Back to Authors

Tita, Cristina

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2257-182X

Mayo Clinic

Henry Ford Health

Citations 2

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators in patients with orthotopic heart transplant: A multicenter case series
Maskoun, Waddah , Raad, Mohamad , Cha, Yong‐Mei , Houmsse, Mahmoud , Abualsuod, Amjad , Ezzeddine, Fatima M. , Pieper, Justin, Jamoor, Khaled, Tita, Cristina , Miller, John M. , Ezzeddine, Fatima

Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology | June 7, 2022 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1813-1822

10.1111/jce.15588 Get It

AbstractBackgroundSudden cardiac death (SCD) is common after orthotopic heart transplant (OHT). No clear guidelines for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation in OHT patients at high risk for SCD currently exist.ObjectivesTo assess the safety, efficacy, and benefit of ICDs and resynchronization therapy post‐OHT. We also provide a systematic review of previous reports.MethodsA retrospective multicenter cohort study within the United States. Patients with ICD post‐OHT between 2000 and 2020 were identified.ResultsWe analyzed 16 patients from 4 centers. The mean standard‐deviation (SD) age was 43 (18) years at OHT and 51 (20) years at ICD implantation. The mean (SD) duration from OHT to ICD implantation was 9 (5) years. The mean (SD) left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 35% (17%). There were 2 (13%) postprocedural complications: 1 hematoma and 1 death. Mean (SD) follow‐up was 24 (23) months. Survival rate was 63% (10/16) at 1 year and 56% (9/16) at 2 years, with 6/7 of those who died having LVEF < 35% at the time of the ICD implantation. Patients were more likely to receive appropriate therapy if their ICD was implanted for secondary (5/8) rather than primary (0/8) prevention (p = .007). Of those who did, 4 patients survived to 30 days post‐ICD therapy. Severe CAV was not associated with the rate of appropriate therapy.ConclusionsBeneficial outcomes were observed when ICDs were implanted for secondary prevention only, and in patients with higher baseline LVEF. We also observed benefits with resynchronization therapy.
A Phase 2A Dose-Escalation Study of the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Haemodynamic Effects of BMS-986231 in Hospitalized Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction
Tita, Cristina , Gilbert, Edward M. , Bakel, Adrian B. Van , Grzybowski, Jacek , Haas, Garrie J. , Dunlap, Stephanie H., Klapholz, Marc, Patel, Parag C. , Pfister, Roman , Seidler, Tim , Shah, Keyur B. , Zieliński, Tomasz , Venuti, Robert, Cowart, Douglas, Foo, Shi Yin, Vishnevsky, A. A., Jarrah, Mohammad , Gottlieb, Stephen S. , Mitrović, Veselin L.

European Journal of Heart Failure | July 5, 2017 | Volume: 19 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1321-1332

10.1002/ejhf.897 Get It

Abstract Aims This study was designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability and haemodynamic effects of BMS-986231, a novel second-generation nitroxyl donor with potential inotropic, lusitropic and vasodilatory effects in patients hospitalized with decompensated heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods and results Forty-six patients hospitalized with decompensated HFrEF were enrolled into four sequential dose-escalation cohorts in this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 2a study. Patients with baseline pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) of ≥20 mmHg and a cardiac index of ≤2.5 L/min/m2 received one 6-h i.v. infusion of BMS-986231 (at 3, 5, 7 or 12 µg/kg/min) or placebo. BMS-986231 produced rapid and sustained reductions in PCWP, as well as consistent reductions in time-averaged pulmonary arterial systolic pressure, pulmonary arterial diastolic pressure and right atrial pressure. BMS-986231 increased non-invasively measured time-averaged stroke volume index, cardiac index and cardiac power index values, and decreased total peripheral vascular resistance. There was no evidence of increased heart rate, drug-related arrhythmia or symptomatic hypotension with BMS-986231. Analyses of adverse events throughout the 30-day follow-up did not identify any toxicities specific to BMS-986231, with the potential exception of infrequent mild-to-moderate headaches during infusion. There were no treatment-related serious adverse events. Conclusions BMS-986231 demonstrated a favourable safety and haemodynamic profile in patients hospitalized with advanced heart failure. Based on preclinical data and these study's findings, it is possible that the haemodynamic benefits may be mediated by inotropic and/or lusitropic as well as vasodilatory effects. The therapeutic potential of BMS-986231 should be further assessed in patients with heart failure.