Elmquist, William F.

Abstract Background EGFR targeting antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are highly effective against EGFR-amplified tumors, but poor distribution across the blood–brain barrier (BBB) limits their efficacy in glioblastoma (GBM) when administered systemically. We studied whether convection-enhanced delivery (CED) can be used to safely infuse ADCs into orthotopic patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of EGFRvIII mutant GBM. Methods The efficacy of the EGFR-targeted ADCs depatuxizumab mafodotin (Depatux-M) and Serclutamab talirine (Ser-T) was evaluated in vitro and in vivo. CED was performed in nontumor and tumor-bearing mice. Immunostaining was used to evaluate ADC distribution, pharmacodynamic effects, and normal cell toxicity. Results Dose-finding studies in orthotopic GBM6 identified single infusion of 2 μg Ser-T and 60 μg Depatux-M as safe and effective associated with extended survival prolongation (>300 days and 95 days, respectively). However, with serial infusions every 21 days, four Ser-T doses controlled tumor growth but was associated with lethal toxicity approximately 7 days after the final infusion. Limiting dosing to two infusions in GBM108 provided profound median survival extension of over 200 days. In contrast, four Depatux-M CED doses were well tolerated and significantly extended survival in both GBM6 (158 days) and GBM108 (310 days). In a toxicity analysis, Ser-T resulted in a profound loss in NeuN+ cells and markedly elevated GFAP staining, while Depatux-M was associated only with modest elevation in GFAP staining. Conclusion CED of Depatux-M is well tolerated and results in extended survival in orthotopic GBM PDXs. In contrast, CED of Ser-T was associated with a much narrower therapeutic window.

Abstract The ATM inhibitor AZD1390 disrupts cellular responses to ionizing radiation (IR) and is a potent radiosensitizer being tested in clinical trials. Here, we evaluated, the effects of AZD1390 on radiation sensitivity and DNA damage repair pathways in glioblastoma (GBM) cells and patient derived xenografts (PDXs). AZD1390 (30 nM and higher) suppressed IR (5 Gy)-induced phosphorylation of ATM-Serine1981 and downstream phosphorylation sites on Kap1, Chk2 and H2AX in U251 cells and multiple PDXs. Consistent with enhanced DNA damage, AZD1390 increased IR induced G2/M arrest in U251 (80.6% with AZD1390/IR vs. 64.6% with IR, p= 0.01), GBM43 (61.9% vs. 25.7%, p= 0.01) and GBM39 (40.9% vs. 25.4%, p= 0.01). Moreover, in a clonogenic survival assay, AZD1390 sensitized U251 cells to 5 Gy IR (0.24% survival with AZD1390/IR vs. 2.3% with IR alone, p=0.01). In a reporter-based analysis of DNA repair capacity, ATM inhibition resulted in a 40 to 60% reduction in homologous recombination (HR) and modest but significant decrease in micro-homology mediated end joining (MMEJ) and gap fill-in synthesis in U251 cells but had no effect on non-homologous end joining, translesion synthesis, nucleotide or base excision repair pathways. Comparing effects of AZD1390 on repair in GBM14 (TP53-wt) and GBM43 (TP53-mutant), similar results were observed except that decreased MMEJ was seen only in GBM43 (0.03± 0.01% vs. 0.07± 0.01% in control, p=0.002). Intriguingly, RAD51 knockdown (to disrupt HR) sensitized U251 and GBM43 but not GBM14. The efficacy of AZD1390 ± IR was studied in vivo in 10 PDXs. IR was delivered to orthotopic tumors using opposed lateral 225 kVp beams. AZD1390 (20 mg/kg PO) was given just prior to each radiation dose (2 Gy x 5 fractions). AZD1390 monotherapy was mostly ineffective, IR alone was reasonably efficacious with an average 1.8 ± 0.1-fold-increase in survival relative to sham radiation (survival ratio) across all 10 models. IR/AZD1390 treatment resulted in significant survival extension relative to IR alone in 6 of 10 models. Analysis of the survival benefit of combination therapy compared to IR alone across the entire cohort of PDXs was statistically marginal (average survival ratio 2.3± 0.3 vs. 1.8 ± 0.1 with IR, p=0.08). However, when stratified by TP53 status, combination therapy was significantly more effective than IR (mean survival ratio 2.3 ± 0.1 vs. 1.6 ± 0.2 with IR alone, p=0.02) in TP53-mutant PDXs, where all 5 models benefited. In contrast, TP53-wt group had no benefit (mean survival ratio 2.2 ± 0.5 vs. 2.0 ± 0.2, p=0.61), GBM39 was only TP53-wt PDX that benefited from the combination. In conclusion, AZD1390 is an effective radio-sensitizer that causes disruption in HR and potentially other DNA repair pathways. Interestingly, in vivo radiosensitizing effects are mostly restricted to TP53-mutant GBM PDXs. Understandingmechanism of resistance in the context of different TP53 backgrounds remains an important future direction. Citation Format: Shiv K. Gupta, Jiajia Chen, Daniel J. Laverty, Surabhi Talele, Brett L. Carlson, Ann C. Mladek Tuma, Danielle Burgenske, Gaspar J. Kitange, Petra Hamerlik, Zachary D. Nagel, Stephen T. Durant, William F. Elmquist, Jann N. Sarkaria. AZD1390 radio-sensitizes p53-mutant GBM via disrupting homology directed DNA repair [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 2598.

Abstract H3K27-altered diffuse midline glioma (DMG) is a uniformly lethal CNS cancer that predominately occurs in children. In the last decade, while studies revealing the molecular underpinnings of the disease have paved the way for novel therapeutic strategies, this tumor remains a death sentence. Our lab and others have identified numerous drugs of high interest for treating this devasting disease, however, every trial has failed to show benefit. Is our failure to translate these laboratory findings due to the fact we have not found the right drugs or treatment regimens yet? Or is this a failure to get the drugs to the tumor? Or is this simply a very bad disease to treat? The answer is likely multifactorial. Our lab, in collaboration with others, have strong data to show that simply getting drugs to the tumor will not result in a positive benefit. Most drugs are rapidly cleared from their target space. Utilizing techniques that increase the drug-tumor resonance time is necessary to translate our basic science findings to our patients. Picking the right drug and the delivery mechanism is not enough for a positive effect. Here, we assessed the efficacy of a previously identified inhibitor, alisertib, delivered by short-term convection-enhanced delivery or a continuous osmotic pump and found that continuous, direct delivery results in a significant increase in survival (p = 0.0002). Furthermore, long-term survivors showed a decreased tumor burden and on-target drug effects. These data support that translation into patients must consider three factors: 1) selection of a potent therapy, 2) selection of the proper delivery method for that therapy, 3) modulation to ensure that the therapy remains in the targeted tissue long enough for desired effect. Keeping these basic tenets at the forefront of development may finally lead to a more effective treatment strategy for this devastating disease

AbstractBrain tumours have a poor prognosis and lack effective treatments. The blood–brain barrier (BBB) represents a major hurdle to drug delivery to brain tumours. In some locations in the tumour, the BBB may be disrupted to form the blood–brain tumour barrier (BBTB). This leaky BBTB enables diagnosis of brain tumours by contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; however, this disruption is heterogeneous throughout the tumour. Thus, relying on the disrupted BBTB for achieving effective drug concentrations in brain tumours has met with little clinical success. Because of this, it would be beneficial to design drugs and drug delivery strategies to overcome the ‘normal’ BBB to effectively treat the brain tumours. In this review, we discuss the role of BBB/BBTB in brain tumour diagnosis and treatment highlighting the heterogeneity of the BBTB. We also discuss various strategies to improve drug delivery across the BBB/BBTB to treat both primary and metastatic brain tumours. Recognizing that the BBB represents a critical determinant of drug efficacy in central nervous system tumours will allow a more rapid translation from basic science to clinical application. A more complete understanding of the factors, such as BBB–limited drug delivery, that have hindered progress in treating both primary and metastatic brain tumours, is necessary to develop more effective therapies.

Abstract BACKGROUND Diffuse midline gliomas (DMGs) harboring the H3K27M mutation are highly aggressive, fatal brainstem tumors that primarily occur in children. The blood-brain barrier (BBB) prevents numerous drugs from reaching CNS tumors, like DMG, at cytotoxic concentrations. Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) has emerged as a drug delivery technique that bypasses the BBB through a direct interstitial infusion under a pressure gradient. However, drug distribution and clearance from the brain following CED is poorly understood and has been cited as a potential reason for the lack of efficacy observed in prior clinical trials. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to understand how two small molecule inhibitors (alisertib, ponatinib) that inhibit cell growth and proliferation in DMG cells in vitro distribute and clear from the brain following CED to the brainstem. METHODS Sprague-dawley rats underwent a single 60mL CED infusion of drug to the brainstem (200mM alisertib, 10mM ponatinib) and were sacrificed 0.083, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 24 hours following the completion of the infusion. Brains were dissected and drug concentration was determined via HPLC analysis. RESULTS No rats showed any clinical or neurological signs of toxicity post-infusion. Both drugs showed significant differences in drug concentration based on anatomical brain region where higher concentrations were observed in the pons and cerebellum compared to the cortex. Drug half-life in the brain was ~0.5 hours for alisertib and ~1 hour for ponatinib, but this was not significantly increased following co-administration of elacridar, a BBB efflux pump inhibitor. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that elimination of drugs from the brain in a complex, multifactorial mechanism that warrants further preclinical investigation prior to the initiation of a clinical trial.

Abstract Choosing effective chemotherapies for intravenous delivery to brain tumors is challenging, especially given the protective nature of the blood brain barrier (BBB). Connecting drug distribution to non-invasive, pre-surgical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could allow for predictive insight into drug distribution. In a previous study, we found that T2Gd images were predictive of a low BBB penetrant drug (Cefazolin), and FLAIR images were predictive of a high BBB penetrant drug (Levetiracetam). While these results are promising, we further seek to explore how advanced MRI sequences might inform image-based models of drug distribution. Prior to surgery, we acquired advanced dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) MRI sequences for eight brain tumor patients (7 gliomas and 1 metastatic adenocarcinoma) in addition to the anatomic MRIs. All resulting quantitative maps and acquired images were co-registered. Prior to incision, patients received injections of cefazolin and levetiracetam. Next, multiple blood samples and biopsies were collected during surgery. Biopsies and plasma samples were analyzed for drug concentration using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LCMS), and biopsy drug levels were reported as Brain-Plasma Ratio (BPR). Mean image intensity was extracted from a 15x15 voxel window surrounding the biopsy location. We performed linear regression analyses to determine which combination of images were predictive of BPR. We found that considering quantitative imaging improved our initial ability to predict BPR for both drugs. For cefazolin, the third diffusion tensor eigenvalue (L3) map was significantly correlated with BPR (p< 0.001, R2= 0.36). For levetiracetam, the best model consisted of a combination of images and maps with the L3 map and the isotropic diffusion map (P) being the most influential (p= 0.001, R2= 0.63). Advanced MRI-based modeling is a promising tool for forecasting drug distribution in brain tumors and could be of great importance for understanding efficacy and selecting therapeutic strategies.

Abstract Background Glioblastoma (GBM) is an incurable disease with few approved therapeutic interventions. Radiation therapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) remain the standards of care. The efficacy and optimal deployment schedule of the orally bioavailable small-molecule tumor checkpoint controller lisavanbulin alone, and in combination with, standards of care were assessed using a panel of IDH-wildtype GBM patient-derived xenografts. Methods Mice bearing intracranial tumors received lisavanbulin +/−RT +/−TMZ and followed for survival. Lisavanbulin concentrations in plasma and brain were determined by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry, while flow cytometry was used for cell cycle analysis. Results Lisavanbulin monotherapy showed significant benefit (P < .01) in 9 of 14 PDXs tested (median survival extension 9%-84%) and brain-to-plasma ratios of 1.3 and 1.6 at 2- and 6-hours postdose, respectively, validating previous data suggesting significant exposure in the brain. Prolonged lisavanbulin dosing from RT start until moribund was required for maximal benefit (GBM6: median survival lisavanbulin/RT 90 vs. RT alone 69 days, P = .0001; GBM150: lisavanbulin/RT 143 days vs. RT alone 73 days, P = .06). Similar observations were seen with RT/TMZ combinations (GBM39: RT/TMZ/lisavanbulin 502 days vs. RT/TMZ 249 days, P = .0001; GBM26: RT/TMZ/lisavanbulin 172 days vs. RT/TMZ 121 days, P = .04). Immunohistochemical analyses showed a significant increase in phospho-histone H3 with lisavanbulin treatment (P = .01). Conclusions Lisavanbulin demonstrated excellent brain penetration, significant extension of survival alone or in RT or RT/TMZ combinations, and was associated with mitotic arrest. These data provide a strong clinical rationale for testing lisavanbulin in combination with RT or RT/TMZ in GBM patients.

Abstract Diffuse midline gliomas (DMGs) harboring the H3K27M mutation are highly aggressive, uniformly fatal brain tumors that primarily occur in children. The blood-brain barrier (BBB), including drug efflux pumps, prevent numerous drugs from reaching CNS tumors at cytotoxic concentrations. Alisertib is an aurora kinase inhibitor that was previously identified in a drug screen as a compound of interest. However, its ability to penetrate the BBB is not well established. The goals of this study were two-fold: 1) determine the CNS distribution and clearance rates of alisertib following systemic delivery and if the BBB efflux pumps, Pgp and BCRP, alter distribution and clearance. 2) Compare alisertib distribution and clearance following convection-enhanced delivery to systemic results. WT and Pgp/BCRP knockout mice and Sprague-dawley rats underwent tail vein injection (mice and rats) or convection-enhanced delivery to the brainstem (rats only) of alisertib and sacrificed at 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24hours. The plasma and brain were collected and analyzed for alisertib concentration by HPLC-MS/MS. We found that in both mice and rats, alisertib concentration in the plasma and brain decreased biexponentially. Overall, Alisertib was found to be 3.14% brain penetrant. In Pgp/BCRP knockout mice, alisertib concentration in the plasma and brain decreased biexponentially, but was detected at higher concentration at all time points in the brain compared to WT mice. This resulted in a higher brain penetrance (17.26%). Differences based on anatomical brain region were significant in those rats which received convection-enhanced delivery. Alisertib was found in higher concentration in the pons and cerebellum compared to systemic delivery, but lower concentrations in the cortex and plasma. These results suggest that drug clearance may be a general mechanism limiting efficacy of drugs of interest and should be carefully considered during preclinical evaluation.

Abstract Background Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), such as depatuxizumab mafodotin (Depatux-M), is a promising therapeutic strategy for glioblastoma (GBM) but recent clinical trials did not demonstrate a survival benefit. Understanding the mechanisms of failure for this promising strategy is critically important. Methods PDX models were employed to study efficacy of systemic vs intracranial delivery of Depatux-M. Immunofluorescence and MALDI-MSI were performed to detect drug levels in the brain. EGFR levels and compensatory pathways were studied using quantitative flow cytometry, Western blots, RNAseq, FISH, and phosphoproteomics. Results Systemic delivery of Depatux-M was highly effective in nine of 10 EGFR-amplified heterotopic PDXs with survival extending beyond one year in eight PDXs. Acquired resistance in two PDXs (GBM12 and GBM46) was driven by suppression of EGFR expression or emergence of a novel short-variant of EGFR lacking the epitope for the Depatux-M antibody. In contrast to the profound benefit observed in heterotopic tumors, only two of seven intrinsically sensitive PDXs were responsive to Depatux-M as intracranial tumors. Poor efficacy in orthotopic PDXs was associated with limited and heterogeneous distribution of Depatux-M into tumor tissues, and artificial disruption of the BBB or bypass of the BBB by direct intracranial injection of Depatux-M into orthotopic tumors markedly enhanced the efficacy of drug treatment. Conclusions Despite profound intrinsic sensitivity to Depatux-M, limited drug delivery into brain tumor may have been a key contributor to lack of efficacy in recently failed clinical trials.