Pittock, S J

ABSTRACT Objective We sought to characterize the sixth most common finding in our neuroimmunological laboratory practice (tissue assay‐observed unclassified neural antibodies [UNAs]), combining protein microarray and phage immunoprecipitation sequencing (PhIP‐Seq). Methods Patient specimens (258; 133 serums; 125 CSF) meeting UNA criteria were profiled; October 2022–September 2023. Top‐ranking candidate antigens were validated in silico, by dual‐staining confocal microscopy, and ≥ 1 protein‐specific assay. Clinical data were reviewed. Results Among 21 patients, 11 autoantibodies were characterized (serum, 19; CSF, all 9 available). Autoantigens were CACNA1I, 1; CAMK2B, 2; CLIP2, 1; FMN2, 2; MAP1A, 2; MAP2, 5; NECAB1, 1; SNAP91, 3; SRCIN1, 1; SYNJ1, 1; SYT3, 2. Analytical validation was by confocal TIIFA (all), western blot (10/10 available), and cell‐based assay (5/5 performed). Clinical accompaniments were: encephalitis, 6; brainstem encephalitis, 2; encephalomyelitis, 2; cerebellar ataxia, 2; longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM), 2; sensory neuronopathy, 1; peripheral neuropathy, 4, and movement disorders, 2. Inflammatory MRI abnormalities were identified in 5/16 patients (31%) with CNS disorders: T2 signal change (2), LETM (2), leptomeningeal enhancement (1). Seven of 8 (88%) had inflammatory CSF (pleocytosis, 5 [median 25.5 cells, range 7–294]; elevated IgG index/synthesis rate, 4; CSF‐exclusive oligoclonal bands, 4). Six had paraneoplastic causation (lung cancer, 2; other, 4); 3 were postinfectious (1 each of COVID‐19, HSV‐1, and post‐Group A streptococcal infection). Of 9 immunotherapy‐treated patients, 5 improved. Interpretation UNAs are partly accounted for by a repertoire of diverse mostly intracellular synaptic antigens. Their characterization is expedited by protein arrays and PhIPSeq. Further individual studies are needed to assess them as disease biomarkers.

Abstract Objectives γ‐Aminobutyric acid B receptor (GABA B R)‐IgG (immunoglobulin G) is an intermediate‐risk paraneoplastic autoantibody often associated with seizures. We aimed to assess the clinical and oncological features of GABA B R‐IgG autoimmune encephalitis (AE) and evaluate the performance of antibody testing. Methods Patients testing positive for GABA B R‐IgG in serum/cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) at Mayo Clinic Neuroimmunology Laboratory were identified. Archived sera were retested by cell‐based assay (CBA) at 1:100 and 1:200 dilutions. A live‐cell flow cytometry–based assay (LCFBA) was developed and validated using archived sera and CSF. True positivity included patients with classic presentations of GABA B R‐IgG AE or oncological explanations for antibody presence. Results Eighty‐six patients (median age 63 years; 43 female) presented with classic presentations of GABA B R‐IgG AE: encephalopathy with prominent seizures ( n = 55), status epilepticus ( n = 23), and rapidly progressive dementia ( n = 8). In addition, 44 patients (33%) had a false‐positive result for GABA B R‐IgG characterized by non‐specific symptoms/alternate diagnoses. Malignancy was identified in 78% of true‐positive patients, predominantly small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). Testing serum at 1:100 dilution on CBA and using tissue immunofluorescence assay (IFA) in serum and CSF improved the identification of true‐positive patients ( p < 0.001). CBA at 1:100 dilution performed better than conventional CBA (at 1:10 dilution, p < 0.001) and tissue IFA ( p = 0.031). An in‐house LCFBA showed 100% sensitivity and specificity in CSF, performing similarly to conventional CBA ( p = 0.125) in CSF, but better than tissue IFA ( p = 0.031). Furthermore, serum LCFBA performed better than conventional CBA ( p = 0.022) and tissue IFA ( p = 0.006). LCFBA had the highest diagnostic accuracy and was closely followed by CBA at 1:100 dilution. Significance GABA B R‐IgG AE often presents as encephalopathy with seizures or status epilepticus in the context of an underlying SCLC. Multimodal evaluation using tissue IFA and fixed CBA at higher dilutions improves detection of true cases. LCFBA performs very well as a diagnostic test with very high sensitivity and specificity.

ABSTRACTClinicians often repeat aquaporin‐4‐immunoglobulin G (AQP4‐IgG) testing in case of possible seroconversion. Compared with older, less sensitive immunofluorescence assays (IFA), cell‐based assays (CBA) offer higher sensitivity. This study assessed the frequency of seroconversion in a retrospective Cleveland Clinic cohort (2006–2024) of 451 patients with an initial negative AQP4‐IgG result who underwent serial testing. Seroconversion occurred in 4.3% (7/170) of patients initially tested by tissue IFA, but in none (0/263) of those tested by CBA. The lack of AQP4‐IgG seroconversion after a negative CBA, with only rare cases after a negative IFA, suggests that repeat AQP4‐IgG testing is low yield unless prior testing used older methods such as IFA.

ABSTRACT Objectives To investigate the value of cytokine, chemokine, and neurofilament light chain (NfL) concentrations in predicting relapse risk, chronic epilepsy, and functional impairment in LGI1 autoimmune encephalitis (AE). Methods Cytokines/chemokines (IL‐1‐beta, IL‐2, IL‐4, IL‐5, IL‐6, IL‐8/CXCL8, IL‐10, IL‐12p70, IL‐13, IL‐17A, GM‐CSF, TNF‐alpha, IFN‐gamma, CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL13, BAFF) and NfL concentrations were measured in CSF and paired serum from LGI1‐AE patients evaluated at Mayo Clinic (01/2015–02/2024), using a multiplex immunoassay system (ELLA, Bio‐Techne) and correlated with clinical outcomes. A laboratory‐based cohort of LGI1‐IgG‐positive patients and control cohorts, including patients with mixed non‐inflammatory disorders (MNID), Alzheimer's disease (AD), and temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) were analyzed. Results Forty‐four patients with LGI1‐AE were included; 29 (66%) were male, with a median age of 68.5 years (range, 8–85). Median time from symptom onset to CSF sampling was eight months (IQR, 3–17); 19/42 (45%) experienced a clinical relapse and 27% developed chronic epilepsy. Serum IL‐6, serum and CSF IL‐8/CXCL8, and IL‐17A were higher in LGI1‐IgG positive patients than MNID ( p < 0.05). TLE cytokine/chemokine profiles were similar to LGI1 AE; AD patients had lower serum IL‐6 and CSF IL‐8/CXCL8 ( p = 0.04; p = 0.01), and higher serum IL‐17A and GM‐CSF ( p = 0.004; p = 0.01) than LGI1‐AE. Higher CSF IL‐6 and IL‐8/CXCL8 in LGI1‐AE associated with clinical relapse ( p < 0.05) and higher CSF NfL associated with chronic epilepsy ( p = 0.01). Conclusion Elevations in IL‐6, IL‐8/CXCL8, and IL‐17A were identified in this LGI1‐AE cohort. CSF IL‐6, IL‐8/CXCL8, and NfL levels are potential prognostic biomarkers for risk of relapse and chronic epilepsy in LGI1‐AE.