents and live technical support may be options for improving nursing satisfaction with ASC. Patient responses suggest qualitative effectiveness of ASC in reducing hair loss. While those with ASC were less likely to shave or use a wig, this did not translate to significant differences in quality of life or psychosocial body image compared to controls. Cold discomfort and dizziness were the most frequent side effects among those with lower utilization of ASC.

Abstract Breast cancer survivors may experience significant after effects from diagnoses of breast cancer and cancer directed therapies. This review synthesizes the evidence about optimal management of the sequelae of a diagnosis of breast cancer. It describes the side effects of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy and evidence based strategies for management of such effects, with particular attention to effects of therapies with curative intent. It includes strategies to promote health and wellness among breast cancer survivors, along with data to support the use of integrative oncology strategies. In addition, this review examines models of survivorship care and ways in which digital tools may facilitate communication between clinicians and patients. The strategies outlined in this review are paramount to supporting breast cancer survivors’ quality of life.

PURPOSE BMI affects breast cancer risk and prognosis. In contrast to cytotoxic chemotherapy, CDK4/6 inhibitors are given at a fixed dose, irrespective of BMI or weight. This preplanned analysis of the global randomized PALLAS trial investigates the impact of BMI on the side-effect profile, treatment adherence, and efficacy of palbociclib. METHODS Patients were categorized at baseline according to WHO BMI categories. Neutropenia rates were assessed with univariable and multivariable logistic regression. Time to early discontinuation of palbociclib was analyzed with Fine and Gray competing risk models. Unstratified Cox models were used to investigate the association between BMI category and time to invasive disease-free survival (iDFS). 95% CIs were derived. RESULTS Of 5,698 patients included in this analysis, 68 (1.2%) were underweight, 2,082 (36.5%) normal weight, 1,818 (31.9%) overweight, and 1,730 (30.4%) obese at baseline. In the palbociclib arm, higher BMI was associated with a significant decrease in neutropenia (unadjusted odds ratio for 1-unit change, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.91 to 0.94; adjusted for age, race ethnicity, region, chemotherapy use, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group at baseline, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.92 to 0.95). This translated into a significant decrease in treatment discontinuation rate with higher BMI (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] for 10-unit change, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.83). There was no significant improvement in iDFS with the addition of palbociclib to ET in any weight category (normal weight HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.12; overweight HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.49; and obese HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.30) in this analysis early in follow-up (31 months). CONCLUSION This preplanned analysis of the PALLAS trial demonstrates a significant impact of BMI on side effects, dose reductions, early treatment discontinuation, and relative dose intensity. Additional long-term follow-up will further evaluate whether BMI ultimately affects outcome.

PURPOSE In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many cancer practices rapidly adopted telehealth services. However, there is a paucity of data regarding ongoing telehealth visit utilization beyond this initial response. The purpose of this study was to assess changes in variables associated with telehealth visit utilization over time. METHODS This is a cross-sectional, year-over-year, retrospective analysis of telehealth visits conducted across a multisite, multiregional cancer practice in the United States. Multivariable models examined the association of patient- and provider-level variables with telehealth utilization across outpatient visits conducted over three 8-week periods from July to August in 2019 (n = 32,537), 2020 (n = 33,399), and 2021 (n = 35,820). RESULTS The rate of telehealth utilization increased from <0.01% (2019) to 11% (2020) to 14% (2021). The most significant patient-level factors associated with increased telehealth utilization included nonrural residence and age ≤65 years. Among patients residing in rural settings, video visit utilization rates were significantly lower and phone visit utilization rates were significantly higher compared with patients from nonrural residences. Regarding provider-level factors, widening differences in telehealth utilization were observed at tertiary versus community-based practice settings. Increased telehealth utilization was not associated with duplicative care as per-patient and per-physician visit volumes in 2021 remained consistent with prepandemic levels. CONCLUSION We observed continuous expansion in telehealth visit utilization from 2020 to 2021. Our experiences suggest that telehealth can be integrated into cancer practices without evidence of duplicative care. Future work should examine sustainable reimbursement structures and policies to ensure accessibility of telehealth as a means to facilitate equitable, patient-centered cancer care.

Introduction: Exercise Stress Echocardiography (ESE) is recommended as a screening tool for the evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) in patients with suspected Radiation-Induced Heart Disease (RIHD). Up to now, studies have only evaluated its association with the extent of CAD. Hypothesis Cancer survivors treated with chest Radiotherapy (RT) that undergo an ESE and have a +ESE develop more MACE than those who have -ESE. Methods: A retrospective, descriptive, cohort study was conducted. Patients who had chest RT and underwent ESE with Treadmill Bruce Stress Protocol, from 2000 to 2012, at Mayo Clinic Rochester and Mayo Clinic Health System were included. A univariate analysis was performed to characterize the population. An analysis including Kruskal Wallis and Pearson Chi-Squared tests was completed to identify variables associated with + SE (Table 1). Multivariable Cox Model for MACE was conducted and is shown in Table 2. A time-to-event curve using Kaplan-Meier estimates is shown in Figure 1. Results: We identified 113 patients, with a mean age of 67 years and a median follow-up of 15.1 years. Of those, 99% were female, 98% were breast cancer survivors, 59% had HTN, 14% DM, 11% AFib, 2% COPD, and 12% had a history of MI. All the patients received >3000cGy of Photon RT, and 57% were treated with systemic cancer therapies. A +ESE was seen in 20.3% of the patients with no significant difference in METS achieved compared with patients who had a -ESE. COPD, RT dose, and systemic therapies, specifically doxorubicin, were associated with a +ESE. The cumulative incidence of MACE was higher in the group of +ESE (p=0.029). After adjustment for HTN, DM, smoking history, hyperlipidemia, and prior MI, the HR for MACE associated with a +ESE was 1.97 (1.09-3.59). Conclusion: MACE was more frequent in patients with a +ESE who received chest RT and doxorubicin versus -ESE. These results support the usefulness of ESE in cancer survivors after RT as a cardiovascular screening tool.