Back to Authors

Blows, Fiona M.

Mayo Clinic

University of Cambridge

Citations 11

Abstract 2211: Patient level polygenic risk scores and continuous estrogen receptor expression in breast cancer
Shetty, Anamay , Blows, Fiona M., Inard, Nicholas, Couch, Fergus J., Easton, Douglas F. , Mannermaa, Arto, Raza, Ali , Caldas, Carlos , Benı́tez, Javier , Chang, Jenny C. , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Couch, Fergus J. , Cox, Angela , Devilee, Peter , García‐Closas, Montserrat , Mannermaa, Arto, Nevanlinna, Heli , Schmidt, Marjanka K. , Pharoah, Paul D.P.

Cancer Research | August 17, 2018 | Volume: 78 | Issue: 13_Supplement | Pages: 2211-2211

10.1158/1538-7445.am2018-2211 Get It

Abstract Introduction: Genome-wide association studies over the past 10 years have identified over 100 common variants associated with breast cancer risk. The association of these polymorphisms varies according to estrogen receptor status of the tumor, with some associated primarily with ER+ or ER- disease, or both subtypes. However, ER expression in breast cancer cells is continuous. The aim of this study was to establish whether the association between polygenic risk scores and ER expression in breast cancer is continuous in nature. Methods: Data were taken from the international Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC). Germline genotype data for 75 SNPs previously reported to be associated with breast cancer were available for 4,999 breast cancer cases for which ER expression data were also available. Automated ER expression on a continuous scale was measured using two image analysis algorithms: Astrogrid and Ariol. A third form of ER expression score, the manual Allred ordinal, was used. Genotype data were used to calculate polygenic risk scores using the equation: PRS = ∑ βx where β is the log-odds of the odds ratio (OR) of breast cancer associated with that single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), and x is the number of variant alleles at a SNP locus. Five different PRSs were calculated: i) SNPs associated with both ER+ and ER- disease (PRS-A, n= 74) ii) SNPs associated with ER+ disease at P<0.01 (PRS-B, n= 65) iii) SNPs associated with ER- disease at P<0.01 (PRS-C, n= 43) iv) SNPs associated with ER+ but not ER- disease (PRS-D, n= 30) v) SNPs associated with ER- but not ER+ disease (PRS-E, n = 8) The ER-specific weights for the PRS were taken from previous OR estimates. Linear regression models adjusted for study were used to test for a relationship between the five PRSs and ER expression measured on the Ariol, Astrogrid and Allred scales. Results: There was a strong positive correlation found between PRS-B against Astrogrid (β=0.0176, P=4.06x10-4), a weak negative correlation found with PRS-C (β=-0.012, P=0.019) and a weak positive correlation for PRS-A (β=0.012, P=0.0144). PRS-D and E showed far stronger association with Astrogrid than PRS-B and C, respectively (β=0.0186 and -0.017, P=1.97x10-4 and 8.1x10-4). There was a qualitatively similar association when the PRSs were correlated with Ariol and Allred, apart from the stronger correlations with PRS-B (β=91.2 and 0.0853, P=5.52x10-4 and 1.33x10-3). Conclusion: We have shown a robust association between PRS and ER expression in the directions we predicted. This suggests that the continuous variation in ER expression is biologically plausible and linked to genetic polymorphism. The weakening of association with PRS-A and the stronger associations with PRS-D and E show that having SNPs that are associated with both ER subtypes in the same PRS weakens significance, and suggests that subtype-specific PRSs may be improved on by using SNPs exclusive to the respective subtype. Citation Format: Anamay H. Shetty, Raza Ali, Fiona Blows, Carlos Caldas, Nicholas Inard, Javier Benítez, Jenny Chang-Claude, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Fergus Couch, Angela Cox, Peter Devilee, Douglas Easton, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Arto Mannermaa, Heli Nevanlinna, Marjanka Schmidt, Paul Pharoah. Patient level polygenic risk scores and continuous estrogen receptor expression in breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2211.
Etiology of hormone receptor positive breast cancer differs by levels of histologic grade and proliferation
Abubakar, Mustapha , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Ali, H. Raza , Chatterjee, Nilanjan , Coulson, Penny , Daley, Frances , Blows, Fiona M., Benı́tez, Javier , Brenner, Hermann , Stegmaier, Christa, Mannermaa, Arto, Sinn, Hans‐Peter , Tollenaar, Rob A.�E.�M. , Seynaeve, Caroline, Figueroa, Jonine D. , Lissowska, Jolanta , Hewitt, Stephen M. , Hooning, Maartje J. , Foekens, Renée , Koppert, Linetta B. , Investigators, kConFab, Bolla, Manjeet K. , Wang, Qin , Jones, Michael E. , Schoemaker, Minouk J. , Keeman, Renske , Easton, Douglas F. , Swerdlow, Anthony J. , García‐Closas, Montserrat , Swerdlow, Anthony J , Lissowska, Jolanta , Sinn, Peter , Jones, Michael E , Brenner, Hermann , García-Closas, Montserrat , Benitez, Javier , Figueroa, Jonine D , Milne, Roger L. , Mannermaa, Arto, Rudolph, Anja , Couch, Fergus J. , Devilee, Peter , Hollestelle, Antoinette , Sherman, Mark E. , Schmidt, Marjanka K. , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Schoemaker, Minouk J

International Journal of Cancer | March 1, 2018 | Volume: 143 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 746-757

10.1002/ijc.31352 Get It

Limited epidemiological evidence suggests that the etiology of hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer may differ by levels of histologic grade and proliferation. We pooled risk factor and pathology data on 5,905 HR+ breast cancer cases and 26,281 controls from 11 epidemiological studies. Proliferation was determined by centralized automated measures of KI67 in tissue microarrays. Odds ratios (OR), 95% confidence intervals (CI) and p‐values for case–case and case–control comparisons for risk factors in relation to levels of grade and quartiles (Q1–Q4) of KI67 were estimated using polytomous logistic regression models. Case–case comparisons showed associations between nulliparity and high KI67 [OR (95% CI) for Q4 vs. Q1 = 1.54 (1.22, 1.95)]; obesity and high grade [grade 3 vs. 1 = 1.68 (1.31, 2.16)] and current use of combined hormone therapy (HT) and low grade [grade 3 vs. 1 = 0.27 (0.16, 0.44)] tumors. In case–control comparisons, nulliparity was associated with elevated risk of tumors with high but not low levels of proliferation [1.43 (1.14, 1.81) for KI67 Q4 vs. 0.83 (0.60, 1.14) for KI67 Q1]; obesity among women ≥50 years with high but not low grade tumors [1.55 (1.17, 2.06) for grade 3 vs. 0.88 (0.66, 1.16) for grade 1] and HT with low but not high grade tumors [3.07 (2.22, 4.23) for grade 1 vs. 0.85 (0.55, 1.30) for grade 3]. Menarcheal age and family history were similarly associated with HR+ tumors of different grade or KI67 levels. These findings provide insights into the etiologic heterogeneity of HR+ tumors.
Abstract PD1-15: The landscape of somatic genetic alterations in breast cancers from ATM germline mutation carriers
Weigelt, Britta , Bi, Rui , James, PA, Couch, FJ, Blows, Fiona M., Geyer, FC, Li, A, Lim, RS, Blecua, P, Shen, Rhine R. , Wen, Huei Chi, Reis‐Filho, JS, Kumar, Rahul , Thorne, Heather , Eccles, Diana , Selenica, Pier , Blecua, Pedro , Robson, Mark E. , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia

Cancer Research | February 15, 2018 | Volume: 78 | Issue: 4_Supplement | Pages: PD1-15-PD1-15

10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-pd1-15 Get It

Abstract Introduction:Pathogenic and/or founder germline variants in the ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) gene confer an increased breast cancer (BC) risk. The protein kinase ATM plays a central role inDNA double-strand break-repair and in the activation of downstream targets such as p53 and BRCA1. We sought to define the repertoire of somatic genetic alterations of BCs from patients with pathogenic germline ATM mutations and whether somatic loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of ATM would be present in these cancers. Methods: 21 BCs from ATM germline mutation carriers were microdissected. Tumor and normal DNA samples were subjected to whole-exome sequencing (WES, n=12) or massively parallel sequencing targeting all coding regions and selected intronic and regulatory regions of 410 key cancer genes (n=9). Somatic mutations, copy number alterations, cancer cell fractions, large-scale state transitions (LSTs) and mutational signatures were defined using state-of-the-art bioinformatics algorithms. ABSOLUTE and FACETS were employed to assess LOH of the wild-type allele of ATM. Results: Of the patients included in this study, 71%, 24% and 5% of cases harbored ATM missense (all but one p.V2424G), frame-shift and nonsense germline mutations, respectively. All tumors were ER-positive and four (19%) were HER2-positive. The median age of the patients was 46 years (32–79 years). Our analyses revealed biallelic inactivation of ATM through LOH of the wild-type allele in 16 of 21 cases (76%), and second somatic ATM mutations were not found. The median number of non-synonymous somatic mutations was 38 (range 15-113) and 2 (range 0-8)in tumors subjected to WES and targeted sequencing, respectively. The repertoire of somatic genetic alterations of ATM-associated BCs was found to be heterogeneous, including clonal PIK3CA mutations (24%), GATA3 mutations (19%), FANCI amplifications (19%) and CCND1 amplifications (14%). Importantly, however, no somatic mutations affecting TP53 were found. Analysis of the WES data revealed that 5 (42%) ATM-associated BCs displayed high LST scores, all of which harbored bi-allelic ATM inactivation. In contrast to BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated BCs, which frequently display the mutational signature 3 associated with defective homologous recombination DNA repair, the ATM-associated BCs studied displayed the ageing mutational signature (i.e. signature 1). Comparison of the mutational profiles of the ATM--associated BCs subjected to WES (n=12) with those of BRCA1- (n=11) and BRCA2-associated (n=10) BCs from The Cancer Genome Atlas revealed that TP53 was more frequently mutated in BCs from BRCA1 germline mutation carriers (0% vs 72%, P<0.001), while no differences with BRCA2-associated BCs were found. Conclusion: ATM-associated BCs frequently display bi-allelic ATM inactivation through LOH of the wild-type allele and a subset of these cases displayed high levels of LSTs. These findings suggest that at least in a subset of ATM-associated BCs, biallelic inactivation of ATM rather than a dominant negative effect of the germline mutation may be the mechanism of inactivation of this tumor suppressor gene. The repertoire of somatic genetic alterations of ATM-associated BCs is heterogeneous, with a noticeable lack of TP53 somatic mutations. Citation Format: Weigelt B, Bi R, Kumar R, James PA, Thorne H, Couch FJ, Eccles DM, Blows F, Geyer FC, Li A, Selenica P, Lim RS, Blecua P, Shen R, Wen H, Robson ME, Reis-Filho JS, Chenevix-Trench G. The landscape of somatic genetic alterations in breast cancers from ATM germline mutation carriers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD1-15.
TP53-based interaction analysis identifies cis-eQTL variants for TP53BP2, FBXO28, and FAM53A that associate with survival and treatment outcome in breast cancer
Fagerholm, Rainer, Khan, Sofia , Schmidt, Marjanka K. , García‐Closas, Montserrat , Saarela, Jani , Beesley, Jonathan, Jamshidi, Maral, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Liu, Jianjun , Ali, H. Raza , Andrulis, Irene L. , Beckmann, Matthias W. , Blows, Fiona M., Brenner, Hermann , Chang‐Claude, Jenny, Couch, Fergus J. , Fasching, Peter A. , Figueroa, Jonine D. , Floris, Giuseppe , Glendon, Gord, Guo, Qi , Hallberg, Emily, Hamann, Ute , Holleczek, Bernd , Hooning, Maartje J. , Hopper, John L. , Jager, Agnes , Kabisch, Maria, Investigators, kConFab AOCS, Keeman, Renske , Kosma, Veli‐Matti, Lambrechts, Diether , Lindblom, Annika , Mannermaa, Arto, Margolin, Sara , Provenzano, Elena , Shah, Mitul , Southey, Melissa C. , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Wang, Qin, Bolla, Manjeet K. , Dunning, Alison M. , Easton, Douglas F. , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Blomqvist, Carl , Thorne, Heather , Bowtell, David D.L. , Lambrechts, Diether , Heikkilä, Päivi , Behrens, Sabine , Couch, Fergus J. , Czene, Kamila , Hall, Per N , Hooning, Maartje J. , Mannermaa, Arto, Dennis, Joe , Lush, Michael J. , Wang, Qin, Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Nevanlinna, Heli , Lambrechts, Diether , Southey, Melissa C , Dunning, Alison M , Lambrechts, Diether , Brenner, Hermann , García-Closas, Montserrat , Schmidt, Marjanka K , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Figueroa, Jonine D , Bowtell, David D , Lindblom, Annika , Liu, Jing

Oncotarget | February 7, 2017 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 18381-18398

10.18632/oncotarget.15110 Get It

High‐throughput automated scoring of Ki67 in breast cancer tissue microarrays from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium
Howat, William , Daley, Frances , Zabaglo, Lila, McDuffus, Leigh‐Anne, Blows, Fiona M., Coulson, Penny , Ali, H. Raza , Benı́tez, Javier , Brenner, Hermann , Stegmaier, Christa, Mannermaa, Arto, Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Sinn, Hans‐Peter , Tollenaar, Rob A.�E.�M. , Devilee, Peter , Figueroa, Jonine D. , Sherman, Mark E., Lissowska, Jolanta , Hewitt, Stephen M. , Eccles, Diana , Hooning, Maartje J. , Deurzen, Carolien HM van, Investigators, kConFab, Bolla, Manjeet K. , Wang, Qin , Jones, Michael E. , Schoemaker, Minouk J. , Leeuwen, Flora E. van , Veer, Laura van’t, Swerdlow, Anthony J. , Orr, Nick , Dowsett, Mitch , Easton, Douglas F. , Schmidt, Marjanka K. , García‐Closas, Montserrat , Abubakar, Mustapha , Milne, Roger L. , Mannermaa, Arto, Rudolph, Anja , Couch, Fergus J. , Hollestelle, Antoinette , Martens, John W.M. , Deurzen, Carolien HM van, Broeks, Annegien , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Eccles, Diana , Swerdlow, Anthony J , Lissowska, Jolanta , Sinn, Peter , Jones, Michael E , Brenner, Hermann , García-Closas, Montserrat , Schmidt, Marjanka K , Benitez, Javier , Figueroa, Jonine D , Devilee, Peter , Schoemaker, Minouk J , Orr, Nick

The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research | March 2, 2016 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 138-153

10.1002/cjp2.42 Get It

AbstractAutomated methods are needed to facilitate high‐throughput and reproducible scoring of Ki67 and other markers in breast cancer tissue microarrays (TMAs) in large‐scale studies. To address this need, we developed an automated protocol for Ki67 scoring and evaluated its performance in studies from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. We utilized 166 TMAs containing 16,953 tumour cores representing 9,059 breast cancer cases, from 13 studies, with information on other clinical and pathological characteristics. TMAs were stained for Ki67 using standard immunohistochemical procedures, and scanned and digitized using the Ariol system. An automated algorithm was developed for the scoring of Ki67, and scores were compared to computer assisted visual (CAV) scores in a subset of 15 TMAs in a training set. We also assessed the correlation between automated Ki67 scores and other clinical and pathological characteristics. Overall, we observed good discriminatory accuracy (AUC = 85%) and good agreement (kappa = 0.64) between the automated and CAV scoring methods in the training set. The performance of the automated method varied by TMA (kappa range= 0.37–0.87) and study (kappa range = 0.39–0.69). The automated method performed better in satisfactory cores (kappa = 0.68) than suboptimal (kappa = 0.51) cores (p‐value for comparison = 0.005); and among cores with higher total nuclei counted by the machine (4,000–4,500 cells: kappa = 0.78) than those with lower counts (50–500 cells: kappa = 0.41; p‐value = 0.010). Among the 9,059 cases in this study, the correlations between automated Ki67 and clinical and pathological characteristics were found to be in the expected directions. Our findings indicate that automated scoring of Ki67 can be an efficient method to obtain good quality data across large numbers of TMAs from multicentre studies. However, robust algorithm development and rigorous pre‐ and post‐analytical quality control procedures are necessary in order to ensure satisfactory performance.
Performance of automated scoring of ER, PR, HER2, CK5/6 and EGFR in breast cancer tissue microarrays in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium
Howat, William , Blows, Fiona M., Provenzano, Elena , Brook, Mark N. , Morris, Lorna , Gazińska, Patrycja , Johnson, Nicola, McDuffus, Leigh‐Anne, Miller, Jodi L. , Sawyer, Elinor J. , Pinder, Sarah E. , Deurzen, Carolien H. M. van , Sironen, Reijo , Visscher, Daniel W., Caldas, Carlos , Daley, Frances , Coulson, Penny , Sanders, Joyce , Wesseling, Jelle , Fagerholm, Rainer, Blomqvist, Carl , Ali, H. Raza , Dawson, Sarah‐Jane , Figueroa, Jonine D. , Lissowska, Jolanta , Brinton, Louise A. , Mannermaa, Arto, Kataja, Vesa , Kosma, Veli‐Matti , Brock, Ian W., Reed, Malcolm , Devillee, Peter, Mesker, Wilma E. , Seyaneve, Caroline M, Menéndez, Primitiva, Bolla, Manjeet K. , Easton, Douglas F. , Schmidt, Marjanka K. , Pharoah, Paul D.P., Sherman, Mark E., García‐Closas, Montserrat , Visscher, Daniel, Jones, J. Louise , Broeks, Annegien , Nevanlinna, Heli , Heikkilä, Päivi , Mannermaa, Arto, Cox, Angela , Cross, Simon S. , Couch, Fergus J. , Olson, Janet E. , Hollestelle, Antoinette , Benı́tez, Javier , Pérez, José Ignacio Arias , Lissowska, Jolanta , Caldas, Carlos , García-Closas, Montserrat , Schmidt, Marjanka K , Figueroa, Jonine D , Sawyer, Elinor J

The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research | December 4, 2014 | Volume: 1 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 18-32

10.1002/cjp2.3 Get It

AbstractBreast cancer risk factors and clinical outcomes vary by tumour marker expression. However, individual studies often lack the power required to assess these relationships, and large‐scale analyses are limited by the need for high throughput, standardized scoring methods. To address these limitations, we assessed whether automated image analysis of immunohistochemically stained tissue microarrays can permit rapid, standardized scoring of tumour markers from multiple studies. Tissue microarray sections prepared in nine studies containing 20 263 cores from 8267 breast cancers stained for two nuclear (oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor), two membranous (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and epidermal growth factor receptor) and one cytoplasmic (cytokeratin 5/6) marker were scanned as digital images. Automated algorithms were used to score markers in tumour cells using the Ariol system. We compared automated scores against visual reads, and their associations with breast cancer survival. Approximately 65–70% of tissue microarray cores were satisfactory for scoring. Among satisfactory cores, agreement between dichotomous automated and visual scores was highest for oestrogen receptor (Kappa = 0.76), followed by human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Kappa = 0.69) and progesterone receptor (Kappa = 0.67). Automated quantitative scores for these markers were associated with hazard ratios for breast cancer mortality in a dose‐response manner. Considering visual scores of epidermal growth factor receptor or cytokeratin 5/6 as the reference, automated scoring achieved excellent negative predictive value (96–98%), but yielded many false positives (positive predictive value = 30–32%). For all markers, we observed substantial heterogeneity in automated scoring performance across tissue microarrays. Automated analysis is a potentially useful tool for large‐scale, quantitative scoring of immunohistochemically stained tissue microarrays available in consortia. However, continued optimization, rigorous marker‐specific quality control measures and standardization of tissue microarray designs, staining and scoring protocols is needed to enhance results.
Identification and characterization of novel associations in the CASP8/ALS2CR12 region on chromosome 2 with breast cancer risk
Lin, Wei‐Yu , Camp, Nicola J. , Ghoussaini, Maya , Beesley, Jonathan, Michailidou, Kyriaki , Hopper, John L. , Apicella, Carmel, Southey, Melissa C. , Stone, Jennifer , Schmidt, Marjanka K. , Veer, Laura J. van’t , Muir, Kenneth , Lophatananon, Artitaya, Stewart‐Brown, Sarah , Siriwanarangsan, Pornthep, Fasching, Peter A. , Haeberle, Lothar, Ekici, Arif B. , Beckmann, Matthias W. , Peto, Julian, dos‐Santos‐Silva, Isabel , Fletcher, Olivia , Johnson, Nichola , Bolla, Manjeet K. , Wang, Qin, Sawyer, Elinor J. , Cheng, Timothy, Tomlinson, Ian , Kerin, Michael J. , Miller, Nicola, Surowy, Harald , Burwinkel, Barbara , Guénel, Pascal , Truong, Thérèse , Ménégaux, F. , Mulot, Claire , Bojesen, Stig E. , Nordestgaard, Børge G. , Nielsen, Sune F. , Flyger, Henrik, Benı́tez, Javier , Zamora, M. Pilar , Pérez, José Ignacio Arias , Menéndez, Primitiva, González‐Neira, Anna , Pita, Guillermo , Alonso, M. Rosario, Álvarez, Núria, Herrero, Daniel, Brenner, Hermann , Dieffenbach, Aida Karina, Stegmaier, Christa, Meindl, Alfons , Lichtner, Peter , Schmutzler, Rita K., Müller‐Myhsok, Bertram , Brauch, Hiltrud , Brüning, Thomas , Ko, Yon‐Dschun, Network, The GENICA, Tessier, Daniel C., Vincent, Daniel , Bacot, François, Nevanlinna, Heli , Aittomäki, Kristiina, Blomqvist, Carl , Khan, Sofia , Matsuo, Keitaro , Iwata, Hiroji, Horio, Akiyo, Bogdanova, Natalia , Antonenkova, Natalia, Dörk, Thilo , Lindblom, Annika , Margolin, Sara , Mannermaa, Arto, Kataja, Vesa , Kosma, Veli‐Matti, Hartikainen, Jaana M. , Investigators, kConFab, Group, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Wu, Anna H. , Tseng, Chiu-Chen , Neven, Patrick , Wauters, Els , Wildiers, Hans , Lambrechts, Diether , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Flesch‐Janys, Dieter, Radice, Paolo , Peterlongo, Paolo , Manoukian, Siranoush , Couch, Fergus J. , Vachon, Celine M. , Purrington, Kristen S. , Giles, Graham G. , McLean, Catriona , Haiman, Christopher A., Henderson, Brian E., Schumacher, Fredrick R. , Simard, Jacques , Goldberg, Mark S. , Dumont, Martine , Teo, Soo‐Hwang , Yip, Cheng Har , Vithana, Eranga N. , Kristensen, Vessela N. , Deming-Halverson, Sandra, Shrubsole, Martha J. , Long, Jirong , Winqvist, Robert , Pylkäs, Katri , Jukkola‐Vuorinen, Arja , Kauppila, Saila , Andrulis, Irene L. , Knight, Julia A. , Glendon, Gord, Tchatchou, Sandrine, Devilee, Peter , Tollenaar, Robert A.E.M., Seynaeve, Caroline, García‐Closas, Montserrat , Figueroa, Jonine D. , Lissowska, Jolanta , Brinton, Louise A. , Czene, Kamila , Darabi, Hatef, Eriksson, Mikael , Brand, Judith S. , Hooning, Maartje J. , Hollestelle, Antoinette , Ouweland, Ans M.W. van den, Jager, Agnes , Li, Jingmei , Liu, Jianjun , Humphreys, Keith , Shu, Xiao‐Ou , Lu, Wei , Gao, Yu‐Tang , Cai, Hui , Cross, Simon S. , Reed, Malcolm , Blot, William J. , Signorello, Lisa B., Cai, Qiuyin, Perkins, Barbara, Shah, Mitul, Blows, Fiona M., Kang, Daehee , Yoo, Keun-Young, Noh, Dong‐Young , Hartman, Mikael , Miao, Hui , Chia, Kee Seng , Putti, Thomas Choudary , Hamann, Ute , Luccarini, Craig , Baynes, Caroline, Maranian, Mel, Healey, Catherine S., Jakubowska, Anna , Lubiński, Jan , Jaworska–Bieniek, Katarzyna, Durda, Katarzyna, Sangrajrang, Suleeporn , Gaborieau, Valérie , Brennan, Paul , McKay, James , Slager, Susan, Yannoukakos, Drakoulis , Hsiung, Chia‐Ni , Wu, Pei‐Ei , Ding, Shian-ling, Ashworth, Alan , Jones, Michael E. , Orr, Nick , Swerdlow, Anthony J. , Makalic, Enes , Bui, Minh , Hunter, David J. , Hein, Rebecca, Dahmen, Norbert, Beckmann, Lars , Aaltonen, Kirsimari, Muranen, Taru , Heikkinen, Tuomas , Irwanto, Astrid , Rahman, Nazneen , Turnbull, Clare , Study, The Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility (BOCS), Waisfisz, Quinten , Meijers‐Heijboer, Hanne , Adank, Muriel A. , Luijt, Rob B. van der , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Dunning, Alison M. , Easton, Douglas F. , Cox, Angela , Durocher, Francine , Zheng, Wei , Thorne, Heather , Lambrechts, Diether , Vachon, Celine, Broeks, Annegien , Rutgers, Emiel J. , Wang, Qin, Dennis, Joe , Marmé, Frederik , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Arndt, Volker , Meindl, Alfons , Network, The GENICA, Ito, Hidemi , Iwata, Hiroji , Mannermaa, Arto , Investigators, kConFab, Group, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Berg, David Van Den , Stram, Daniel O. , Rudolph, Anja , Seibold, Petra , Bonanni, Bernardo , Couch, Fergus J. , Wang, Xianshu , Vachon, Celine M. , Milne, Roger L. , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Labrèche, France , Rudolph, Anja , Zheng, Wei , Asperen, Christi J. van , Eriksson, Mikael , Hooning, Maartje J. , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Ahmed, Shahana , Toland, Amanda Ewart , Shen, Chen‐Yang , Tsimiklis, Helen , Schmidt, Daniel Frederick , Bui, Minh , Chanock, Stephen Jacob , Study, The Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility (BOCS), Hall, Per N , Nevanlinna, H , Dörk, Thilo , Lambrechts, Diether , Giles, Graham G , Peterlongo, Paolo , Teo, Soo H , Shrubsole, Martha J , Swerdlow, Anthony J , Radice, Paolo , Lissowska, Jolanta , Southey, Melissa C , van der Luijt, Rob B , Muir, Kenneth , Shu, Xiao-Ou , Matsuo, Keitaro , Dunning, Alison M , Jakubowska, Anna , Jones, Michael E , Lambrechts, Diether , Brenner, Hermann , Cox, Angela , Guénel, Pascal , Hartman, Mikael , Li, Jingmei , Muranen, Taru A , García-Closas, Montserrat , Schmidt, Marjanka K , Makalic, Enes , Ekici, Arif B , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Hartikainen, Jaana M , Bogdanova, Natalia V , Benitez, Javier , Simard, Jacques , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Zheng, Wei , Figueroa, Jonine D , Czene, Kamila , Stone, Jennifer , Pylkäs, Katri , Yannoukakos, Drakoulis , Devilee, Peter , Manoukian, Siranoush , Lubinski, Jan , Fletcher, Olivia , Bojesen, Stig E , Purrington, Kristen S , Truong, Therese , Wildiers, Hans , Mclean, Catriona , Brauch, Hiltrud , Lindblom, Annika , Sawyer, Elinor J , Orr, Nick , Liu, Jing , Kang, Daehee

Human Molecular Genetics | August 29, 2014 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 285-298

10.1093/hmg/ddu431 Get It

Common Breast Cancer Susceptibility Loci Are Associated with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Stevens, Kristen N., Vachon, Celine M. , Slager, Susan, Lesnick, Timothy G. , Olswold, Curtis, Fasching, Peter A. , Miron, Penelope , Eccles, Diana , Carpenter, Jane, Winqvist, Robert , Brauch, Hiltrud , Schmidt, Marjanka K. , Cox, Angela , Cross, Simon S. , Sawyer, Elinor J. , Hartmann, Arndt, Beckmann, Matthias W. , Schulz-Wendtland, Rüdiger, Ekici, Arif B. , Tapper, William , Gerty, Susan M. , Durcan, Lorraine , Graham, Nikki , Hein, Rebecca, Nickels, Stephan, Flesch‐Janys, Dieter, Heinz, Judith , Sinn, Hans‐Peter , Konstantopoulou, Irene , Pectasides, Dimitrios , Dimopoulos, Athanasios M., Clarke, Christine L. , Balleine, Rosemary L. , Fredericksen, Zachary, Diasio, Robert B. , Ross, Eric A. , Weaver, JoEllen , Rüdiger, Thomas , Dünnebier, Thomas, Ademuyiwa, Foluso O. , Kulkarni, Swati , Pylkäs, Katri , Jukkola‐Vuorinen, Arja , Ko, Yon‐Dschun, Limbergen, Erik Van, Janssen, Hilde, Peto, Julian , Fletcher, Olivia , Giles, Graham G. , Baglietto, Laura , Verhoef, Senno, Tomlinson, Ian , Kosma, Veli‐Matti , Greco, Dario , Blomqvist, Carl , Irwanto, Astrid , Liu, Jianjun , Blows, Fiona M., Dawson, Sarah‐Jane , Margolin, Sara , Mannermaa, Arto, Martin, Nicholas G. , Montgomery, Grant W. , Lambrechts, Diether , dos‐Santos‐Silva, Isabel , Severi, Gianluca , Hamann, Ute, Easton, Douglas F., Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Yannoukakos, Drakoulis , Nevanlinna, Heli , Dimopoulos, Meletios Α. , Purrington, Kristen S. , Lambrechts, Diether , Vachon, Celine M. , Lee, Adam M. , Godwin, Andrew K. , Ambrosone, Christine B. , Fostira, Florentia , Dimopoulos, Athanasios M., Fountzilas, George , Olson, Janet E. , Pathak, Harsh B. , Försti, Asta , Beesley, Jonathan , Mannermaa, Arto, Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Wang, Xianshu , Couch, Fergus J. , Nevanlinna, H , Lambrechts, Diether , Giles, Graham G , Eccles, Diana , Dimopoulos, Meletios A , Konstantopoulou, Irene , Martin, Nicholas G , Sinn, Peter , Lambrechts, Diether , Cox, Angela , Schmidt, Marjanka K , Severi, Gianluca , Ekici, Arif B , Ademuyiwa, Foluso O , Pylkäs, Katri , Yannoukakos, Drakoulis , Baglietto, Laura , Fletcher, Olivia , Purrington, Kristen S , Brauch, Hiltrud , Sawyer, Elinor J , Liu, Jing

Cancer Research | August 15, 2011 | Volume: 71 | Issue: 19 | Pages: 6240-6249

10.1158/0008-5472.can-11-1266 Get It

Abstract Triple-negative breast cancers are an aggressive subtype of breast cancer with poor survival, but there remains little known about the etiologic factors that promote its initiation and development. Commonly inherited breast cancer risk factors identified through genome-wide association studies display heterogeneity of effect among breast cancer subtypes as defined by the status of estrogen and progesterone receptors. In the Triple Negative Breast Cancer Consortium (TNBCC), 22 common breast cancer susceptibility variants were investigated in 2,980 Caucasian women with triple-negative breast cancer and 4,978 healthy controls. We identified six single-nucleotide polymorphisms, including rs2046210 (ESR1), rs12662670 (ESR1), rs3803662 (TOX3), rs999737 (RAD51L1), rs8170 (19p13.1), and rs8100241 (19p13.1), significantly associated with the risk of triple-negative breast cancer. Together, our results provide convincing evidence of genetic susceptibility for triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res; 71(19); 6240–9. ©2011 AACR.