Elsbernd, Laura R.

Abstract Purpose: AB160 is a 160-nm nano-immunoconjugate consisting of nab-paclitaxel (ABX) nanoparticles noncovalently coated with bevacizumab (BEV) for targeted delivery into tissues expressing high levels of VEGF. Preclinical data showed that AB160 resulted in greater tumor targeting and tumor inhibition compared with sequential treatment with ABX then BEV. Given individual drug activity, we investigated the safety and toxicity of AB160 in patients with gynecologic cancers. Patients and Methods: A 3+3 phase I trial was conducted with three potential dose levels in patients with previously treated endometrial, cervical, and platinum-resistant ovarian cancer to ascertain the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). AB160 was administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle (ABX 75–175 mg/m2, BEV 30–70 mg/m2). Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed. Results: No dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were seen among the three dose levels tested. Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia, thromboembolic events, and leukopenia. DL2 (ABX 150 mg/m2, BEV 60 mg/m2) was chosen as the RP2D. Seven of the 19 patients with measurable disease (36.8%) had confirmed partial responses (95% confidence interval, 16.3%–61.6%). Pharmacokinetic analyses demonstrated that AB160 allowed 50% higher paclitaxel dosing and that paclitaxel clearance mirrored that of therapeutic antibodies. Conclusions: The safety profile and clinical activity of AB160 supports further clinical testing in patients with gynecologic cancers; the RP2D is DL2 (ABX 150 mg/m2, BEV 60 mg/m2).

Abstract Malignant melanoma is the most aggressive form of skin cancer, accounting for 10,000 deaths annually. Largely resistant to conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy and radiation, immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapies have revolutionized patient care, accounting for partial or complete responses in up to 70% of patients. An important aspect of cancer elimination is activation of the cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) response. Recent data suggest that ICB mediated broadening of the peripheral blood CTL repertoire correlates with good clinical outcomes. Thus, recent studies in cancer immunotherapy have focused on targeting tumor neoantigens (tNeoAg) with cancer vaccines for use in combination with ICB. Computational algorithm-driven predictions of immunogenic tNeoAgs yield vast numbers of potential peptide targets, only a fraction of which may be immunogenic in patients. This likely contributed to the modest success of cancer vaccines targeting predicted, high-avidity tNeoAgs, emphasizing the importance of identifying true tumor rejection antigens, including sub-dominant antigens, outside the scope of predictive models. In addition to promoting T cell-mediated tumor rejection, ICB often comes at the expense of treatment-induced immune-related adverse effects (irAE) that frequently require discontinuation of treatment. Modulation of ICB towards antitumor immunity and away from autoimmunity may dramatically improve the therapeutic index of modern cancer therapy. This appears feasible considering the clinical observation that antitumor efficacy does not correlate with type/severity of irAE, suggesting that the mechanisms of both processes, though likely related (CTL mediated), may not be identical. We aim to identify and separate non-cross-reacting antigenic targets mediating tumor rejection from those mediating irAEs to enable therapeutic interventions that maximize the efficacy of ICB, expanding tumor-specific CTLs with vaccines while minimizing irAEs through desensitization. We have access to samples from responding/nonresponding melanoma patients subjected to ICB with varying degrees of irAEs. We have designed an experimental approach that combines established mass spectrometry and sequencing techniques to identify peptides and matching TCR clones with a novel strategy that targets the TCR-associated CD3 complex to allow inclusion of subdominant antigens in our studies. T-cell “co-potentiation” is achieved when anti-CD3 monovalent Fabs induce a conformational change in the CD3 complex that sustains the T-cell response to weak antigenic stimulation. We have successfully used anti-human CD3 Fabs to co-potentiate in vitro the activation and subsequent response to weak peptide-HLA/TCR interactions of human T cells found in PBMCs isolated from healthy donors. Our preliminary data suggest T-cell co-potentiation may allow identification of ICB-induced CTL clones specific for subdominant tNeoAgs and irAE targets in patients with melanoma undergoing active immunotherapy. Citation Format: Laura Elsbernd, Alfreda Nelson, Hien Huynh, Michele Hoffmann, Christopher Parks, Wendy Nevala, Shari Sutor, Larry Pease, Adam Schrum, Diana Gil, Svetomir N. Markovic. Co-potentiation of human T cells to identify subdominant tumor neoantigens from melanoma patients responding to immune checkpoint blockade [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy; 2018 Nov 27-30; Miami Beach, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2020;8(4 Suppl):Abstract nr B78.

Abstract We recently described the concept of T cell co-potentiation as means to target antigen recognition by T cells to achieve antitumor immunotherapy in mouse models. Normally, T cell antigen receptor (TCR) engagement by a strong immunogenic antigen induces a CD3 conformational change that exposes a proline-rich sequence (PRS) in the cytosolic domain of CD3 epsilon (CD3e) to dock cytosolic proteins and contribute to the assembly of the signaling cascade that activates T cell immune function. While induction of CD3 conformational change is required by T cells to achieve productive TCR/CD3 signaling, this molecular event fails to occur when the TCR interacts with poorly immunogenic antigens, like most tumor-associated antigens (TAAs). We found that CD3 conformational change can be exogenously induced on T cells using monovalent Fab fragments (Mono-Fabs) specific for the CD3 complex. Anti-CD3 Mono-Fabs expose the CD3e PRS, but fail to crosslink the TCR/CD3, turning them incompetent to trigger T cell activation in the absence of additional stimulation. However, if TCR has bound a weak antigen, one that fails to induce CD3 conformational change intrinsically, then anti-CD3 Mono-Fabs enable TCR/CD3 signaling, and as a result co-potentiate T cell responses to weak antigenic stimulation. Using a mouse model for melanoma (B6 mice and B16-F10 melanoma cell line), we found that treatment of mice with anti-CD3e Mono-Fabs improved antitumor T cell responses against melanoma in an antigen-dependent manner, and dramatically improved the outcome of complementary T cell immunotherapies. Based on these observations, we hypothesize that T cell co-potentiation using anti-human CD3 Mono-Fabs can be exploited as a novel immunotherapy for cancer patients. We have recently identified one anti-human CD3 Mono-Fab that is capable to induce CD3 conformational change in human T cells and allows the co-potentiation of T cell response to weak antigenic stimulation. Here we present data from human T cells and humanized mouse models using this Mono-Fab that support the potential therapeutic value of exploiting T cell co-potentiation to treat cancer patients. Citation Format: Alfreda D. Nelson, Laura Elsbernd, Adam G. Schrum, Diana Gil Pages. Testing T cell co-potentiation as an antitumor therapeutic strategy in humanized mouse models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 962.

Abstract Using personalized peptide vaccines (PPVs) to target tumor-specific nonself-antigens (neoantigens) is a promising approach to cancer treatment. However, the development of PPVs is hindered by the challenge of identifying tumor-specific neoantigens, in part because current in silico methods for identifying such neoantigens have limited effectiveness. In this article, we report the results of molecular dynamics simulations of 12 oligopeptides bound with an HLA, revealing a previously unrecognized association between the inability of an oligopeptide to elicit a T cell response and the contraction of the peptide-binding groove upon binding of the oligopeptide to the HLA. Our conformational analysis showed that this association was due to incompatibility at the interface between the contracted groove and its αβ–T cell Ag receptor. This structural demonstration that having the capability to bind HLA does not guarantee immunogenicity prompted us to develop an atom-based method (SEFF12MC) to predict immunogenicity through using the structure and energy of a peptide·HLA complex to assess the propensity of the complex for further complexation with its TCR. In predicting the immunogenicities of the 12 oligopeptides, SEFF12MC achieved a 100% success rate, compared with success rates of 25–50% for 11 publicly available residue-based methods including NetMHC-4.0. Although further validation and refinements of SEFF12MC are required, our results suggest a need to develop in silico methods that assess peptide characteristics beyond their capability to form stable binary complexes with HLAs to help remove hurdles in using the patient tumor DNA information to develop PPVs for personalized cancer immunotherapy.