Kittner, Steven J.

Introduction: Genetic studies of early-onset disease have been an effective strategy to identify novel pathways and drug targets generalizable also to later-onset disease. Few studies have investigated the sex-specific genetic associations with early-onset ischemic stroke even though several features of ischemic stroke differ between males and females. We hypothesized that stratifying the GWAS by sex would reveal novel stroke loci. Methods: We performed a transethnic ischemic stroke GWAS of 3,056 female cases and 4,462 male cases < 60 years-old and 16,192 and 16,048 sex-matched controls, respectively, from the Early Onset Stroke Genetics Consortium. Results: We identified a significant association in women with a locus in close proximity to TMX1 , a transmembrane platelet protein that inhibits platelet function. Additionally, we identified 2 other suggestive (P < 5 x 10 -6 ) loci in females (see Table), i.e., at APOH , which encodes beta2-glycoprotein I, an established GWAS locus for lipoprotein(a), and LRFN2 which has been previously reported to associate with obesity-related measures and type II diabetes. We observed suggestive evidence for association in males with MMP3/MMP12 , a known stroke susceptibility locus. Conclusions: Despite a very modest sample size, sex-specific analyses identified suggestive associations at biologically important novel loci in females and a known stroke locus in males. Further studies of sex-specific associations in both early- and later-onset ischemic stroke are needed.

Abstract Stroke represents a considerable burden of disease for both men and women. However, a growing body of literature suggests clinically relevant sex differences in the underlying causes, presentations and outcomes of acute ischaemic stroke. In a recent study, we reported sex divergences in lesion topographies: specific to women, acute stroke severity was linked to lesions in the left-hemispheric posterior circulation. We here determined whether these sex-specific brain manifestations also affect long-term outcomes. We relied on 822 acute ischaemic patients [age: 64.7 (15.0) years, 39% women] originating from the multi-centre MRI-GENIE study to model unfavourable outcomes (modified Rankin Scale &gt;2) based on acute neuroimaging data in a Bayesian hierarchical framework. Lesions encompassing bilateral subcortical nuclei and left-lateralized regions in proximity to the insula explained outcomes across men and women (area under the curve = 0.81). A pattern of left-hemispheric posterior circulation brain regions, combining left hippocampus, precuneus, fusiform and lingual gyrus, occipital pole and latero-occipital cortex, showed a substantially higher relevance in explaining functional outcomes in women compared to men [mean difference of Bayesian posterior distributions (men – women) = −0.295 (90% highest posterior density interval = −0.556 to −0.068)]. Once validated in prospective studies, our findings may motivate a sex-specific approach to clinical stroke management and hold the promise of enhancing outcomes on a population level.

Abstract While chronological age is one of the most influential determinants of post-stroke outcomes, little is known of the impact of neuroimaging-derived biological brain age. We here first examine whether radiomics analysis of the texture of brain T2-FLAIR MRI images can be used to predict brain age in stroke patients. We then assess the clinical determinants of accelerated brain aging and, finally, its impact on post-stroke functional outcomes. Leveraging a multisite cohort of 4,163 ischemic stroke patients, we show that older-appearing patients have more hypertension, diabetes mellitus, prior strokes, and smoking history and are more likely to develop worse post-stroke outcomes than their younger-appearing counterparts. Our results strengthen the importance of preventive medicine for maintaining brain health in stroke patients as they age and suggest a novel methodology to capture previously undescribed prognostic information available on commonly acquired MRI sequences during routine stroke care.

Background: Considerable disagreement exists among experts regarding the appropriate extent of diagnostic testing after ischemic stroke (IS). Evidence-based data guiding stroke evaluation for individual patients according to the underlying phenotype are unknown. We sought to determine the yield of cardiac and arterial evaluations for identifying an alternative major stroke etiology in patients with a given phenotype in the NINDS Stroke Genetics Network (SiGN). Methods: SiGN is a consortium of IS studies at 22 US and European sites aiming to identify stroke susceptibility genes. Adjudicators certified in Causative Classification of Stroke (CCS) system determined major etiologic stroke phenotypes based on chart review. All diagnostic data entered into the CCS software were stored in a confidential database. We determined the probability of identifying an alternative major abnormality based on cardiac (history, EKG, echocardiography) and arterial [intracranial (IC), extracranial (EC)] evaluations in 3 stroke phenotypes: lacunar infarct (LI), large artery atherosclerosis (LAA), and cardiac embolism (CE). Proportions of alternative major etiologies were calculated in patients with complete evaluations in each phenotype. Results: The analyses included 15720 patients. Among these, 2299 had phenotypic subtype of LI (1660 with cardiac and 1691 with arterial evaluations); 4228 had CE (2451 with arterial evaluation); and 2613 had LAA (2047 with cardiac evaluation). Cardiac evaluation revealed a major cardiac source of embolism in 12.3% of patients with LI and 20.3% with LAA. Echocardiography demonstrated an additional major structural cardiac source not seen by history/examination/EKG in 1.9% and 1.6% in LI and LAA respectively. Arterial evaluation led to the identification of ≥50%ipsilateral stenosis in 13.5% (IC: 8.9%, EC: 5.8%) of patients with LI and 17% (IC: 8.1%, EC: 11.3%) of those with CE. In LI patients with complete cardiac and vascular evaluations, 24.1% had an alternative major stroke etiology. Conclusions: A considerable proportion of IS patients with LI, LAA, and CE harbor an alternative major etiology. In the future, these results can be used to generate evidence-based and cost-effective evaluation and management strategies.

Background: Recruitment and phenotyping constitute major costs in stroke genetics research. Clinical trial datasets that include biological samples provide an opportunity to leverage richly phenotyped cases for genomic research. However, the heterogeneity of stroke and methodological differences across studies present challenges. We developed and validated a systematic method of mapping data abstracted from a multicenter randomized clinical trial to the inputs of the CCS stroke subtyping system for the SiGN study. Methods: The SiGN Phenotype Committee and the Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Strokes (SPS3) research team systematically reviewed SPS3 case report forms (CRF) to identify key elements required to generate CCS subtyping, and drafted and refined mapping rules using a derivation set of 30 charts. The resultant algorithm was compared to manual entry of clinical information into the CCS in a test set of 30 randomly selected charts. This identified problems due to multiple versions of CRFs (up to 7 versions) and prompted revision of the mapping rules. We assessed the revised algorithm in an independent test set. Results: None of the subtype classifications agreed in the initial testing prompting revision to allow capture information from different versions of the CRFs. The revised mapping algorithm applied to the same test set performed well; 29/30 agreed - 20 small artery occlusion (SAO) evident, 4 SAO possible, 2 SAO probable and 3 supra-aortic large artery atherosclerosis evident). The one chart that disagreed was classified as SAO evident by manual entry but as undetermined by the data mapping rules. In the 2nd independent test set, 30/30 agreed: 22 SAO evident, 4 SAO possible, 3 supra-aortic large artery atherosclerosis evident and 1 undetermined unknown - incomplete evaluation. Conclusions: We created mapping rules using CRFs from a clinical trial to allow reliable subtype classification using the CCS. Issues related to multiple iterations of CRFs presented challenges. Highly phenotyped stroke cases from clinical trials represent a cost-effective opportunity for genomic research.

Background and Purpose: NINDS Stroke Genetics Network (SiGN) is an international consortium of ischemic stroke studies that aims to generate high quality phenotype data to identify the genetic basis of ischemic stroke subtypes. The goal of this analysis is to characterize the etiopathogenetic basis of ischemic stroke in the consortium. Methods: This analysis included 16,954 subjects with imaging-confirmed ischemic stroke from 12 US studies and 11 studies from 8 European countries. 52 trained and certified adjudicators used the web-based Causative Classification of Stroke System for etiologic stroke classification through chart reviews to determine both phenotypic (abnormal test findings categorized in major etiologic groups without weighting towards the most likely cause in the presence of multiple etiologies) and causative subtypes in each subject. Classification reliability was assessed with blinded re-adjudication of 1509 randomly selected cases. Findings: The figure shows the distribution of etiologic categories. Overall, only 40% to 54% of cases with a given major ischemic stroke etiology (phenotypic subtype) were classified into the same final causative category with high confidence. There was good agreement for both causative (kappa 0·72, 95%CI:0·69-0·75) and phenotypic classifications (kappa 0·73, 95%CI:0·70-0·75). Conclusions: This study provides high quality data on etiologic stroke subtypes and demonstrates that etiologic subtypes can be determined with good reliability in studies that include investigators with different expertise and background, institutions with different stroke evaluation protocols and geographic location, and patient populations with different epidemiological characteristics. The discordance between phenotypic and causative stroke subtypes suggests that the presence of an abnormality in a stroke patient does not necessarily mean that it is the cause of stroke.

Objectives: Identification of gene variants of stroke subtypes is important for the development of tailored ischemic stroke therapies among various ethnic groups. Valid and reliable determination of ischemic stroke subtype is essential for achieving this goal and to standardize a classification scheme across multi-center studies and different populations. Causative Classification System for Ischemic Stroke (CCS) is a novel computerized subclassification tool developed to improve reliability and accuracy of classifying stroke types. The CCS algorithm relies on both phenotypic and causative stroke variables. A Hispanic subset of the SiGN, an important and distinct target population with greater risk of certain stroke subtypes, was evaluated with Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) and CCS and the agreement between the two classification systems was analyzed. Methods: Over 6000 subjects at 15 sites across US and Europe were enrolled, with TOAST and CCS locally adjudicated. Blood collection and central data quality control (10% central readjudication) were performed on all participants. A subset of Hispanics was analyzed for the purpose of this study and the agreement between the TOAST and CCS were assessed by kappa statistic. Findings: Hispanics (n=595, 10.9%) compared to non-Hispanics (n=5457) were more likely to be younger (63.7 vs. 64.0), male (55% vs. 46%) and have fewer of the traditional stroke risk factors HTN (54% vs. 64%), Afib (11% vs. 14%), DM(23% vs. 25%), CAD(16% vs. 20%) and smoking(19% vs. 22%). While the TOAST showed no differences between stroke subtypes for Hispanic vs. non-Hispanics, in CCS, Hispanics were classified with more of large vessel (22% vs. 20%), cardioembolic (37% vs. 30%) and small vessel strokes (13% vs. 9%) and fewer with undetermined etiology (28% vs. 40%) as compared to non-Hispanics. TOAST and CCS offered moderate correlation across all stroke types in Hispanics: kappa of 0.66 for large artery atherosclerosis, 0.58 for cardioembolic, and 0.58 for small artery occlusion. Conclusion: CCS offers a more sensitive and accurate system for subphenotyping of strokes in Hispanics who tended to have relatively fewer risk factors and unclassified strokes. Further studies correlating the two classification systems and their relation to genotyping data are warranted.

Background: The Stroke Genetics Network (SiGN) funded by the NINDS aims to identify genetic risk factors in ischemic stroke using whole-genome association studies (GWAS). High quality phenotyping is crucial to successful application of GWAS. As a heterogenous disorder, stroke poses specific challenges. The Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) classification is a broadly used, but its validity is challenged especially when performed by multiple investigators with differing interpretations of the system. The Causative Classification System for Ischemic Stroke (CCS) system is a new, web-based, and computerized algorithm that integrates clinical, diagnostic, and etiologic stroke characteristics in an evidence-based manner ( ccs.mgh.harvard.edu ) to generate subtypes. Methods: In planning the SiGN proposal, a sample of 20 coded charts were collected from a subset of participating studies to assess feasibility of central adjudication and comparability to study-specific TOAST. Two central adjudicators reviewed all records and generated TOAST and CCS subtypes. These were compared to study-specific TOAST subtype and the CCS phenotype generated for SiGN by local trained adjudicators. CCS data is now available for 7134 included cases using both a 5 and a 7 category system as defined in the table . Results: All 4 phenotypes were available for 115 ischemic stroke cases from 6 studies in SiGN. Basic demographics were 54% women, 63% white, and median age between 65-74. Table 1 provides the agreement between the various subtypes. Table 2 describes the types of disagreement. Conclusions: Central adjudication with only two adjudicators and curated medical records yielded more consistent subtyping independent of phenotyping system. The agreement for TOAST was higher than published rates by independent groups (∼0.50). In contrast, the agreement for CCS was lower than previously published (0.85-0.95). Site adjudicators' familiarity with TOAST and inexperience with CCS may contribute. Although CCS is an automated algorithm and has a number of user friendly features, our findings suggest that formal training and certification process before starting to use CCS may be worthwhile to achieve optimal benefit from the system.

Background and Purpose: Family-based methods for estimating heritability cannot discriminate between shared genetic and shared environmental exposures. Recently, methods have been developed for estimating heritability in population samples using genome-wide SNPs. We used the approach developed by Visscher and colleagues to estimate the heritability of ischemic stroke in Caucasian subjects. In addition to evaluating the overall heritability of ischemic stroke, we assessed whether stroke heritability varies by age, gender, and stroke subtype. Methods: Using publicly available software (GCTA and PLINK), we estimated ischemic stroke heritability stratified by age and gender using genome-wide association (GWA) data from three Caucasian ischemic stroke studies: Ischemic Stroke Genetics Study (ISGS), Bio-Repository of DNA in Stroke (BRAINS), and Genetics of Early-Onset Stroke (GEOS). Weighted means of site-specific heritability point estimates were combined according to a standard fixed effects model. Results: Conclusions: A SNP-based approach may be useful in discerning differences in ischemic stroke heritability between different cohorts and subtypes. Overall, our analysis estimated ischemic stroke heritability to be 31% (SE = 7%), with a suggestion of higher heritability for younger cases. Small vessel stroke showed the highest heritability (58 ± 19%), with cardioembolic showing the lowest heritability (16 ± 14%). It should be emphasized that heritability estimates are population-specific and that the method used only reflects the heritability captured by common SNP variants measured in GWA studies, and not phenotypic variability explained by rare variants.

Background: Identification of clinical and imaging characteristics of ischemic stroke that can predict the underlying etiology is critical for accurate stroke subtyping. We sought to investigate the relationship between stroke characteristics and stroke etiology in 7,591 patients in the NINDS Stroke Genetics Network Study. Methods: We determined the probability of having a major etiology in the presence of certain stroke characteristics that were previously linked to specific stroke mechanisms. We excluded patients with multiple competing major etiologies. All patients had brain imaging, intra- and extra-cranial vascular imaging, and complete cardiac assessment. We defined major etiologies according to the Causative Classification of Stroke System Criteria without reference to the stroke characteristics under study. Results: History of 1 ipsilateral ischemic events within the last month, the presence of internal watershed infarcts or multiple, ipsilateral, unilateral, and temporally separate infarcts were associated with large artery atherosclerosis (Table). Multiple acute infarcts in different cerebral circulations were more common in patients with major cardiac source of embolism as well as in those with uncommon/cryptogenic causes. Stereotypic lacunar TIAs within the last week and lacunar syndrome were associated with lacunar infarction Discussion: Clinical and imaging stroke characteristics appear to predict stroke etiologies. This information may find utility in developing algorithms for a guided stroke evaluation as well as help identify the most likely causative etiology in the presence of multiple competing etiologies.