Block, Matthew S.

11534 Background: To date, there are no validated blood-based biomarkers of predicting response to PD-1 blockade. We previously reported that Bim is a downstream signaling molecule of the PD-1 pathway, and that measurement of Bim levels in circulating T-cells may predict and monitor responses to anti–PD-1 therapy in melanoma. We have identified the existence of sPD-L1 in cancer patients and showed that the sPD-L1 is biologically active and capable of triggering apoptosis in activated T-cells. Here we evaluated T cell Bim and sPD-L1 in the peripheral blood (PB) as biomarkers of response in a cohort of patients with metastatic melanoma and lung cancer undergoing anti-PD1 therapy. Methods: 60 pts treated with anti-PD-1 had PB collected at baseline and at radiographic tumor evaluation. Frequencies of Bim+ T cells and Bim median fluorescence intensity (MFI) were measured by flow cytometry in gated tumor-reactive CD11ahighPD1+ CD8+ T cells. We also measured levels of sPD-L1 at baseline and serially during treatment with sPD-L1 ELISA. Baseline Bim and sPD-L1 levels and percent change in Bim levels in patients (pts) who had a radiographic response (CR/PR) were compared to those who had progressive disease (PD) at 12 wks. Results: Similarly to previously reported preliminary data, pts with objective response (CR/PR, 15/60) after 4 cycles of anti-PD1 therapy had higher frequency of Bim T cells at baseline compared to pts with PD (16/60) (mean 43% vs. 30%, P = 0.0484). The frequencies of Bim+ T cells decreased significantly after the first 3 months of treatment in responders compared with progressors (mean -16% vs. + 40% P = 0.0111). High baseline sPD-L1 were associated with progression on anti-PD1 therapy (mean 2.8 ng/mL vs. 0.7 ng/mL, p = 0.07, n = 13) and the levels increased by the first tumor assessment in patients resistant to anti-PD-1. Conclusions: Measurements of Bim and sPD-L1 levels may help to select patients who are likely to benefit from anti-PD1 monotherapy versus combinatorial strategies, and provide a new non-invasive way to monitor response to anti-PD-1 blockade. A larger validation study is underway.

11006 Background: CMB305 is an active immunotherapy regimen designed to generate and expand anti-NY-ESO-1 T cells. It consists of LV305, a dendritic cell targeting lentiviral vector encoding NY-ESO-1, and a boost with G305, an NY-ESO-1 recombinant protein plus GLA-SE, a TLR-4 agonist. An LV305 phase 1 study demonstrated a 1-yr survival of 81% and induction of anti-NY-ESO-1 T cells in sarcoma patients (pts). This first-in-human study of CMB305 examined safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy in pts with NY-ESO-1 positive (+) solid tumors. Methods: Adults with previously treated NY-ESO-1+ sarcomas, NSCLC, ovarian cancer were enrolled in a 3+3 dose-escalation with an expansion phase 1 study. The CMB305 regimen included 4 intradermal injections of LV305 at 109 or 1010 vector genomes, alternating with 3 intramuscular G305 injections at 250 µg for 3 months, then bimonthly G305 injections up to 1 yr. Results: As of 31Dec2016, 25 pts with STS (15 synovial (SS), 8 myxoid/round cell liposarcoma (MRCL), 2 other) were evaluable for safety; 23 SS/MRCL pts were evaluable for immune response (IR) and efficacy. All SS and MRCL pts received prior therapy for locally advanced/metastatic disease, 67% > = 2 prior chemo regimens. No DLTs were observed; treatment related AEs were grade 1 and 2, except 1 pt with grade 3 SAE (prostatic pain). Of 11 SS/MRCL pts tested, 64% pts developed NY-ESO-1 specific T cells and 72% pts anti-NY-ESO-1 antibodies. T cell receptor sequencing indicated increased clonality, and antigen spreading after CMB305. Best response by immune related response criteria was stable disease in 8/15 (53%) SS pts and 6/8 (75%) MRCL pts. The 3 month PFS rate was 74% and 75% for SS and MRCL pts. Median survival has not been reached with 1-yr survival rate of 86% and 100% for SS and MRCL pts. Conclusions: CMB305 is safe, well tolerated, and demonstrates a survival rate that is favorable when compared with approved agents for recurrent STS. CMB305 resulted in a stronger and broader integrated IR than LV305, including antigen spreading. These data warrant further investigation of CMB305 as a monotherapy in a randomized clinical study in STS. A randomized study of CMB305 in combination with atezolizumab in SS/MRCL pts is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02387125.

e21038 Background: Several studies of advanced melanoma patients suggest that combining therapies that target tumor mechanisms of immune evasion with activation of normal immune cell functionality may provide optimal benefits for patients. The synthetic parasite derived GK1 peptide in combination with anti-PD-L1 showed significant longer survival (34 days) compared to GK1 or Anti-PD-L1 alone (23-27 days) in a murine melanoma model (p < 0.05). This means an increase survival increased in 47.82% in the mice treated with GK-1 + anti-PD-L1, 21.7% treated with GK-1, and 6.08% treated with anti-PD-L1. Methods: To elucidate the potential mechanism by which this combination treatment exerts its anti-melanoma effects, C57BL/6 mice were injected with B16-F10-luc2 cells and separated according to treatments in four groups: control, GK-1, anti-PD-L1 and GK-1/anti-PDL-1.Blood samples were collected at day 0, 14, and at euthanization or end of the experiment and monitored for serum cytokines using mice-specific V-PLEX Pro-inflammatory Panel. Results: On day 14, TNF-α levels in the Anti-PD-L1 and GK-1 therapy group was significantly lower compared to control mice. At sacrifice, the combined treatment group demonstrated significant decrease cytokine production in IL-6 and IL-10. Conclusions: The decreased cytokine levels observed in the GK-1/anti-PD-L1 group may explain the significant improved survival. GK-1 is a Th1 response inductor both in vitro and in vivo as it increases IFN-γ, IL-2 but not IL-4 and IL-10. It is noteworthy that when PD-L1 signaling is reduced in T cells these cells proliferate extensively in vitro and produce increased levels of IFN-γ and IL-17, suggesting an enhanced pro-inflammatory phenotype. It has been established that cytokines of Th2 response such as IL-4 and IL-5 and IL-6, have tumor-promoting activity. The anti-melanoma effect of the GK-1/anti-PD-L1 combination observed in the present study could be mediated by decreasing the pro-tumor Th2 response. These results provide novel alternative pathways and potential targets to enhance the clinical effect of the PD-1/PD-L1 blockade pathway.

e21057 Background: BRAF, NRAS, CDKN2A and P53 mutations are commonly observed pathogenic mutations in cutaneous melanoma. The influence of mutations such as BRAF, NRAS, CDKN2A and P53 on treatment response in the PD1 inhibitor era has not been well defined. Methods: This study included patients with melanoma with a cutaneous or unknown primary. All patients had genomic profiling with the Mayo Clinic 50-gene solid tumor mutation panel. Treatment response to first line immunotherapy with PD1, CTLA-4, or combination PD1/CTLA-4 inhibitors were assessed by response rate and time-to-progression (TTP) rate at 12 months. Each patient outcome was stratified by non-mutually exclusive gene mutation status into BRAF, NRAS, P53, CDKN2A, or quadruple negative (N4) groups. Results: Genomic profiling was performed on 208 patients, of whom 102 received first line immunotherapy. Most patients received a PD1 inhibitor (n = 62), followed by CTLA-4 inhibitor (n = 34), and combination therapy (n = 6). A trend towards improved outcomes was observed in CDKN2A and BRAF mutated patients with worse outcomes noted in P53, N4, and NRAS patients. The percent without progression at 12 months were BRAF 52.2%, CDKN2A 58.2%, NRAS 30.5%, P53 37.7%, and N4 26.7% (see table below). Response rates were BRAF 46.4%, CDKN2A 38.5%, NRAS 22.2%, P53 40.0%, and N4 33.3%. Conclusions: There is a trend towards improved outcomes with immunotherapy in BRAF and CDKN2A mutated patients while P53, NRAS and N4 patients have inferior outcomes. [Table: see text]

e21054 Background: Up to 50% of patients undergoing resection for advanced melanoma experience recurrence. Identification of preoperative prognostic biomarkers is needed to ascertain risk of relapse and guide postoperative management. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) represents a strong prognostic factor in unresectable metastatic (stage IV) melanoma, but its relevance in patients with resected stage III or IV disease remains unknown. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with stage III and IV melanoma who had undergone complete resection of disease and received follow-up treatment at Mayo Clinic, Rochester between January 1, 2000 and January 31, 2012. Clinical data were collected from electronic records. Survival data were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Associations of preoperative LDH with time to relapse and death were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression models and summarized with hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Results: A total of 154 subjects with resectable stage III or IV melanoma were included in the study. Median age at the time of resection was 58; 54 (35.1%) were female. One-hundred sixteen (75.3%) patients were classified as stage III and 38 (24.7%) stage IV. Adjuvant systemic treatment was administered in 75 (48.7%) patients and adjuvant radiation in 32 (20.7%). Median duration of follow-up was 4.0 years. Sixteen (10.3%) patients had preoperative LDH above the upper limit of normal. Each 50-unit increase in LDH was associated with a 15% increased risk of relapse (HR 1.15; p = 0.040) and 23% increased risk of death (HR 1.23; p = 0.001). After adjusting for age, gender, stage, number of sites, adjuvant systemic treatment, and adjuvant radiation, preoperative LDH remained associated with time to death (HR 1.25; p = 0.002). Preoperative LDH greater than the upper limit of normal was associated with increased hazard of death, both with univariate (HR 2.44; p = 0.005) and multivariate (HR 2.17; p = 0.017) analyses. Conclusions: This study supports the role of elevated preoperative LDH as a predictor of inferior outcomes in patients with advanced melanoma. Further study to correlate LDH to outcomes in the era of adjuvant immunotherapy is required.

3090 Background: The correlation of immune response (IR) and clinical benefit in patients (pts) who receive active immunotherapy remains controversial. CMB305 is an active immunotherapy designed to generate and expand anti-NY-ESO-1 T cells, consisting of LV305 (a DC targeting lentiviral vector encoding NY-ESO-1) and a boost (NY-ESO-1 recombinant protein plus GLA-SE, a TLR-4 agonist). Phase 1 studies of LV305 and CMB305 evaluated the IR and survival of pts with NY-ESO-1 positive tumors. Methods: 62 pts with recurrent NY-ESO-1 expressing (by IHC) solid tumors were enrolled in 2 Phase 1 trials (31 pts each: 43 sarcomas, 12 ovarian, 4 melanomas, and 3 NSCLC). Peripheral blood was assessed pre and post therapy for anti-NY-ESO-1 T cell responses (IFNγ ELISPOT) and antibodies (Ab) (ELISA) (n = 62), TCR-β CDR3 repertoire and conserved (public) TCR (n = 28), and antigen spreading (ELISA, ELISPOT) (n = 23). Relationship between progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and up to 15 biomarkers were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Preexisting anti-NY-ESO-1 T cells and Ab were identified in 34% and 40% of pts. LV305 and CMB305 induced (de novo or increased) anti-NY-ESO-1 T-cells in 51% and 65% pts, and anti-NY-ESO-1 Ab responses in 13% and 68% pts, respectively. LV305 and CMB305 induced antigen spreading in 17% and 36% pts. TCR clonality increased after CMB305 as compared to LV305. The TCRβ-CDR3 amino acid sequences of three NY-ESO-1 specific TCR clones in a patient with a > 2-year response were fully conserved in 20/28 patients. Biomarkers showing the strongest association with OS and PFS were pre-existing anti-NY-ESO-1 T-cell response and Ab, integrated IR (T cells and antibodies), and NY-ESO-1 expression level. Presence of public TCRs was associated with longer survival, particularly in pts with high ( > 50%) NY-ESO-1 expression. Conclusions: While LV305 and CMB305 are both immunogenic, CMB305 resulted in a stronger and broader integrated IR, including antigen spreading. The three identified survival variables, preexisting and treatment-induced NY-ESO-1 IR and the presence of public TCRs, warrant validation in randomized studies of CMB305.

Abstract Introduction. VSV-IFNβ-NIS is an oncolytic vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV; Rhabdovirus family) with rapid replication kinetics and potent antitumor activity. VSV-IFNβ-NIS encodes the human interferon beta (IFNβ) gene as a STING agonist and the human sodium iodide symporter (NIS) as a reporter gene for tracking the pharmacokinetics (PK) of virus replication in infected tumors. VSV replicates selectively in cancer cells and has promising preclinical antitumor activity across a broad spectrum of cancer types. We report here the safety and correlative data from an FIH trial of intravenous (IV) administration of VSV-IFNβ-NIS in patients with stage IV or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC). Methods. There are two ongoing IV FIH trials using VSV-IFN-NIS, in patients with EC (NCT03120624) and one in patients with hematological malignancies (NCT03017820). In EC, it is a classical 3+3 phase I trial, starting at 5x109 TCID50 through 5x1011 TCID50, given as a single IV dose. The primary objective is safety and tolerability; secondary objectives include monitoring the PK of viral replication through SPECT/CT imaging with NIS gene, viremia, virus shedding, preliminary efficacy, changes in the immune profile of peripheral blood leukocytes, and immunohistochemistry for immune cell infiltrates in tumors. Results. Nine patients have received IV VSV-IFNβ-NIS to date; three with EC and six with hematologic malignancies. The highest dose administered to date is 1.7x1010 TCID50 and dose escalation is ongoing. No DLTs have been observed. Patients experienced the expected infusion related AEs including rigors, chills, nausea, fever, hypotension, and hot flashes. Multiple cytokines increased at 4h post infusion of virus, but most returned to baseline levels by 24h. Viremia was detectable in all patients at the end of infusion, and to varying levels at 30 mins, 1, 2, 4, 24, 48h or 72 hours post virus infusion. No persistent viremia was observed. No infectious virus was recovered in buccal swabs or urine and neutralizing anti-VSV antibodies were present by day 29. Extensive immune phenotyping for T cells, NK, MSDC, myeloid cells performed on peripheral blood cells collected at baseline and at day 3, 8, 15 and 29 post virus infusion showed a trend towards increased PD-1 expression on CD8+ cells. Early IHC data suggests an increase in CD3+ and CD8+ cells in tumor biopsies at day 29 and 3 months in patients with EC treated at the first dose level. Elispot assays for shared EC antigens are pending. Conclusions. IV administration of VSV-IFNβ-NIS up to doses of 1.7x1010 is safe and well tolerated. There is evidence of T cell activation with increased PD-1 expression in CD8+ T cells in the peripheral blood and increased in CD3+ and CD8+ cells in tumor biopsies. Updated results for the EC study will be reported. Citation Format: Jamie Bakkum-Gamez, Matthew S. Block, Nanda Packiriswamy, Bethany A. Brunton, Upreti Deepak, Jonathan M. Mitchell, Lukkana Suksanpaisan, Pamela Atherton, Amylou Dueck, Stephen J. Russell, Martha Q. Lacy, Kah-Whye Peng. First in human (FIH) dose escalation studies of intravenous administration of VSV-IFNβ-NIS (Voyager-V1™) in Stage IV or recurrent endometrial cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT072.

Abstract Using personalized peptide vaccines (PPVs) to target tumor-specific nonself-antigens (neoantigens) is a promising approach to cancer treatment. However, the development of PPVs is hindered by the challenge of identifying tumor-specific neoantigens, in part because current in silico methods for identifying such neoantigens have limited effectiveness. In this article, we report the results of molecular dynamics simulations of 12 oligopeptides bound with an HLA, revealing a previously unrecognized association between the inability of an oligopeptide to elicit a T cell response and the contraction of the peptide-binding groove upon binding of the oligopeptide to the HLA. Our conformational analysis showed that this association was due to incompatibility at the interface between the contracted groove and its αβ–T cell Ag receptor. This structural demonstration that having the capability to bind HLA does not guarantee immunogenicity prompted us to develop an atom-based method (SEFF12MC) to predict immunogenicity through using the structure and energy of a peptide·HLA complex to assess the propensity of the complex for further complexation with its TCR. In predicting the immunogenicities of the 12 oligopeptides, SEFF12MC achieved a 100% success rate, compared with success rates of 25–50% for 11 publicly available residue-based methods including NetMHC-4.0. Although further validation and refinements of SEFF12MC are required, our results suggest a need to develop in silico methods that assess peptide characteristics beyond their capability to form stable binary complexes with HLAs to help remove hurdles in using the patient tumor DNA information to develop PPVs for personalized cancer immunotherapy.