Back to Authors

Plecha, Donna

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1714-4337

Mayo Clinic

Cleveland Clinic

Citations 2

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis, Version 1.2023
Bevers, Therese B. , Niell, Bethany L. , Bonaccio, Ermelinda, Camp, Melissa , Chikarmane, Sona A. , Eghtedari, Mohammad , Flanagan, Meghan R. , Hawley, Jeffrey , Helvie, Mark A. , Hodgkiss, Linda, Hoyt, Tamarya L., Ivanovich, Jennifer , Kulkarni, Swati , Lancaster, Rachael, Mauer, Caitlin , Pearlman, Mark D. , Philpotts, Liane E. , Plichta, Jennifer K. , Shakeri, Shadi Aminololama, Smith, Mary Lou , Streibert, Clarie L., Strigel, Roberta M. , Tumyan, Lusine , Winkler, Nicole , Wolverton, Dulcy , Bergman, Mary Anne, Stehman, Katie, Plichta, Jennifer K , Baker, Jennifer L. , Bennett, Debbie Lee , Conant, Emily F. , Jochelson, Maxine S. , Maxwell, Jessica, Patel, Bhavika , Plecha, Donna , Kumar, Rashmi

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | September 6, 2023 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 900-909

10.6004/jnccn.2023.0046 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis provide health care providers with a practical, consistent framework for screening and evaluating a spectrum of clinical presentations and breast lesions. The NCCN Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Panel is composed of a multidisciplinary team of experts in the field, including representation from medical oncology, gynecologic oncology, surgical oncology, internal medicine, family practice, preventive medicine, pathology, diagnostic and interventional radiology, as well as patient advocacy. The NCCN Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Panel meets at least annually to review emerging data and comments from reviewers within their institutions to guide updates to existing recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s decision-making and discussion surrounding the most recent updates to the guideline’s screening recommendations.
Utilization of Patient Navigators in Breast Imaging Facilities Across the United States: A Survey of Breast Imaging Radiologists
Lee, Amie Y. , Plecha, Donna , Woodard, Genevieve A. , Price, Elissa R. , Hayward, Jessica H. , Mark, Sueanne, Joe, Bonnie N. , Mark, Sueann

Journal of Breast Imaging | January 2, 2020 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 16-21

10.1093/jbi/wbz078 Get It

Abstract Objective To assess the utilization of patient navigators at breast imaging facilities across the United States. Methods An online survey was distributed to physician members of the Society of Breast Imaging. Questions encompassed use of patient navigators in breast imaging including: presence and qualifications, roles in patient care, perceived benefits, and barriers. Data were analyzed to identify the overall prevalence of patient navigators, their responsibilities and qualifications, and the impact on breast imaging centers. Results Three-hundred and eighty-five board-certified radiologists practicing in the United States completed the survey. The most common practice types were private practice (52%; 201/385) and academic (29%; 110/385). The majority (67%; 256/385) employed navigators, and the most common qualification was a registered nurse (78%; 200/256). Navigators were used for a variety of patient communication and care coordination roles, most commonly to provide educational resources (86%; 219/256), assist patients with scheduling appointments (80%; 205/256), explain the biopsy process (76%;195/256), and communicate biopsy results (64%). Nearly all (99%; 254/256) respondents ranked patient navigators as valuable to extremely valuable in improving patient care and indicated they would recommend implementation of a patient navigation program to other breast imaging practices. The most common barrier to employing a navigator was the financial cost. Conclusion Patient navigators have been widely adopted in breast imaging practices across the United States, with two-thirds of respondents reporting use of a navigator. Although navigator roles varied by practice, nearly all radiologists utilizing patient navigators found that they positively impact patient care and would recommend them to other breast imaging practices.