Bestourous, Daniel E.

ABSTRACT Objectives To characterize the structure, resources, and educational practices of temporal bone laboratory training across ACGME‐accredited U.S. otolaryngology residency programs. Methods A national cross‐sectional survey was distributed to program directors and faculty responsible for temporal bone education. Survey domains included curriculum structure, training frequency, faculty involvement, assessment practices, and access to laboratory resources. Descriptive statistics and univariable regression analyses were performed to explore associations between program characteristics and neurotology fellowship pursuit. Results Thirty‐seven programs responded (28.2%). Laboratory structure varied widely, including longitudinal (monthly or weekly) and condensed (annual or 2–3 courses/year) formats. Programs with longitudinal sessions reported more annual lab hours than condensed formats (median 42 vs. 16 h/year, p = 0.003). All programs had access to cadaveric temporal bones (mean 2.25 ± 1.13 bones per resident/year), though five reported fewer bones than residents. The mean drill‐to‐resident ratio was 0.59, with 10.8% reporting a 1:1 ratio. Formal performance evaluation was used by 43.2% of programs. On exploratory univariable analysis, longer otology rotation duration was associated with having at least one neurotology fellow within five years ( p = 0.025). Larger resident cohort size ( p = 0.048) and older laboratory instruments ( p = 0.043) were associated with producing more than one fellow. Conclusion There is substantial variability in temporal bone education across U.S. otolaryngology training programs. Programs differ in curricula, resources, and access to cadaveric and simulation‐based training. Standardization of core components may improve educational equity and training consistency. Level of Evidence N/A.

Objectives Evaluate the training background of surgeons performing high volumes of cochlear implants (CIs) and estimate the ratio of providers trained in otology/neurotology (O&N) to the number of traditional CI candidates and audiologists. Methods A retrospective review of US surgeon registration data from a single CI manufacturer was performed to determine CI volume based on surgeon training. The prevalence of traditional candidates for CIs was estimated from US census population data and compared with the number of O&N providers. The ratio of audiologists to O&N providers was estimated from the Bureau of Labor and Statistics and American Speech‐Language‐Hearing Association databases. Results From 2021 to 2023, a mean of 88% of providers performing ≥25 CIs per year and 90% performing ≥40 per year had training in O&N. All surgeons registering ≥100 implants per year were O&N providers. The mean percentage of O&N providers performing ≥25 CIs per year and ≥ 40 per year was higher than the percentage of General and Pediatric Otolaryngology providers performing the same volume: mean difference = 76%, p < 0.001 and mean difference = 79%, p < 0.001, respectively. The mean estimated prevalence of traditional CI candidates per O&N provider is 3,354 with an estimated mean of 32 audiologists (3.5 trained in CIs) per O&N provider. Conclusion 88% of high‐volume CI surgeons have fellowship training in O&N. To meet the current state of CI underutilization and anticipated growing population of CI candidates, we propose increasing the surgical capacity of O&N providers and the number of surgeons proficient in CIs. Level of Evidence NA Laryngoscope , 135:2146–2153, 2025