Gardener, Hannah

Background: Race-ethnic disparities in stroke care can contribute to inequality in stroke outcomes. We sought to determine the disparities in stroke performance metrics by race-ethnicity in a voluntary stroke registry of Florida and Puerto Rico Get With The Guidelines-Stroke (GWTG-S) data. Methods: Sixty-three sites who had enrolled in the FL-PR Stroke Registry (54 FL; 9 PR) recorded 38,684 ischemic stroke cases from 2010 to 2013. Generalized linear regression models were used to evaluate race-ethnic differences in 7 pre-defined acute stroke performance measures and defect-free care (IV tPA treatment, in-hospital antithrombotic therapy, DVT prophylaxis, antithrombotic therapy at discharge, anticoagulation therapy, statin medication at discharge, and smoking cessation counseling), adjusting for age and region (FL vs. PR). Results: Of acute ischemic stroke cases, 63% were non-Hispanic White (NHW), 18% NH-Black (NHB), and 17% Hispanic. The mean age was 71±14 years. NHW were older (73±14), followed by Hispanics (70±14), and NHB (63±14); p<0.0001. Defect-free care was better among NHB (78%) and NHW (76%) than in Hispanics (68%), p<0.0001. Defect-free care improved over time and the race-ethnic disparity decreased (2010: NHW 61%, NHB 64%, Hispanic 46%, p<0.0001; 2013: 91%, 91%, 86%, p=0.47 respectively). NHW were most likely to receive IV tPA treatment (arrived by 2 hours and treated by 3 hours; 88%) and early antithrombotic treatment (96%). Hispanics were least likely to receive DVT prophylaxis (76%), anticoagulation (92%), statins (89%), and smoking cessation counseling (93%). Conclusions: Race-ethnic disparities in acute stroke care are evident yet decreasing, coinciding with improvements in quality of care over time in Florida and Puerto Rico hospitals participating in GWTG-S. Special stroke quality improvement programs to target areas where performance is less than expected and minimize race-ethnic disparities are necessary to improve stroke care for all Americans.

Background: Higher prevalence of stroke in women and sex-specific disparities in stroke care are reported. We sought to determine sex-specific differences in stroke performance metrics in a large quality improvement registry of Florida and Puerto Rico based on Get With The Guidelines-Stroke (GWTG-S). Methods: 38,684 (49% women) acute ischemic stroke patients were included from 63 sites (54 FL; 9 PR) from 2010 to 2013. Logistic regression was used to evaluate sex-specific differences in defect-free care (IV tPA therapy, in-hospital antithrombotic therapy, DVT prophylaxis, antithrombotic therapy at discharge, anticoagulation therapy, statin medication at discharge, smoking cessation counseling) adjusting for age and race-ethnicity. Results: As compared to men, women were older (73±15 vs. 69±14 years; p<0.0001), less likely Hispanic (17% vs. 18%; p=0.0001), with lower age- and race-ethnic-adjusted rates of hypertension (34% vs. 37%; p=0.0009) and smoking (13% vs. 21%; p<0.0001), but higher rates of atrial fibrillation (18% vs. 16%; p=0.02). Overall, 9% of patients received thrombolysis. Women were less likely to receive thrombolysis (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.86-0.99) and less likely to have door-to-needle time <1 hour (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.73-0.97). Overall, defect-free care was 75% in women and 76% in men (lower early antithrombotic therapy [OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.77-0.96], less antithrombotic at discharge [OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77-0.99], less statin therapy at discharge [OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.88] and less smoking cessation counseling [OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.56-0.98]). Defect- free care improved over the study period; it was significantly lower in women vs. men in 2010 (58.2% vs. 60.7%, p=0.005), but similar in 2013 (90.2% vs 90.0%; p=0.64). Conclusions: Women eligible to receive IV tPA for acute ischemic stroke were less likely to be treated and received less defect-free care compared to men, but these measures improved over time. These findings suggest that the adoption of GWTG-S quality improvement program helps reduce sex disparities in quality of care for acute ischemic stroke patients.

Objectives: Identification of gene variants of stroke subtypes is important for the development of tailored ischemic stroke therapies among various ethnic groups. Valid and reliable determination of ischemic stroke subtype is essential for achieving this goal and to standardize a classification scheme across multi-center studies and different populations. Causative Classification System for Ischemic Stroke (CCS) is a novel computerized subclassification tool developed to improve reliability and accuracy of classifying stroke types. The CCS algorithm relies on both phenotypic and causative stroke variables. A Hispanic subset of the SiGN, an important and distinct target population with greater risk of certain stroke subtypes, was evaluated with Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) and CCS and the agreement between the two classification systems was analyzed. Methods: Over 6000 subjects at 15 sites across US and Europe were enrolled, with TOAST and CCS locally adjudicated. Blood collection and central data quality control (10% central readjudication) were performed on all participants. A subset of Hispanics was analyzed for the purpose of this study and the agreement between the TOAST and CCS were assessed by kappa statistic. Findings: Hispanics (n=595, 10.9%) compared to non-Hispanics (n=5457) were more likely to be younger (63.7 vs. 64.0), male (55% vs. 46%) and have fewer of the traditional stroke risk factors HTN (54% vs. 64%), Afib (11% vs. 14%), DM(23% vs. 25%), CAD(16% vs. 20%) and smoking(19% vs. 22%). While the TOAST showed no differences between stroke subtypes for Hispanic vs. non-Hispanics, in CCS, Hispanics were classified with more of large vessel (22% vs. 20%), cardioembolic (37% vs. 30%) and small vessel strokes (13% vs. 9%) and fewer with undetermined etiology (28% vs. 40%) as compared to non-Hispanics. TOAST and CCS offered moderate correlation across all stroke types in Hispanics: kappa of 0.66 for large artery atherosclerosis, 0.58 for cardioembolic, and 0.58 for small artery occlusion. Conclusion: CCS offers a more sensitive and accurate system for subphenotyping of strokes in Hispanics who tended to have relatively fewer risk factors and unclassified strokes. Further studies correlating the two classification systems and their relation to genotyping data are warranted.

Diagnostic criteria to classify severity of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis vary across vascular laboratories. Consensus-based criteria, proposed by the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound in 2003 (SRUCC), have been broadly implemented but have not been adequately validated. We conducted a multicentered, retrospective correlative imaging study of duplex ultrasound versus catheter angiography for evaluation of severity of ICA stenosis. Velocity data were abstracted from bilateral duplex studies performed between 1/1/2009 and 12/31/2015 and studies were interpreted using SRUCC. Percentage ICA stenosis was determined using North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) methodology. Receiver operating characteristic analysis evaluated the performance of SRUCC parameters compared with angiography. Of 448 ICA sides (from 224 patients), 299 ICA sides (from 167 patients) were included. Agreement between duplex ultrasound and angiography was moderate (κ = 0.42), with overestimation of degree of stenosis for both moderate (50–69%) and severe (⩾ 70%) ICA lesions. The primary SRUCC parameter for ⩾ 50% ICA stenosis of peak-systolic velocity (PSV) of ⩾ 125 cm/sec did not meet prespecified thresholds for adequate sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy (sensitivity 97.8%, specificity 64.2%, accuracy 74.5%). Test performance was improved by raising the PSV threshold to ⩾ 180 cm/sec (sensitivity 93.3%, specificity 81.6%, accuracy 85.2%) or by adding the additional parameter of ICA/common carotid artery (CCA) PSV ratio ⩾ 2.0 (sensitivity 94.3%, specificity 84.3%, accuracy 87.4%). For ⩾ 70% ICA stenosis, analysis was limited by a low number of cases with angiographically severe disease. Interpretation of carotid duplex examinations using SRUCC resulted in significant overestimation of severity of ICA stenosis when compared with angiography; raising the PSV threshold for ⩾ 50% ICA stenosis to ⩾ 180 cm/sec as a single parameter or requiring the ICA/CCA PSV ratio ⩾ 2.0 in addition to PSV of ⩾ 125 cm/sec for laboratories using the SRUCC is recommended to improve the accuracy of carotid duplex examinations.