Back to Authors

Wallace, Michael B

0000-0002-6446-5785

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic in Florida

Citations 91

Glycemic Control after Total Pancreatectomy for Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm: An Exploratory Study
Jamil, Laith H. , Chindriş, Ana Maria, Gill, Kanwar R. , Scimeca, Daniela , Stauffer, John , Meek, Shon , Nguyen, Justin H. , Asbun, Horacio J. , Raimondo, Massimo , Woodward, Timothy A., Wallace, Michael B. , Heckman, Michael G. , Wallace, Michael B , A Stauffer, John

HPB Surgery | August 26, 2012 | Volume: 2012 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 1-8

10.1155/2012/381328 Get It

Background . Glycemic control following total pancreatectomy (TP) has been thought to be difficult to manage. Diffuse intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is a potentially curable precursor to pancreatic adenocarcinoma, best treated by TP. Objective . Compare glycemic control in patients undergoing TP for IPMN to patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM). Design/Setting . Retrospective cohort. Outcome Measure . Hemoglobin A1C(HbA1C) at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after TP. In the control group, baseline was defined as 6 months prior to the first HbA1c measure. Results . Mean HgbA1C at each point of interest was similar between TP and type I DM patients (6 months (7.5% versus 7.7%, P = 0.52 ), 12 months (7.3% versus 8.0%, P = 0.081 ), 18 months (7.7% and 7.6%, P = 0.64 ), and at 24 months (7.3% versus 7.8%, P = 0.10 )). Seven TP patients (50%) experienced a hypoglycemic event compared to 65 type 1 DM patients (65%, P = 0.38 ). Limitations . Small number of TP patients, retrospective design, lack of long-termfollowup. Conclusion . This suggests that glycemic control following TP for IPMNcan be well managed, similar to type 1 DM patients. Fear of DM following TP for IPMN should not preclude surgery when TP is indicated.
Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy
Palma, Giovanni Domenico De , Wallace, Michael B. , Giovannini, Marc, Wallace, Michael B

Gastroenterology Research and Practice | April 12, 2012 | Volume: 2012 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 1-2

10.1155/2012/216209 Get It

Accuracy of real-time vs. blinded offline diagnosis of neoplastic colorectal polyps using probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy: a pilot study
Buchner, Anna M. , Raimondo, Massimo , Woodward, Timothy A., Krishna, Murli , Wallace, Michael B. , Shahid, Muhammad , Wallace, Michael B

Endoscopy | March 2, 2012 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 04 | Pages: 343-348

10.1055/s-0031-1291589 Get It

Confocal Endomicroscopy of Colorectal Polyps
Ussui, Vivian, Wallace, Michael B. , Wallace, Michael B

Gastroenterology Research and Practice | January 26, 2012 | Volume: 2012 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 1-6

10.1155/2012/545679 Get It

Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) is one of several novel methods that provide real-time, high-resolution imaging at a micron scale via endoscopes. CLE has the potential to be a disruptive technology in that it can change the current algorithms that depend on biopsy to perform surveillance of high-risk conditions. Furthermore, it allows on-table decision making that has the potential to guide therapy in real time and reduce the need for repeated procedures. CLE and related technologies are often termed “virtual biopsy” as they simulate the images seen in traditional histology. However, the imaging of living tissue allows more than just pragmatic convenience; it also allows imaging of living tissue such as active capillary circulation, cellular death, and vascular and endothelial translocation, thus extending beyond what is capable in traditional biopsy. Immediate potential applications of CLE are to guide biopsy sampling in Barrett's esophagus and inflammatory bowel disease surveillance, evaluation of colorectal polyps, and intraductal imaging of the pancreas and bile duct. Data on these applications is rapidly emerging, and more is needed to clearly demonstrate the optimal applications of CLE. In this paper, we will focus on the role of CLE as applied to colorectal polyps detected during colonoscopy.
A comparison of high definition-image enhanced colonoscopy and standard white-light colonoscopy for colorectal polyp detection
Gross, Seth A. , Buchner, Anna M. , Cangemi, J., Picco, Michael F., Wolfsen, Herbert C. , DeVault, Kenneth R. , Loeb, David M. , Raimondo, Massimo , Woodward, Timothy A., Wallace, Michael B. , Crook, Julia E. , Wallace, Michael B

Endoscopy | October 4, 2011 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1045-1051

10.1055/s-0030-1256894 Get It

New classification for probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in the colon
Kuiper, Teaco , Broek, F. van den, Eeden, S. van, Wallace, Michael B. , Buchner, Anna M. , Meining, Alexander, Hee, K. van, Dekker, Evelien , Meining, Alexander , Fockens, Paul , Wallace, Michael B , Dekker, Evelien

Endoscopy | October 4, 2011 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1076-1081

10.1055/s-0030-1256767 Get It

Miami classification for probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy
Wallace, Michael B. , Lauwers, Gregory Y. , Chen, Y., Dekker, Evelien , Meining, Alexander, Meining, Alexander , Fockens, Paul , Sharma, Prateek , Wallace, Michael B , Dekker, Evelien

Endoscopy | August 4, 2011 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 882-891

10.1055/s-0030-1256632 Get It

A Multicenter, Double-Blinded Validation Study of Methylation Biomarkers for Progression Prediction in Barrett's Esophagus
Jin, Zhe , Cheng, Yulan , Gu, Wen , Sato, Fumiaki , Mori, Yuriko , Olaru, Alexandru, Paun, Bogdan C., Kan, Takatsugu, Ito, Tetsuo, Hamilton, James P. , Selaru, Florin M. , Agarwal, Rachana , David, Stefan, Abraham, John , Wolfsen, Herbert C. , Wallace, Michael B. , Shaheen, Nicholas J. , Washington, Kay, Bhattacharyya, Achyut, Nelson, Mark A. , Romero, Yvonne , Wang, Kenneth K. , Feng, Ziding , Sampliner, Richard E., Meltzer, Stephen J. , Zheng, Yingye , Yang, Jian Ping , Wang, Jean , Canto, Marcia Irene , Wagner, Paul Daniel , Wallace, Michael B , Meltzer, Stephen J

Cancer Research | May 12, 2009 | Volume: 69 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 4112-4115

10.1158/0008-5472.can-09-0028 Get It

Abstract Esophageal adenocarcinoma risk in Barrett's esophagus (BE) is increased 30- to 125-fold versus the general population. Among all BE patients, however, neoplastic progression occurs only once per 200 patient-years. Molecular biomarkers are therefore needed to risk-stratify patients for more efficient surveillance endoscopy and to improve the early detection of progression. We therefore performed a retrospective, multicenter, double-blinded validation study of eight BE progression prediction methylation biomarkers. Progression or nonprogression were determined at 2 years (tier 1) and 4 years (tier 2). Methylation was assayed in 145 nonprogressors and 50 progressors using real-time quantitative methylation-specific PCR. Progressors were significantly older than nonprogressors (70.6 versus 62.5 years; P < 0.001). We evaluated a linear combination of the eight markers, using coefficients from a multivariate logistic regression analysis. Areas under the ROC curve (AUC) were high in the 2-year, 4-year, and combined data models (0.843, 0.829, and 0.840; P < 0.001, <0.001, and <0.001, respectively). In addition, even after rigorous overfitting correction, the incremental AUCs contributed by panels based on the 8 markers plus age versus age alone were substantial (Δ-AUC = 0.152, 0.114, and 0.118, respectively) in all 3 models. A methylation biomarker–based panel to predict neoplastic progression in BE has potential clinical value in improving both the efficiency of surveillance endoscopy and the early detection of neoplasia. [Cancer Res 2009;69(10):4112–5]
Pilot Study on Light Dosimetry Variables for Photodynamic Therapy of Barrett's Esophagus with High-Grade Dysplasia
Gill, Kanwar R. , Wolfsen, Herbert C. , Preyer, Norris W., Scott, Marquitta V., Gross, Seth A., Wallace, Michael B. , Jones, Linda, Wallace, Michael B

Clinical Cancer Research | February 25, 2009 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1830-1836

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-08-2317 Get It

Abstract Purpose: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is used to treat Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia and mucosal carcinoma. Outcomes are variable with some patients having persistent disease, whereas others develop strictures. The aims of this study were (a) to compare porfimer sodium tissue uptake, light dose, and esophageal thickness with clinical outcomes and (b) to determine the selectivity of porfimer sodium uptake in diseased and normal epithelium. Experimental Design: Forty-eight hours after porfimer sodium infusion, patients underwent mucosal biopsy for quantification of the porfimer sodium. Laser light was delivered at 48 hours and again 24 or 48 hours later. Porfimer sodium was extracted from the biopsy samples and quantified using fluorescence spectroscopy. The enhanced photodynamic dose was determined as [porfimer sodium content * light dose/esophageal thickness]. PDT efficacy was determined 6 to 8 weeks later based on persistence or complete ablation of dysplasia or carcinoma. Results: Mean porfimer sodium content of 6.2 mg/kg (range, 2.6-11.2 mg/kg) and mean total light dose of 278 J/cm (range, 225-360 J/cm) resulted in a complete treatment. Mean porfimer sodium tissue content of 3.9 mg/kg (range, 2.1-8.1 mg/kg) and mean total light dose of 268 J/cm (range, 250-350 J/cm) resulted in an incomplete treatment. The total esophageal thickness (range, 1.7-6.0 mm) and enhanced photodynamic dose were correlated with treatment outcome. Conclusions: Esophageal thickness is the strongest predictor of treatment outcome. The porfimer sodium content of Barrett's and normal tissue is not significantly different. “Photodynamic dose” for esophageal PDT should incorporate the esophageal thickness.