Rosenbaum, Andrew N

Background Diastolic pulmonary gradient ( DPG ) was proposed as a better marker of pulmonary vascular remodeling compared with pulmonary vascular resistance ( PVR ) and transpulmonary gradient ( TPG ). The prognostic significance of DPG in patients requiring a left ventricular assist device ( LVAD ) remains unclear. We sought to investigate whether pre‐ LVAD DPG is a predictor of survival or right ventricular ( RV ) failure post‐ LVAD . Methods and Results We retrospectively reviewed 268 patients who underwent right heart catheterization before LVAD implantation from 2007 to 2017 and had pulmonary hypertension because of left heart disease. Patients were dichotomized using DPG ≥7 mm Hg, PVR ≥3 mm Hg, or TPG ≥12 mm Hg. The associations between these parameters and all‐cause mortality or RV failure post LVAD were assessed with Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan–Meier analyses. After a mean follow‐up time of 35 months, elevated DPG was associated with increased risk of RV failure (hazard ratio [ HR ]: 3.30; P =0.004, for DPG ≥7 versus DPG <7), whereas elevated PVR ( HR 1.85, P =0.13 for PVR ≥3 versus PVR <3) or TPG ( HR 1.47, P =0.35, for TPG ≥12 versus TPG <12) were not associated with the development of RV failure. Elevated DPG was not associated with mortality risk ( HR 1.16, P =0.54, for DPG ≥7 versus DPG <7), whereas elevated PVR , but not TPG , was associated with higher mortality risk ( HR 1.55; P =0.026, for PVR ≥3 versus PVR <3). Conclusions Among patients with pulmonary hypertension because of left heart disease requiring LVAD support, elevated DPG was associated with RV failure but not survival, while elevated PVR predicted mortality post LVAD implantation.

Background Left ventricular (LV) hemodynamic assessment has been sparsely performed in patients supported on continuous‐flow LV assist devices (cf LVADs ). Insight into dynamic changes of left heart parameters during ramp studies may improve LV assist device optimization and evaluate pathology. Methods and Results To complement right heart catheterization, a novel technique for left heart catheterization in patients with a cf LVAD was developed. Patients implanted with cf LVAD s underwent hemodynamic ramp left heart catheterization and right heart catheterization with transthoracic echocardiography. Continuous aortic and LV pressures were measured along with right atrial, pulmonary artery, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressures. A novel index, the transaortic gradient ( TAG ) was established. Thirty eight patients with cf LVADs were evaluated at a median of 446 days (interquartile range, 183–742) after device implant. During left heart catheterization performed for hemodynamic optimization, drop‐in LV end‐diastolic pressure and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure were associated with a rise in TAG . A range was identified for TAG (20–40 mm Hg) as providing the most optimal level of hemodynamic offloading. Pathologic states deviated from normal responses to ramp. LV assist device thrombosis was associated with an inability to increase in TAG during speed ramp. Significant aortic insufficiency was associated with a marked increase in LV end‐diastolic pressure despite a concomitant decrease in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure with increasing LV assist device speeds. Conclusions Inclusion of left heart catheterization to a typical right heart catheterization LV assist device ramp protocol imparted unique insights to optimize cf LVAD speeds in different clinical scenarios. A novel index, the TAG was defined and provided additional resolution to optimized offloading.

Background The true prevalence of heart failure due to wild type transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRwt) is likely underestimated. There is a paucity of data with regard to the management of ATTRwt-related advanced heart failure and the natural history of extracardiac ATTRwt. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing cardiac transplant (HTx) for ATTRwt at a single institution. Comprehensive clinical data, including baseline hemodynamic and echocardiographic characteristics, and posttransplant outcomes, were obtained. Results Seven patients with ATTRwt underwent HTx between 2007 and 2015. All patients were male with a mean age of 66 ± 9. Patients had a reduced ejection fraction (mean, 37 ± 14%) and elevated filling pressures pre-HTx (mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure 22 ± 7 mm Hg) before HTx. Three-year survival was 100%; 1 patient died of pancreatic cancer 45 months post-HTx (1 death per 30.8 patient-years). Oxygen consumption (Δ +6.8 ± 4.9 mL·kg−1·min−1) and 6-minute walk distances (Δ +189 ± 60 m) improved. Symptomatic gastrointestinal involvement (n = 2) and peripheral nerve involvement (n = 4) by ATTRwt developed late. Conclusions This is the first report of a series of ATTRwt patients receiving HTx in which excellent outcomes are demonstrated. Although cardiac death is averted, systemic manifestations of ATTRwt may develop posttransplantation.

Although improvement in cardiac output and hemodynamic parameters is routinely demonstrated in patients implanted with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs), improvement in exercise capacity is inconsistently seen. Our purpose was to determine whether native cardiac factors, LVAD factors, or comorbid factors were associated with lack of improvement. Review of all patients undergoing preimplant cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and CPET on LVAD therapy at one institution was performed between 2007 and 2014 (n = 49). Comprehensive assessment of echocardiographic parameters, right heart catheterization data, medications, and comorbid illness was undertaken. There was no mean improvement in peak oxygen consumption (VO2; 11.8–12.4 ml/kg/min; p = 0.26), although exercise time (5.1 [46% predicted] to 5.8 min [56% predicted]; p = 0.02) and nadir of the ratio of minute ventilation to carbon dioxide production slope (VE/VCO2; 39–36; p = 0.001) improved. Factors most strongly associated with improvement in VO2 were Heartmate II pulsatility index (PI; R = 0.48; p = 0.001), power (R = −0.40; p = 0.009), pump flow (R = −0.40; p = 0.008), and pump speed (R = −0.32; p = 0.04). Peak heart rate (HR) was also associated with improvement in VO2 (R = 0.41; p = 0.004). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; R = 0.004; p = 0.77), right ventricular (RV) function (R = 0.22; p = 0.28), and aortic valve opening (R = 0.20; p = 0.57) were not associated with improvement in VO2. Our data suggest that less reliance on LVAD support was modestly associated with improvement in exercise capacity. Further studies should seek to determine the optimal level of device support prospectively in relation to exercise capacity.