Pomerantz, William C. K.

BET bromodomain inhibitors are efficacious as anti-inflammatory compounds, but clinical translation is hampered by dose-limiting toxicities from non-selective inhibition. We herein report compounds 16 and 26, based on previously reported 4-methyl-1,2,3-triazole-based inhibitor, DW34. 16 has a BRD4 BD1 Ki of 10 nM, and up to 13–38-fold selectivity for BRD4 BD1 over other BD2 domains, and an improved hERG affinity of 4.24 µM over DW34. 26, A biscyclopropyl analog of 16 showed further enhancement of BD1 selectivity over BD2 (26–203-fold), but exhibited more potent hERG inhibition. Compound 16 had improved liver and plasma clearance over DW34, with good biodistribution to the liver, and had an intracellular target-engagement affinity Ki of 92 nM, with reduction of Ccl2, Cxcl1, AST, and ALT in in vitro and in vivo mouse models of liver inflammation. 16 represents a useful lead for treating inflammatory liver diseases, with improved specificity, drug-like properties, and reduced hERG affinity.

BET bromodomain inhibitors demonstrate significant promise as anti-inflammatory agents targeting a variety of inflammatory disorders. However, clinical data has demonstrated that the administration of non-selective BET bromodomain inhibitors has led to significant dose-limiting toxicity in clinical settings. More selective inhibitors of the second BET bromodomains, referred to as pan-D2 inhibitors, are better tolerated, however their efficacy varies significantly depending on disease indication. Here, we use three orally bioavailable inhibitors, 1–3, that are either selective for the first N-terminal bromodomain of BRD4 (BRD4-D1 selective), or pan-D1 biased, for assessing their cellular and in vivo efficacy and safety profile in two models of inflammatory liver disease. We compare their effects to known pan-D2 and pan-BET inhibitors. Our results show that pan-D1 biased inhibitor, 3, is as efficacious as the pan-BET inhibitor I-BET151 in reducing inflammation from LPS-induced and drug-induced toxicity, whereas pan-D2 inhibitors are less effective. BRD4-D1 selective inhibitors, 1 and 2, are also efficacious; however, new inhibitors with improved cellular target engagement will be necessary to more thoroughly assess their effects. Finally, BRD4-D1 selective inhibitors are better tolerated in a preclinical model of thrombocytopenia than pan-D1 biased inhibitors, while gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity may be a BRD4-driven effect. These results highlight the importance of assessing specific BET protein and bromodomain functions due to their varying roles in diverse disease models.

Background and Aims During liver fibrosis, liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs) release angiocrine signals to recruit inflammatory cells into the liver. p300, a master regulator of gene transcription, is associated with pathological inflammatory response. Therefore, we examined how endothelial p300 regulates angiocrine signaling and inflammation related to portal hypertension and fibrogenesis. Approach and Results CCl4 or partial inferior vena cava ligation (pIVCL) was used to induce liver injury. Mice with LSEC‐specific p300 deletion (p300 LSECΔ/Δ) or C‐C motif chemokine ligand 2 (Ccl2) deficiency, nuclear factor kappa B (NFκB)–p50 knockout mice, and bromodomain containing 4 (BRD4) inhibitors in wild‐type mice were used to investigate mechanisms of inflammation regulation. Leukocytes were analyzed by mass cytometry by time‐of‐flight. Epigenetic histone marks were modified by CRISPR endonuclease‐deficient CRISPR‐associated 9‐fused with the Krüppel associated box domain (CRISPR‐dCas9‐KRAB)–mediated epigenome editing. Portal pressure and liver fibrosis were reduced in p300 LSECΔ/Δ mice compared to p300 fl/fl mice following liver injury. Accumulation of macrophages was also reduced in p300 LSECΔ/Δ mouse livers. Ccl2 was the most up‐regulated chemokine in injured LSECs, but its increase was abrogated in p300 LSECΔ/Δ mice. While the macrophage accumulation was increased in NFκB‐p50 knockout mice with enhanced NFκB activity, it was reduced in mice with LSEC‐specific Ccl2 deficiency and mice treated with specific BRD4 inhibitors. In vitro, epigenome editing of CCL2 enhancer and promoter regions by CRISPR‐dCas9‐KRAB technology repressed TNFα‐induced CCL2 transcription through H3K9 trimethylation. In contrast, TNFα activated CCL2 transcription by promoting p300 interaction with NFκB and BRD4, leading to histone H3 lysine 27 acetylation at CCL2 enhancer and promoter regions. Conclusions In summary, endothelial p300 interaction with NFκB and BRD4 increases CCL2 expression, leading to macrophage accumulation, portal hypertension, and liver fibrosis. Inhibition of p300 and its binding partners might serve as therapy in the treatment of liver diseases.