Carta, Sara

AbstractObjectiveThe first international consensus criteria for optic neuritis (ICON) were published in 2022. We applied these criteria to a prospective, global observational study of acute optic neuritis (ON).MethodsWe included 160 patients with a first‐ever acute ON suggestive of a demyelinating CNS disease from the Acute Optic Neuritis Network (ACON). We applied the 2022 ICON to all participants and subsequently adjusted the ICON by replacing a missing relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) or dyschromatopsia if magnetic resonance imaging pathology of the optical nerve plus optical coherence tomography abnormalities or certain biomarkers are present.ResultsAccording to the 2022 ICON, 80 (50%) patients were classified as definite ON, 12 (7%) patients were classified as possible ON, and 68 (43%) as not ON (NON). The main reasons for classification as NON were absent RAPD (52 patients, 76%) or dyschromatopsia (49 patients, 72%). Distribution of underlying ON etiologies was as follows: 78 (49%) patients had a single isolated ON, 41 (26%) patients were diagnosed with multiple sclerosis, 25 (16%) patients with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody‐associated disease, and 15 (9%) with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. The application of the adjusted ON criteria yielded a higher proportion of patients classified as ON (126 patients, 79%).InterpretationAccording to the 2022 ICON, almost half of the included patients in ACON did not fulfill the requirements for classification of definite or possible ON, particularly due to missing RAPD and dyschromatopsia. Thorough RAPD examination and formal color vision testing are critical to the application of the 2022 ICON.

Abstract Background Differentiating neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) from its mimics is crucial to avoid misdiagnosis, especially in the absence of aquaporin‐4‐IgG. While multiple sclerosis (MS) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein‐IgG associated disease (MOGAD) represent major and well‐defined differential diagnoses, non‐demyelinating NMOSD mimics remain poorly characterized. Methods We conducted a systematic review on PubMed/MEDLINE to identify reports of patients with non‐demyelinating disorders that mimicked or were misdiagnosed as NMOSD. Three novel cases seen at the authors' institutions were also included. The characteristics of NMOSD mimics were analyzed and red flags associated with misdiagnosis identified. Results A total of 68 patients were included; 35 (52%) were female. Median age at symptoms onset was 44 (range, 1–78) years. Fifty‐six (82%) patients did not fulfil the 2015 NMOSD diagnostic criteria. The clinical syndromes misinterpreted for NMOSD were myelopathy (41%), myelopathy + optic neuropathy (41%), optic neuropathy (6%), or other (12%). Alternative etiologies included genetic/metabolic disorders, neoplasms, infections, vascular disorders, spondylosis, and other immune‐mediated disorders. Common red flags associated with misdiagnosis were lack of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pleocytosis (57%), lack of response to immunotherapy (55%), progressive disease course (54%), and lack of magnetic resonance imaging gadolinium enhancement (31%). Aquaporin‐4‐IgG positivity was detected in five patients by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay ( n = 2), cell‐based assay ( n = 2: serum, 1; CSF, 1), and non‐specified assay ( n = 1). Conclusions The spectrum of NMOSD mimics is broad. Misdiagnosis frequently results from incorrect application of diagnostic criteria, in patients with multiple identifiable red flags. False aquaporin‐4‐IgG positivity, generally from nonspecific testing assays, may rarely contribute to misdiagnosis.