Back to Authors

Kulkarni, Swati

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4213-0933

Mayo Clinic

Western University

Citations 4

Systemic Therapy for Small Cell Lung Cancer: ASCO Guideline Rapid Recommendation Update Clinical Insights
Khurshid, Humera , Ismaila, Nofisat , Das, Millie , Manochakian, Rami , Weinberg, Frank , Kalemkerian, Gregory P. , Manochakian, Rami , Weinberg, Frank , Kalemkerian, Gregory P , Das, Millie , Kulkarni, Swati

JCO Oncology Practice | November 20, 2024 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 754-758

10.1200/op-24-00840 Get It

Systemic Therapy for Small-Cell Lung Cancer: ASCO-Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) Guideline
Khurshid, Humera , Ismaila, Nofisat , Bian, Jessica , Dabney, Raetasha, Das, Millie , Ellis, Peter , Hann, Christine L. , Laskin, Janessa , Mishra, Deebya Raj , Reddy, Pavan S. , Saxena, Ashish , Kalemkerian, Gregory P. , Hann, Christine , Laskin, Janessa , Manochakian, Rami , Mishra, Deebya Raj , Preeshagul, Isabel , Reddy, Pavan , Weinberg, Frank , Kalemkerian, Gregory P , Das, Millie , Feldman, Jill , Kulkarni, Swati , Manochakian, Rami , Weinberg, Frank

Journal of Clinical Oncology | October 11, 2023 | Volume: 41 | Issue: 35 | Pages: 5448-5472

10.1200/jco.23.01435 Get It

PURPOSE To provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing clinicians on the management of patients with small-cell lung cancer. METHODS An Expert Panel of medical oncology, thoracic surgery, radiation oncology, pulmonary, community oncology, research methodology, and advocacy experts were convened to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials published from 1990 through 2022. Outcomes of interest included response rates, overall survival, disease-free survival or recurrence-free survival, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. RESULTS The literature search identified 95 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. RECOMMENDATIONS Evidence-based recommendations were developed to address systemic therapy options, timing of therapy, treatment in patients who are older or with poor performance status, role of biomarkers, and use of myeloid-supporting agents in patients with small-cell lung cancer. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/thoracic-cancer-guidelines .
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis, Version 1.2023
Bevers, Therese B. , Niell, Bethany L. , Bonaccio, Ermelinda, Camp, Melissa , Chikarmane, Sona A. , Eghtedari, Mohammad , Flanagan, Meghan R. , Hawley, Jeffrey , Helvie, Mark A. , Hodgkiss, Linda, Hoyt, Tamarya L., Ivanovich, Jennifer , Kulkarni, Swati , Lancaster, Rachael, Mauer, Caitlin , Pearlman, Mark D. , Philpotts, Liane E. , Plichta, Jennifer K. , Shakeri, Shadi Aminololama, Smith, Mary Lou , Streibert, Clarie L., Strigel, Roberta M. , Tumyan, Lusine , Winkler, Nicole , Wolverton, Dulcy , Bergman, Mary Anne, Stehman, Katie, Plichta, Jennifer K , Baker, Jennifer L. , Bennett, Debbie Lee , Conant, Emily F. , Jochelson, Maxine S. , Maxwell, Jessica, Patel, Bhavika , Plecha, Donna , Kumar, Rashmi

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | September 6, 2023 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 900-909

10.6004/jnccn.2023.0046 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis provide health care providers with a practical, consistent framework for screening and evaluating a spectrum of clinical presentations and breast lesions. The NCCN Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Panel is composed of a multidisciplinary team of experts in the field, including representation from medical oncology, gynecologic oncology, surgical oncology, internal medicine, family practice, preventive medicine, pathology, diagnostic and interventional radiology, as well as patient advocacy. The NCCN Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Panel meets at least annually to review emerging data and comments from reviewers within their institutions to guide updates to existing recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s decision-making and discussion surrounding the most recent updates to the guideline’s screening recommendations.
Common Breast Cancer Susceptibility Loci Are Associated with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Stevens, Kristen N., Vachon, Celine M. , Slager, Susan, Lesnick, Timothy G. , Olswold, Curtis, Fasching, Peter A. , Miron, Penelope , Eccles, Diana , Carpenter, Jane, Winqvist, Robert , Brauch, Hiltrud , Schmidt, Marjanka K. , Cox, Angela , Cross, Simon S. , Sawyer, Elinor J. , Hartmann, Arndt, Beckmann, Matthias W. , Schulz-Wendtland, Rüdiger, Ekici, Arif B. , Tapper, William , Gerty, Susan M. , Durcan, Lorraine , Graham, Nikki , Hein, Rebecca, Nickels, Stephan, Flesch‐Janys, Dieter, Heinz, Judith , Sinn, Hans‐Peter , Konstantopoulou, Irene , Pectasides, Dimitrios , Dimopoulos, Athanasios M., Clarke, Christine L. , Balleine, Rosemary L. , Fredericksen, Zachary, Diasio, Robert B. , Ross, Eric A. , Weaver, JoEllen , Rüdiger, Thomas , Dünnebier, Thomas, Ademuyiwa, Foluso O. , Kulkarni, Swati , Pylkäs, Katri , Jukkola‐Vuorinen, Arja , Ko, Yon‐Dschun, Limbergen, Erik Van, Janssen, Hilde, Peto, Julian , Fletcher, Olivia , Giles, Graham G. , Baglietto, Laura , Verhoef, Senno, Tomlinson, Ian , Kosma, Veli‐Matti , Greco, Dario , Blomqvist, Carl , Irwanto, Astrid , Liu, Jianjun , Blows, Fiona M., Dawson, Sarah‐Jane , Margolin, Sara , Mannermaa, Arto, Martin, Nicholas G. , Montgomery, Grant W. , Lambrechts, Diether , dos‐Santos‐Silva, Isabel , Severi, Gianluca , Hamann, Ute, Easton, Douglas F., Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Yannoukakos, Drakoulis , Nevanlinna, Heli , Dimopoulos, Meletios Α. , Purrington, Kristen S. , Lambrechts, Diether , Vachon, Celine M. , Lee, Adam M. , Godwin, Andrew K. , Ambrosone, Christine B. , Fostira, Florentia , Dimopoulos, Athanasios M., Fountzilas, George , Olson, Janet E. , Pathak, Harsh B. , Försti, Asta , Beesley, Jonathan , Mannermaa, Arto, Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Wang, Xianshu , Couch, Fergus J. , Nevanlinna, H , Lambrechts, Diether , Giles, Graham G , Eccles, Diana , Dimopoulos, Meletios A , Konstantopoulou, Irene , Martin, Nicholas G , Sinn, Peter , Lambrechts, Diether , Cox, Angela , Schmidt, Marjanka K , Severi, Gianluca , Ekici, Arif B , Ademuyiwa, Foluso O , Pylkäs, Katri , Yannoukakos, Drakoulis , Baglietto, Laura , Fletcher, Olivia , Purrington, Kristen S , Brauch, Hiltrud , Sawyer, Elinor J , Liu, Jing

Cancer Research | August 15, 2011 | Volume: 71 | Issue: 19 | Pages: 6240-6249

10.1158/0008-5472.can-11-1266 Get It

Abstract Triple-negative breast cancers are an aggressive subtype of breast cancer with poor survival, but there remains little known about the etiologic factors that promote its initiation and development. Commonly inherited breast cancer risk factors identified through genome-wide association studies display heterogeneity of effect among breast cancer subtypes as defined by the status of estrogen and progesterone receptors. In the Triple Negative Breast Cancer Consortium (TNBCC), 22 common breast cancer susceptibility variants were investigated in 2,980 Caucasian women with triple-negative breast cancer and 4,978 healthy controls. We identified six single-nucleotide polymorphisms, including rs2046210 (ESR1), rs12662670 (ESR1), rs3803662 (TOX3), rs999737 (RAD51L1), rs8170 (19p13.1), and rs8100241 (19p13.1), significantly associated with the risk of triple-negative breast cancer. Together, our results provide convincing evidence of genetic susceptibility for triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res; 71(19); 6240–9. ©2011 AACR.