DeVault, Kenneth R.

INTRODUCTION Gastroesophageal reflux is common in respiratory disease, but the interplay between gastrointestinal mechanisms that expose individuals to reflux and potentially aspiration, and lung mechanics and function remain incompletely understood. Our aim was to investigate this in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and non-idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) interstitial lung disease (non-IPF ILD), and compare with our published findings in IPF. METHODS Fifty-seven patients with COPD (aged: 34–75 years) and 64 with non-IPF ILD (22–75 years) who underwent high-resolution impedance manometry and 24-hour pH impedance together with pulmonary function assessment were compared with 35 IPF patients (51–84 years). RESULTS COPD patients were less likely to exhibit ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) and/or absent contractility ( P = 0.009; P = 0.028), and tended to exhibit esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) and/or hypercontractility ( P = 0.09, P = 0.14) than IPF and non-IPF ILD patients. Notably, integrated relaxation pressure correlated with esophageal length index (ELI) ( P = 0.048) and inspiratory LESP ( P = 0.003), with latter 2 correlating with each other ( P < 0.001). EGJOO patients tended to have fewer proximal reflux events and reduced pulmonary function, with the latter inversely correlating with ELI ( P < 0.05). Non-IPF ILD patients were less likely to exhibit EGJOO than COPD patients ( P = 0.27), and less likely to exhibit IEM ( P = 0.07) than IPF patients. However, those with IEM or EGJOO exhibited greater proportions of reflux events reaching the proximal esophagus than those with normal motility ( P < 0.03), which in contrast to IPF, seemed not to associate with worse pulmonary function. DISCUSSION Associations between esophageal motility, and lung mechanics and function, and consequently reflux, are very disease-specific.

ABSTRACT Background Patients with erosive oesophagitis, and those with persistent symptomatic non‐erosive gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease, require long‐term maintenance treatment with acid‐suppressing agents. Aim To evaluate the safety of vonoprazan, a potassium‐competitive acid blocker, in an integrated analysis of data from clinical trials in adults. Methods We included 14 clinical trials of vonoprazan conducted in multiple countries. Mean duration of exposure in person‐years to vonoprazan ( n = 5318) was 2068, to comparators lansoprazole ( n = 1925) or esomeprazole ( n = 86) was 751, and to placebo ( n = 779) was 59. We report adverse events, serum gastrin, and liver enzyme levels as the main outcomes. Post‐marketing safety data from December 26, 2014 (date of commercialisation in Japan) to December 25, 2023, are also provided. Results Nasopharyngitis was the only adverse event reported by at least 5.0% of patients (6.94% vonoprazan, 5.07% proton pump inhibitor (PPI), 4.49% placebo). Incidence rates per 100 person‐years for serious adverse events were 10.39 for vonoprazan, 10.65 for PPIs, and 1.69 for placebo. One patient each on vonoprazan and lansoprazole was diagnosed with gastric cancer. Mean serum gastrin levels were higher on vonoprazan than lansoprazole but normalised by 4 weeks after discontinuation. Elevated liver enzyme levels were infrequent and of low magnitude with no differences between vonoprazan and PPIs. There were four deaths; none was considered related to study drug. Conclusions Vonoprazan was well tolerated. Its safety profile from both clinical trial and post‐marketing data were consistent and comparable to that of its PPI comparators with respect to treatment‐emergent adverse events.

AbstractBackgroundFor many patients with lung disease the only proven intervention to improve survival and quality of life is lung transplantation (LTx). Esophageal dysmotility and gastroesophageal reflux (GER) are common in patients with respiratory disease, and often associate with worse prognosis following LTx. Which, if any patients, should be excluded from LTx based on esophageal concerns remains unclear. Our aim was to understand the effect of LTx on esophageal motility diagnosis and examine how this and the other physiological and mechanical factors relate to GER and clearance of boluses swallowed.MethodsWe prospectively recruited 62 patients with restrictive (RLD) and obstructive (OLD) lung disease (aged 33–75 years; 42 men) who underwent high resolution impedance manometry and 24‐h pH‐impedance before and after LTx.Key ResultsRLD patients with normal motility were more likely to remain normal (p = 0.02), or if having abnormal motility to change to normal (p = 0.07) post‐LTx than OLD patients. Esophageal length (EL) was greater in OLD than RLD patients' pre‐LTx (p < 0.001), reducing only in OLD patients' post‐LTx (p = 0.02). Reduced EL post‐LTx associated with greater contractile reserve (r = 0.735; p = 0.01) and increased likelihood of motility normalization (p = 0.10). Clearance of reflux improved (p = 0.01) and associated with increased mean nocturnal baseline impedance (p < 0.001) in RLD but not OLD. Peristaltic breaks and thoraco‐abdominal pressure gradient impact both esophageal clearance of reflux and boluses swallowed (p < 0.05).Conclusions and InferencesRLD patients are more likely to show improvement in esophageal motility than OLD patients post‐LTx. However, the effect on GER is more difficult to predict and requires other GI, anatomical and pulmonary factors to be taken into consideration.

Esophageal dilation is an important part of endoscopic practice. Proper preparation and technique can optimize outcomes. Techniques include wire guided per oral dilation, blind bougienage and balloon dilation. Fluoroscopy and steroid injections may also be part of endoscopic practice. Diseases that are often and addressed with esophageal dilation include peptic strictures, lower esophageal rings, eosinophilic esophagitis, achalasia and other motility disorders, postoperative dysphagia, radiation induced strictures and malignant strictures. The techniques and approach to all of these disorders will be discussed in this review.

Abstract Importance and Objective Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic condition associated with several risk factors, but little is known about the association between hormone therapy (HT) and GERD in postmenopausal women. Evidence Review We investigated the association between ever or current menopausal HT use and GERD using a systematic review and meta-analysis. Studies published between 2008 and August 31, 2022, were pooled using a DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model, and outcomes were reported as adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with a corresponding 95% CI. Findings The pooled analysis of five studies found a significant direct association between estrogen use and GERD (aOR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.16-1.66; I 2 = 97.6%), and progestogen use and GERD (two studies: aOR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.15-1.64; I 2 = 0.0%). The use of combined HT was also associated with GERD (1.16; 95% CI, 1.00-1.33; I 2 = 87.9%). Overall, HT use was associated with 29% higher odds for GERD (aOR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.17-1.42; I 2 = 94.8%). The large number of pooled participants, differences in study design, geography, patient characteristics, and outcome assessment resulted in significant high heterogeneity. Conclusions and Relevance There is a significant association between ever or current HT use and GERD. However, the results should be interpreted with caution, given the small number of included studies and high heterogeneity. This warrants careful evaluation of GERD risk factors when prescribing HT to reduce the risk of potential GERD complications.

LINKED CONTENTThis article is linked to Chen et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.16959 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17176