Newcomb, Polly A.

Abstract Menopausal users of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) are at increased breast cancer risk and decreased colorectal cancer (CRC) risk compared with individuals who have never used HRT, but these opposing associations may differ by familial risk of breast cancer and CRC. We harmonized data from 3 cohorts and generated separate breast cancer and CRC familial risk scores based on cancer family history. We defined moderate or strong family history as a risk score of 0.4 or higher, where 0.4 was equivalent to a 50-year-old woman with 1 parent diagnosed with either breast cancer or CRC at 55 years of age. Of 24 486 women assessed, 1243 and 405 were diagnosed with incident breast cancer and CRC, respectively. For breast cancer, menopausal HRT ever use versus never use hazard ratios were 1.27 (95% CI = 1.11 to 1.45) for a breast cancer familial risk score below 0.4 and 1.01 (95% CI = 0.82 to 1.25) for a breast cancer familial risk score of 0.4 or higher (Pdifference = .08). For CRC, menopausal HRT hazard ratios were 0.63 (95% CI = 0.50 to 0.78) for a CRC familial risk score below 0.4 and 1.21 (95% CI = 0.73 to 2.00) for a CRC familial risk score of 0.4 or higher (Pdifference = .03). Associations with menopausal HRT use that apply to the general population may not hold for women at moderate or strong familial risk of these cancers.

Abstract Background The legal climate for cannabis use has dramatically changed with an increasing number of states passing legislation legalizing access for medical and recreational use. Among cancer patients, cannabis is often used to ameliorate adverse effects of cancer treatment. Data are limited on the extent and type of use among cancer patients during treatment and the perceived benefits and harms. This multicenter survey was conducted to assess the use of cannabis among cancer patients residing in states with varied legal access to cannabis. Methods A total of 12 NCI-Designated Cancer Centers, across states with varied cannabis-access legal status, conducted surveys with a core questionnaire to assess cannabis use among recently diagnosed cancer patients. Data were collected between September 2021 and August 2023 and pooled across 12 cancer centers. Frequencies and 95% confidence intervals for core survey measures were calculated, and weighted estimates are presented for the 10 sites that drew probability samples. Results Overall reported cannabis use since cancer diagnosis among survey respondents was 32.9% (weighted), which varied slightly by state legalization status. The most common perceived benefits of use were for pain, sleep, stress and anxiety, and treatment side effects. Reported perceived risks were less common and included inability to drive, difficulty concentrating, lung damage, addiction, and impact on employment. A majority reported feeling comfortable speaking to health-care providers though, overall, only 21.5% reported having done so. Among those who used cannabis since diagnosis, the most common modes were eating in food, smoking, and pills or tinctures, and the most common reasons were for sleep disturbance, followed by pain and stress and anxiety with 60%-68% reporting improved symptoms with use. Conclusion This geographically diverse survey demonstrates that patients use cannabis regardless of its legal status. Addressing knowledge gaps concerning benefits and harms of cannabis use during cancer treatment is critical to enhance patient-provider communication.

Regular, long-term aspirin use may act synergistically with genetic variants, particularly those in mechanistically relevant pathways, to confer a protective effect on colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. We leveraged pooled data from 52 clinical trial, cohort, and case-control studies that included 30,806 CRC cases and 41,861 controls of European ancestry to conduct a genome-wide interaction scan between regular aspirin/nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use and imputed genetic variants. After adjusting for multiple comparisons, we identified statistically significant interactions between regular aspirin/NSAID use and variants in 6q24.1 (top hit rs72833769 ), which has evidence of influencing expression of TBC1D7 (a subunit of the TSC1-TSC2 complex, a key regulator of MTOR activity), and variants in 5p13.1 (top hit rs350047 ), which is associated with expression of PTGER4 (codes a cell surface receptor directly involved in the mode of action of aspirin). Genetic variants with functional impact may modulate the chemopreventive effect of regular aspirin use, and our study identifies putative previously unidentified targets for additional mechanistic interrogation.

Abstract Background: The genotoxin colibactin causes a tumor single-base substitution (SBS) mutational signature, SBS88. It is unknown whether epidemiologic factors’ association with colorectal cancer risk and survival differs by SBS88. Methods: Within the Genetic Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium and Colon Cancer Family Registry, we measured SBS88 in 4,308 microsatellite stable/microsatellite instability low tumors. Associations of epidemiologic factors with colorectal cancer risk by SBS88 were assessed using multinomial regression (N = 4,308 cases, 14,192 controls; cohort-only cases N = 1,911), and with colorectal cancer–specific survival using Cox proportional hazards regression (N = 3,465 cases). Results: 392 (9%) tumors were SBS88 positive. Among all cases, the highest quartile of fruit intake was associated with lower risk of SBS88-positive colorectal cancer than SBS88-negative colorectal cancer [odds ratio (OR) = 0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37-0.76; OR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.66–0.85, respectively, Pheterogeneity = 0.047]. Among cohort studies, associations of body mass index (BMI), alcohol, and fruit intake with colorectal cancer risk differed by SBS88. BMI ≥30 kg/m2 was associated with worse colorectal cancer–specific survival among those SBS88-positive [hazard ratio (HR) = 3.40, 95% CI 1.47–7.84], but not among those SBS88-negative (HR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.78–1.21, Pheterogeneity = 0.066). Conclusions: Most epidemiologic factors did not differ by SBS88 for colorectal cancer risk or survival. Higher BMI may be associated with worse colorectal cancer–specific survival among those SBS88-positive; however, validation is needed in samples with whole-genome or whole-exome sequencing available. Impact: This study highlights the importance of identification of tumor phenotypes related to colorectal cancer and understanding potential heterogeneity for risk and survival.

AbstractWe conducted the first large genome‐wide association study to identify novel genetic variants that predict better (or poorer) prognosis in colorectal cancer patients receiving standard first‐line oxaliplatin‐based chemotherapy vs chemotherapy without oxaliplatin. We used data from two phase III trials, NCCTG N0147 and NCCTG N9741 and a population‐based patient cohort, DACHS. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were employed, including an interaction term between each SNP and type of treatment for overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival. The analysis was performed for studies individually, and the results were combined using fixed‐effect meta‐analyses separately for resected stage III colon cancer (3098 patients from NCCTG N0147 and 549 patients from DACHS) and mCRC (505 patients from NCCTG N9741 and 437 patients from DACHS). We further performed gene‐based analysis as well as in silico bioinformatics analysis for CRC‐relevant functional genomic annotation of identified loci. In stage III colon cancer patients, a locus on chr22 (rs11912167) was associated with significantly poorer OS after oxaliplatin‐based chemotherapy vs chemotherapy without oxaliplatin (Pinteraction < 5 × 10−8). For mCRC patients, three loci on chr1 (rs1234556), chr12 (rs11052270) and chr15 (rs11858406) were found to be associated with differential OS (P < 5 × 10−7). The locus on chr1 located in the intronic region of RCSD1 was replicated in an independent cohort of 586 mCRC patients from ALGB/SWOG 80405 (Pinteraction = .04). The GWA gene‐based analysis yielded for RCSD1 the most significant association with differential OS in mCRC (P = 6.6 × 10−6). With further investigation into its biological mechanisms, this finding could potentially be used to individualize first‐line treatment and improve clinical outcomes.

Abstract Background: The genotoxin colibactin, produced by Escherichia coli containing the pks island, is associated with a tumor single base substitution (SBS) mutational signature SBS88. It is unknown whether lifestyle and environmental factors related to gut dysbiosis impact colorectal cancer (CRC) risk and survival differently by colibactin signature status. Methods: Utilizing the resources of the Genetic Epidemiology of Colorectal cancer Consortium and Colon Cancer Family Registry (GECCO-CCFR), a consortium including both case-control and cohort study designs, SBS88 tumor mutational signature was measured in 4308 CRC cases who were microsatellite stable (MSS) and had at least five somatic single nucleotide variants for signature decomposition. Associations of 13 lifestyle and environmental factors with CRC risk by colibactin signature status were assessed using logistic and multinomial regression; associations with CRC survival were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: 392 (9%) of the 4308 MSS tumors were positive for SBS88. Having a BMI ≥30 kg/m2 (versus a BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m2) was strongly associated with worse CRC-specific survival among those with the SBS88 signature, but not among those with SBS88 negative CRC [further adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 3.40 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.47, 7.84, and HR = 0.97 95% CI 0.78, 1.21, respectively, P for heterogeneity = 0.066]. Associations of fruit intake with CRC risk may be differential by SBS88 status. In minimally adjusted models, those in the highest quartile of fruit intake (versus the first quartile) had 0.53 (95% CI 0.37, 0.76) times the risk of SBS88 positive CRC, as opposed to 0.75 (95% CI 0.66, 0.85) times the risk of SBS88 negative CRC (P for heterogeneity = 0.047). Among cohort studies specifically, associations between CRC risk and BMI, alcohol, and fruit intake also differed by SBS88 status (P for heterogeneity ranging 0.02-0.05). Conclusions: Higher BMI may be associated with worse CRC-specific survival among those with SBS88 positive tumors. BMI, alcohol, and dietary factors may be differentially associated with CRC risk based on SBS88 status. Citation Format: Claire Elizabeth Thomas, Peter Georgeson, Conghui Qu, Robert S. Steinfelder, Daniel D. Buchanan, Mark A. Jenkins, Andrea Gsur, Jane C. Figueiredo, Polly A. Newcomb, Peter T. Campbell, Christina Newton, Caroline Y. Um, Lisa Boardman, Victor Moreno, Jenny Chang-Claude, Michael Hoffmeister, Marc J. Gunter, Andrew T. Chan, Shuji Ogino, Ellen L. Goode, Brigid Lynch, Yohannes A. Melaku, Steven Gallinger, Sonja I. Berndt, Wen-Yi Huang, Ulrike Peters, Amanda I. Phipps. Lifestyle and environmental factors in relation to colorectal cancer risk and survival by colibactin tumor mutational signature status [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 6453.

Abstract Colorectal cancer risk can be impacted by genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors, including diet and obesity. Gene-environment interactions (G × E) can provide biological insights into the effects of obesity on colorectal cancer risk. Here, we assessed potential genome-wide G × E interactions between body mass index (BMI) and common SNPs for colorectal cancer risk using data from 36,415 colorectal cancer cases and 48,451 controls from three international colorectal cancer consortia (CCFR, CORECT, and GECCO). The G × E tests included the conventional logistic regression using multiplicative terms (one degree of freedom, 1DF test), the two-step EDGE method, and the joint 3DF test, each of which is powerful for detecting G × E interactions under specific conditions. BMI was associated with higher colorectal cancer risk. The two-step approach revealed a statistically significant G×BMI interaction located within the Formin 1/Gremlin 1 (FMN1/GREM1) gene region (rs58349661). This SNP was also identified by the 3DF test, with a suggestive statistical significance in the 1DF test. Among participants with the CC genotype of rs58349661, overweight and obesity categories were associated with higher colorectal cancer risk, whereas null associations were observed across BMI categories in those with the TT genotype. Using data from three large international consortia, this study discovered a locus in the FMN1/GREM1 gene region that interacts with BMI on the association with colorectal cancer risk. Further studies should examine the potential mechanisms through which this locus modifies the etiologic link between obesity and colorectal cancer. Significance: This gene-environment interaction analysis revealed a genetic locus in FMN1/GREM1 that interacts with body mass index in colorectal cancer risk, suggesting potential implications for precision prevention strategies.

INTRODUCTION: Early-onset colorectal cancer diagnosed before the age of 50 years has been increasing. Likely reflecting the pathogenic role of the intestinal microbiome, which gradually changes across the entire colorectal length, the prevalence of certain tumor molecular characteristics gradually changes along colorectal subsites. Understanding how colorectal tumor molecular features differ by age and tumor location is important in personalized patient management. METHODS: Using 14,004 cases with colorectal cancer including 3,089 early-onset cases, we examined microsatellite instability (MSI), CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), and KRAS and BRAF mutations in carcinomas of the cecum, ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum and compared early-onset cases with later-onset cases. RESULTS: The proportions of MSI-high, CIMP-high, and BRAF -mutated early-onset tumors were lowest in the rectum (8.8%, 3.4%, and 3.5%, respectively) and highest in the ascending colon (46% MSI-high; 15% CIMP-high) or transverse colon (8.6% BRAF -mutated) (all P trend <0.001 across the rectum to ascending colon). Compared with later-onset tumors, early-onset tumors showed a higher prevalence of MSI-high status and a lower prevalence of CIMP-high status and BRAF mutations in most subsites. KRAS mutation prevalence was higher in the cecum compared with that in the other subsites in both early-onset and later-onset tumors ( P < 0.001). Notably, later-onset MSI-high tumors showed a continuous decrease in KRAS mutation prevalence from the rectum (36%) to ascending colon (9%; P trend <0.001), followed by an increase in the cecum (14%), while early-onset MSI-high cancers showed no such trend. DISCUSSION: Our findings support biogeographical and pathogenic heterogeneity of colorectal carcinomas in different colorectal subsites and age groups.

Abstract Background: Tobacco smoking is an established risk factor for colorectal cancer. However, genetically defined population subgroups may have increased susceptibility to smoking-related effects on colorectal cancer. Methods: A genome-wide interaction scan was performed including 33,756 colorectal cancer cases and 44,346 controls from three genetic consortia. Results: Evidence of an interaction was observed between smoking status (ever vs. never smokers) and a locus on 3p12.1 (rs9880919, P = 4.58 × 10−8), with higher associated risk in subjects carrying the GG genotype [OR, 1.25; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.20–1.30] compared with the other genotypes (OR &lt;1.17 for GA and AA). Among ever smokers, we observed interactions between smoking intensity (increase in 10 cigarettes smoked per day) and two loci on 6p21.33 (rs4151657, P = 1.72 × 10−8) and 8q24.23 (rs7005722, P = 2.88 × 10−8). Subjects carrying the rs4151657 TT genotype showed higher risk (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.09–1.16) compared with the other genotypes (OR &lt;1.06 for TC and CC). Similarly, higher risk was observed among subjects carrying the rs7005722 AA genotype (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.07–1.28) compared with the other genotypes (OR &lt;1.13 for AC and CC). Functional annotation revealed that SNPs in 3p12.1 and 6p21.33 loci were located in regulatory regions, and were associated with expression levels of nearby genes. Genetic models predicting gene expression revealed that smoking parameters were associated with lower colorectal cancer risk with higher expression levels of CADM2 (3p12.1) and ATF6B (6p21.33). Conclusions: Our study identified novel genetic loci that may modulate the risk for colorectal cancer of smoking status and intensity, linked to tumor suppression and immune response. Impact: These findings can guide potential prevention treatments.

Abstract Background: Evidence suggests that, compared to later-onset colorectal cancer (CRC), early-onset CRC (diagnosed before 50 years of age) occur more frequently in rectal location and less frequently in proximal colon location. Studies also indicate heterogeneity of molecular characteristics within early-onset CRCs and between early-onset and later-onset CRCs. Understanding how tumor molecular features and biological aggressiveness of early-onset CRC differ by detailed tumor location is important in personalized patient management. Methods: Using 14,004 CRC cases including 3,089 early-onset cases from The Cancer Genome Atlas and the Genetics and Epidemiology of CRC Consortium (GECCO), we examined microsatellite instability (MSI), CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), and KRAS and BRAF mutations in cancers of the cecum, ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum. We further conducted CRC-specific survival analyses of detailed tumor location stratified by molecular characteristics using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Results: The proportions of MSI-high, CIMP-high, and BRAF-mutated early-onset tumors gradually increased from the rectum (8.8%, 3.4%, and 3.5%, respectively) to the ascending colon (46% MSI-high; 15% CIMP-high) or transverse colon (8.6% BRAF-mutated), followed by declines in the cecum for MSI-high (36%) and BRAF-mutated (4.6%) tumors. Notably, later-onset MSI-high tumors showed a continuous decrease in KRAS mutation prevalence from the rectum (36%) to ascending colon (9%; Ptrend &lt;0.001) followed by an increase in the cecum (14%), while early-onset MSI-high cancer showed no such trend. In survival analyses, there was a trend for better CRC-specific survival from the cecum to sigmoid colon (Ptrend&lt;0.001) (but not to rectum), which did not significantly differ by age of diagnosis (Pinteraction=0.61). Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for sigmoid vs. cecum were 0.86 (95% CI, 0.64-1.14) for early-onset cases and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.70-0.93) for later-onset cases. Notably, the prognostic association of tumor location differed by MSI status (Pinteraction=0.001). Non-MSI-high tumors exhibited the cecum-to-sigmoid trend for better CRC-specific survival [Ptrend &lt;0.001; multivariable-adjusted HR for the sigmoid colon (vs. cecum), 0.80; 95% CI, 0.70-0.92], whereas MSI-high tumors demonstrated an opposite cecum-to-sigmoid trend for worse survival (Ptrend = 0.020; the corresponding HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.15-3.92). Conclusions: Our findings support biogeographical and pathogenic heterogeneity of CRC in different age groups and colorectal subsites. Both detailed colorectal location and tumor molecular features need to be accounted for prognostication of early-onset and later-onset CRCs to advance precision medicine. Citation Format: Tomotaka Ugai, Yin Cao, Koichiro Haruki, Tabitha A. Harrison, Daniel D. Buchanan, Peter T. Campbell, Andrew T. Chan, Steven Gallinger, Marc J. Gunter, Michael Hoffmeister, Mark A. Jenkins, Roger L. Milne, Polly A. Newcomb, Rish K. Pai, Andrew J. Pellatt, Robert E. Schoen, Bethany Van Guelpen, Michael O. Woods, Amanda I. Phipps, Ulrike Peters, Shuji Ogino. Molecular characteristics and prognosis of early-onset colorectal cancer according to detailed anatomical locations: Comparison to later-onset cases [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Colorectal Cancer; 2022 Oct 1-4; Portland, OR. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(23 Suppl_1):Abstract nr A010.