Reid, Joel M.

Abstract Introduction: The binding of Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) on the surface of tumor cells to PD-1 on T cells prevents T-cell-mediated anti-cancer immune responses. Immune checkpoint blockades that target the PD-L1/PD-1 interaction have improved survival rates but have several critical limitations. Post-translational modifications (PTMs) of PD-L1, such as glycosylation, are crucial for its stability and engagement with PD-1. Thus, targeting PD-L1 PTMs may be a novel method to improve immune checkpoint blockade efficacy. The mevalonate pathway (MVP) generates various substances involved in PTMs process. Here, we explore the effect of MVP in altering the PTMs of PD-L1 and its impacts on cell surface PD-L1 function. Methods: The triple-negative human breast cancer (TNBC) cell lines MDA-MB-231 and BT549 were treated with the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor lovastatin (LOV) with or without the addition of IFN-γ and/or MVP intermediates for 48 hours. PD-L1 transcription was evaluated by qPCR. Alterations in PD-L1 size were detected by Western blotting. PD-L1 surface levels were measured by flow cytometry. HMG-CoA reductase (HMGCR) knockdown was performed to validate the non-off-target effect of LOV. The binding of PD-1 protein to the cell surface PD-L1 was measured by PD-1/PD-L1 binding assay. PD-L1 glycosylation levels were measured by Concanavalin A (Con A) lectin binding assay with immunoprecipitated PD-L1 protein. Results: LOV treatment caused a significant molecular weight shift of PD-L1 from approximately 45 kDa to 40 kDa and reduced the cell surface PD-L1 levels. However, PD-L1 transcription was not affected by LOV. HMGCR knockdown produced similar changes, indicating LOV's impact on PD-L1 was not due to off-target effects. The addition of MVP intermediates mevalonate (MEV) or geranylgeraniol, but not farnesol prevented LOV-induced changes in PD-L1 molecular weight and surface levels. Interestingly, the addition of 25-hydroxycholesterol, but not dolichol, partially prevented LOV-induced decreases in PD-L1 surface levels. Geranylgeranyl transferase inhibitor GGTI-286, which prevents protein geranylgeranylation, also altered PD-L1 molecular weight and decreased surface levels. In addition, LOV impaired the binding of PD-1 protein to tumor cells' surface PD-L1, which was reversed by the addition of MVP substrate MEV. Con A lectin-binding of immunoprecipitated PD-L1 showed that the LOV did not reduce the N-glycosylation level of PD-L1. Conclusions: This study reveals the involvement of the MVP in regulating PD-L1 PTMs and highlights the MVP as a potential therapeutic target to modulate PD-L1’s molecular weight and function and improve the efficacy of immunotherapy interventions, presenting a promising avenue for further investigation. Citation Format: Ruoheng Zhang, Emily J. Koubek, Jessie L. Reed, Jeffrey D. Neighbors, Joel M. Reid, Raymond J. Hohl. The role of the mevalonate pathway in post-translational modifications of PD-L1 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 4265.

Abstract Purpose: Selinexor is a first-in-class, central nervous system (CNS)–penetrant, oral inhibitor of exportin 1 (XPO1), the main nuclear exporter of many key tumor suppressors. We report a phase I trial of selinexor in children and adolescents with recurrent CNS and solid tumors (NCT02323880). Patients and Methods: A rolling six design was used to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and first dose pharmacokinetics of selinexor administered once (35–45 mg/m2) or twice (20–35 mg/m2) weekly during a 28-day cycle (part A). Ten additional patients with high-grade glioma (HGG) were treated at the MTD administered once weekly (part B). Results: In part A, 49 patients were enrolled. Continuous twice weekly dosing was limited by extended hematologic toxicity. The MTD on a twice weekly schedule for 3 weeks on/1 week off (twice weekly 3/1) was 20 mg/m2/dose. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) on this schedule included fatigue, acute reversible neurologic changes, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase increase. On a continuous once weekly schedule, the MTD was 35 mg/m2/dose; DLTs included seizure and thrombocytopenia. In part B (HGG expansion), there were no additional DLTs observed. Non-DLTs included lymphopenia, leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anorexia, fatigue, hypophosphatemia, nausea, and vomiting. There were no objective responses. The median number of cycles received was 1 (range, 1–9); eight of 59 patients (13.5%) received 5 to 9 cycles, five of whom had HGG. Conclusions: Selinexor-related toxicities were primarily hematologic and neurologic, requiring dose or dose-frequency reduction. The MTD and recommended initial phase II dose of selinexor in children and adolescents with recurrent solid and CNS tumors is 35 mg/m2/dose once weekly.

PURPOSE The TRK inhibitor larotrectinib is US Food and Drug Administration approved for NTRK fusion–positive solid tumors that lack a satisfactory alternative or have progressed after treatment but has not been systematically studied as a frontline therapy with a defined duration of treatment. ADVL1823 evaluated larotrectinib in patients with newly diagnosed NTRK fusion–positive solid tumors with response-adapted duration of therapy and local control. METHODS Patients received larotrectinib twice daily in 28-day cycles for a predefined duration of treatment, ranging from 6 to 26 cycles depending on response to therapy and surgical resectability. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR) within six cycles in patients with infantile fibrosarcoma (IFS); patients with other histologic diagnoses were analyzed in a separate cohort. Secondary objectives included event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Thirty-three patients were enrolled: 18 with IFS and 15 with other solid tumors. The ORR within six cycles was 94% (17/18; 95% adjusted CI, 72.7 to 98.6) among children with IFS and 60% (9/15; 95% CI, 32.3 to 83.7) among children with other solid tumors. Six percent (2/33; 95% CI, 0.7 to 22.2) patients developed progressive disease while on therapy. Two-year EFS and OS among these groups were 82.2% (95% CI, 54.3 to 93.9) and 93.8% (95% CI, 63.2 to 99.1) for IFS and 80% (95% CI, 50.0 to 93.1) and 93.3% (95% CI, 61.3 to 99.0) for other solid tumors, respectively. Patients undergoing surgical resection of their tumor had prolonged EFS, with only 1 of 16 such patients experiencing disease progression. Four of 33 patients had dose-limiting toxicities. CONCLUSION Larotrectinib is highly active in patients with newly diagnosed NTRK fusion–positive solid tumors. Larotrectinib should be a frontline option for patients with IFS and other NTRK fusion–positive solid tumors. Local control with surgical resection remains important in the treatment of patients with IFS.

Introduction: Survival of children with relapsed/refractory (r/r) acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML) remains dismal, and successful treatment approaches are limited. Myeloid leukemias frequently have high telomerase expression, and neoplastic progenitor cells have relatively shorter telomeres compared to normal tissues due to the balance between frequent malignant cell division and compensatory increased telomerase activity. In one study, the 5-year overall survival (OS) in children with AML and lower telomerase activity was 88% compared to 43% for those with higher activity, suggesting potential prognostic and therapeutic importance of telomerase in this population (Verstovsek Cancer 2003). Imetelstat is a first-in-class telomerase inhibitor approved by the FDA in 2024 for the treatment of adult patients with low-to-intermediate-1 risk myelodysplastic syndromes (LR-MDS) with transfusion-dependent anemia who are r/r/ineligible for erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. . Imetelstat has also been shown to drive AML cells into ferroptosis (Bruedigam Nature Cancer 2024). The Children's Oncology Group (COG) previously conducted the ADVL1112 Phase 1 study of imetelstat monotherapy in children with r/r solid tumors or lymphomas (Thompson CCR 2013). Imetelstat was administered intravenously on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. The recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was 268 mg/m2. Imetelstat was well-tolerated with no grade >3 non-hematologic toxicities and one dose-limiting thrombocytopenia observed in a subject treated at the RP2D. In preclinical studies, imetelstat was active against leukemia stem cells in pediatric AML patient derived xenograft models (Barwe J Clin Med, 2022). Methods: PEPN2312 is an open-label, multi-center phase 1 study of imetelstat in combination with fludarabine/high dose cytarabine (FLA) for patients with AML in second or greater relapse, refractory to re-induction after first relapse, or r/r MDS or JMML (NCT06247787). The primary objective of this study is to estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or RP2D of imetelstat in combination with FLA in this patient population. Secondary objectives include toxicity assessment, pharmacokinetics, clinical response/minimal residual disease assessments per standard criteria, and OS. Exploratory analyses will be conducted to analyze telomerase activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, conduct pharmacodynamic studies, and evaluate any changes in cytogenetic and mutational abnormalities. Eligible patients must be between the ages of 1 to 18 at the time of study enrollment with Lansky/Karnofsky performance status of ≥50. Patients with leukemia must have platelet count >25,000/µL and hemoglobin >8 g/dL (transfusions allowed). Patients known to have a congenital bone marrow failure syndrome are excluded. This study will use the Rolling 6 design to estimate the MTD/RP2D. The starting dose of imetelstat (DL1) is 212 mg/m2 IV over 2 hours (80% of the single-agent RP2D) given on days 1 and 8 of a 28-day cycle in combination with FLA administered days 2-6. Premedication for infusion reactions with an antihistamine and corticosteroid are required prior to each dose of imetelstat. Patients may receive up to 2 cycles of therapy in the absence of progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity as graded by CTCAE version 5.0. Response assessment will be performed via morphology and central flow cytometry analysis for patients with AML and standard response criteria for patients with JMML or MDS (Niemeyer Haematologica 2015; Zeidan Blood 2023). One dose escalation to 268 mg/m2 (DL2) will be explored if DL1 is deemed safe. Intra-patient dose escalation is not permitted. Pharmacokinetic sampling will be performed during cycle 1. Once the MTD/RP2D is determined, further assessment of safety and preliminary activity of imetelstat and FLA chemotherapy will occur in an expansion cohort of up to 6 additional patients treated at the MTD/RP2D. PEPN2312 was activated in July 2024 and will enroll at 21 participating COG/PEP-CTN sites.

ABSTRACT Background Nab ‐sirolimus (ABI‐009, nab ‐rapamycin; Aadi Bioscience Inc. [Aadi]) is a human albumin‐bound form of sirolimus nanoparticles, a potent mTOR inhibitor. This phase I trial was conducted to define dose‐limiting toxicities (DLT), maximum tolerated or recommended phase II dose (MTD/RP2D), and pharmacokinetics of Nab ‐sirolimus in combination with temozolomide and irinotecan. Methods Using a rolling 6 design, Nab ‐sirolimus was administered intravenously (IV) on days (D) 1 and 8 of cycle (C) 1. In subsequent cycles, Nab ‐sirolimus was administered D1 and D8 in combination with temozolomide (125 mg/m 2 /dose, maximum 250 mg/dose) and irinotecan (90 mg/m 2 /dose) orally, daily on D1–5. Cycle duration was 21 days. Three dose levels (DL) of Nab ‐sirolimus were investigated (DL1: 35 mg/m 2 /dose, DL‐1: 20 mg/m 2 /dose, and DL‐2: 15 mg/m 2 /dose). The observation period for estimating the MTD/RP2D was defined by cycles 1 and 2. Results Thirty‐three patients were enrolled, 32 were eligible. Dose determination included 17 evaluable patients, median (range) age 12 (2–20) years and six additional patients were enrolled (four evaluable for toxicity) on a pharmacokinetic cohort. C1 or C2 DLTs were primarily thrombocytopenia including 2/5 patients at DL1, 2/6 patients at DL‐1, and 1/6 patients at DL‐2. One patient (DL1) with Ewing Sarcoma had a partial response and remained on study for 35 cycles. Rapamycin clearance was dose dependent. Irinotecan clearance and its active metabolite SN‐38 exposure were not affected by coadministration with Nab ‐sirolimus. Conclusion The MTD for Nab ‐sirolimus was 15 mg/m 2 /dose IV on D1 and D8 in combination with temozolomide 125 mg/m 2 /dose and oral irinotecan 90 mg/m 2 /dose daily for 5 days during 21D cycles. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02975882

BET bromodomain inhibitors demonstrate significant promise as anti-inflammatory agents targeting a variety of inflammatory disorders. However, clinical data has demonstrated that the administration of non-selective BET bromodomain inhibitors has led to significant dose-limiting toxicity in clinical settings. More selective inhibitors of the second BET bromodomains, referred to as pan-D2 inhibitors, are better tolerated, however their efficacy varies significantly depending on disease indication. Here, we use three orally bioavailable inhibitors, 1–3, that are either selective for the first N-terminal bromodomain of BRD4 (BRD4-D1 selective), or pan-D1 biased, for assessing their cellular and in vivo efficacy and safety profile in two models of inflammatory liver disease. We compare their effects to known pan-D2 and pan-BET inhibitors. Our results show that pan-D1 biased inhibitor, 3, is as efficacious as the pan-BET inhibitor I-BET151 in reducing inflammation from LPS-induced and drug-induced toxicity, whereas pan-D2 inhibitors are less effective. BRD4-D1 selective inhibitors, 1 and 2, are also efficacious; however, new inhibitors with improved cellular target engagement will be necessary to more thoroughly assess their effects. Finally, BRD4-D1 selective inhibitors are better tolerated in a preclinical model of thrombocytopenia than pan-D1 biased inhibitors, while gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity may be a BRD4-driven effect. These results highlight the importance of assessing specific BET protein and bromodomain functions due to their varying roles in diverse disease models.

PURPOSE The National Cancer Institute-Children's Oncology Group Pediatric Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice trial assigned patients age 1-21 years with relapsed or refractory solid tumors, lymphomas, and histiocytic disorders to phase II treatment arms of molecularly targeted therapies on the basis of genetic alterations detected in their tumor. Patients with tumors that harbored prespecified genomic alterations in the cyclinD-CDK4/6-INK4a-Rb pathway with intact Rb expression were assigned and treated with the cdk4/6 inhibitor palbociclib. METHODS Patients received palbociclib orally once daily for 21 days of 28-day cycles until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or up to 2 years. The primary end point was objective response rate; secondary end points included safety/tolerability and progression-free survival. RESULTS Twenty-three patients (median age, 15 years; range, 8-21) were enrolled; 20 received protocol therapy and were evaluable for toxicity and response. Of the evaluable patients, the most common diagnoses were osteosarcoma (n = 9) and rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 6). A single actionable gene amplification was found in 19 tumors ( CDK4 , n = 11, CDK6 , n = 2, CCND3 , n = 6), with one tumor harboring two amplifications ( CDK4 and CCND2 ). Hematologic toxicities were the most common treatment-related events. No objective responses were seen. Two patients with tumors harboring CDK4 amplifications (neuroblastoma and sarcoma) had best response of stable disease for six and three cycles. Six-month progression was 10% (95% CI, 1.7 to 27.2). CONCLUSION The CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib at 75 mg/m 2 orally daily was tolerable in this heavily pretreated cohort. No objective responses were observed in this histology-agnostic biomarker-selected population with treatment-refractory solid tumors, demonstrating that pathway alteration alone is insufficient in pediatric cancers to generate a response to palbociclib monotherapy.

PURPOSE Patients age 1-21 years with relapsed or refractory solid and CNS tumors were assigned to phase II studies of molecularly targeted therapies on the National Cancer Institute-Children's Oncology Group (NCI-COG) Pediatric Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (MATCH) trial. Patients whose tumors harbored predefined genetic alterations in the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway and lacked mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway activating alterations were treated with the PI3K/mTOR inhibitor samotolisib. METHODS Patients received samotolisib twice daily in 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. A rolling 6 limited dose escalation was performed as, to our knowledge, this was the first pediatric study of samotolisib. The primary end point was the objective response rate; secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and the recommended phase II dose and toxicity of samotolisib in children. RESULTS A total of 3.4% (41/1,206) of centrally tested patients were matched to this arm. Seventeen patients were treated. Among treated patients, the most common diagnoses included osteosarcoma (n = 6) and high-grade glioma (n = 5) harboring alterations in phosphatase and tensin homolog (n = 6), PIK3CA (n = 5), and tuberous sclerosis complex 2 (n = 3). No objective responses or prolonged stable disease were observed. Three-month PFS was 12% (95% CI, 2 to 31). Two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (mucositis and pneumonitis). Dose level 2 (115 mg/m 2 /dose twice daily) was determined to be the recommended phase II dose of samotolisib in children. CONCLUSION This nationwide study was successful at identifying patients and evaluating the efficacy of molecularly targeted therapy for rare molecular subgroups of patients in a histology-agnostic fashion. Unfortunately, there was no activity of samotolisib against tumors with PI3K/mTOR pathway alterations. Prospective trials such as the NCI-COG Pediatric MATCH are necessary to evaluate the efficacy of molecularly targeted therapies given their increasing use in clinical practice.

PURPOSE The National Cancer Institute-Children's Oncology Group (NCI-COG) Pediatric MATCH trial assigns patients age 1-21 years with refractory malignancies to phase II treatment arms of molecularly targeted therapies on the basis of genetic alterations detected in their tumor. Patients with activating alterations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway were treated with ulixertinib, an extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)1/2 inhibitor. METHODS As there were no previous pediatric data, ulixertinib was initially tested in a dose escalation cohort to establish the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) before proceeding to the phase II cohort. Ulixertinib was administered at 260 mg/m2/dose orally twice a day (dose level 1 [DL1], n = 15) or 350 mg/m2/dose orally twice a day (DL2, n = 5). The primary end point was objective response rate; secondary end points included safety/tolerability and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS Twenty patients (median 12 years; range, 5-20) were treated, all evaluable for response. CNS tumors comprised 55% (11/20) of diagnoses, with high-grade glioma and low-grade glioma most common (n = 5 each). All CNS tumors except one harbored BRAF fusions or V600E mutations. Rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 5) was the most frequent non-CNS diagnosis. DL1 was declared the RP2D in the dose escalation cohort after dose-limiting toxicities in Cycle 1 occurred in 1/6 patients at DL1 and 2/5 patients at DL2, including fatigue, anorexia, rash, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dehydration, hypoalbuminemia, and hypernatremia. No objective responses were observed. Six-month PFS was 37% (95% CI, 17 to 58). Three patients with BRAF-altered CNS tumors achieved stable disease >6 months. CONCLUSION Ulixertinib, a novel targeted agent with no previous pediatric data, was successfully evaluated in a national precision medicine basket trial. The pediatric RP2D of ulixertinib is 260 mg/m2/dose orally twice a day. Limited single-agent efficacy was observed in a biomarker-selected cohort of refractory pediatric tumors.