Khawar, Mirza Muhammad Hadeed

e24020 Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a widely adopted treatment for severe aortic stenosis, but outcomes in cancer survivors with prior chest radiation therapy (C-XRT) remain uncertain. This study compares the clinical outcomes of TAVR between patients with a history of C-XRT and those without prior radiation exposure (control group). Methods: Patients with prior chest radiation therapy (C-XRT) were compared to a control group without radiation exposure to evaluate key clinical endpoints. For each endpoint, odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were determined, and heterogeneity was analyzed using the I² statistic. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis, encompassing 3083 C-XRT and 8891 control patients. Patients with prior C-XRT showed significantly higher long-term mortality (OR 1.84, 95% CI [1.08, 3.13], p=0.02) compared to controls. Other outcomes, including access-related vascular complications, Acute Kidney Injury, Congestive heart failure, major bleeding, need for pacemaker, short-term mortality, and stroke, did not demonstrate significant differences between the groups. Conclusions: Cancer survivors with prior chest radiation therapy undergoing TAVR may experience higher long-term mortality compared to patients without radiation exposure. However, no significant differences were observed in other major outcomes. These findings suggest that while TAVR is a viable treatment for C-XRT patients, long-term risks require further investigation to optimize patient selection and management strategies. Outcomes. Outcome OR 95% Confidence Interval P value Access related vascular complications 1.12 [0.85, 1.48] 0.43 Acute kidney injury 0.54 [0.20, 1.50] 0.24 Congestive heart failure 1.38 [0.88, 2.17] 0.16 Long term mortality 1.84 [1.08, 3.13] 0.02 Major bleeding 0.96 [0.78, 1.17] 0.67 Need for pacemaker 1.05 [0.88, 1.26] 0.57 Short term mortality 1.66 [0.97, 2.84] 0.06 Stroke 1.25 [0.74, 2.11] 0.39

e24024 Background: Patients with active cancer undergoing trans catheter aortic valvular replacement (TAVR) face a higher risk of adverse outcomes due to the interplay between cancer and cardiovascular disease. Although TAVR is increasingly used in high-risk populations, data on outcomes for these patients remain limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the clinical outcomes associated with TAVR in patients with active cancer compared to non-cancer controls, providing insights to inform clinical decision-making in this unique group. Methods: A systematic search of major databases (PubMed, Embase, OVID, Web of Science, Scopus) was conducted to identify studies comparing clinical outcomes of TAVR between patients with active cancer and those without cancer. Key outcomes included measures of mortality, procedural complications, and post-procedure adverse events. The Mantel-Haenszel method was used for pooled analysis, applying random-effects or fixed-effects modeling based on heterogeneity assessed by Higgins I². Statistical significance was set at a p-value < 0.05. Results: Twelve studies involving 5,73,192 patients (67,684 active cancer, 505508 control) were included. Patients with active cancer undergoing TAVR have significantly higher risks of short-term mortality (OR 1.31, 95% CI [1.15, 1.49], p < 0.0001), long-term mortality (OR 2.24, 95% CI [1.85, 2.70], p < 0.0001), and major bleeding complications (OR 1.80, 95% CI [1.68, 1.92], p < 0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences in cardiovascular mortality (OR 1.33, 95% CI [0.94, 1.89], p = 0.11), myocardial infarction (OR 1.60, 95% CI [0.82, 3.11], p = 0.17), stroke (OR 0.61, 95% CI [0.28, 1.35], p = 0.22), AKI (OR 0.92, 95% CI [0.49, 1.73], p = 0.80), or the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (OR 1.12, 95% CI [0.85, 1.48], p = 0.42). Conclusions: Patients with active cancer undergoing TAVR face significantly higher risks of mortality and major bleeding compared to non-cancer controls. However, the risks of cardiovascular mortality, MI, stroke, AKI, and the need for permanent pacemaker implantation are comparable to those of non-cancer controls. Careful risk assessment and management are crucial for optimizing outcomes in this vulnerable population, and further studies are needed to refine treatment strategies. Odds ratios of all outcomes. Outcomes OR Confidence Interval (95% CI) p-value Short term mortality 1.31 [1.15, 1.49] < 0.0001 Long term mortality 2.24 [1.85, 2.70] < 0.00001 Major bleeding 1.8 [1.68, 1.92] < 0.00001 Cardiovascular mortality 1.33 [0.94, 1.89] 0.11 Myocardial Infarction 1.6 [0.82, 3.11] 0.17 Stroke 0.61 [0.28, 1.35] 0.22 Acute Kidney Injury 0.92 [0.49, 1.73] 0.8 Need for permanent pacemaker implantation 1.12 [0.85, 1.48] 0.42

Background: Risk stratification for embolism in cardiac myxomas remains poorly explored. Goals: By this meta-analysis we studied the risk factors assicated with embolism among patients with cardiac myxoma. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar from their inception until January 2024. Statistical analyses were performed using Cochrane's RevMan 5.4 software. For each risk factor, the pooled odds ratio or mean difference was calculated along with the corresponding 95% confidence interval. Results: We included 18 studies in our analysis with a total population of 2601 out of which 525 patients (20.1%) had at least one episode of embolism. The pooled analyses showed that hypertension (p = 0.001), New York Heart Association I/II (p = 0.03), irregular tumor surface (p <0.00001), hyperlipidemia (p < 0.0001), coronary artery disease (p=0.01), high mean platelet volume (p=0.02), high tumor mobility (p<0.00001), were significantly associated with increased incidence of embolism. Female gender (p = 0.03) was the only risk factor associated with reduced risk. Other factors like smoking, atrial fibrillation, tumor size, age, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left atrial diameter (LAD) were not significantly associated with embolism (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Our study is the first to report significant pooled outcomes for gender, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, mean platelet volume, and tumor mobility in the population discussed. Hypertension, New York Heart Association I/II, irregular tumor surface, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, mean platelet volume and tumor mobility were significantly associated with high risk while female gender was associated with low risk of embolism. Patients with high-risk factors might benefit from early evaluation and definitive treatment (surgery).