Efficacy and safety of semaglutide versus placebo for people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders with obesity or early-stage metabolic abnormalities: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies
Background Individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders are at increased risk of cardiometabolic complications, largely due to antipsychotic-associated metabolic effects. Effective management strategies remain limited. Semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, has shown metabolic benefits in the general population, but its role in this population remains unclear. Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of semaglutide compared with placebo in individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders receiving antipsychotic therapy and experiencing metabolic abnormalities. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Data Sources and Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and ScienceDirect were searched from inception to February 2026. Randomized controlled trials comparing semaglutide with placebo were included. The longest follow-up time point from each study was used for pooled analysis. Mean differences (MD) and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using RevMan 5.4. The certainty of evidence for critical outcomes was assessed using the GRADE framework. Results Three randomized controlled trials (n = 258) were included. Semaglutide was associated with reductions in body weight (MD: -11.01 kg), BMI (MD: -3.63 kg/m 2 ), and waist circumference (MD: -6.33 cm). Improvements were also observed in body composition. No significant differences were found in lipid or glycemic parameters except HbA1c which showed a significant reduction. Psychiatric outcomes remained unchanged. Gastrointestinal adverse particularly nausea and vomiting events were more frequent with semaglutide. Conclusion Semaglutide appears to improve anthropometric outcomes without worsening psychiatric symptoms in individuals receiving antipsychotic therapy. However, evidence is limited, and larger, long-term trials are required. According to the GRADE framework, the certainty of evidence ranged from moderate for key anthropometric and safety outcomes to low or very low for several metabolic and psychiatric outcomes, highlighting the need for larger, long-term randomized trials.
Abstract 4134589: Evaluating risk factors of embolism in patients with cardiac myxoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Background: Risk stratification for embolism in cardiac myxomas remains poorly explored. Goals: By this meta-analysis we studied the risk factors assicated with embolism among patients with cardiac myxoma. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar from their inception until January 2024. Statistical analyses were performed using Cochrane's RevMan 5.4 software. For each risk factor, the pooled odds ratio or mean difference was calculated along with the corresponding 95% confidence interval. Results: We included 18 studies in our analysis with a total population of 2601 out of which 525 patients (20.1%) had at least one episode of embolism. The pooled analyses showed that hypertension (p = 0.001), New York Heart Association I/II (p = 0.03), irregular tumor surface (p <0.00001), hyperlipidemia (p < 0.0001), coronary artery disease (p=0.01), high mean platelet volume (p=0.02), high tumor mobility (p<0.00001), were significantly associated with increased incidence of embolism. Female gender (p = 0.03) was the only risk factor associated with reduced risk. Other factors like smoking, atrial fibrillation, tumor size, age, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left atrial diameter (LAD) were not significantly associated with embolism (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Our study is the first to report significant pooled outcomes for gender, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, mean platelet volume, and tumor mobility in the population discussed. Hypertension, New York Heart Association I/II, irregular tumor surface, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, mean platelet volume and tumor mobility were significantly associated with high risk while female gender was associated with low risk of embolism. Patients with high-risk factors might benefit from early evaluation and definitive treatment (surgery).