Yoon, Harry H.

Cancers originating in the esophagus or esophagogastric junction constitute a major global health problem. Esophageal cancers are histologically classified as squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) or adenocarcinoma, which differ in their etiology, pathology, tumor location, therapeutics, and prognosis. In contrast to esophageal adenocarcinoma, which usually affects the lower esophagus, esophageal SCC is more likely to localize at or higher than the tracheal bifurcation. Systemic therapy can provide palliation, improved survival, and enhanced quality of life in patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. The implementation of biomarker testing, especially analysis of HER2 status, microsatellite instability status, and the expression of programmed death-ligand 1, has had a significant impact on clinical practice and patient care. Targeted therapies including trastuzumab, nivolumab, ipilimumab, and pembrolizumab have produced encouraging results in clinical trials for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. Palliative management, which may include systemic therapy, chemoradiation, and/or best supportive care, is recommended for all patients with unresectable or metastatic cancer. Multidisciplinary team management is essential for all patients with locally advanced esophageal or esophagogastric junction cancers. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers focuses on the management of recurrent or metastatic disease.

424 Background: Understanding the impact of anticancer therapies on immune system is critical to successful design and incorporation of immunotherapies. We developed a novel immune monitoring platform that measures the relative amount of circulating effector T cells and antitumor cytotoxicity of circulating immune cells. We previously showed that this assay can differentiate patients’ clinical response to anti-PD-1 therapy. Here, we applied this assay to patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GGEA) who received chemoradiation or chemotherapy-based therapies. Methods: Patients underwent peripheral blood collection at baseline and during follow-up. Levels of circulating effector T cells (CX3CR1+NKG7+/CD3+CD8+) were quantified by flow cytometry using peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Antitumor cytotoxicity of circulating immune cells was evaluated by co-culturing CD3/CD28 activated PBMCs with calcein-AM labeled GGEA tumor cells (FLO-1). Antitumor cytotoxicity of individual patients’ PBMCs was calculated based on the amount of calcein released by dead tumor cells. Results: In a pilot study of 8 patients with mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) GGEA, the changes in the frequency of effector T cells appeared to be associated with radiographic response to treatment based on RECIST (3 partial response [PR], 3 stable disease [SD], and 2 progressive disease [PD]). The median interval between sequential blood collections was 64 days and an increase in effector T cells was observed in patients with PD. Antitumor cytotoxicity was evaluated in 4 patients who did not receive targeted therapies or immune checkpoint inhibitors. Two of these patients (a, b) had blood collected at the time of diagnosis (treatment naïve) and after neoadjuvant therapy. One developed pulmonary metastases after chemoradiation while the other had significant tumor shrinkage after chemotherapy. The decrease in antitumor cytotoxicity of PBMCs was less in the patient with PD (-19.4%) than the one with PR (-48.5%). Two patients (c, d) had blood collected twice while receiving the same chemotherapy for metastatic disease (not treatment naïve). The decrease in antitumor cytotoxicity of PBMCs was less in the patient with SD (-0.3%) than the one with PR (-14.5%). Conclusions: We demonstrated the feasibility of using PBMCs to monitor immune response to anticancer therapies. Our data raise the possibility that the amount of circulating effector T cells and antitumor cytotoxicity of PBMCs may be associated with tumor burden in patients with pMMR solid tumors. [Table: see text]

340 Background: TIS, an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody, + chemo as 1L therapy demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival (OS) vs PBO + chemo in patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC (hazard ratio [HR] 0.66 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54, 0.80]; P< 0.0001), with a manageable safety profile, at interim analysis of the phase 3, double-blind RATIONALE-306 study (NCT03783442). Here, we report data from the non-Asia subgroup (Europe, Northern America, and Oceania). Methods: Adults with advanced or metastatic ESCC, with no prior systemic treatment for advanced disease were randomized 1:1, (stratified by region, prior definitive therapy, and investigator [INV]-chosen chemo) to receive TIS 200 mg intravenously (IV) once every 3 weeks (Q3W) (Arm A) or PBO IV Q3W (Arm B), with platinum + fluoropyrimidine, or platinum + paclitaxel until disease progression by INV per RECIST v1.1, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal. The primary endpoint was OS in the intent-to-treat population. Secondary endpoints included: progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DoR) by INV per RECIST v1.1; OS in the programmed death-ligand 1 score ≥10%; and safety. Results: Of 649 randomized patients, 163 (25.1%) were from the non-Asia subgroup (Arm A, n = 83; Arm B, n = 80). At data cutoff (Feb 28, 2022), the median study follow-up time in the non-Asia subgroup was 16.0 months (mo) in Arm A vs 8.4 mo in Arm B. OS (median 16.3 vs 9.0 mo; unstratified HR 0.66 [95% CI 0.45, 0.96]) and PFS (median 7.7 vs 5.5 mo; unstratified HR 0.59 [95% CI 0.41, 0.83]) were improved in Arm A vs Arm B, respectively. Arm A had higher ORR (61.4% vs 41.3%, odds ratio 2.27 [95% CI 1.21, 4.25]) and longer median DoR (7.1 mo [95% CI 5.6, 9.6] vs 5.7 mo [95% CI 3.8, 8.3]) than Arm B. More patients in Arm A vs Arm B experienced ≥1 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE; 94.0% vs 88.5%), serious TRAEs (25.3% vs 17.9%), and discontinuation due to treatment-emergent AEs (42.2% vs 35.9%, respectively). Similar proportions of patients in Arm A vs Arm B had ≥grade 3 TRAEs (56.6% vs 52.6%), and TRAEs leading to death (1.2% vs 1.3%), respectively. Conclusions: In the non-Asia subgroup, 1L TIS + chemo showed a clinically meaningful improvement in OS vs PBO + chemo in patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC, with a manageable safety profile, consistent with published results in the overall population. Clinical trial information: NCT03783442 .

Abstract Purpose: Targeting focal adhesion kinase (FAK) renders checkpoint immunotherapy effective in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) mouse model. Defactinib is a highly potent oral FAK inhibitor that has a tolerable safety profile. Patients and Methods: We conducted a multicenter, open-label, phase I study with dose escalation and expansion phases. In dose escalation, patients with refractory solid tumors were treated at five escalating dose levels of defactinib and gemcitabine to identify a recommended phase II dose (RP2D). In expansion phase, patients with metastatic PDAC who progressed on frontline treatment (refractory cohort) or had stable disease (SD) after at least 4 months of standard gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (maintenance cohort) were treated at RP2D. Pre- and posttreatment tumor biopsies were performed to evaluate tumor immunity. Results: The triple drug combination was well-tolerated, with no dose-limiting toxicities. Among 20 treated patients with refractory PDAC, the disease control rate (DCR) was 80%, with one partial response (PR) and 15 SDs, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3.6 and 7.8 months, respectively. Among 10 evaluable patients in the maintenance cohort, DCR was 70% with one PR and six SDs. Three patients with SD came off study due to treatment- or disease-related complications. The median PFS and OS on study treatment were 5.0 and 8.3 months, respectively. Conclusions: The combination of defactinib, pembrolizumab, and gemcitabine was well-tolerated and safe, had promising preliminary efficacy, and showed biomarker activity in infiltrative T lymphocytes. Efficacy of this strategy may require incorporation of more potent chemotherapy in future studies.

ImportanceApproval by the US Food and Drug Administration of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) for advanced gastroesophageal cancer (aGEC) irrespective of PD-L1 status has generated controversy. Exploratory analyses from individual trials indicate a lack of meaningful benefit from ICI in patients with absent or low PD-L1 expression; however, analysis of a single variable while ignoring others may not consider the instability inherent in exploratory analyses.ObjectiveTo systematically examine the predictive value of tissue-based PD-L1 status compared with that of other variables for ICI benefit in aGEC to assess its stability.Data SourcesMEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register (2000-2022).Study Selection, Data Extraction, and SynthesisRandomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included of adults with aGEC (adenocarcinoma [AC] or squamous cell carcinoma [SCC]) randomized to anti−PD-1 or PD-L1−containing treatment vs standard of care (SOC). Study screening, data abstraction, and bias assessment were completed independently by 2 reviewers. Of 5752 records screened, 26 were assessed for eligibility; 17 trials were included in the analysis.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe prespecified primary end point was overall survival. The mean hazard ratio (HR) for ICI vs SOC was calculated (random-effects model). Predictive values were quantified by calculating the ratio of mean HRs between 2 levels of each variable.ResultsIn all, 17 RCTs (9 first line, 8 after first line) at low risk of bias and 14 predictive variables were included, totaling 11 166 participants (5067 with SCC, 6099 with ACC; 77.6% were male and 22.4% were female; 59.5% of patients were younger than 65 years, 40.5% were 65 years or older). Among patients with SCCs, PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) was the strongest predictor of ICI benefit (HR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.53-0.68] for high TPS; and HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.75-0.95] for low TPS), yielding a predictive value of 41.0% favoring high TPS (vs ≤16.0% for other variables). Among patients with AC, PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) was the strongest predictor (after microsatellite instability high status) of ICI benefit (HR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.66-0.81] for high CPS; and HR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.84-1.07] for low CPS), yielding a predictive value of 29.4% favoring CPS-high (vs ≤12.9% for other variables). Head-to-head analyses of trials containing both levels of a variable and/or having similar design generally yielded consistent results.Conclusions and RelevanceTissue-based PD-L1 expression, more than any variable other than microsatellite instability-high, identified varying degrees of benefit from ICI-containing therapy vs SOC among patients with aGEC in 17 RCTs.

Summary Exploratory analysis of a phase III trial in esophageal cancer found that the patients who most contributed to an overall survival benefit from PD-1 blockade were not responders, but non-responders. The analysis has limitations but may have implications for investigating the optimal timing of immunotherapy relative to other treatments. See related article by Okada et al., p. 3277

4146 Background: Targeting focal adhesion kinase (FAK) renders checkpoint immunotherapy effective in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) mouse models. Defactinib is a highly potent oral FAK inhibitor shown to have a tolerable safety profile. We evaluated the safety and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of defactinib in combination with pembrolizumab and gemcitabine for PDAC patients. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, open-label, phase I study with dose escalation and expansion phases. In 3x3 dose escalation, patients with refractory solid tumors were treated at five escalating dose levels of defactinib and gemcitabine to identify a RP2D. In expansion phase, patients with metastatic PDAC who progressed on frontline treatment (refractory cohort) or had treatment response or stable disease (SD) on standard gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (maintenance cohort) were treated at RP2D. Pre- and post-treatment tumor biopsies were performed to evaluate changes in tumor immunity. Results: The triple drug combination was well-tolerated with no dose-limiting toxicities. Among 17 treated patients with refractory PDAC, the disease control rate (DCR) was 58.8% with one partial response (PR) and nine SDs and the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 4.2 months and 9.1 months, respectively. Among the evaluable patients in the maintenance cohort, DCR was 63.6% with one PR and six SD. Three patients with SD came off study due to treatment- or disease-related complications. The median PFS and OS were 5.0 months and 8.3 months, respectively. Conclusions: The combination of defactinib, pembrolizumab, and gemcitabine was well-tolerated, had promising preliminary efficacy, and showed increased infiltrative T lymphocytes in post-treatment tumor biopsies. Incorporation of a more potent chemotherapy backbone should be considered to achieve better clinical response in future trial design. Clinical trial information: NCT02546531.

2538 Background: Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) is a highly selective cell lineage marker with limited expression in normal gastric tissues and significantly higher expression in primary gastric, pancreatic tumors and their metastases. Anti-CLDN18.2-targeted CAR T cells, termed CT041, were developed to evaluate tumor response and patient-reported outcomes in the gastric and pancreatic cancer. Preliminary results of the trial (NCT03874897) showed an objective response rate (ORR) of about 60% in gastric cancer from a non-Western population. Here we report the results of CT041 for metastatic gastric cancer after ≥ 2 prior lines of systemic therapy or pancreatic cancer ≥ 1 prior line from six centers in the United States. Methods: This single-arm, open-label, phase Ib study (NCT04404595) investigated autologous CT041 CAR T cells in patients with CLDN18.2 positive advanced gastric (including diffuse, signet-ring) or pancreatic adenocarcinoma. All patients completed a conditioning regimen consisting of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and nab-paclitaxel prior to CT041 CAR T cells. The primary objective was to assess the safety, efficacy and cytokinetic profile of CT041. Adverse Events (AEs) were graded according to CTCAE 5.0, and tumor response was assessed per RECIST 1.1. Results: As of February 15, 2022, 11 patients (5 gastric and 6 pancreatic) with a median of 2 prior lines of therapy (range 1- 4) were treated with CT041 at a dose between 2.5 and 4 x 108 cells. There were no dose limiting toxicities, treatment-related deaths, severe cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurologic syndrome (ICANS), or severe gastrointestinal (GI) related AEs. All CRS were grade 1 or 2. Only one patient received tocilizumab. No grade 4 AEs were observed except for hematologic toxicities related to conditioning. The first eight patients were evaluable for response by the date of data cut-off: 1 patient achieved a complete response after two CT041 doses (gastric), 2 had partial response (gastric), 2 had stable disease with tumor shrinkage (pancreatic) and 3 (pancreatic) had progression of disease after an initial biochemical response. ORR was 37.5% (3/8) in all patients including 100% (3/3) in the gastric subgroup (all ≥ 3 prior lines). The last three patients had not reached the time for response assessment. CAR T cell expansion correlated with ctDNA reduction. The median duration of response and the progression-free survival had not been reached. Conclusions: These preliminary results indicate that CT041 therapy was safe and had therapeutic efficacy in patients with advanced GI cancers. In heavily pre-treated gastric cancer, CT041 may have significantly improved anti-tumor activity compared to historical treatment regimens. Clinical trial information: NCT04404595.

Abstract Purpose: This phase Ib/2 trial investigated pembrolizumab-containing trimodality therapy in patients with gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. Patients and Methods: Patients with GEJ adenocarcinoma (cT1–3NanyM0) received neoadjuvant pembrolizumab-containing chemoradiation (CROSS regimen) followed by surgical resection and adjuvant pembrolizumab. The primary endpoints were tolerability in the first 16 patients and pathologic complete response [pCR (ypT0N0)]. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). An independent propensity-score-matched cohort (treated with CROSS without immunotherapy) was used for comparison. Exploratory analyses included immune biomarkers in the tumor microenvironment (TME) and plasma. Results: We enrolled 31 eligible patients, of whom 29 received all expected doses of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab and 28 underwent R0 resection. Safety endpoints were met. The primary efficacy endpoint was not met [7/31 (22.6%) achieved pCR]. Patients with high [i.e., combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 10] baseline expression of programmed death (PD)-L1 in the TME had a significantly higher pCR rate than those with low expression [50.0% (4/8) vs. 13.6% (3/22); P = 0.046]. Patients with high PD-L1 expression also experienced longer PFS and OS than propensity-score-matched patients. Among trial patients with PD-L1 CPS &lt; 10, unprespecified analysis explored whether extracellular vesicles (EV) could identify further responders: an elevated plasma level of PD-L1–expressing EVs was significantly associated with higher pCR. Conclusions: Adding pembrolizumab to trimodality therapy showed acceptable tolerability but did not meet the pre-specified pCR endpoint. Exploratory analyses suggested that high PD-L1 expression in the TME and/or on EVs may identify patients most likely to achieve tumor response.