Kholeif, Zeyad

Abstract Aims Nutritional counselling is a core component of cardiac rehabilitation (CR), yet the evidence base for specific dietary interventions within CR remains fragmented. This scoping review aimed to map the range of nutritional interventions evaluated in adult CR programmes, characterize their reported outcomes, and identify key gaps in current evidence and practice. Methods and results Following the Arksey and O’Malley framework and reporting according to PRISMA-ScR, a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was conducted from inception to June 2026. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, non-randomized trials, and observational studies evaluating an explicitly described nutritional intervention within a structured CR programme in adults with established cardiovascular disease. Of 2765 identified records, 35 studies met eligibility criteria. Interventions spanned Mediterranean and heart-healthy dietary patterns, calorie-restriction and weight-loss programmes, comprehensive lifestyle interventions, structured nutrition education and counselling, supplementation, functional foods, and individualized diet prescriptions. Across categories, improvements in body weight, central adiposity, and adherence to cardioprotective dietary recommendations were commonly reported, particularly when nutrition was delivered with repeated contact and individualized support. Effects on lipid profiles, inflammatory markers, blood pressure, functional capacity, and clinical outcomes were more variable. Conclusion Nutritional interventions within CR were most consistently associated with improvements in intermediate behavioural, anthropometric, and cardiometabolic outcomes, particularly when structured and reinforced over time. However, heterogeneity in study design, intervention delivery, comparator groups, outcome reporting, and follow-up duration precludes definitive conclusions about comparative efficacy, optimal intervention format, or the magnitude of benefit. Greater standardization, longer follow-up, and further evaluation of personalized nutritional strategies are needed to strengthen the nutritional component of CR.

ABSTRACT Background Factor XI/XIa inhibitors are emerging anticoagulants with potential to reduce bleeding complications in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. This meta‐analysis evaluated their efficacy and safety compared to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and explored dose optimization. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase was conducted through March 2025 following PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing Factor XI/XIa inhibitors with DOACs in AF patients were included. Outcomes assessed were major bleeding, stroke, systemic embolism, all‐cause and cardiovascular mortality and serious adverse events. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using a Mantel‐Haenszel random‐effects model. Heterogeneity was evaluated with the I² statistic, and evidence certainty assessed by the GRADE approach. Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) was performed. Results Three RCTs including 16,772 patients (mean age 73 years, CHA₂DS₂‐VASc 3.9–5) were analyzed. Factor XI/XIa inhibitors significantly reduced major bleeding (RR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.36–0.46, I² = 0%) compared to DOACs. However, stroke risk was increased (RR: 3.42, 95% CI: 2.62–4.46), particularly with asundexian 50 mg (RR: 4.02). No significant differences were observed in all‐cause mortality (RR: 0.82) or cardiovascular death (RR: 1.05). Systemic embolism risk was higher (RR: 4.26), while serious adverse events were comparable (RR: 0.95). TSA indicated encouraging safety outcomes but highlighted the need for further large‐scale studies. Conclusion Factor XI/XIa inhibitors lower major bleeding risk in AF patients but increase stroke and systemic embolism rates without impacting mortality.