Espahbodi, Mana

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate intracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) amplitude parameters during cochlear implantation (CI) using a novel multi‐frequency ECochG algorithm. Methods A multi‐institutional, prospective cohort study was performed at 18 high‐volume CI centers. The inclusion criteria were adults with sensorineural hearing loss and audiometric thresholds of ≤ 90 dB hearing level at 500 Hz undergoing CI with Advanced Bionics (Valencia, CA) Ultra 3D devices between 2024 and 2025. ECochG recordings were performed with simultaneous multi‐frequency stimulation of four frequencies between 125 and 4000 Hz during cochlear implant insertion. Concurrent multi‐frequency recording allowed extraction of amplitude and phase of each frequency individually. Post hoc analysis was performed to determine the difference in the number of drop alarms between single‐ and multi‐frequency ECochG. An ECochG amplitude drop of 6 dB was defined as a drop alarm. Insertion track patterns were compared between single‐ and multi‐frequency ECochG. Results One hundred ninety‐five ears were included. Mean number of drop alarms for the single‐frequency algorithm was 1.72 (95% CI: 1.52, 1.92; median 1) compared to 0.42 (95% CI: 0.31, 0.53; median 0) for multi‐frequency; p < 0.001. The number of Type C patterns (rise in amplitude during insertion followed by a drop) decreased with the multi‐frequency ECochG algorithm compared to the single‐frequency ECochG algorithm. The number of Type D patterns (no‐response) decreased, indicating that multi‐frequency ECochG generated more responses across the cochlea than single‐frequency ECochG. Conclusions A novel multi‐frequency ECochG algorithm during CI is associated with fewer drop alarms and altered insertion track patterns, which may provide a more accurate assessment of the cochlear microenvironment. Level of Evidence 3.

ABSTRACT Objectives To characterize the structure, resources, and educational practices of temporal bone laboratory training across ACGME‐accredited U.S. otolaryngology residency programs. Methods A national cross‐sectional survey was distributed to program directors and faculty responsible for temporal bone education. Survey domains included curriculum structure, training frequency, faculty involvement, assessment practices, and access to laboratory resources. Descriptive statistics and univariable regression analyses were performed to explore associations between program characteristics and neurotology fellowship pursuit. Results Thirty‐seven programs responded (28.2%). Laboratory structure varied widely, including longitudinal (monthly or weekly) and condensed (annual or 2–3 courses/year) formats. Programs with longitudinal sessions reported more annual lab hours than condensed formats (median 42 vs. 16 h/year, p = 0.003). All programs had access to cadaveric temporal bones (mean 2.25 ± 1.13 bones per resident/year), though five reported fewer bones than residents. The mean drill‐to‐resident ratio was 0.59, with 10.8% reporting a 1:1 ratio. Formal performance evaluation was used by 43.2% of programs. On exploratory univariable analysis, longer otology rotation duration was associated with having at least one neurotology fellow within five years ( p = 0.025). Larger resident cohort size ( p = 0.048) and older laboratory instruments ( p = 0.043) were associated with producing more than one fellow. Conclusion There is substantial variability in temporal bone education across U.S. otolaryngology training programs. Programs differ in curricula, resources, and access to cadaveric and simulation‐based training. Standardization of core components may improve educational equity and training consistency. Level of Evidence N/A.

Objective: To examine the benefit of cochlear implantation (CI) in pediatric patients with a history of temporal bone fracture resulting in single-sided deafness (SSD). Study design: Retrospective chart review. Setting: Two tertiary academic centers. Patients: Pediatric patients less than 18 years of age with SSD secondary to temporal bone fracture who underwent CI from 2012 to 2022. Intervention(s): CI. Main outcome measure(s): Postoperative audiometric testing. Results: Seven subjects were identified (median age: 10 years (y); Q1 to Q3: 5 to 16 y). Median time from temporal bone trauma to CI was 7 months (mo) (Q1 to Q3: 3 to 7 mo) and 85% had otic capsule involvement. Subjects were followed for a median length of 12 months (Q1 to Q3: 6 to 24 mo) after CI. All patients achieved full electrode insertion, though 2 required scala vestibuli insertion due to ossification of the scala tympani (one of whom had a history of meningitis after temporal bone fracture). Postoperative audiometric testing revealed variable speech perception outcomes with 4 of 7 obtaining open or closed set speech perception and 3 of 7 obtaining only sound awareness. No postoperative complications occurred. Conclusions: CI is a feasible intervention for SSD following pediatric temporal bone fractures, but outcomes are variable. Early evaluation and timely CI, ideally within 6 months of temporal bone fracture, may optimize outcomes. Cochlear ossification, either as a result of otic capsule fracture or subsequent meningitis, may lead to suboptimal outcomes.

Objective Literature is limited regarding the relationship between cochlear magnetic resonance imaging fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) signal and hearing preservation after resection of vestibular schwannoma (VS). We hypothesize that increased preoperative FLAIR signal is associated with decreased odds of hearing preservation. Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Single academic tertiary/quaternary care center. Patients Subjects with histologically confirmed intracanalicular VS (without extension into the cerebellopontine angle). Intervention Microsurgical resection via middle fossa approach. Main Outcome Measures A review of demographic, clinical, radiographic, and audiometric outcomes were performed. Hearing preservation was defined as American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) class A or B hearing. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed with SPSS version 29. Results Twenty-seven subjects met inclusion criteria with median age at time of surgery of 47 (interquartile range [IQR]: 38–54) years; 92.60% were White; 66.67% had AAO-HNS class A, and 33.33% had class B hearing. Postoperatively, at median (IQR) of 11.50 (2.10–38.50) months, 44.40% had class A or B hearing. On logistic regression analysis, a ratio of cochlea-to-brainstem FLAIR signal greater than 0.6 was associated with decreased odds of hearing preservation at 11.50 months—odds ratio, 0.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.02–0.84. Age, sex, surgery duration, tumor volume and linear dimension, fundal cap of cerebrospinal fluid, and extent of resection were not associated with hearing preservation. Conclusion Increased cochlear FLAIR signal on preoperative imaging is associated with decreased likelihood of hearing preservation after resection of intracanalicular, sporadic VS via middle fossa approach.

Objectives Evaluate the training background of surgeons performing high volumes of cochlear implants (CIs) and estimate the ratio of providers trained in otology/neurotology (O&N) to the number of traditional CI candidates and audiologists. Methods A retrospective review of US surgeon registration data from a single CI manufacturer was performed to determine CI volume based on surgeon training. The prevalence of traditional candidates for CIs was estimated from US census population data and compared with the number of O&N providers. The ratio of audiologists to O&N providers was estimated from the Bureau of Labor and Statistics and American Speech‐Language‐Hearing Association databases. Results From 2021 to 2023, a mean of 88% of providers performing ≥25 CIs per year and 90% performing ≥40 per year had training in O&N. All surgeons registering ≥100 implants per year were O&N providers. The mean percentage of O&N providers performing ≥25 CIs per year and ≥ 40 per year was higher than the percentage of General and Pediatric Otolaryngology providers performing the same volume: mean difference = 76%, p < 0.001 and mean difference = 79%, p < 0.001, respectively. The mean estimated prevalence of traditional CI candidates per O&N provider is 3,354 with an estimated mean of 32 audiologists (3.5 trained in CIs) per O&N provider. Conclusion 88% of high‐volume CI surgeons have fellowship training in O&N. To meet the current state of CI underutilization and anticipated growing population of CI candidates, we propose increasing the surgical capacity of O&N providers and the number of surgeons proficient in CIs. Level of Evidence NA Laryngoscope , 135:2146–2153, 2025

Objective To evaluate cochlear implant speech perception among patients with sporadic inner ear schwannoma who underwent ipsilateral implantation. Study Design Retrospective multi-institutional cohort study. Setting Eleven tertiary academic medical centers across Germany, Denmark, and the United States. Patients One hundred six patients with sporadic inner ear schwannoma who received an ipsilateral cochlear implant from 2011 to 2022. Interventions Ipsilateral cochlear implantation with observation, stereotactic radiosurgery, or microsurgery for tumor management. Main Outcome Measures Monosyllabic speech perception testing scores and rates of open-set speech perception. Results Among 106 patients studied, 101 (95%) achieved open-set speech perception with a median of 24 months (interquartile range [IQR] 12–42 mo) of audiometric follow-up. Median ipsilateral monosyllabic speech perception testing achieved was 72% (IQR 54–85%), and median ipsilateral AzBio in quiet was 75% (IQR 46–90%). Most (91 of 106 [86%]) underwent microsurgery for tumor control, with cochlear implantation performed simultaneously in 98% (89 of 91) of these patients. The ability to achieve gross total resection significantly differed by tumor complexity, with 97% of low-complexity tumors, 100% of intermediate complexity, and 0% of high-complexity tumors undergoing gross total resection (p < 0.001). However, among patients managed with microsurgery, there was not a statistically significant difference in post-cochlear implantation monosyllabic speech perception scores across complexity groupings, with median scores of 75 and 70% for patients with tumors of low or intermediate complexity and those with tumors of high complexity, respectively (p = 0.5). Eight of 102 patients (8%) assessed experienced deterioration in cochlear implant performance over time. Among the subset of 39 patients with available MRI to review, the region of surveillance interest could be visualized postoperatively on MRI in all cases. Conclusions Open-set speech perception is achieved in most patients with inner ear schwannoma undergoing ipsilateral cochlear implantation. Although cochlear implantation in high-complexity inner ear schwannomas is only possible with incomplete tumor resection, long-term open-set speech perception outcomes are similar to lower-complexity tumors.

Objective To compare cochlear implant (CI) speech perception outcomes in patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS) managed with observation, radiosurgery, or microsurgery. Study Design Retrospective review. Setting Eleven tertiary academic medical centers. Patients One hundred patients with sporadic VS who received an ipsilateral CI. Interventions Ipsilateral cochlear implantation. Main Outcome Measures Pure-tone thresholds, monosyllabic speech perception testing scores, and rates of open-set speech acquisition. Results Of the 100 patients studied, 54 underwent microsurgery, 26 underwent radiosurgery, 19 continued observation, and 1 underwent multimodal therapy. Among all patients, the median post-implantation pure-tone average was 31 dB (interquartile range [IQR] 25–39 dB) and the median monosyllabic speech perception score was 30% (IQR 0–60%) at a median of 12 months (IQR 5–25 months) post-implantation. Patients who were managed with microsurgery (median speech perception score 11%, IQR 0–52%) exhibited poorer implant outcomes overall compared with those managed with observation (median speech perception score 52%, IQR 40–72%) or radiosurgery (median speech perception score 30%, IQR 16–60%). Open-set speech perception was achieved in 61% of patients managed with microsurgery, 100% with observation, and 80% with radiosurgery. In a multivariable setting, those managed with observation (p = 0.02) or who underwent radiosurgery (p = 0.04) were significantly more likely to achieve open-set speech perception compared with patients who underwent microsurgery. Conclusions Cochlear implants offer benefit in selected patients with sporadic VS. Although achieved in over half of people after microsurgery, open-set speech perception is more reliably attained in patients who are treated with observation or radiosurgery compared with microsurgical resection. These data may inform patient counseling and VS tumor management in people who may benefit from implantation.