Nishimura, Yoshito

Abstract Background Stroke is a leading cause of mortality and disability globally. However, information about stroke burden in the Philippines is limited. We sought to analyze stroke burden in the Philippines from 1990 to 2023. Methods Incidence, prevalence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023 data were used as indicators to analyze the burden of stroke by sex and age. Temporal trends in both crude and age-standardized rates were analyzed using joinpoint regression analysis. Results In 2023, stroke incidence was estimated at 156.2 (95% uncertainty interval [UI]: 140.8–175.4) thousand, prevalence at 1.2 (95% UI: 1.2–1.4) million, mortality at 72.2 (95% UI: 63.2–83.0) thousand, and DALYs at 2.1 (95% UI: 1.8–2.3) million. High systolic blood pressure was the leading contributor to risk-attributable stroke mortality and DALYs. Since 1990, age-standardized rates declined significantly, whereas crude rates increased markedly. Compared with women, men had a higher fatal burden and consistently exhibited a higher age-standardized burden. Although older adults (≥ 55 years) had the highest stroke burden and achieved reductions in stroke incidence and fatal outcomes, both fatal and non-fatal burdens consistently increased among young adults (35–54 years). Conclusion While age-standardized rates have improved, the rising crude burden and shift towards younger adults present significant public health challenges. These trends highlight the pressing need for aggressive and targeted risk factor control, sustained risk monitoring, and strengthened acute and post-stroke care to mitigate the growing health burden of stroke in the Philippines.

Abstract Castleman disease (CD) is a heterogeneous group of lymphoproliferative disorders anatomically classified by distribution (unicentric CD [UCD], oligocentric CD [oligoCD], or multicentric CD [MCD]). Human herpes virus 8–negative MCD is called idiopathic MCD (iMCD), which includes clinical subtypes with varying phenotypes and responses: TAFRO (thrombocytopenia, anasarca, fever, renal dysfunction and/or reticulin fibrosis, and organomegaly), IPL (idiopathic plasmacytic lymphadenopathy), and not otherwise specified. OligoCD has recently emerged as an intermediate form between UCD and MCD, with unclear clinical behavior, and IPL has not been validated in a Western cohort. We retrospectively analyzed 217 patients with CD evaluated at our institution between January 2004 and August 2024. Survival probabilities were compared using log-rank tests. Overall, 57% had UCD, 20% had oligoCD, and 23% had iMCD. Patients with oligoCD and iMCD more frequently exhibited systemic symptoms than those with UCD. Patients with oligoCD and iMCD had significantly shorter event-free survival (EFS) of 8.9 and 2.3 years, respectively, than those with UCD (not reached; P< .001 and P< .02). Among iMCD subtypes, iMCD-IPL demonstrated a longer EFS than iMCD-TAFRO (P = .02), with no deaths during the follow-up periods. The results validate oligoCD and iMCD-IPL as new subtypes in this Western cohort. The survival outcome in oligoCD was intermediate between UCD and iMCD, with only a subset of patients with oligoCD requiring systemic therapy. iMCD-IPL had a favorable survival outcome in this US cohort, similar to what has been reported in non-Western countries. Tailoring treatment strategies to disease subtypes and vigilant monitoring of oligoCD for progression may improve survival outcomes in CD.

Abstract Introduction: Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have an increased risk of infection secondary to hypogammaglobulinemia, due to myeloma itself and anti-myeloma therapies. Prophylactic immunoglobulin (Ig) supplementation has been considered a potential strategy to reduce the risk of infections. A randomized controlled trial (Chapel, Lancet, 1994) demonstrated a reduction in both overall and major infections with the use of Ig. However, its real-world benefit remains unclear and prophylactic Ig is not routinely given as part of standard therapies. Furthermore, little is known regarding the routine use of Ig in the context of modern therapeutic agents such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy or bispecific antibody therapies. To address this gap, we conducted an updated systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) to elucidate the efficacy of prophylactic immunoglobulin in patients with MM. Methods: We performed a SRMA of observational and randomized controlled trials comparing the outcomes in patients with MM who received prophylactic immunoglobulin versus those who did not. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases was conducted up to July 2025, along with a manual review of the reference lists from relevant articles. This review adheres to the recommendations from the Cochrane Collaboration and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement guidelines. R software version 4.5.1 was used for statistical analyses. Results: A total of 18 studies were included in the systematic review. Among them, 11 studies compared patients who received immunoglobulin prophylaxis with those who did not (“Ig” versus “no Ig” groups). The remaining seven studies analyzed the same group of patients, comparing periods when they were receiving Ig (“on-Ig”) with periods when they were not (“off-Ig”). Among 18 studies, 13 studies were included in meta-analysis due to data availability (eight from the former group and five from the latter group). First, we conducted a meta-analysis of 1,234 patients from the eight studies that preceded this analysis, comparing Ig and no-Ig. Three studies included MM patients treated with bispecific antibodies, two focused on those treated with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), and one on those treated with anti-CD38 antibodies. The dose of Ig was 0.4 g/kg every four weeks in most studies, and the timing of initiation of Ig varied across studies. The majority of Ig was delivered through an intravenous route. Most studies defined severe infections as those greater than grade 3 according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, while one study defined them as infections requiring intravenous or oral antibiotic treatment. The incidence of severe infection was significantly lower in patients who received prophylactic Ig compared with those who did not (odds ratio [OR] 0.22; 95% CI 0.08-0.63; p = 0.005). There was no significant difference in the overall infection rate between the two groups (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.68-1.37; p = 0.85). A subgroup analysis by treatment type (chemotherapy, bispecific antibody, and ASCT) showed no significant differences in the overall infection rate among the subgroups (ASCT: OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.64-1.45; Bispecific antibody: OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.49-1.11). However, a significant reduction in the rate of severe infections was observed in patients treated with bispecific antibodies (OR 0.33; 95% CI 0.13-0.85; p = 0.021). Next, we analyzed 460 patients from the latter five studies comparing on-Ig and off-Ig. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) of overall infection was significantly lower during on-Ig periods compared with off-Ig periods (IRR 0.62; 95% CI 0.43-0.88; p = 0.0082). Conclusions: In patients with MM, prophylactic Ig use was associated with a low incidence of severe infections. Furthermore, the incidence rate ratio of overall infection was lower during periods of Ig prophylaxis compared to periods without Ig. These findings underscore the potential efficacy of a routine Ig prophylaxis in patients with MM to mitigate the risk of infections. Since this meta-analysis does not include studies involving patients treated with CAR-T therapy, further studies are warranted to evaluate the effectiveness of Ig in patients receiving novel therapies such as CAR-T therapy, while also considering the cost and time associated with Ig administration in real-world clinical practice.

Abstract Introduction: The epidemiology and clinical characteristics of familial myelodysplastic syndromes/acute myeloid leukemia (MDS/AML) remain poorly understood, particularly among Native Hawaiians and Other Pacific Islanders (NHOPI). Methods: To investigate the real-world evidence in this area, we conducted a retrospective study at the Queen's Medical Center (QMC), Hawaii's largest tertiary referral hospital. The data was gathered from QMC's electronic medical record. Familial MDS or familial AML patients in this study were defined as MDS or AML occurring in a patient with a family history of MDS and/or AML. Patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), as well as those with a family history of APL, were excluded given the differences in disease characteristics and its genetic phenotype from other AML subtypes. Unspecified leukemia was defined when a patient had a family history of leukemia but the specific subtype was unavailable. Some patients underwent comprehensive panel testing, while others had targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays ordered at the discretion of their treating physicians. NGS was performed at Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-certified commercial laboratories. NGS panels typically included the following genes: ASXL1, BCOR, BRAF, CEBPA, CSF3R, DNMT3A, ETV6, EZH2, FLT3, HRAS, IDH1, IDH2, JAK2, KIT, KRAS, MLL, NPM1, NRAS, PDGFRA, PHF6, PML, PTPN11, RUNX1, SETBP1, STAG2, TET2, TP53, and WT1. Results: Among 1,686 MDS/AML patients presented between January 2012 and July 2023, 12 (0.71 %) had familial MDS/AML and 25 (1.48%) had a family history of unspecified leukemia. While no NHOPI were identified among familial MDS/AML cases, 20% of patients with a family history of unspecified leukemia were NHOPI. The median age at diagnosis of familial MDS/AML was 70 years, and 50% of familial MDS patients had MDS with low blasts based on the World Health Organization 2022 classification. Based on International Consensus Classification 2022 criteria, 25% had MDS, not otherwise specified (NOS) with multilineage dysplasia, and 25% had MDS, NOS with single lineage dysplasia. Among the eight patients with familial MDS, the median overall survival (OS) was 12.7 years, with an estimated 5-year OS rate of 75.0% (95% CI: 12.8–96.1), based on Kaplan–Meier analysis. In contrast, the three patients with familial AML had a median survival of 10.2 months and a 3-year OS estimate of 33.3% (95% CI: 0.90–77.4). For patients with a family history of unspecified leukemia, the median survival was not reached during the follow-up period. The estimated 5-year OS rate was 53.3% (95% CI: 12.5–82.7) for the 10 familial MDS cases and 53.3% (95% CI: 20.9–77.3) for the 13 familial AML cases. When combining all familial cases, the median OS for familial MDS (n = 18) was 12.7 years with a 5-year OS rate of 61.9% (95% CI: 26.8–84.0). The median OS for familial AML (n = 16) was 0.90 years, and the estimated 5-year OS rate was 48.2% (95% CI: 20.8–71.3). When all cases were combined, there was no statistically significant difference in overall survival between patients with familial AML (n = 16) and those with familial MDS (n = 18), based on the log-rank test (p = 0.22). Regarding NGS, ASXL1 mutations were the most frequent in the cohort, detected in six of the 32 NGS tests performed (18.8%). Among patients with familial MDS, recurrent somatic mutations were observed in several genes. ASXL1 mutations were identified in two patients; one had a brother with MDS, and the other had a maternal uncle with unspecified leukemia. DNMT3A mutations were also found in two patients with familial MDS; one had a brother with MDS, and the other had a paternal uncle with MDS. SRSF2 mutations were detected in two patients; one had a brother with MDS, and the other had a granddaughter with leukemia. Additionally, SF3B1 mutations were found in two patients; one had a mother with MDS, and the other had a paternal uncle with MDS. Two patients with familial AML were found to have ASXL1 mutation, both with fathers who had unspecified leukemia. Otherwise, no other repeated mutations were found. None of the cases involved NHOPI patients. Conclusion: Our study offers new insights into familial MDS/AML within Hawaii's multiethnic population. Although no NHOPI patients were identified among the familial cases, our findings underscore the genetic heterogeneity and clinical variability of these disorders.

Background: Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a life-threatening hematologic emergency caused by ADAMTS13 deficiency, leading to microvascular thrombosis, haemolytic anaemia, thrombocytopenia, and end-organ damage. Neurological symptoms occur in up to 90% of cases and are frequently misdiagnosed as stroke. Prompt recognition and treatment reduce the mortality rate from over 90% to 10–20%. Case presentation: A 70-year-old woman with no significant medical history presented with acute aphasia and right-sided facial and upper extremity numbness. Five days prior, she had experienced fatigue, headache, and bruising. On admission, she had stable vitals with mild aphasia and purpuric ecchymoses noted on examination. Laboratory findings revealed haemolytic anaemia (haemoglobin 7.8 g/dl, lactate dehydrogenase 875 U/l, total bilirubin 2.4 mg/dl), thrombocytopenia (35 ×109/l), and unremarkable coagulation studies (partial thromboplastin time 30 sec, prothrombin time-international normalized ratio 1, fibrinogen 370 mg/dl, D-dimer 2.15 ng/ml). Peripheral smear showed no schistocytes but noted 2+spherocytes. Stroke was ruled out with brain magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance angiography. Given the bicytopenia with possible haemolysis along with new neurological symptoms, TTP was considered in the differential diagnosis. A PLASMIC score of 5 suggested a high probability of TTP. Plasma exchange and corticosteroids were initiated within 5 hours of presentation. ADAMTS13 activity <1% confirmed the diagnosis 4 days after presentation. After five plasma exchange sessions, the patient’s platelet count normalized and neurologic deficits resolved by discharge. Conclusion: This case underscores the importance of considering TTP in stroke mimics, even in the absence of schistocytes, if clinical suspicion is high. Early recognition and initiation of treatment significantly improve patient outcomes.

ABSTRACTIdiopathic multicentric Castleman disease (iMCD) is a rare lymphoproliferative disorder classified into three recognized clinical subtypes—idiopathic plasmacytic lymphadenopathy (IPL), TAFRO, and NOS. Although clinical criteria are available for subtyping, diagnostically challenging cases with overlapping histopathological features highlight the need for an improved classification system integrating clinical and histopathological findings. We aimed to develop an objective histopathological subtyping system for iMCD that closely correlates with the clinical subtypes. Excisional lymph node specimens from 94 Japanese iMCD patients (54 IPL, 28 TAFRO, 12 NOS) were analyzed for five key histopathological parameters: germinal center (GC) status, plasmacytosis, vascularity, hemosiderin deposition, and “whirlpool” vessel formation in GC. Using hierarchical clustering, we visualized subgroups and developed a machine learning‐based decision tree to differentiate the clinical subtypes and validated it in an external cohort of 12 patients with iMCD. Hierarchical cluster analysis separated the IPL and TAFRO cases into mutually exclusive clusters, whereas the NOS cases were interspersed between them. Decision tree modeling identified plasmacytosis, vascularity, and whirlpool vessel formation as key features distinguishing IPL from TAFRO, achieving 91% and 92% accuracy in the training and test sets, respectively. External validation correctly classified all IPL and TAFRO cases, confirming the reproducibility of the system. Our histopathological classification system closely aligns with the clinical subtypes, offering a more precise approach to iMCD subtyping. It may enhance diagnostic accuracy, guide clinical decision‐making for predicting treatment response in challenging cases, and improve patient selection for future research. Further validation of its versatility and clinical utility is required.