Rehman, Tooba

Abstract Background Ventricular arrhythmias (VA) are common complications of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and can cause cardiac arrest and adverse outcomes. However, the prognostic impact of VA according to their timing in relation to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unclear. Purpose To assess the prognostic significance of VA in patients with ACS undergoing PCI according to the timing of occurrence (before, during, or after PCI). Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies reporting all-cause mortality with and without VA (sustained VT/VF) in ACS patients undergoing PCI. Pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random-effects models for short-term (30 days/in-hospital) and long-term (1 year) mortality. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. We conducted subgroup analyses for studies that stratified VA according to timing, defined as VA before PCI (prior to arrival in the catheterization laboratory), VA during PCI (in the catheterization laboratory or immediately after reperfusion), VA after PCI (following completion of PCI). Each timing category was compared to patients who did not develop VA within the same time window (before, during or after PCI). Results Twelve studies comprising 49306 patients were included, of whom 4320 (8.76%) experienced VA. The mean age of the patients ranged from 60 to 70 years, and the follow-up ranged from hospital discharge to 8 years. VA was associated with increased short-term (OR 5.02 [3.91-6.44]) and long-term mortality (OR 3.00 [2.86-3.82]). However, in patients alive at discharge/30 days, subsequent long-term mortality risk did not differ between those with and without VA (OR 1.21 [0.70-2.09]) (Figure 1). The subgroup analyses showed that patients with VA were associated with higher short-term mortality compared to patients without VA within each time window: before (OR 4.32 [3.29-5.66]), during (OR 4.29 [2.08-8.84]), and after PCI (OR 9.29 [3.12-27.63]) (Figure 2). VA after PCI was associated with the highest OR for short-term mortality. Conclusions VA significantly worsens short-term outcomes in ACS patients undergoing PCI. Subgroup analysis shows that VA increases mortality in each timing category, before, during and after PCI, with the poorest prognosis observed for arrhythmias developed after reperfusion, in whom reversible acute ischemia may play a lesser role and underlying arrhythmic substrate may predominate.Figure 1Figure 2

ABSTRACT Background Factor XI/XIa inhibitors are emerging anticoagulants with potential to reduce bleeding complications in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. This meta‐analysis evaluated their efficacy and safety compared to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and explored dose optimization. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase was conducted through March 2025 following PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing Factor XI/XIa inhibitors with DOACs in AF patients were included. Outcomes assessed were major bleeding, stroke, systemic embolism, all‐cause and cardiovascular mortality and serious adverse events. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using a Mantel‐Haenszel random‐effects model. Heterogeneity was evaluated with the I² statistic, and evidence certainty assessed by the GRADE approach. Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) was performed. Results Three RCTs including 16,772 patients (mean age 73 years, CHA₂DS₂‐VASc 3.9–5) were analyzed. Factor XI/XIa inhibitors significantly reduced major bleeding (RR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.36–0.46, I² = 0%) compared to DOACs. However, stroke risk was increased (RR: 3.42, 95% CI: 2.62–4.46), particularly with asundexian 50 mg (RR: 4.02). No significant differences were observed in all‐cause mortality (RR: 0.82) or cardiovascular death (RR: 1.05). Systemic embolism risk was higher (RR: 4.26), while serious adverse events were comparable (RR: 0.95). TSA indicated encouraging safety outcomes but highlighted the need for further large‐scale studies. Conclusion Factor XI/XIa inhibitors lower major bleeding risk in AF patients but increase stroke and systemic embolism rates without impacting mortality.