Camilleri, M

Abstract Introduction The aim of this case–control study was to determine if exposure to tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors (TNFIs) or immunomodulators (thiopurines or methotrexate) was associated with development of primary gastrointestinal lymphoma (PGIL) in patients with chronic inflammatory conditions. Methods Patients with PGIL and controls evaluated at a tertiary care center over 20 years were matched 1:3 using a medical record informatics search engine based on their chronic inflammatory condition (Crohn’s disease [CD], ulcerative colitis [UC], rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and psoriatic arthritis) and duration of follow-up. Patients who started on TNFI within 3 months of PGIL diagnosis were excluded. We extracted demographics, medical history, and medications used. Univariate models using conditional logistic regression were used due to the small number of matched pairs. Results Twenty PGIL cases matched with 60 controls were followed for a mean 9.9 ± 6.9 and 9.7 ± 8.6 years, respectively. Mean age at time of PGIL diagnosis was 47.5 ± 22.0 (standard deviation) years and the majority (75%) were males. The most common inflammatory diagnosis was inflammatory bowel disease (80% of cases; 45% with UC and 35% with CD). Development of PGIL was not associated with TNFI (odds ratio [OR] = 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69–11.01; P = .18), but with use of TNFI in combination with thiopurines (OR = 8.93; 95% CI 1.43–80.25; P = .014). Risk of PGIL increased with every additional TNFI (2.277 (1.002–5.713); P = .0494). All cases exposed to multiple TNFI were also exposed to thiopurines. Use of thiopurines (alone or in combination) was the greatest risk factor (OR = 6.32; 95% CI 1.55–37.05; P = 0.006) to develop PGIL. Conclusions TNFI therapy was not associated with increased risk for PGIL unless used in combination with thiopurines and with every switch to a different TNFI.

SummaryBackgroundObesity has reached epidemic proportions, with >40% of the US population affected. Although traditionally managed by lifestyle modification, and less frequently by bariatric therapies, there are significant pharmacological advancements.AimsTo conduct a narrative review of the neurohormonal and physiological understanding of weight gain and obesity, and the development, clinical testing, indications, expected clinical outcomes, and associated risks of current FDA‐approved and upcoming anti‐obesity medications (AOMs).MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive review in PubMed for articles on pathophysiology and complications of obesity, including terms ‘neurohormonal’, ‘obesity’, ‘incretin’, and ‘weight loss’. Next, we searched for clinical trial data of all FDA‐approved AOMs, including both the generic and trade names of orlistat, phentermine/topiramate, bupropion/naltrexone, liraglutide, and semaglutide. Additional searches were conducted for tirzepatide and retatrutide ‐ medications expecting regulatory approval. Searches included combinations of terms related to mechanism of action, indications, side effects, risks, and future directions.ResultsWe reviewed the pathophysiology of obesity, including specific role of incretins and glucagon. Clinical data supporting the use of various FDA‐approved medications for weight loss are presented, including placebo‐controlled or, when available, head‐to‐head trials. Beneficial metabolic effects, including impact on liver disease, adverse effects and risks of medications are discussed, including altered gastrointestinal motility and risk for periprocedural aspiration.ConclusionAOMs have established efficacy and effectiveness for weight loss even beyond 52 weeks. Further pharmacological options, such as dual and triple incretins, are probable forthcoming additions to clinical practice for combating obesity and its metabolic consequences such as metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease.

AbstractBackgroundFood intake is regulated by homeostatic and hedonic systems that interact in a complex neuro‐hormonal network. Dysregulation in energy intake can lead to obesity (OB) or anorexia nervosa (AN). However, little is known about the neurohormonal response patterns to food intake in normal weight (NW), OB, and AN.Material & MethodsDuring an ad libitum nutrient drink (Ensure®) test (NDT), participants underwent three pseudo‐continuous arterial spin labeling (pCASL) MRI scans. The first scan was performed before starting the NDT after a > 12 h overnight fast (Hunger), the second after reaching maximal fullness (Satiation), and the third 30‐min after satiation (postprandial fullness). We measured blood levels of ghrelin, cholecystokinin (CCK), glucagon‐like peptide (GLP‐1), and peptide YY (PYY) with every pCASL‐MRI scan. Semiquantitative cerebral blood flow (CBF) maps in mL/100 gr brain/min were calculated and normalized (nCBF) with the CBF in the frontoparietal white matter. The hypothalamus (HT), nucleus accumbens [NAc] and dorsal striatum [DS] were selected as regions of interest (ROIs).ResultsA total of 53 participants, 7 with AN, 17 with NW (body‐mass index [BMI] 18.5–24.9 kg/m2), and 29 with OB (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) completed the study. The NW group had a progressive decrease in all five ROIs during the three stages of food intake (hunger, satiation, and post‐prandial fullness). In contrast, participants with OB showed a minimal change from hunger to postprandial fullness in all five ROIs. The AN group had a sustained nCBF in the HT and DS, from hunger to satiation, with a subsequent decrease in nCBF from satiation to postprandial fullness. All three groups had similar hormonal response patterns with a decrease in ghrelin, an increase in GLP‐1 and PYY, and no change in CCK.ConclusionConditions of regulated (NW) and dysregulated (OB and AN) energy intake are associated with distinctive neurohormonal activity patterns in response to hunger, satiation, and postprandial fullness.

SummaryBackgroundGastroparesis is defined by delayed gastric emptying with associated symptoms in the absence of mechanical obstruction.AimTo evaluate pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of felcisetrag, a highly selective 5‐HT4 receptor agonist, on total gut transit in patients with documented delayed gastric emptying of solids.MethodsSingle‐centre, placebo‐controlled study of 36 participants receiving placebo, 0.1mg, 0.3mg or 1.0mg of felcisetrag I.V. infusion, daily, for 3 days. At baseline, each participant completed a 4h, 99mTc‐egg meal (300 kcal, 30% fat) gastric emptying test. Following infusion (Day 2), gastric, small bowel and colonic transit of solids were measured over 48h (same meal plus 111In‐charcoal delivered in methacrylate‐coated capsule). Samples were collected for pharmacokinetics. The primary endpoint was gastric emptying T1/2. Statistical analysis used baseline parameters as covariates (ANCOVA).ResultsPatients (22 idiopathic, 14 diabetic gastroparesis) were randomised to felcisetrag (0.1 mg, n = 10; 0.3 mg, n = 9; 1.0 mg, n = 7) or placebo (n = 10). Compared to placebo, felcisetrag significantly accelerated gastric emptying T1/2, colonic filling at 6h, and 10% small bowel transit time (overall P < 0.01; all three doses individually Bonferroni corrected P < 0.05) for all three measurements. Ascending colon emptying (T1/2) was significantly accelerated (all doses), and colonic transit at 48 hours was accelerated with 0.1 mg and 0.3 mg felcisetrag compared to placebo. Pharmacokinetic results were dose proportional. Felcisetrag was well tolerated with no clinically significant findings from clinical laboratory, vital signs or ECG.ConclusionI.V. felcisetrag significantly accelerated gastric, small bowel and colonic transit in patients with gastroparesis, and should be further evaluated for short‐term treatment of gastric and intestinal motility disorders.ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT03281577

Objective Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) has gained global adoption but our understanding of its mechanism(s) of action and durability of efficacy is limited. We sought to determine changes in gastric emptying (GE), gastric motility (GM), hormones and eating behaviours after ESG. Design A priori-designed single-centre substudy of a large US randomised clinical trial, adults with obesity were randomised to ESG or lifestyle interventions (LS) alone. We measured GE, hormones and weight loss and assessed eating behaviours. In a subset of ESG patients, we assessed GM. The primary outcome was the change in T1/2 (min) at 3 months, and secondary outcomes were changes in weight, GE, GM, hormones and eating behaviours. We used t-test analyses and regression to determine the association between GE and weight loss. Results 36 (ESG=18; LS=18) participated in this substudy. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. At 3 months, T1/2 was delayed in the ESG group (n=17) compared with the LS group (n=17) (152.3±47.3 vs 89.1±27.9; p<0.001). At 12 months, T1/2 remained delayed in the ESG group (n=16) vs control group (n=14) (137±37.4 vs 90.1±23.4; p<0.001). Greater delays in GE at 3 months were associated with greater weight loss. GM was preserved and fasting ghrelin, glucagon-like peptide 1 and polypeptide YY significantly increased 18 months after ESG. Conclusion ESG promotes weight loss through several key mechanistic pathways involving GE and hormones while preserving GM. These findings further support clinical adoption of this technique for the management of obesity. Trial registration number NCT03406975.

Abstract Aim To identify patient factors, including gastrointestinal functions, that are predictive or associated with weight loss in response to once‐daily 3 mg liraglutide administered subcutaneously (SQ) or placebo in obesity. Methods One hundred and thirty‐six obese adults (87% female) were randomized in a placebo‐controlled, 16‐week trial of liraglutide, escalated to 3 mg administered SQ daily. Gastrointestinal functions were measured at baseline and 16 weeks: gastric emptying of solids (GET 1/2 ); fasting and postprandial gastric volumes; kcal ingested during ad libitum buffet meal and the nutrient drink test. GET 1/2 was also measured at 5 weeks. A multiple variable regression model examined variables associated with weight loss of more than 4 kg at 16 weeks. A parsimonious model using backward selection identified the final model. Results Weight loss of more than 4 kg at 16 weeks occurred in 71% of liraglutide‐ and 16% of placebo‐treated patients. In all participants combined, parameters univariately associated with a weight loss of more than 4 kg were GET 1/2 at 5 and 16 weeks, weight loss at 5 weeks and kcal intake during the buffet meal at 16 weeks. The final parsimonious model (area under the receiver operator characteristics [AUROC] curve = 0.832) identified that factors associated with more than 4‐kg weight loss were GET 1/2 at 5 weeks (OR = 2.505; 95% CI: 1.57‐3.997) per 50 minutes and kcal intake during ad libitum meal at 16 weeks (OR = 0.721; 95% CI: 0.602‐0.864) per 100 kcal. Among only the 60 liraglutide‐treated subjects, kcal intake at 16 weeks was associated with 4‐kg weight loss (AUROC = 0.757). Conclusions Slower GET 1/2 and weight loss at 5 weeks predicted a weight loss of more than 4 kg at 16 weeks in all participants. Among liraglutide‐treated adults, weight loss of more than 4 kg was associated with ad libitum meal kcal intake at 16 weeks.

Abstract Objective This study aimed to determine the effects of a long‐acting glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) receptor agonist, liraglutide, and placebo subcutaneously over 16 weeks on weight and gastric functions and to evaluate associations of single‐nucleotide polymorphisms in GLP1R (rs6923761) and TCF7L2 (rs7903146) with effects of liraglutide. Methods The study conducted a randomized, parallel‐group, placebo‐controlled, 16‐week trial of liraglutide, escalated to 3 mg subcutaneously daily in 136 otherwise healthy adults with obesity. Weight, gastric emptying of solids (GES), gastric volumes, satiation, and body composition measured at baseline and after treatment were compared in two treatment groups using analysis of covariance. Results Liraglutide ( n = 59) and placebo ( n = 65) groups completed treatment. Relative to placebo, liraglutide increased weight loss at 5 and 16 weeks (both p < 0.05), slowed time to half GES (T 1/2 ) at 5 and 16 weeks (both p < 0.001), and increased fasting gastric volume ( p = 0.01) and satiation ( p < 0.01) at 16 weeks. GES T 1/2 was positively correlated with weight loss on liraglutide (both p < 0.001). After 16 weeks of liraglutide, GLP1R rs6923761 (AG/AA vs. GG) was associated with reduced percent body fat ( p = 0.062), and TCF7L2 rs7903146 (CC vs. CT/TT) was associated with lower body weight ( p = 0.015). Conclusions Liraglutide, 3 mg, induces weight loss with delay in GES T 1/2 and reduces calorie intake. Slowing GES and variations in GLP1R and TCF7L2 are associated with liraglutide effects in obesity.

We show how switching from a regular diet to an HCHF increases cholesterol absorption in patients with normal weight and obesity. The decrease in cholesterol absorption from an HCHF to an LCLF, on the other hand, was only seen in normal-weight controls, underlining the importance of body weight in this regulation. In addition, changes in caloric and fat content had an immediate and direct effect on hepatic bile acid production.