Bateman, Randall J.

AbstractIntroductionFour less well‐studied but promising “emerging” cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers are elevated in late‐onset Alzheimer disease (AD): neurogranin, synaptosomal‐associated protein‐25 (SNAP‐25), visinin‐like protein 1 (VILIP‐1), and chitinase‐3‐like protein 1 (YKL‐40).MethodsCSF neurogranin, SNAP‐25, VILIP‐1, and YKL‐40 were measured in families carrying autosomal‐dominant AD mutations.ResultsThe four emerging CSF biomarkers were significantly elevated in the mutation carriers (n = 235) versus noncarriers (n = 145). CSF SNAP‐25, VILIP‐1, and YKL‐40 were altered very early in the AD time course, approximately 15–19 years before estimated symptom onset. All CSF biomarkers predicted important AD‐related outcomes including performance on a cognitive composite, brain amyloid burden as measured by amyloid positron emission tomography, and the estimated years from symptom onset.DiscussionEarly abnormalities in CSF tTau, pTau, SNAP‐25, VILIP‐1, and YKL‐40 suggest that synaptic damage, neuronal injury, and neuroinflammation begin shortly after the commencement of brain amyloid accumulation.

Aβ deposition in the basal ganglia is common in autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease. Vöglein et al. report an increased severity of motor symptoms in autosomal dominant versus sporadic disease in advanced disease stages. Motor symptoms are more severe in post-codon 200 presenilin 1 mutation carriers and correlate with basal ganglia Aβ.

Abstract Introduction Quantitative in vivo measurement of brain amyloid burden is important for both research and clinical purposes. However, the existence of multiple imaging tracers presents challenges to the interpretation of such measurements. This study presents a direct comparison of Pittsburgh compound B–based and florbetapir‐based amyloid imaging in the same participants from two independent cohorts using a crossover design. Methods Pittsburgh compound B and florbetapir amyloid PET imaging data from three different cohorts were analyzed using previously established pipelines to obtain global amyloid burden measurements. These measurements were converted to the Centiloid scale to allow fair comparison between the two tracers. The mean and inter‐individual variability of the two tracers were compared using multivariate linear models both cross‐sectionally and longitudinally. Results Global amyloid burden measured using the two tracers were strongly correlated in both cohorts. However, higher variability was observed when florbetapir was used as the imaging tracer. The variability may be partially caused by white matter signal as partial volume correction reduces the variability and improves the correlations between the two tracers. Amyloid burden measured using both tracers was found to be in association with clinical and psychometric measurements. Longitudinal comparison of the two tracers was also performed in similar but separate cohorts whose baseline amyloid load was considered elevated (i.e., amyloid positive). No significant difference was detected in the average annualized rate of change measurements made with these two tracers. Discussion Although the amyloid burden measurements were quite similar using these two tracers as expected, difference was observable even after conversion into the Centiloid scale. Further investigation is warranted to identify optimal strategies to harmonize amyloid imaging data acquired using different tracers.