Qureshi, Muhammad Ahmad

ABSTRACTIntroductionIntramyocardial needle ablation is a novel technique for treating refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) and premature ventricular complexes (PVC). However, studies defining the effectiveness and safety of this procedure are limited. This meta‐analysis aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of needle ablation for VT and PVC refractory to standard ablation.MethodsEmbase, Ovid (includes Medline), and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to December 31, 2024. Human studies on needle ablation for recurrent VT and PVC were included. Primary outcome was immediate effectiveness (no immediate post‐procedural inducible VT or PVC). Secondary outcomes were long‐term effectiveness (no clinical VT or PVC at 6 months) and safety (composite measure of peri‐ and post‐procedural complications).ResultsA total of five studies including 180 patients (140 VT; 40 PVC) were analyzed. Mean ages ranged from 54 to 66 years. Among 129 patients with VT, immediate effectiveness was 75% (95% CI, 54–92; I2 80%), and cumulative freedom from clinical VT dropped to 43% at 6 months (95% CI, 35–52; I2 0%). Among 40 patients with PVC, immediate effectiveness was 82% (95% CI, 67–94; I2 0%), and long‐term effectiveness was 76% (95% CI, 61–90; I2 0%). Safety outcomes were reported in 19% of patients (95% CI, 13–27; I2 0%) and 10% of patients (95% CI 1, 23; I2 0%) in the VT and PVC arm, respectively. Death related to ablation was report in 7 patients (5.0%) only in the VT studies.ConclusionIntramyocardial needle ablation is an emerging alternative approach for refractory VT and PVC ablation, showing cautious but promising results and safety profiles. Prospective studies and an international registry could provide valuable insights needed for optimal patient selection and protocol refinement.

Background: Risk stratification for embolism in cardiac myxomas remains poorly explored. Goals: By this meta-analysis we studied the risk factors assicated with embolism among patients with cardiac myxoma. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar from their inception until January 2024. Statistical analyses were performed using Cochrane's RevMan 5.4 software. For each risk factor, the pooled odds ratio or mean difference was calculated along with the corresponding 95% confidence interval. Results: We included 18 studies in our analysis with a total population of 2601 out of which 525 patients (20.1%) had at least one episode of embolism. The pooled analyses showed that hypertension (p = 0.001), New York Heart Association I/II (p = 0.03), irregular tumor surface (p <0.00001), hyperlipidemia (p < 0.0001), coronary artery disease (p=0.01), high mean platelet volume (p=0.02), high tumor mobility (p<0.00001), were significantly associated with increased incidence of embolism. Female gender (p = 0.03) was the only risk factor associated with reduced risk. Other factors like smoking, atrial fibrillation, tumor size, age, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left atrial diameter (LAD) were not significantly associated with embolism (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Our study is the first to report significant pooled outcomes for gender, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, mean platelet volume, and tumor mobility in the population discussed. Hypertension, New York Heart Association I/II, irregular tumor surface, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, mean platelet volume and tumor mobility were significantly associated with high risk while female gender was associated with low risk of embolism. Patients with high-risk factors might benefit from early evaluation and definitive treatment (surgery).