Back to Authors

Atherton, Philip J.

0000-0002-7286-046X

Mayo Clinic

Ritsumeikan University

Citations 13

Phase I Trial of Intraperitoneal Administration of an Oncolytic Measles Virus Strain Engineered to Express Carcinoembryonic Antigen for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
Hartmann, Lynn C. , Cliby, William A. , Long, Harry J., Peethambaram, Prema P. , Barrette, Brigitte A., Kaur, Judith S. , Haluska, Paul , Aderca, Ileana, Zollman, Paula J., Sloan, Jeff A. , Keeney, Gary L., Atherton, Pamela J., Podratz, Karl C. , Dowdy, Sean C. , Stanhope, C.Robert, Wilson, Timothy O., Federspiel, Mark J. , Peng, Kah-Whye , Russell, Stephen J. , Atherton, Philip J. , Galanis, Evanthia , Atherton, Pamela J., Russell, Stephen J , Atherton, Philip J.

Cancer Research | January 26, 2010 | Volume: 70 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 875-882

10.1158/0008-5472.can-09-2762 Get It

Abstract Edmonston vaccine strains of measles virus (MV) have shown significant antitumor activity in preclinical models of ovarian cancer. We engineered MV to express the marker peptide carcinoembryonic antigen (MV-CEA virus) to also permit real-time monitoring of viral gene expression in tumors in the clinical setting. Patients with Taxol and platinum-refractory recurrent ovarian cancer and normal CEA levels were eligible for this phase I trial. Twenty-one patients were treated with MV-CEA i.p. every 4 weeks for up to 6 cycles at seven different dose levels (103–109 TCID50). We observed no dose-limiting toxicity, treatment-induced immunosuppression, development of anti-CEA antibodies, increase in anti-MV antibody titers, or virus shedding in urine or saliva. Dose-dependent CEA elevation in peritoneal fluid and serum was observed. Immunohistochemical analysis of patient tumor specimens revealed overexpression of measles receptor CD46 in 13 of 15 patients. Best objective response was dose-dependent disease stabilization in 14 of 21 patients with a median duration of 92.5 days (range, 54–277 days). Five patients had significant decreases in CA-125 levels. Median survival of patients on study was 12.15 months (range, 1.3–38.4 months), comparing favorably to an expected median survival of 6 months in this patient population. Our findings indicate that i.p. administration of MV-CEA is well tolerated and results in dose-dependent biological activity in a cohort of heavily pretreated recurrent ovarian cancer patients. Cancer Res; 70(3); 875–82
Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Trial of Risedronate for the Prevention of Bone Loss in Premenopausal Women Undergoing Chemotherapy for Primary Breast Cancer
Hines, Stephanie L., Mincey, Betty A., Sloan, Jeff A. , Thomas, Sachdev , Chottiner, Elaine G., Loprinzi, Charles L. , Carlson, Mark D., Atherton, Pamela J., Salim, Muhammad , Perez, Edith A. , Atherton, Philip J. , Atherton, Pamela J., Atherton, Philip J.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | December 16, 2008 | Volume: 27 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1047-1053

10.1200/jco.2008.19.1783 Get It

Purpose Risedronate prevents bone loss in postmenopausal women. The purpose of this study was to determine whether risedronate prevents bone loss in premenopausal women undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer. Patients and Methods Premenopausal women undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer were treated with oral calcium 600 mg and vitamin D 400 U daily and randomly assigned to receive oral risedronate 35 mg weekly or placebo, with all these therapies beginning within a month of the start of chemotherapy. Most chemotherapy regimens included anthracyclines, taxanes, or cyclophosphamide. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at baseline and 1 year. The primary end point was the change in lumbar spine (LS) BMD from baseline to 1 year. Results A total of 216 women enrolled; 170 women provided BMD data at 1 year. There was no difference in the mean change or percent change in LS BMD between groups, with a loss of 4.3% in the risedronate arm and 5.4% for placebo at 1 year (P = .18). Loss of BMD at the femoral neck and total hip were also similar between treatment groups. Risedronate was well tolerated, with no significant differences in adverse events compared with placebo, except that arthralgias and chest pain were worse in those receiving the placebos. Conclusion Risedronate did not prevent bone loss in premenopausal women undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.
Phase III, Double-Blind Study of Depot Octreotide Versus Placebo in the Prevention of Acute Diarrhea in Patients Receiving Pelvic Radiation Therapy: Results of North Central Cancer Treatment Group N00CA
Martenson, James A., Halyard, Michele Y. , Sloan, Jeff A. , Proulx, Gary M., Miller, Robert C. , Deming, Richard L., Dick, Stephen J., Johnson, Harold A., Tai, Tianxiang, Keit, Joan, Stien, Kathy J., Atherton, Pamela J., Atherton, Philip J. , Zhu, Angela W. , Atherton, Pamela J., Atherton, Philip J.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 3, 2008 | Volume: 26 | Issue: 32 | Pages: 5248-5253

10.1200/jco.2008.17.1546 Get It

Purpose To assess the effectiveness of depot octreotide for the prevention of diarrhea during pelvic radiation therapy. Patients and Methods Patients receiving pelvic radiation therapy (planned minimum dose, 45 Gy; 1.7 to 2.1 Gy daily) were eligible for the study. From May 10, 2002, through October 14, 2005, 125 patients were randomly allocated in a double-blind fashion to receive octreotide (100 μg, administered subcutaneously on day 1, followed by depot octreotide, 20 mg, administered intramuscularly on days 2 and 29; n = 62) or to receive a placebo (n = 63). Results Grade 0, 1, 2, and 3 diarrhea were observed in 18%, 31%, 31%, and 21% of patients in the octreotide arm, respectively, and in 25%, 32%, 22%, and 21% of patients in the placebo arm, respectively (P = .64). Grade 0, 1, 2, and 3 abdominal cramps were observed in 32%, 45%, 21%, and 2% of patients receiving octreotide, respectively, and in 51%, 24%, 21%, and 5% of patients receiving the placebo, respectively (P = .053). Some patient-reported symptoms were worse in the octreotide group, including nocturnal bowel movements (70% v 45%; P = .004), clustering of bowel movements (90% v 69%; P = .004), and bleeding with bowel movements (57% v 35%; P = .01). Conclusion As administered in this study, octreotide did not decrease diarrhea during pelvic radiation therapy. Some gastrointestinal symptoms were worse in patients treated with octreotide. Octreotide is not indicated for prevention of diarrhea during pelvic radiation therapy.