Raad, Mohamad

ABSTRACTIntroductionIntramyocardial needle ablation is a novel technique for treating refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) and premature ventricular complexes (PVC). However, studies defining the effectiveness and safety of this procedure are limited. This meta‐analysis aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of needle ablation for VT and PVC refractory to standard ablation.MethodsEmbase, Ovid (includes Medline), and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to December 31, 2024. Human studies on needle ablation for recurrent VT and PVC were included. Primary outcome was immediate effectiveness (no immediate post‐procedural inducible VT or PVC). Secondary outcomes were long‐term effectiveness (no clinical VT or PVC at 6 months) and safety (composite measure of peri‐ and post‐procedural complications).ResultsA total of five studies including 180 patients (140 VT; 40 PVC) were analyzed. Mean ages ranged from 54 to 66 years. Among 129 patients with VT, immediate effectiveness was 75% (95% CI, 54–92; I2 80%), and cumulative freedom from clinical VT dropped to 43% at 6 months (95% CI, 35–52; I2 0%). Among 40 patients with PVC, immediate effectiveness was 82% (95% CI, 67–94; I2 0%), and long‐term effectiveness was 76% (95% CI, 61–90; I2 0%). Safety outcomes were reported in 19% of patients (95% CI, 13–27; I2 0%) and 10% of patients (95% CI 1, 23; I2 0%) in the VT and PVC arm, respectively. Death related to ablation was report in 7 patients (5.0%) only in the VT studies.ConclusionIntramyocardial needle ablation is an emerging alternative approach for refractory VT and PVC ablation, showing cautious but promising results and safety profiles. Prospective studies and an international registry could provide valuable insights needed for optimal patient selection and protocol refinement.

AbstractBackgroundSudden cardiac death (SCD) is common after orthotopic heart transplant (OHT). No clear guidelines for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation in OHT patients at high risk for SCD currently exist.ObjectivesTo assess the safety, efficacy, and benefit of ICDs and resynchronization therapy post‐OHT. We also provide a systematic review of previous reports.MethodsA retrospective multicenter cohort study within the United States. Patients with ICD post‐OHT between 2000 and 2020 were identified.ResultsWe analyzed 16 patients from 4 centers. The mean standard‐deviation (SD) age was 43 (18) years at OHT and 51 (20) years at ICD implantation. The mean (SD) duration from OHT to ICD implantation was 9 (5) years. The mean (SD) left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 35% (17%). There were 2 (13%) postprocedural complications: 1 hematoma and 1 death. Mean (SD) follow‐up was 24 (23) months. Survival rate was 63% (10/16) at 1 year and 56% (9/16) at 2 years, with 6/7 of those who died having LVEF < 35% at the time of the ICD implantation. Patients were more likely to receive appropriate therapy if their ICD was implanted for secondary (5/8) rather than primary (0/8) prevention (p = .007). Of those who did, 4 patients survived to 30 days post‐ICD therapy. Severe CAV was not associated with the rate of appropriate therapy.ConclusionsBeneficial outcomes were observed when ICDs were implanted for secondary prevention only, and in patients with higher baseline LVEF. We also observed benefits with resynchronization therapy.

Background: Microvascular dysfunction is known to play a key role in patients with angina and nonobstructive coronary artery disease. We investigated the impact of ranolazine among patients with angina and nonobstructive coronary artery disease. Methods: In this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled pilot trial, 26 patients with angina once weekly or more, abnormal stress test, and nonobstructive coronary artery disease (<50% stenosis by angiography and fractional flow reserve >0.80) were randomized 1:1 to ranolazine or placebo for 12 weeks. Primary end point was ΔSeattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) angina frequency score. Baseline and 3 months follow-up SAQ, Duke Activity Status Index scores along with invasive fractional flow reserve, coronary flow reserve (CFR), hyperemic myocardial resistance, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing measurements were performed. Results: No significant differences in ΔSAQ angina frequency scores ( P =0.53) or Duke Activity Status Index ( P =0.76) were observed between ranolazine versus placebo, although patients on ranolazine had lesser improvement in SAQ physical limitation scores ( P =0.02) compared with placebo at 3 months. There were no significant differences in ΔCFR or Δhyperemic myocardial resistance between ranolazine and placebo groups. Patients treated with ranolazine, compared with placebo, had no significant improvement in maximum rate of oxygen consumption measured during incremental exercise (VO 2 max) and peak metabolic equivalents of task. Interestingly, in the ranolazine group, patients with baseline CFR<2.0 demonstrated greater gain in CFR compared with those with baseline CFR≥2.0 ( P =0.02). Conclusions: Ranolazine did not demonstrate improvement in SAQ angina frequency score, invasive microvascular function, or peak metabolic equivalent compared with placebo at 3 months. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02147067.